Publication Cover
Food, Culture & Society
An International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
Volume 16, 2013 - Issue 4
745
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Critique of Single-issue Campaigning and the Importance of Comprehensive Abolitionist Vegan Advocacy

Pages 651-668 | Published online: 29 Apr 2015

References

  • Ashworth, R., Boyne, G. and Delbridge, R. 2009. Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(1): 165–87.
  • Benford, R. 1993. Frame Disputes within the Nuclear Disarmament Movement. Social Forces 71(3): 667–701.
  • Cameron, C. D. and Payne, B. K. 2011. Escaping Affect: How Motivated Emotion Regulation Creates Insensitivity to Mass Suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100(1): 1–15.
  • Cooney, N. 2011. Change of Heart: What Psychology Can Teach Us About Social Change. Brooklyn, NY: Lantern Books.
  • DiMaggio, P J. and Powell, W. W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–60.
  • Dunayer, J. 2004. Speciesism. Derwood: Ryce Publishing.
  • Dunayer, J. 2007. Advancing Animal Rights: A Response to “Anti-Speciesism,” Critique of Gary Francione's Work, and Discussion of Speciesism. Journal of Animal Law 3: 17–44.
  • Eidelman, S., J. Pattershall, and C. S. Crandall. 2009. The Existence Bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97(5): 765–775.
  • Einwohner, R. 2002. Motivational Framing and Efficacy Maintenance: Animal Rights Activists' Use of Four Fortifying Strategies. The Sociological Quarterly 43(4): 509–26.
  • Edwards, B. and Marullo, S. 1995. In a Declining Social Movement: The Demise of Peace Movement Organizations in the End of the Cold War Era. American Sociological Review 60(6): 908–27.
  • Ferree, M. 2003. Resonance and Radicalism: Feminist Framing in the Abortion Debates of the United States and Germany American Journal of Sociology 109(2): 304–44.
  • Fitzgerald, K. J. and Rodgers, D. M. 2000. Radical Social Movement Organizations: A Theoretical Model. Sociological Quarterly 41(4): 573–92.
  • Francione, G. L. 1995. Animals, Property, and the Law. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Francione, G. L. 1996. Rain without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Francione, G. L. 2009. We're all Michael Vick. Philadelphia Daily News, August 14. Available from: http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/media/pdf/philadelphia-daily-news-20090814.pdf (accessed March 6, 2012).
  • Francione, G. L. 2010a. A Short Note on Abolitionist Veganism as a Single Issue Campaign. Available from http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/a-short-note-on-abolitionist-veganism-as-a-single-issue-campaign (accessed March 6, 2012).
  • Francione, G. L. 2010b. Is Every Campaign a Single-Issue Campaign? Available from http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/is-every-campaign-a-single-issue-campaign (accessed March 6, 2012).
  • Francione, G. L. 2010c. The Abolition of Animal Exploitation. In G. L. Francione and R. Garner, The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation? New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 1–102.
  • Francione, G. L. 2010d. Single-Issue Campaigns in Human & Nonhuman Contexts. Available from http://wwwabolitionistapproach.com/single-issue-campaigns-and-in-human-nonhuman-contexts/ (accessed March 6, 2012).
  • Francione, G. L. and Garner, R. 2010. The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation? New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Freeman, C. P. 2012. Fishing for Animal Rights in “The Cove”: A Holistic Approach to Animal Advocacy Documentaries. Journal for Critical Animal Studies 10(1): 104–18.
  • Glasser, C. 2012. Simplifying Advocacy Materials---Understanding Decision Fatigue. Humane Thinking. Humane Research Council. Available from http://www.humanespot.org/content/simplifying-advocacy-materials-understanding-decision-fatigue (accessed February 29, 2012).
  • Haines, H. 1984. Black Radicalization and the Funding of Civil Rights: 1957--1970. Social Problems 32(1): 31–43.
  • Hall, L. 2006. Capers in the Churchyard: Animal Rights Advocacy in the Age of Terror. Darien, CT: Nectar Bat Press.
  • Hall, L. 2011. Single-Issue Campaigns: What They Are and How They Work. Action Line (Winter 2011--2012). Available from http://www.friendsofanimals.org/actionline/winter-2011_12/movement-watch.php (accessed February 29, 2012).
  • Harper, B. A. 2010a. Race as a “Feeble Matter” in Veganism: Interrogating Whiteness, Geopolitical Privilege, and Consumption Philosophy of “Cruelty-Free Products.” Journal for Critical Animal Studies 8(3): 5–27.
  • Harper, B. A. 2010b. Sistah Vegan: Black Female Vegans Speak on Food, Identity, Health, and Society. Brooklyn, NY: Lantern Books.
  • Hunt, S. and Benford, R. 1994. Identity Talk in the Peace and Justice Movement. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22(4): 488–517.
  • Iyengar, S. and Lepper, M. 2000. When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79: 996–1006.
  • Jasper, J. 1998. The Emotions of Protest: Affective and Reactive Emotions in and around Social Movements. Sociological Forum 13(3): 397–424.
  • Jenkins, J. C. and Eckert, C. M. 1986. Channeling Black Insurgency: Elite Patronage and Professional Social Movement Organizations. American Sociological Review 51(6): 812–29.
  • Johnson, R. and Wrenn, C. L. 2012. Popular Myths about Abolitionism Debunked. The Abolitionist 3 (Winter): 16–19. Available from: http://www.theabolitionist.info/article/popular-myths-about-abolitionism-debunked/ (accessed March 6, 2012).
  • Joy, M. 2008. Strategic Action for Animals: A Handbook on Strategic Movement Building, Organizing, and Activism for Animal Liberation. Brooklyn, NY: Lantern Books.
  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263–91.
  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1983. Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist 39 (4): 341–50.
  • Kleidman, R. 1994. Volunteer Activism and Professionalism in Social Movement Organizations. Social Problems 41(2): 257–6.
  • Koopmans, R. 1993. The Dynamics of Protest Waves: West Germany, 1965--1989. American Sociological Review 58(5): 637–658.
  • LaVeck, J. 2006. Invasion of the Movement Snatchers: A Social Justice Cause Falls Prey to the Doctrine of “Necessary Evil.” SATYA, October. Available from http://www.satyamag.com/oct06/laveck.html (accessed March 23, 2012).
  • Marullo, S. and Meyer, D. 2004. Antiwar and Peace Movements. In, D. Snow, S. Soule and H. Kriesi (eds) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 641–65.
  • McCarthy, J. D. and Zald, M. N. 1977. Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory American Journal of Sociology 82(6): 1212–41.
  • Oliver, P. E. and Marwell, G. 1992. Mobilizing Technologies for Collective Action. In Morris, A. and C. Mueller (eds) Frontiers of Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 251–272.
  • O'Reilly, A. 2012. A Vegan Presentation. The Abolitionist 3 (Winter): 14–15. Available from http://www.theabolitionist.info/article/a-vegan-presentation/ (accessed March 6, 2012).
  • Perz, J. 2006. Anti-Speciesism: The Appropriation and Misrepresentation of Animal Rights in Joan Dunayer's Speciesism (Abridged). Journal of Animal Law 2: 49–66.
  • Perz, J. 2007. Adulterating Animal Rights: Joan Dunayer's “Advancing Animal Rights” Refuted. Journal of Animal Law & Ethics 2: 123–71.
  • Regan, T. 2004. Empty Cages: Facing the Challenge of Animal Rights. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  • Schwartz, B. 2004. The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Slocum, R. 2004. Polar Bears and Energy-Efficient Lightbulbs: Strategies to Bring Climate Change Home. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22(3): 413–38.
  • Staggenborg, S. 1988. The Consequences of Professionalization and Formalization in the Pro- Choice Movement. American Sociological Review 53(4): 585–605.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.