Perception and Deception: How Quantity and Quality of Sensory Information Affect Users' Perception of Office Chairs

References

• Alcantara, E., Artacho, M. A., Gonzalez, J. C. and Garcia, A. C. (2005). ‘Application of product semantics to footwear design. Part I - Identification of footwear semantic space applying differential semantics'. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, 713–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). 4th edn. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bassereau, J. F. (1995). ‘Cahier des Charges Qualitatif Design, élaboration par le mécanisme des sens'. PhD Thesis. Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers (ENSAM), Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Bassereau, J. F., Bedran, C., Dessi, H., Duchamp, R. and Roussel, B. (1997). L'ingénierie centrée sur l'Homme. Paris: Ministére de l'Industrie de la Poste et des Télécommunications.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. M. A. (2003). ‘A multilayered model of product emotions'. The Design Journal, 6(2), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. M. A., Overbeeke, C. J. and Tax, S. J. E. T. (2001). ‘Designing products with added emotional value: development and application of an approach for research through design'. The Design Journal, 4(1), 32–47.
   Google Scholar
• de Rouvray, A. (2006). ‘Formalisation et intégration des préférences sensorielles des consommateurs dans la conception de produits d'ameublement'. In Yannou, B. and Bonjour, E. (eds), Evaluation et Décision dans le processus de conception. Paris: Lavoisier, pp. 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Engage Consortium (2005). Engage: Engineering Emotional Design - Report of the state of the art July 2005 [internet]. Available at: http://www.designandemotion.org/engage/ [accessed September 2006].
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, P. (2000). Designing Pleasurable Products. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Leeds Keyworth Institute (2005). Affective Engineering [internet]. Available at: http://www.keyworth.leeds.ac.uk/affectiveengineering/ [accessed 31 August 2006].
   Google Scholar
• McDonagh, D., Bruseberg, A. and Haslam, C. (2002). ‘Visual product evaluation: exploring users' emotional relationships with products'. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mono, R., (1997). Design for Product Understanding. Stockholm: Liber AB.
   Google Scholar
• Nagamachi, M. (2002). ‘Kansei Engineering as a powerful consumer oriented technology for product development'. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 289–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Person, O. (2003). Understanding Emotional Response to Product Form - Studying the Relationship between Emotional Profile and Product Format. Trondheim: Department of Product Design, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Schifferstein, H. N. J. (1995). ‘Contextual shifts in hedonic judgements'. Journal of Sensory Studies, 10(4), 381–392.
   Google Scholar
• Stompff, G. (2003). ‘The forgotten bond: brand identity and product design'. Design Management Journal, 14, 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Truchot, P., Duchamp, R. and Guidat, C. (1997). ‘L'approche Pluridisciplinaire de la Conception de Produits: Une Science de L'innovation'. Proceedings of the Second International FranceQuebec Congress of Industrial Engineering. Albi, France, September 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Urdapilleta, I., Ton Nu, C., Saint Denis, C. and Huon De Kermadec, F. (2001). Traite devaluation Sensorielle. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Warell, A. (2001). Design Syntactics: A Functional Approach to Visual Product Form. Goteborg: Product and Production Development, Engineering and Industrial Design, Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Weightman, D. and McDonagh, D. (2004). ‘Supra-functional factors in sustainable products'. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Design and Manufacture for Sustainable Development, Loughborough University, 1–2 September 2004, pp. 91–101.
   Google Scholar