Empathizing with the Future: Creating Next-Next Generation Products and Services

References

• Bell, W. (1996). ‘What do we mean by Futures Studies?’ In Slaughter, R. (ed.), New Thinking for a New Millennium. London: Routledge, pp. 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, G. (2005). ‘Expecting the unexpected’. Futures, 37, 105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, E. (1973). ‘Foreword’. In Polak, F. (ed.), The Image of the Future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, M. and Cooper, R. (1997). Marketing and Design Management. Cornwall, UK: Thomson Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, J. (1996). 2025: Scenarios of US and Global Society Reshaped by Science and Technology. Greensboro, NC: Oakhill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. and Press, M. (1995). The Design Agenda: A Guide to Successful Design Management. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, E. (2004). Futuring: The Exploration of the Future. Bethesda, MD: World Future Society.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan, P. and Prokopoff, I. (2004). ‘Managing Change, by Design'. In Boland, R. and Collopy, F. (eds), Managing as Designing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 188–192.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N., Elliot, D. and Roy, R. (1975). Designing the Future: Man Made Futures: Design and Technology [Open University Course Material T2621]. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dator, J. (1996). ‘Futures studies as applied knowledge’. In Slaughter, R. (ed.), New Thinking for a New Millennium. London: Routledge, pp. 105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M. (2003). ‘Trends forecasting for design futures.’5^th European Academy of Design Conference, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 28–30 April 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Fahey, L. and Randall, R. (1998). Learning from the Future. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Futures (1969). ‘Confidence From Chaos'. Futures, 1(1), 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, T. (2003). ‘The Delphi method’. In Glenn, J. and Gordon, T. (eds), Futures Research Methodology (Version 2.0) [CD Rom]. Washington, DC: American Council for the United Nations University Millennium Project.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, T. and Glenn, J. (2003). ‘Environmental scanning.’ In Glenn, J. and Gordon, T. (eds), Futures Research Methodology (Version 2.0) [CD Rom]. Washington, DC: American Council for the United Nations University Millennium Project.
   Google Scholar
• Gropius, W. (1962). ‘My conception of the Bauhaus idea'. Scope of Total Architecture. New York: Colliers.
   Google Scholar
• Helmer, O. and Dalkey, N. (1983). ‘The Delphi technique’. In Helmer, O. (ed.), Looking Forward. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp.136–152.
   Google Scholar
• IDEO (2003). IDEO Method Cards: 51 Ways to Inspire Design. Palo Alto, CA: William Stout.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, C. and Johnson, B. (1995). ‘Exploring the future in the present'. Design Management Journal, Spring, 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, B. (2007). Get There Early: Sensing the Future to Compete in the Present. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Joziasse, F. (2008). ‘Corporate strategy: Bringing design management into the fold'. In Lockwood, T. and Walton, T. (eds), Building Design Strategy: Using Design to Achieve Key Business Objectives. New York: Allworth Press, pp. 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. and Littman, J. (2004). The Art of Innovation. Croydon, UK: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kolko, J. (2007). ‘Information architecture and design strategy: The importance of synthesis during the process of design'. Industrial Designers Society of America Conference 2007, San Francisco, CA, 17–20 October 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2006). The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. (2006). How Designers Think, 4th edn. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, M. and Bandhold, H. (2003). Scenario Pianning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Loewy, R. (1951). Never Leave Well Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, V. (2007). ‘Design, the future and the human spirit.’Design Issues, 23(3), 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. L. and Wilson, I. (1996). ‘The strategic armament response to the challenge of global change'. In Didsbury, H. (ed.), Future Vision: Ideas, Insights, and Strategies. Maryland, USA: World Future Society, pp. 166–181.
   Google Scholar
• Myerson, J. (2004). IDEO: Masters of Innovation. China: Lawrence King Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvy, J. (1996). ‘Scenario planning, critical theory and the role of hope'. In Slaughter, R. (ed.), The Knowiedge Base of Futures Studies, Vol. 1: Foundations. Melbourne, Australia: DDM/FSC, pp. 205–215.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvy, J. (2002). Creating Better Futures: Scenario Pianning as a Tooi for a Better Tomorrow. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patnaik, D. (2009). Wired to Care. New Jersey, USA: FT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poggenpohl, S. (2009). ‘Time for a change: Building design as a discipline'. In Poggenpohl, S. and Sato, K. (eds), Design Integrations: Research and Coiiaboration. Bristol: Intellect Books, pp. 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, M. (2003). Tomorrow People: Mapping the Needs and Desires of Tomorrow's Customers Now. Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. (1997). Predicting the Future: Introduction to the Theory of Forecasting. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoemaker, P. (1995). ‘Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking'. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, P. (1991). The Art of the Long View. New York: Random House Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, R. (2008). ‘Optimistic futurism’. Interactions, May/June, 52–54.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, R. (2010). The Violence of the New [online]. Eastman Innovation Labs. Available at: http://www.core77.com/blog/videos/richard_seymour_on_eastman_innovation_lab_16565. asp [accessed 16 May 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, R. (1996). ‘Futures studies: From individual to social capacity.’ Futures, 28(8), 751–762.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Duin, P. (2008). ‘The difficult future’. Foresight, 50(5), 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Vanston, J. (2003). ‘Better forecasts, better plans, better results.’ Research Technology Management, January/February, 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Voros, J. (2006). ‘Introducing a classification framework for prospective methods'. Foresight, 8(2), 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. (2002). Developing Tangible Strategies. Design Management Journal, 13(1), 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, M. and Nelson, W. (2005). Complicated Lives: The Malaise of Modernity. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar