173
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Event, Politics and Dissent: Alain Badiou and the Utopian Provocations of Brodsky and Utkin

References

  • - Badiou, A. 1999. Manifesto for Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press.
  • - Badiou, A. 2000. Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil. New York: Verso.
  • - Badiou, A. 2004. “Fifteen Theses on Contemporary Art.” Lacanian Inc. 23.
  • - Badiou, A. 2005a. Metapolitics. New York: Verso.
  • - Badiou, A. 2005b. Handbook of Inaesthetics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • - Badiou, A. 2007. Being and Event. London: Continuum.
  • - Barris, R. 1994. “Review” (New Russian Design, The Avant-Garde Frontier: Russia Meets the West). Design Issues, 10, no. 3: 84–6.
  • - Belov, M. 1988. “Children of the Stagnation.” In Nostalgia of Culture: Contemporary Soviet Visionary Architecture, 6–8. London: Architectural Association.
  • - Boym, C. 1992. New Russian Architecture. New York: Rizzoli.
  • - Brodsky, A. and Utkin, I. [1982] 2003. “Crystal Palace.” In L. Nesbitt, Brodsky and Utkin: The Complete Works, pl. 16. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • - Brodsky, A. and Utkin, I. [1984] 2003. “Glass Tower.” In L. Nesbitt, Brodsky and Utkin: The Complete Works, pl. 14. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • - Coleman, N. 2005. Utopias and Architecture. London: Routledge.
  • - Cruickshank, D. (ed.). 1996. Sir Bannister Fletcher's History of Architecture. 20th edition. Oxford: The Architectural Press.
  • - Doordan, D.P. 1992. “Architecture of the Mind.” New York Times Book Review (January 5), p. 18.
  • - Gillespie, S. 2008. The Mathematics of Novelty: Badiou's Minimalist Metaphysics. Melbourne: re.press.
  • - Goodwin, B. and Taylor, K. 1982. The Politics of Utopia: A Study in Theory and Practice. London: Hutchison.
  • - Griffin, M.J. and Moylan, T. 2007. Exploring the Utopian Impulse. Berne: Peter Lang.
  • - Hallward, P. 2003. Badiou: A Subject to Truth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
  • - Hatton, B. 1988. “Voices from the Courtyard.” In Nostalgia of Culture: Contemporary Soviet Visionary Architecture, 27–71. London: Architectural Association.
  • - Jameson, F. 1999. “History Lessons.” In Architecture and Revolution: Contemporary Perspectives on Central and Eastern Europe, edited by N. Leach, 69–80. London: Routledge.
  • - Jameson, F. 2005. Archaeologies of the Future. New York: Verso.
  • - Johnson, C.B. 2007. “Utopia and the Dirty Secret of Architecture.“ Colloquy, 14: 30–44.
  • - Klotz, H. 1989. “Introduction.” In Paper Architecture: New Projects from the Soviet Union, edited by H. Klotz, 7–10. New York: Rizzoli.
  • - Levitas, R. 1990. The Concept of Utopia. Hertfordshire: Simon and Schuster.
  • - Ling, A. 2006. “Can Cinema Be Thought? Alain Badiou and the Artistic Condition.“ Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 2, no. 1–2: 263–76.
  • - Loughery, J. 1991. “Glasnost Hopes, MoMA Failures.“ The Hudson Review, 44, no. 1: 118–24.
  • - Miller, W.C. 1990. “Exhibition Review: Soviet Architecture 1917–1987.” Journal of Architectural Education, 43, no. 3: 56–7.
  • - Mumford, L. 1959. The Story of Utopias. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
  • - Nesbitt, L.E. 2003. Brodsky and Utkin: The Complete Works. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • - Ostwald, M.J. 2007. “Rancière and the Metapolitical Framing of Architecture: Reconstructing Brodsky and Utkin's Voyage.“ Interstices, 8: 9–20.
  • - Ostwald, M.J. 2009. “The Metapolitics of Aesthetics.” In Back to the City, edited by S. Lehmann, 94–101. Berlin: Hatje Cantz.
  • - Ostwald, M.J. 2010. “The Politics of Fractal Geometry in Russian Paper Architecture: The Intelligent Market and The Cube of Infinity.” Architectural Theory Review, 15, no. 2: 125–37.
  • - Ostwald, M.J. 2012. “Politics and the Deliquescence of Scale: The Columbaria of Brodsky and Utkin.” In Scale: Imagination, Perception and Practice in Architecture, edited by G. Adler, T. Brittain-Catlin and G. Fontana-Guisti, 206–17. London: Routledge.
  • - Rancière, J. 1995. On the Shores of Politics. New York: Verso.
  • - Rancière, J. 2004a. The Politics of Aesthetics. London: Continuum.
  • - Rancière, J. 2004b. “Aesthetics, Inaesthetics, Anti-Aesthetics.” In Think Again: Alain Badiou and the Future of Philosophy, edited by P. Hallward, 218–31. London: Continuum.
  • - Rancière, J. 2009. Aesthetics and its Discontents. Cambridge: Polity.
  • - Rancière, J. 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Continuum.
  • - Rappaport, A.G. 1989. “Language and Architecture of Post-Totalitarianism.” In Paper Architecture: New Projects from the Soviet Union, edited by H. Klotz, 11–18. New York: Rizzoli.
  • - Rappaport, A.G. 1994. “Paper Architecture: A Postscript.” In Post Soviet Art and Architecture, edited by A. Yurasovsky and S. Ovenden. London: Academy Editions.
  • - Riichi, M. and Yōichi, I. 1993. “The Paper Architecture of Russia: 80s Russian Conceptual Project.“ Space Design, 4, no. 343: 37–76.
  • - Rosenau, H. 1983. The Ideal City – its Architectural Evolution in Europe. New York: Methuen.
  • - Shaw, D.Z. 2007. “Inaesthetics and Truth: The Debate Between Alain Badiou and Jacques Rancière.“ Filozofski vestnik, no. 2: 183–99.
  • - Vidler, A. 1986. “The Scenes of the Street: Transformations in Ideal and Reality, 1750–1871.” In On Streets, edited by S. Anderson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • - Vidler, A. 2006. Claude-Nicolas Ledoux: Architecture and Utopia in the Era of the French Revolution. Basle: Birkhäuser.
  • - Weizman, I. 2009. “Interior Exile and Paper Architecture: A Spectrum for Architectural Dissidence.” In Agency: Working With Uncertain Architectures, edited by F. Kossak, D. Petrescu, T. Schneider, R. Tyszczuk and S. Walker, 154–64. London: Routledge.
  • - Weizman, I. 2012a. “Dissidence through Architecture.” Perspecta: The Yale Architectural Journal, no. 45: 27–38.
  • - Weizman, I. 2012b. “Citizenship.” In The Sage Handbook Of Architectural Theory, edited by G. C. Crysler, C. Cairns and H. Heynen, 107–20. London: Sage.
  • - Žižek, S. 2001. “Psychoanalysis and the Post-Political.“ New Literary History, 32, no. 1: 1–21.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.