Designing with Information and Empathy: Delivering Human Information to Designers

References

• Bontoft, M. (2004). A Brief History of Design by a Non-Designer [Presentation]. Presented at Helen Hamlyn Centre, Royal College of Art, London [viewed on 23 January 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Butters, L. and Dixon, R. (1998). ‘Ergonomics in consumer product evaluation: An evolving process'. Applied Ergonomics, 29(1), 55–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cassim, J. (2010). ‘Designing effective user interactions - examples from the challenge workshops'. Proceedings of the 3^rd International Association of Universal Design. [CD-ROM]. Hamamatsu: International Association for Universal Design.
   Google Scholar
• Design Council. (2010a). Design Industry Research 2010: Executive Summary [online]. Available at: http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/Documents/Documents/Publications/Research/DesignIndustryResearch2010/DesignIndustryResearch2010_ExecSummary.pdf [accessed 14 May 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Design Council. (2010b). Safer ‘Real Glass’ Pint Glasses to Start UK Trials [online]. Available at: http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/about-us/Media-centre/safer-real-glass-pint-glasses-to-start-UK-trials/ [accessed 7 November 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. M. A., Overbeeke, C. J. and Tax, S. J. E. T. (2001). ‘Designi ng products with added emotional value: development and application of an approach for research through design'. The Design Journal, 4(1), 32–47.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, H., Clarkson, P. J., Cassim, J. and Keates, S. (2005). ‘Critical user forums: An effective user research method for inclusive design'. The Design Journal, 8(2), 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Formosa, D. (2009). ‘Six real people’. Proceedings of the International Association of Societies of Design Research [online]. Available at: http://www.iasdr2009.org/ap/Papers/Special%20Session/Corporate%20Design%20Research/Six%20Real%20People.pdf [accessed 14 May 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Frayling, C. (1993). Research in Art and Design [Royal College of Art Research Papers], 1(1). London: Royal College of Art.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton Suri, J. (2003). ‘The experience evolution: Developments in design practice'. The Design Journal, 6(2), 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton Suri, J. and Marsh, M. (2000). ‘Scenario building as an ergonomic method in consumer product design'. Applied Ergonomics, 31(2), 151–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J., Langdon, P. and Clarkson, P. J. (2007). ‘Formats for user data in inclusive design'. In Stephanidis, C. (ed.), Proceedings of the 4^th International Conference on Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction: Coping with Diversity. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Hasdogan, G. (1996). ‘The role of user models in product design for the assessment of users needs'. Design Studies, 17, 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• IDSA (2009). Designing for Humans [online]. Available at: http://www.designingforhumans.com/idsa/anthropometric_data/ [accessed 12 January 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, P. (1997). ‘Human factors for pleasure in product use'. Applied Ergonomics, 29(1), 25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keinonen, T. (2009). User Need -A Fuzzy Link Between Design and Use [online]. Available at: http://www.iasdr2009.org/ap/Papers/0rally%20Presented%20Papers/Design%20Issues/User%20Need%20-%20A%20Fuzzy%20Link%20Between%20Design%20And%20Use.pdf [accessed 14 May 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., Harada, A. and Stappers, P. J. (2000). ‘Pleasure with products: design based on Kansei'. Proceedings of the Pleasure-Based Human Factors seminar, Copenhagen, 11–13 April 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, V. (2006). ‘Ecodesign tools for designers: defining the requirements'. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(15-16), 1386–1395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonagh, D. and Thomas, J. (2010). ‘Disability + relevant design: empathic design strategies supporting more effective new product design outcomes'. The Design Journal, 13(2), 180–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinley, C. and Dong, H. (2009). ‘Accessing user information for use in design'. In Stephanidis, C. (ed.), Universal Access in HCl, Part 1, HCII2009, LNCC 5614. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, pp. 116–125.
   Google Scholar
• Molenbroek, J. and de Bruin, R. (2005). ‘Enhancing the use of anthropometric data'. In de Waard, D., Brookhuis, K. A., van Egmond, R. and Boersema, T. H. (eds), Human Factors in Design, Safety, and Management. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing, pp. 289–297.
   Google Scholar
• Nickpour, F. and Dong, H. (2008). Designing Anthropometrics: Insights into Designers Use of People Size Data [Technical Report]. School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University.
   Google Scholar
• Ostroff, E. (2003). ‘Strategies for teaching and recruiting designers for an inclusive world'. In Dujardin, M. and Dua, L. (eds), Universal Design Education. Brussels, Belgium: Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van Belgie voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten, pp. 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Patnaik, D. (2009). Innovation Starts with Empathy: The Importance of Developing Deep Connections with the People you Serve[Online]. Available at: http://designmind.frogdesign.com/articles/the-substance-of-things-not-seen/innovation-starts-with-empathy.html [accessed 12 January 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Plowman, I. (2003). ‘Ethnography and critical design practice’. In Laurel, B. (ed.), Design Research: Methods and Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Restrepo, J. (2004). Information Processing In Design. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segelstrom, F. (2009). ‘Communicating through visualizations: Service designers on visualizing user research'. The First Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation. Oslo, Norway, 24–26 November 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sleeswijk Visser, F. and Kouprie, M. (2008). ‘Stimulating empathy in ideation workshops'. In Simonsen, J., Robertson, T. and Hakken, D. (eds), Proceedings of the 10^th Conference on Participatory Design. Bloomington, IN: ACM Press, pp. 174–177.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A. and Young, M. (1998). ‘Ergonomics methods in consumer product design and evaluation'. In Stanton, N. (ed.), Human Factors in Product Design. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 21–52.
   Google Scholar
• Swayne, T. (2006). Social Vision: A New Approach to Presenting Data [Online]. Available at: http://www.hhc.rca.ac.uk/resources/publications/CaseStudies/id4223.pdf [accessed 25 May 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R. Y. and Strong, D. M. (1996). ‘Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data customers.’Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Weightman, D. and McDonagh, D. (2003). ‘People are doing it for themselves'. In Forlizzi, J., Hanington, B. and Ayoob, E. (eds), Proceedings of the International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. Pittsburgh, PA: ACM Press, pp. 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ylirisku, S. and Buur, J. (2007). Designing With Video: Focusing the User-Centred Design Process. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar