Public Attitudes toward the Use of Animals in Research: Effects of Invasiveness, Genetic Modification and Regulation

References

• Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Dietetic Association. 2003. Position of the American Dietetic Association and Dieticians of Canada: Vegetarian diets. ADA Reports 103(6): 748–765. http://www.vrg.org/nutrition/2003_ADA_position_paper.pdf. Accessed on September 15, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Bayne, K. 2008. Standards for the rearing environment of laboratory animals in the United States. Alternatives to Animal Experiments 14 (Special issue): 47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Broida, J., Tingley, L., Kimball, R. and Miele, J. 1993. Personality differences between pro- and antivivisectionists. Society & Animals 1: 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2011. About the CCAC. http://www.ccac.ca/en/About_CCAC/About_CCAC_Intro.htm. Accessed on September 15, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. F. and Gomilla, A. 2012. Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making. A principled review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews 36(4): 1249–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P. 1996. Concepts and coding. In Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies, 26–53, ed. A. Coffey and P. Atkinson. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, L. 2009. Public attitudes to food issues. GfK Social Research: Report for the Food Standards Agency. London, UK. http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/publicattitudestofood.pdf. Accessed on September 15, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dohoo, I., Martin, W. and Stryn, H. 2010. Model-building strategies. In Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. 2nd edn, 317–334, ed. I. Dohoo, W. Martin and H. Stryn. Prince Edward Island, Canada: AVC Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer 55.2. 2001. Europeans, science and technology. http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/press/2001/pr0612en_report.pdf. Accessed on September 15, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer 73.1. 2010. Science and Technology Report. European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_340_en.pdf. Accessed on September 30, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, N., Griffin, G. and Gauthier, C. 2009. The welfare of animals used in science: How the “Three Rs” ethics guides improvements. Canadian Veterinary Journal 50: 523–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, D. B. and Hoffman-Goetz, L. 2006. A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Education and Behaviour 33: 352–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. and Pinder, A. 1990. Young people's attitudes toward experimentation on animals. The Psychologist 10: 444–448.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallup, G. G. and Beckstead, J. W. 1988. Attitudes toward animal research. American Psychologist 43(6): 474–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup Poll. 2010. Four moral issues sharply divide Americans. http://www.gallup.com/poll/137357/Four-Moral-Issues-Sharply-Divide-Americans.aspx. Accessed on September 15, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G., Allum, N. and Stares, S. 2003. Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002: Eurobarometer 58.0. European Union: Directorate Press and Communication, Public Opinion Analysis Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Golovan, S. P., Meidinger, R. G., Ajakaiye, A., Cottrill, M., Wiederkehr, M. Z., Barney, D. J., Plante, C., Pollard, J. W., Fan, M. Z., Hayes, M. A., Laursen, J., Hjorth, J. P., Hacker, R. R., Phillips, J. P. and Forsberg, C. P. 2001. Pigs expressing salivary phytase produce low-phosphorus manure. Nature Biotechnology 19(8): 741–745.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffin, G., Dansereau, M. and Gauthier, C. 2007. Categories of invasiveness-A precautionary approach. Alternatives to Animal Testing and Experimentation 14: 715–720.
   Google Scholar
• Guillot, E., Vaugelade, P., Lemarchali, P. and Re Rat, A. 1993. Intestinal absorption and liver uptake of medium-chain fatty acids in non-anaesthetized pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 69: 431–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagelin, J., Carlsson, H. E. and Hau, J. 2003. An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation: Some factors that may influence the outcome. Public Understanding of Science 12: 67–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagelin, J., Hau, J. and Carlsson, H. E. 1999. Undergraduate university students' views on the use of animals in biomedical research. Academic Medicine 74: 1135–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.Psychological Review 108(4): 814–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. 2002. “Dialogue between my head and my heart”: Affective influences on moral judgment. Psychological Inquiry 13(1): 54–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm, T. E., Dell, R. B. and Van Sluyters, R. C. 1995. Laboratory animal care policies and regulations: United States. Institute of Laboratory Animal Research Journal 37(4): 75–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hampson, J. 1989. Animal experimentation-practical dilemmas and solutions. In The Status of Animals: Ethics, Education and Welfare, 100–110, ed. D. Paterson and M. Palmer. UK: CAB International Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris Interactive. 2008. Vegetarianism in America. Vegetarian Times. http://www.vegetariantimes.com/features/archive_of_editorial/667. Accessed on September 15, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, H. A. and Galvin, S. 1997. Common sense and the mental lives of animals: An empirical approach. In Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, 237–253, ed. R. W. Mitchell, N. S. Thompson and H. L. Miles. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, H. A., Rowan, A. N. and Kossow, D. 2001. Social attitudes and animals. In The State of the Animals, 55–70, ed. D. J. Salem and A. N. Rowan. Washington, DC: Humane Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S., Bard, K., Vrij, A. and Brandon, D. 2010. Human rights, animal wrongs? Exploring attitudes toward animal use and possibilities for change. Society & Animals 18: 251–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S. and Barnett, L. 2008. Justifying attitudes towards animal use: A qualitative study of people's views and beliefs. Anthrozoös 21: 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S., Cherryman, J. and Nunkoosing, K. 2004. Attitudes towards animal use and animal mind. Anthrozoös 17: 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S. and Herzog, H. 2009. All creatures great and small: New perspectives on psychology and human-animal interactions. Journal of Social Issues 65(3): 451–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S., Nunkoosing, K., Vrig, A. and Cherryman, J. 2003. Using grounded theory to examine people's attitudes towards how animals are used. Society & Animals 11(4): 179–198.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S., Vrij, A., Bard, K. and Brandon, D. 2009. Science versus human welfare? Understanding attitudes toward animal use. Journal of Social Issues 65(3): 463–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P. 2001. Animal Futures: Public Attitudes and Sensibilities towards Animals and Biotechnology in Contemporary Britain. Lancaster: IEPPP. http://csec.lancs.ac.uk/docs/pdf/macnaghten_animal_futures.pdf. Accessed on September 15, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P. 2004. Animals in their nature: A case study on public attitudes to animals, genetic modification and “nature.” Sociology 38(3): 533–551.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MORI. 1999. Animals in Medicine and Science: General Public Research Conducted for Medical Research Council. London: MRC.
   Google Scholar
• MORI. 2010. Views on Animal Experimentation. London: MRC. http://www.ipsos-mori.com/DownloadPublication/1343_sri-views-on-animal-experimentation-2010.pdf. Accessed on September 15, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2005. The Ethics of Research Involving Animals. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
   Google Scholar
• Orlans F. B. 2000. Public policies on assessing and reporting degrees of animal harm; international perspectives. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation, 1075–1082, ed. M. Balls, A. M. van Zeller and M. E. Halder. New York: Elsevier Science Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Ormandy, E. H., Schuppli, C. A. and Weary, D. M. 2009. Worldwide trends in the use of animals in research: The contribution of genetically modified animal models. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 37: 63–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearl, D. L., Louie, M., Chui, L., Doré, K., Grimsrud, K. N., Martin, S. W., Michel, P., Svenson, L. W. and McEwen, S. A. 2008. Epidemiological characteristics of reported sporadic and outbreak cases of E. coli O157 in people from Alberta, Canada (2000-2002): Methodological challenges of comparing clustered to unclustered data. Epidemiology and Infection 136(4): 483–491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearl, D. L., Louie, M., Chui, L., Doré, K., Grimsrud, K. M., Martin, S. W., Michel, P., Svenson, L. W. and McEwen, S. A. 2009. A multi-level approach for investigating socio-economic and agricultural risk factors associated with rates of reported cases of Escherichia coli O157 in humans in Alberta, Canada. Zoonoses and Public Health 56(8): 455–464.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pifer, L., Shimizu, K. and Pifer, R. 1994. Public attitudes toward public research: Some international comparisons. Society & Animals 2: 95–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plous, S. 1996. Attitudes towards the use of animals in psychological research and education: Results from a national survey of psychology majors. Psychological Science 7(6): 352–358.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, G., Engelmann, M. and Krupka, L. R. 1990. The animal research controversy. The American Biology Teacher 52(8): 467–471.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Russell, W. M. S. and Burch. R. L. 1959. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London: Meuthen.
   Google Scholar
• Schuppli, C. A. and Weary, D. M. 2010. Attitudes towards the use of genetically modified animals in research. Public Understanding of Science 19: 686–697.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slovic, P. 2006. Affect, reason, risk and rationality. European Working Group “Multicriteria Aid for Decisions” Series 3(3): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. 2003. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. and Richmond, J. 2005. Regulation of animal experimentation in the United Kingdom. School Science Review 87: 85–89.
   Google Scholar