The Surprising Lack of Lunch

References

• Adler, E. and Haas, P 1992. Epistemic Communities, World Order and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program. International Organization 46(1): 367–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almås, R. 2005. How Can Multifunctional Agriculture Be Secured in Norway? Paper presented at the Sociology of Agriculture Research Interest Group conference, Tampa, FL, August 8.
   Google Scholar
• Andresen, A. and Elvbakken, K.T. 2007. From Poor Law Society to the Welfare State: School Meals in Norway 1890s-1950s. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 61: 374–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apall-Olsen, L. 1989. BESSA, skolesbespisnin-gen I Oslo gjennom 100 år. Byminner 2: 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, H. 2000. The Ideological Determinants of Liberal Economic Reform: The Case of Privatization. World Politics 52(4): 520–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beland, D. 2010. The Idea of Power and the Role of Ideas. Political Studies Review 8(2): 14554.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, S. 1998. The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making ofInterwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. 2003. Structures Do Not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas and Progress in Political Science. Perspectives on Politics 1(4): 695–706.
   Google Scholar
• Bolzendahl, C. and Brooks, C. 2007. Women's Political Representation and Welfare State Spending in 12 Capitalist Democracies. Social Forces 85(4): 1509–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugge, A.B. 2010. Young People's School Food Styles: Naughty or Nice? Young 18(2): 223–43.
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G. and Keleman, R.D. 2007. The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics 59(3): 341–69.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R.B and Collier, D. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, The Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, M.L. 1994. Feeding the Family: The Social Organization of Caring as Gendered Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Døving, R. 1999. Matpakka—den store norske fortellingen om familien og nasjonen. Tidsskrift for religion og kultur. Available from: http://tradisjoner.no/text89.html (accessed March 20, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Anderson, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. 1995. Rational Choice and the New(?) Institutionalism. Polity 28(1): 107–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, A.D. 2011. Farmers Want 18 Percent Subsidy Rise. Available from: http://www.newsinenglish.no/2011/04/29/farmers-want-18-percent-subsidy-rise/ (accessed April, 18, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Fleckenstein, T. 2011. The Politics of Ideas in Welfare State Transformation. Social Politics 18(4): 543–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, Alexander and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. 1988. Ideas, Institutions, and American Trade Policy. International Organization 42: 179–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullberg, E. 2006. Food for Future Citizens: School Meal Culture in Sweden. Food Culture and Society 9(3): 338–43.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P 1992. Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone. International Organization 46(1): 187–224.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haavio-Manilla, E. 1983. Economic and Family Roles of Men and Women in Northern Europe. In E. Lupri (ed.) The Changing Position of Women in Family and Society. Leiden: Ej, Brill, pp. 243–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, K. K. Jarausch and C. Allemann-Ghionada (eds) 2011. Children, Families and the State: Time Policies of Childcare, Preschool, and Primary Education in Europe. New York:
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P ed. 1989. The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, A. 1999. Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Policies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, E and Stephens J. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. 2004. Changing the Paradigm: Family Responsibility or Investing in Children. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29(2): 169–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kjærnes, U. 2003. Experiences with the Norwegian Nutrition Policy. Appetite 41: 251–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kloppenberg, J. 1995. Institutionalism, Rational Choice and Historical Analysis. Polity 28(1): 125–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpi, W, Ferraini, T. and Englund, S. 2009. Egalitarian Gender Paradise Lost? Paper prepared for EMPLOY-FAMNET Workshop, Berlin, May 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, P. 2008. The Comparative Political Economy of Parental Leave and Child Care: Evidence from Twenty OECD Countries. Social Politics 15(3): 315–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecours, A. 2000. Theorizing Cultural Identities: Historical Institutionalism as a Challenge to Culturalists. Canadian Journal of Political Science 33(3): 499–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine S. 2008. School Lunch Politics: The Surprising History of America's Favorite Welfare Program. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. 1992. Gender and the Development of Welfare States. Journal of European Social Policy 2: 159–73.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, R. 2002. Ideas, Institutions and Political Orders: Explaining Political Change. The American Political Science Review 96(4): 697–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29(4): 507–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J, 2001. Path-Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development 36(1): 111–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. 2006. Working Mothers and the Welfare State: Religion and the Politics of Work—Family Policies in Western Europe and the United States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal, A. and Myrdal G. 1935. Crisis in the Population Question. Stockholm: A. Bonnier.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Nutrition. 2005. A Healthy Diet for Good Health. Available from: http://helsedirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/a-healthy-diet-for-good-health/Publikasjoner/lS-1259%20A%20heatlhy%20diet%20for%20good%20health.pdf (accessed April 23, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• O'Regan, V 2000. Gender Matters: Female Policymaker's Influence on Industrialized Nations. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 1998. Agricultural Policy Reform and the Rural Economy in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Orloff, A.S. 2006. From Maternalism to “Employment for All.” In J. Levy (ed.) The State after Statism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 230–68.
   Google Scholar
• Orren, K. 1995. Ideas and Institutions. Polity 28(1): 97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. 2002. Showing Ideas as Causes: The Origins of The European Union. International Organization 56(1): 47–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, D. 2001. Gender and the Making of Welfare States: Norway and Sweden. Social Politics 8(1): 113–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiøtz, C. 1926 Om en fullstendig omlegning avskolebespisningen. Oslo: Fabritius & Sonners Boktrykkeri..
   Google Scholar
• Seip, A.L. and Ibsen, H. 1991. Family Welfare, which Policy? Norway's Road to Family Allowances. In G. Bock and P Thane (eds) Maternity and Gender Policies: Women and the Rise of the European Welfare States 1880s-1950s. New York: Routledge, pp. 40–59.
   Google Scholar
• Sikkink, K. 1991. Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sjestersted, F 2011. The Age of Social Democracy: Norway and Sweden in the Twentieth Century. Translated by R. Daly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. 1995. Why I Am an Historical Institutionalist. Polity 28(1): 103–6.
   Google Scholar
• Skowronek, S. 1995. Order and Change. Polity 28(1): 91–6.
   Google Scholar
• Skrede, K. 1999. Gender Equality in the Labour Market: Still a Distant Goal? Document 1999/20. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 1995. Ideas, Institutions and Strategic Choice. Polity 28(1): 135–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sorenson, K. 2011. Party Platforms and Public Childcare: Structural and Ideational Factors Shaping Policy in Norway and Sweden. Scandinavian Political Studies 34(1): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2011. Statistical Yearbook of Norway 2011. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Stortingsforhandlinger (Proceedings of Parliament). 1945/1946. Oslo: Stortinget
   Google Scholar
• Swank, D. 2003. Diminished Democracy: Global Capital, Political Institutions, the Welfare State in Advanced Economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. 1999. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. 2003. How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis. In J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (ed.) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–40.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. and Steino, S. 1998. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and, F Longstreth (eds) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Tvedt, Knut Are. 2009. Kriseforliket. I Store norske leksikon, February 14. Available from: http://snl.no/kriseforliket (accessed May 23, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. 2005. Child Poverty in Rich Countries, 2005. Innocenti Report Card No. 6. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture. 1957. Agricultural Policies of Foreign Governments Including Trade Policies Affecting Agriculture. Agricultural Handbook No. 132. Washington, DC: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Huylenbroeck, G., Verbeke, W. and Lauwers, L. 2004. Role of Institutions in Rural Policies and Agricultural Markets. Cambridge: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wibberley, J. 2008. A Brief History of Agriculture in the UK. RU Source Briefing 193. Available from: http://www.arthurrankcentre.org.uk/projects/rusource_briefings/firm04/193.pdf (accessed March 12, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Yee, A. 1996. The Causal Effects of Ideas on Policies. International Organization 50(1): 69–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar