Ranking Marketing Journals Using the Search Engine Google Scholar

References

• Alon, Anat, Maureen Morrin, and Nada Nasr Bechwati (2002), “Comparing Journal of Consumer Psychology and Journal of Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12 (1), 15-20.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, S., F.J. Cabrerizo, E. Herrera-Viedma, and F. Herrera (2009), “h-index: A Review Focused in Its Variants, Computation and Standardization for Different Scientific Fields,” Journal of Informetrics, 3 (4), 273-289.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, S., F.J. Cabrerizo, E. Herrera-Viedma, and F. Herrera (2010), “hg-index: A New Index to Characterize the Scientific Output of Researchers Based on the h- and g-Indices,” Scientometrics, 82 (2), 391-400.
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, Aysen, Scott J. Vitell, and Gregory M. Rose (2000), “Publications in Major Marketing Journals: An Analysis of Scholars and Marketing Departments,” Journal of Marketing Education, 22 (August), 99-107.
   Google Scholar
• Bakkalbasi, Nisa, Kathleen Bauer, Janis Glover, and Lei Wang (2006), “Three Options for Citation Tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science,” Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3 (7) (available at www.bio-diglib.com/content/3/1/7/). http://www.bio-diglib.com/content/3/1/7
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Ilan, Judit (2008), “Which h.Index? A Comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar,” Scientometrics, 74 (2), 257.271.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Kathleen, and Nisa Bakkalbasi (2005), “An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication Environment,” DLib Magazine, 11 (9) (available at www.dlib.org/ dlib/september05/bauer/09bauer.html). http://www.dlib.org/ dlib/september05/bauer/09bauer.html
   Google Scholar
• Bauerly, Ronald J., and Don T. Johnson (2005), “An Evaluation of Journals Used in Doctoral Marketing Programs,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33 (3), 313-329.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Hans, and Rik Pieters (2003), “The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and Its Subareas over Time,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (April), 123-139.
   Google Scholar
• Belew, Richard K. (2005), “Scientific Impact Quantity and Quality: Analysis of Two Sources of Bibliographic Data,” University of California-San Diego (available at www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~rik/papers/belew05-iqq.pdf). http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~rik/papers/belew05-iqq.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Roger (2007), “Sources and Use of Marketing Information by Marketing Managers,” Journal of Documentation, 63 (5), 702-726.
   Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, Lance A., and Mark B. Houston (2001a), “The Impact of Article Method Type and Subject Area on Article Citations and Reference Diversity in JM, JMR, and JCR,” Marketing Letters, 12 (4), 327-340.
   Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, Lance A., and Mark B. Houston(2001b), “Reference Diversity in JCR, JM, and JMR: A Reexamination and Extension of Tellis, Chandy, and Ackerman (1999),” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (September), 313-323.
   Google Scholar
• Biemans, Wim, Abbie Griffin, and Rudy Moenaert (2007), “Twenty Years of the Journal of Product Innovation Management: History, Participants, and Knowledge Stock and Flows,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24 (3), 193-213.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, Ruth N. (2004), “Invited Commentaries on ‘Evolving to a New Dominant Logic in Marketing,’” Journal of Marketing, 68 (January), 18-27.
   Google Scholar
• Bontis, Nick, and Alexander Serenko (2009), “A Follow-Up Ranking of Academic Journals,” Journal of Knowledge Management, 13 (1), 16-26.
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, Lutz, and Hans-Dieter Daniel (2007), “What Do We Know About the h Index?” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (9), 1381-1385.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Tibor, Wolfgang Glänzel, and András Schubert (2005), “A Hirsch-Type Index for Journals,” Scientist, 19 (22), 8.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Tibor, Wolfgang Glänzel, and András Schubert (2006), “A Hirsch-Type Index for Journals,” Scientometrics, 69 (1), 169-173.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Declan (2004), “Science Searches Shift Up a Gear as Google Starts Scholar Engine,” Nature, 432 (November 24), 423.
   Google Scholar
• Cabell, David W.E. (ed.) (2008), Cabell's Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Marketing, 9th ed., Beaumont, TX: Cabell.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Brian D. (2005), “Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications,” Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 5 (1), 105-125.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Louis T.W., Kam C. Chan, and Ricky Y.K. Chan (2003), “Publications in Major Marketing Journals: An Analysis of Research Productivity of Asia-Pacific Universities,” Journal of Marketing Education, 25 (2), 163-176.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Chang-Hoan, and Hyoung Koo Khang (2006), “The State of Internet-Related Research in Communications, Marketing, and Advertising: 1994-2003,” Journal of Advertising, 35 (3), 143-163.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr. (1979), “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 64-73.
   Google Scholar
• Costas, Rodrigo, and María Bordons (2008), “Is g-Index Better than h-Index? An Exploratory Study at the Individual Level,” Scientometrics, 77 (2), 267-288.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, John B. (1998), “Problems in Using the Social Sciences Citation Index to Rank Economics Journals,” American Economist, 42 (2), 59-64.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, Geoff, and David M. Easton (2003), “Marketing Journals and the Research Assessment Exercise,” Journal of Marketing Management, 19 (1-2), 5-24.
   Google Scholar
• Egghe, Leo (2006), “Theory and Practice of the g-index,” Scientometrics, 69 (1), 131-152.
   Google Scholar
• Egghe, Leo and Ravichandra I.K. Rao (2008), “Study of Different h-Indices for Groups of Authors,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (8), 1276-1281.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, Susan, and Susanna Eng (2005), “Gaga over Google Scholar in the Social Sciences,” Library Hi-Tech News, 22 (8), 42-45.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, Eugene (1955), “Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation Through Association of Ideas,” Science, 122 (July 15), 108-111.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, Jim (2005), “Start Your Engines,” Nature, 438 (December 1), 554-555.
   Google Scholar
• Google (2009), “About Google Scholar” (available at http://scholar.google.com/scholar/about.html). http://scholar.google.com/scholar/about.html
   Google Scholar
• Guidry, Julie A., Brandi N.G. Hollier, Linda Johnson, John R. Tanner, and Christiane Veltsos (2004), “Surveying the Cites: A Ranking of Marketing Journals Using Citation Analysis,” Marketing Education Review, 14 (Spring), 45-59.
   Google Scholar
• Guns, Raf, and Ronald Rousseau (2009), “Real and Rational Variants of the h-Index and the g-Index,” Journal of Informetrics, 3 (1), 64-71.
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, Ann-Wil K. (2009), “Journal Quality List,” 33d ed. (available at www.harzing.com). http://www.harzing.com
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, Ann-Wil K. and Ron van der Wal (2008), “Google Scholar as a New Source for Citation Analysis,” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8 (1), 62-73.
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, Ann-Wil K. and Ron van der Wal (2009), “A Google Scholar h-index for Journals: An Alternative Metric to Measure Journal Impact in Economics and Business,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (1), 41-46
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, Jorge E. (2005), “An Index to Quantify an Individual's Scientific Research Output,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 (46), 16569-16572.
   Google Scholar
• Hofacker, Charles F., Mark R. Gleim, and Stephanie J. Lawson (2009), “Revealed Reader Preference for Marketing Journals,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37 (2), 238-247.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, Raymond, Andrew T. Norman, and Chip E. Miller (2005), “Examining the Influence of Articles Involving Marketing History, Thought, and Theory: A Journal of Marketing Citation Analysis, 1950s-1990s,” Marketing Theory, 5 (3), 323-336.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, Joel (2007), “Journal of Marketing Research in the New Competitive Journalistic Environment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (February), 1-3.
   Google Scholar
• Hult, G. Tomas M., William T. Neese, and R. Edwards Bashaw (1997), “Faculty Perceptions of Marketing Journals,” Journal of Marketing Education, 19 (Spring), 37-52.
   Google Scholar
• Jacsó, Péter (2005), “As We May Search—Comparison of Major Features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar Citation-Based and Citation-Enhanced Databases,” Current Science, 89 (9), 1537-1547.
   Google Scholar
• Jacsó, Péter (2008a), “Google Scholar Revisited,” Online Information Review, 32 (1), 102-114.
   Google Scholar
• Jacsó, Péter (2008b), “The Pros and Cons of Computing the h-Index Using Google Scholar,” Online Information Review, 32 (3), 437-452.
   Google Scholar
• Jacsó, Péter (2008c), “Testing the Calculation of a Realistic h-Index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F.W. Lancaster,” Library Trends, 56 (4), 784-815.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, Cheryl, Scott B. MacKenzie, and Philip M. Podsakoff (2003), “A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (September), 199-218.
   Google Scholar
• Jobber, David, and Paul Simpson (1988), “A Citation Analysis of Selected Marketing Journals,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 5 (2), 137-142.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Jonathan L., and Philip M. Podsakoff (1994), “Journal Influence in the Field of Management: An Analysis Using Salancik's Index in a Dependency Network,” Academy of Management Journal, 37 (October), 1392-1407.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Daniel B., and Eric Chiang (2004), “The Social Science Citation Index: A Black Box-With an Ideological Bias?” Econ Journal Watch, 1 (1), 134-165.
   Google Scholar
• Koojaroenprasit, Narong, Art Weinstein, William C. Johnson, and David O. Remington (1998), “Marketing Journal Rankings Revisited: Research Findings and Academic Implications,” Marketing Education Review, 8 (Spring), 95-102.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Donald R. (2005), “Journal Evolution and the Development of Marketing,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24 (1), 137-142.
   Google Scholar
• Lusch, Robert F., and Stephen L. Vargo (2006), The Service- Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, Naresh K. (1988), “Some Observations on the State of the Art in Marketing Research,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 4-24.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, Naresh K., Mark Peterson, and Susan Bardi Kleiser (1999), “Marketing Research: A State-of-the-Art Review and Directions for the Twenty-First Century,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27 (2), 160-183.
   Google Scholar
• Meho, Lokman I., and Kiduk Yang (2007), “Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science Versus Scopus and Google Scholar,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (13), 2105-2125.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Casey W. (2007), “Superiority of the h-Index over the Impact Factor for Physics,” arXiv (available at http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608183v1/). http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608183v1/
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, Viskas, Lawrence Feick, and Feisal Murshed (2008), “Publish and Prosper: The Financial Impact of Publishing by Marketing Faculty,” Marketing Science, 27 (3), 430-442.
   Google Scholar
• Molinari, Alain, and Jean-François Molinari (2008), “Mathematical Aspects of a New Criterion for Ranking Scientific Institutions Based on the h-Index,” Scientometrics, 75 (2), 339-356.
   Google Scholar
• Mort, Gillian Sullivan, Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, Geoffrey Kiel, and Geoffrey N. Soutar (2004), “Australian and New Zealand Senior Academics' Perceptions of Marketing Journals,” Australasian Marketing Journal, 12 (2), 51-61.
   Google Scholar
• Ngai, E.W.T. (2003), “Internet Marketing Research (1987-2000): A Literature Review and Classification,” European Journal of Marketing, 37 (1-2), 24-49.
   Google Scholar
• Noruzi, Alizera (2005), “Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes,” Libri, 55 (4), 170-180.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, Charles (2007), “Using the h-Index to Rank Influential British Researchers in Information Science and Librarianship,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (21), 297-301.
   Google Scholar
• Palmatier, Robert W., Rajiv P. Dant, Dhruv Grewal, and Kenneth R. Evans (2006), “Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (October), 136-153.
   Google Scholar
• Pauly, Daniel, and Konstantinos I. Stergiou (2005), “Equivalence of Results from Two Citation Analyses: Thomson ISI's Citation Index and Google's Scholar Service,” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 5 (December), 33-35.
   Google Scholar
• Pecotich, Anthony, and James E. Everett (1989), “An Extension of the Citation Analysis of Selected Marketing Journals,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 6 (3), 199-204.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, Michael Jay, and Paul Whitelaw (2005), “What Are We Measuring When We Evaluate Journals?” Journal of Marketing Education, 27 (August), 189-201.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, Michael Jay, and Paul Whitelaw (2006), “A Multi-Dimensional Examination of Marketing Journals by North American Academics,” Marketing Education Review, 16 (Fall), 59-72.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, Michael Jay, Gary Jones, and Megan J. Kearsley (1999), “Accessibility: An Alternative Method of Ranking Marketing Journals,” Journal of Marketing Education, 21 (December), 181-193.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Ronald (2007), “The Influence of Missing Publications on the Hirsch Index,” Journal of Informetrics, 1 (1), 2-7.
   Google Scholar
• Saad, Gad (2006), “Exploring the h-Index at the Author and Journal Levels Using Bibliometric Data of Productive Consumer Scholars and Business-Related Journals Respectively,” Scientometrics, 69 (1), 117-120.
   Google Scholar
• Saad, Gad (2010), “Applying the h-Index in Exploring Bibliometric Properties of Elite Marketing Scholars,” Scientometrics, 83 (2), 423-433.
   Google Scholar
• Salancik, Gerald R. (1986), “An Index of Subgroup Influence in Dependency Networks,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 31 (June), 194-211.
   Google Scholar
• Schibrowsky, John A., James W. Peltier, and Alexander Nill (2007), “The State of Internet Marketing Research: A Review of the Literature and Future Research Directions,” European Journal of Marketing, 41 (7-8), 722-733.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, Michael (2007a), “A Case Study of the Hirsch Index for 26 Non-Prominent Physicists,“ Annalen der Physik, 16 (9), 640-652.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, Michael (2007b), “Self-Citation Corrections for the Hirsch Index,” Europhysics Letters, 78 (3), 30002.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, Michael (2008), “The Influence of Self-Citation Corrections on Egghe's g-Index,” Scientometrics, 76 (1), 187-200.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, Michael (2009), “Fractionalized Counting of Publications for the g-Index,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (10), 2145-2150.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, András, and Wolfgang Glänzel (2007), “A Systematic Analysis of Hirsch-Type Indices for Journals,” Journal of Informetrics, 1 (3), 179-184.
   Google Scholar
• Seggie, Steven H., and David A. Griffith (2009), “What Does It Take to Get Promoted in Marketing Academia? Understanding Exceptional Publication Productivity in the Leading Marketing Journals,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (January), 122-132.
   Google Scholar
• Serenko, Alexander, and Nick Bontis (2009), “A Citation-Based Ranking of the Business Ethics Scholarly Journals,” International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 4 (4), 390-399.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, Venkatesh, and Edward C. Malthouse (2009), “A Peek into the Future of Interactive Marketing,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23 (1), 1-3.
   Google Scholar
• Shostack, Lynn G. (1977), “Breaking Free from Product Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 41 (April), 73-80.
   Google Scholar
• Steward, Michelle D., and Bruce R. Lewis (2010), “A Comprehensive Analysis of Marketing Journal Rankings,” Journal of Marketing Education, 32 (1), 75-92.
   Google Scholar
• Stremersch, Stephan, and Peter C. Verhoef (2005), “Globalization of Authorship in the Marketing Discipline: Does It Help or Hinder the Field?” Marketing Science, 24 (4), 585-594.
   Google Scholar
• Stremersch, Stephan, Isabel Verniers, and Peter C. Verhoef (2007), “The Quest for Citations: Drivers of Article Impact,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (July), 171-193.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, Göran (2006), “Scholarly Journal Ranking(s) in Marketing: Single or Multi-Item Measures,” Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26 (4), 340-352.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, Göran, (2010), “SSCI and Its Impact Factors: A ‘Prisoner's Dilemma’?” European Journal of Marketing, 44 (1-2), 23-33.
   Google Scholar
• Theoharakis, Vasilis, and Andrew Hirst (2002), “Perceptual Differences of Marketing Journals: A Worldwide Perspective,” Marketing Letters, 13 (4), 398-402.
   Google Scholar
• Tol, Richard S.J. (2008), “A Rational, Successive g-Index Applied to Economics Departments in Ireland,” Journal of Informetrics, 2 (3), 149-155.
   Google Scholar
• Urbancic, Frank R. (2005), “Faculty Representation on the Editorial Boards of Leading Marketing Journals: An Update of Marketing Department Rankings,” Marketing Education Review, 15 (Summer), 61-69.
   Google Scholar
• Uslay, Can, Robert E. Morgan, and Jagdish N. Sheth (2009), “Peter Drucker on Marketing: An Exploration of Five Tenets,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37 (1), 47-60.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, Jerome K. (2007), “On the Robustness of the h-index,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (10), 1547-1550.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, Jerome K., (2008), “Ranking Forestry Journals Using the h-Index,” Journal of Informetrics, 2 (4), 326-334.
   Google Scholar
• van Eck, Nees Jan, and Ludo Waltman (2008), “Generalizing the h- and g-Indices,” Journal of Informetrics, 2 (4), 263-271.
   Google Scholar
• Van Raan, Anthony F.J. (2004), “Sleeping Beauties in Science”, Scientometrics, 59 (3), 461-466.
   Google Scholar
• Van Raan, Anthony F.J. (2006), “Comparison of the Hirsch-Index with Standard Bibliometric Indicators and with Peer Judgment for 147 Chemistry Research Groups,” Scientometrics, 67 (3), 491-502.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, Stephen L., and Robert F. Lusch (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (January), 1-17.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, William H. (2007), “Google Scholar Coverage of a Multidisciplinary Field,” Information Processing and Management, 43 (4), 1121-1132.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkie, William L., and Elizabeth S. Moore (2003), “Scholarly Research in Marketing: Exploring the ‘4 Eras’ of Thought Development,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22 (2), 116-146.
   Google Scholar
• Woeginger, Gerhard J. (2009), “Generalizations of Egghe's g-Index,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (6), 1267-1273.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, Fred Y., and Ronald Rousseau (2008), “The Power Law Model and Total Career h-Index Sequences,” Journal of Informetrics, 2 (4), 288-297.
   Google Scholar
• Zinkhan, George M. (2004), “Accessing Academic Research Through an E-Database: Issues of Journal Quality and Knowledge Use,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32 (4), 369-370.
   Google Scholar
• Zinkhan, George M., and Thomas W. Leigh (1999), “Assessing the Quality Ranking of the Journal of Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 28 (Summer), 51-68.
   Google Scholar