Spaces of Possibility: The Imaginary in Design

References

• Attfield, J. (2000).Wild Things: The Material Culture of Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. and Law, J. (eds) (1992). Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchot, M. (1955).L'éspace Littéraire. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1987). ‘Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis'. In Bijker, W., Hughes, T. P. and Pinch, T. (eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. London: MIT Press, pp. 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Castoriadis, C. (1975).L'institution Imaginaire de la Société. Paris: Éditions du seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, A. (1999).Hertzian Tales. Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, A. and Raby, F. (2001).Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. London/Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Engell, J. (1980).Creative Imagination. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fallan, K. (2010).Design History: Understanding Theory and Method. Oxford and New York: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Fällman, D. (2008). ‘The interaction design research triangle of design practice, design studies, and design exploration’.Design Issues, 24(3), 4–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkmann, M. N. (2006). ‘The transfigurative mode of romantic discourse: Poetics models in Novalis, Keats, and Stagnelius'. Prism(s), 14, 27–56.
   Google Scholar
• Folkmann, M. N. (2010). ‘Evaluating aesthetics in design: A phenom- enological approach’.Design Issues, 26(1), 40–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Mackay, H. and Negus, K. (1997). Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). ‘The theory of affordances'. In Shaw, R. and Bransford, J. (eds), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, S. M. (2007). ‘The imagined and the concrete: What is an artifact?’Artifact, 1(1), 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1991).Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Vittori Klostermann.
   Google Scholar
• Heskett, J. (2002).Toothpicks and Logos. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelm, S.I. (2007). ‘Energi som syns'. In Hjelm, S. I. (ed.), Under ytan: En antologi om designforskning. Stockholm: Raster Förlag and SVID, pp. 118–131.
   Google Scholar
• Hörisch, J. (2009).Bedeutsamkeit. Munich: Hanser.
   Google Scholar
• Julier, G. (2008).The Culture of Design. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Julier, G. (2009). ‘Value, relationality and unfinished objects: Guy Julier interview with Scott Lash and Celia Lury’.Design and Culture, 1(1), 93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1990).Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, R. (1998).Poetics of Imagining. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. (1997). ‘Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies'.Theory Culture Society, 14, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). ‘Objectual practice’. In Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (eds), The Practice Term in Contemporary Theory. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 175–188.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, S. (2008).Medium, Bote, Übertragung. Kleine Metaphysik derMedialität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S. and Lury, C. (2007).Global Culture Industry: The Mediation of Things. Cambridge: Polity Press.Latour, B. (2007).Reassembling the Visual. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004).After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964).Le Visible et l'Invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1987).Material Culture and Mass Consumption. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2002).The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oncotype (2006).Thorvaldsens Museum [online]. Available at: http://tilbygningen.dk/ [accessed 26 January 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, T. B. (2010). ‘Design, adferd og magt - En diskussion af design som adferdsregulerende praksis med udgangspunkt i Statsfengslet Østjylland.’ PhD thesis, Kolding: Kolding School of Design.
   Google Scholar
• Redström, J. (2007). ‘En experimenterande designforskning’. In Hjelm, S. I. (ed.), Under ytan: En antologi om seddesignforskning. Stockholm: Raster Förlag and SVID, pp. 164–176.
   Google Scholar
• Sartre, J.-P. (1940).L'imaginaire. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. (2009).Design - eine EinfÜhrung. Entwurf im sozialen, kulturellen und wirtschaftlichen Kontext. Basle: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Stolterman, E. and Nelson, H. G. (2003).The Design Way. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P.-P. (2005).What Things Do. Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wettig, S. (2009).Imagination im Erkenntnisprozess. Chancen und Herausforderungen im Zeitalter der Bildmedien. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wunenburger, J.-J. (2003).L'imaginaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires des France.
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A. (2009). ‘Making the social hold: Towards an actor-network theory of design’.Design and Culture, 1(3), 273–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar