20
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Public Decision Processes, Creativity, and Psychoanalysis

Pages 44-62 | Published online: 08 Dec 2014

  • Allain, S. 2002. “A ‘Negotiated Public Action’ Perspective for Public Management.” Paper presented at European Group for Organizational Studies conference, Barcelona, July 4–7..
  • Amado, G., and A. Ambrose. 2001. The Transitional Approach to Change. London and New York: Karnac Books..
  • Argyris, C. 1982. Reasoning, Learning and Action: Individual and Organizational. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..
  • Argyris, C., and D. Schön. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley..
  • Beauchamp, A. 1997. Environnement et consensus social. Montréal: L’essentiel..
  • Bion, W.R. 2001. Aux sources de l’expérience. Paris: PUF..
  • Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2001. Agir dans un monde incertain: Essai sur la démocratie technique. Paris: Seuil..
  • de Carlo, L. (2006, forthcoming). “Concertation, apprentissage collectif, con?its et créativité.” In Le débat en apprentissage: regards croisés sur les expériences françaises et québécoises, ed. J.M. Fourniau et al., 154–164. Paris: L’Harmattan..
  • ———. 2005.”Accepting Con?ict and Experiencing Creativity: Teaching ‘Concertation’ Using La Francilienne CD-ROM.” Negotiation Journal 21 (1): 85–103..
  • ———. 1996. Gestion de la ville et démocratie locale. Paris: L’Harmattan..
  • Crossan, M.M., H.W. Lane, and R.E. White. 1999. “An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution.” Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 522–537..
  • Diamond, M. 1986. “Resistance to Change: A Psychoanalytic Critique of Argyris and Schön’s Contributions to Organization Theory and Intervention.” Journal of Management Studies 23 (5): 543–563..
  • Duran, P., and J.C. Thoenig. 1996. “L’état et la gestion publique territoriale.” Revue française de science politique 46 (4): 580–623..
  • Dziedzicki, J.M. 2001. “Gestion des con?its d’aménagement de l’espace: quelle place pour les processus de médiation?” Ph.D. dissertation, Tours University..
  • Fisher, R., W. Ury, and B. Patton. 1991. Getting to Yes—Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, 2d ed. New York: Penguin..
  • Fourniau, J.M. 2001. “Mésentente et délibération dans les con?its d’aménagement: l’expérience du débat public institutionnalisé.” In Dynamiques associatives, environnement et cadre de vie, ed. J. Ion, C. Gillio and J.P. Blais, 261–301. Paris: PUCA, Ministère de l’Equipement, des Transports et du Logement..
  • Fourniau, J.M., and C. Blatrix. 2000. Le rail à l’épreuve du débat Barnier. Paris: RFF-FormEquip-INRETS..
  • Fourniau, J.M., and A. Perono-Cit. 1998. Le carrousel des passions et des raisons. Con?it et délibération sur le projet Boutre-Carros. Electricité de France report, May 13..
  • Fukushima, S. 1999. “What You Bring to the Table: Transference and Countertransference in the Negotiation Process.” Negotiation Journal 15 (2): 169–180..
  • Gray, B. 1997. “Framing and Reframing of Intractable Environmental Disputes.” In Research on Negotiation in Organizations, vol. 6, ed. R.J. Lewicki, R.J. Bies, and B.H. Sheppard, 163–188. Greenwich and London: JAI Press..
  • Gray, B., and D.J. Wood. 1991. “Collaborative Alliances: Moving from Practice to Theory.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27 (1): 3–22..
  • Joas, H. 1996. Die Kreativität des Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag..
  • Kern, A. 2003. “Managing Creativity Within Collective Activity.” Paper presented at the tenth Workshop on Managerial and Organizational Cognition, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Cergy, France..
  • Laplanche, J., and J.B. Pontalis. 1998. Vocabulaire de la psychanalyse. Paris: PUF..
  • Lax, D.A., and J.K. Sebenius. 1986. The Manager as Negotiator. New York and London: Free Press..
  • Leary, K. 2003. “A Special Section: Negotiating and Psychoanalysis: Some Common Aspects of Practice.” Negotiation Journal 19 (4): 311–313..
  • Leary, K., and M. Wheeler. 2001.”Crossing the Threshold: First Impressions in Therapy and Negotiation.” PON Working Paper 00–8. Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, PONPapers 2001..
  • Menzies, I. 1960. “A Case-Study in the Functioning of Social Systems as a Defence Against Anxiety.” Human Relations 13(1): 95–121..
  • Neumann, J.E., and L. Hirschhorn. 1999. “The Challenge of Integrating Psychodynamic and Organizational Theory.” Human Relations 52 (6): 683–696..
  • Ouimet, L. 1989. L’audience publique comme processus d’apprentissage: l’intégration des pratiques et des politiques dans le processus de plani?cation. Report, Bureau de Consultation de Montréal..
  • Strauss, A. 1979. Negotiations. Varieties, Contexts, Processes and Social Order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..
  • Susskind, L., and P. Field. 1996. Dealing with an Angry Public: The Mutual Gains Approach to Resolving Disputes. New York: Free Press..
  • Thuderoz, C., and A. Giraud-Héraud. 2002. “Introduction générale—La négociation sociale comme champ d’études: regards sur le cas français.” In La négociation sociale, ed. C. Thuderoz and A. Giraud-Héraud, 155–171. 2d ed. Paris: CNRS..
  • Trist, E. 2001. “Prologue.” In The Transitional Approach to Change, ed. G. Amado and A. Ambrose, xxi–xxvii. London and New York: Karnac Books..
  • Turcotte, M.F., and C. Dancause. 2002. “Apprentissages et actions: étude comparative de structures multipartites.” Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration 19 (3): 217–230..
  • Van Buskirk, W., and D. McGrath. 1999. “Organizational Cultures as Holding Environments: A Psychodynamic Look at Organizational Symbolism.” Human Relations 52 (6): 805–833..
  • Winnicott, D.W. 1965. The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. London: Hogarth Press..
  • ———. 1986. Home Is Where We Start from. New York and London: W.W. Norton..
  • ———. 2001. Playing and Reality. New York: Brunner-Routledge..

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.