Dynamic Knowledge Patterns to Inform Design: A Field Study of Knowledge Stocks and Flows in an Extreme Organization

References

• Baumard, P. Tacit knowledge in professional firms: The teachings of firms in very puzzling situations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6, 2 (2002), 135-151.
   Google Scholar
• Benbasat, I.; Goldstein, D.K.; and Mead, M. The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 3 (1987), 368-386.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E.; McDermott, R.; and Snyder, W.M. Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Szulanski, G. The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 1 (2000), 9-27.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D.J. Research directions for knowledge management. California Management Review, 40, 3 (Spring 1998), 289-292.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Zhuge, H. Knowledge flow management for distributed team software development. Knowledge-Based Systems, 15, 8 (2002), 465-471.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H., and Rubin, I. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Saviotti, P.P. On the dynamics of appropriability, of tacit and of codified knowledge. Research Policy, 26, 7-8 (1998), 843-856.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, M., and Jobe, L.A. Codification and tacitness as knowledge management strategies: An empirical exploration. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12, 1 (2001), 139-165.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hedberg, S. Agents for sale: First wave of intelligent agents go commercial. IEEE Expert, 11, 6 (December 1996), 16-19.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A.R.; March, S.T.; Park, J.; and Ram, S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28, 1 (2004), 75-105.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G.P. Organizational learning: The contributing process and the literatures. Organization Science, 2, 1 (1991), 88-115.
   Google Scholar
• Inkpen, A.C., and Dinur, A. Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science, 9, 4 (1998), 454-468.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S.L., and Staples, D.S. Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1 (Summer 2001), 151-183.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, N.R.; Sycara, K.; and Wooldridge, M. A roadmap of agent research and development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 1, 1 (1998), 7-38.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, H.C.M. Reframing the knowledge debate, with a little help from the Greeks. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 1, Paper 4 (March 2003), 1-9.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H.K., and Myers, M.D. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23, 1 (1999), 67-94.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.; Hwang, H.; and Suh, E. A process-based approach to knowledge-flow analysis: A case study of a manufacturing firm. Knowledge and Process Management, 10, 4 (2003), 260-276.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P.R., and Lorsch, J.W. Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Gane, C., and Sarson, T. Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D.A.; Thomas, J.B.; Clark, S.; and Chittipedi. K. Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sense making and influence. Organization Science, 5, 3 (1994), 363-383.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. NewYork: Aldine, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R.M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, Special Issue (Winter 1996), 109-122.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A.K., and Govindarajan, V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 4 (2000), 473-496.
   Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A., and Fanelli, A. Action and possibility: Reconciling dual perspectives of knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 13, 3 (2002), 290-302.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, A.H.; Malhotra, A.; and Segars, A.H. Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1 (Summer 2001), 185-214.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, V., and Davenport, T.H. General perspectives on knowledge management: Fostering a research agenda. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1 (Summer 2001), 5-21.
   Google Scholar
• Argote, L. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. Boston: Kluwer, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Argote, L.; Beckman, S.; and Epple, D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Science, 36, 2 (1990), 140-154.
   Google Scholar
• Alavi, M., and Leidner, D.E. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems--Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25, 1 (2001), 107-136.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K.J. Information and economic behavior. In K. Arrow (ed.), Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, vol. 4. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1984, pp. 160-176.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J.B. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32, 10 (1986), 1231-1241.
   Google Scholar
• Leavitt, H.J. Applying organizational change in industry: Structural, technological and humanistic approaches. In J. March (ed.), Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965, pp. 1144-1170.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, B., and March, J.G. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14 (1988), 319-340.
   Google Scholar
• Machlup, F. Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution, and Economic Significance, vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 1 (1991), 71-87.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, M.L. Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Situations and factors in reuse success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1 (Summer 2001), 57-93.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., and Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis, 2d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. Structure in 5's: A synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Science, 26, 3 (1980), 322-341.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K.M.; Nadkarni, S.; Narayanan, V.K.; and Ghods, M. Understanding software operations support expertise: A revealed causal mapping approach. MIS Quarterly, 24, 3 (2000), 475-507.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S. An Evolutionary Theory Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Nidumolu, S.R.; Subramani, M.; and Aldrich, A. Situated learning and the situated knowledge web: Exploring the ground beneath knowledge management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1 (Summer 2001), 115-150.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M.E. An extended model of knowledge-flow dynamics. Communications of the AIS, 8, Article 16 (2002), 251-266.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M.E. Toward designing organizations around knowledge flows. In K. Desouza (ed.), New Frontiers of Knowledge Management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 182-203.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M.E. Harnessing Knowledge Dynamics: Principled Organizational Knowing & Learning. Hershey, PA: IRM Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M.E., and Levitt, R.E. Agent-based modeling of knowledge dynamics. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 2, 3 (2004), 169-183.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M.E.; Kamel, M.N.; and Sengupta, K.C. Integrated analysis and design of knowledge systems and processes. Information Resources Management Journal, 13, 1 (January- March 2000), 24-43.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan Norton Institute. Putting the knowing organization to value. White paper, August 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 1 (1994), 14-37.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Petrie, C. Agent-based engineering, the Web, and intelligence. IEEE Expert, 11, 6 (December 1996), 24-29.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., and Sutton, R.I. Knowing "what" to do is not enough: Turning knowledge into action. California Management Review, 42, 1 (1999), 83-108.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge and Kenan Paul, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Postrel, S. Islands of shared knowledge: Specialization and mutual understanding in problem-solving teams. Organization Science, 13, 3 (2002), 303-320.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, B.H., and Kaarst-Brown, M.L. "Seeding the line": Understanding the transition from IT to non-IT careers. MIS Quarterly, 23, 3 (1999), 337-364.
   Google Scholar
• Becerra-Fernandez, I., and Sabherwal, R. Organizational knowledge management: A contingency perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1 (Summer 2001), 23-55.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, H.R. Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., and Duguid, P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 1 (1991), 40-57.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, R.M., and Obel, B. Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: Developing Theory for Application, 2d ed. Boston: Kluwer, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.T., and Stanley, J.C. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R.H. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 16 (1937), 386-405.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W.M., and Levinthal, D.A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1 (1990), 128-152.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R.E. Introduction. California Management Review, 45, 3 (Spring 1998), 15-21.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 4 (1989), 532-550.
   Google Scholar
• Crossan, M.M.; Lane, H.W.; and White, R.E. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24, 3 (1999), 522-537.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T.H., and Prusak, L. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• DeMarco, T. Structured Analysis and System Specification. New York: Yourdon Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Dierickx, I., and Cool, K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35, 12 (1989), 1504-1511.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P.F. Managing in a Time of Great Change. New York: Truman Talley, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, M. Knowledge management strategies: Toward a taxonomy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1 (Summer 2001), 215-233.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, N.J., and, Pedersen, T. Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management, 8, 1 (2002), 49-67.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, S.-C.; Lin, J.L.; Hsiao, L.Y.C.; Huang, C-M.; and Fang, S-R. The relationship of foreign R&D units in Taiwan and the Taiwanese knowledge-flow system. Technovation, 22, 6 (2002), 371-383.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J.R. Organization Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Gamma, E.; Helm, R.; Johnson, R.; and Vlissides, J. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K. The art and politics of interpretation. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994, pp. 500-515.
   Google Scholar
• Echeverria-Carroll, E.L. Knowledge flows in innovation networks: A comparative analysis of Japanese and U.S. high-technology firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3, 4 (1999), 296-303.
   Google Scholar
• Swap, W.; Leonard, D.; Shields, M.; and Abrams, L. Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1 (Summer 2001), 95-114.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P.; Kleiner, A.; Roberts, C.; Ross, R.; Roth, G.; and Smith, B. The Dance of Change: The Challenges of Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations. New York: Doubleday, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 1 (1991), 125-134.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A., and Newell, A. Heuristic problem solving: The next advance in operations research. Operations Research, 6, 6 (1958), 1-10.
   Google Scholar
• Spender, J.C. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, Special Issue (Winter 1996), 45-62.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegler, I. Knowledge management: A new idea or a recycled concept? Communications of the AIS, 3, 14 (2000), 1-24.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, E.W., and Zwass, V. Actualizing organizational memory with information systems. Information Systems Research, 6, 2 (1995), 85-117.
   Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A.L. Information and Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 4 (1979), 539-550.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. "Sticky information" and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40, 4 (1994), 429-439.
   Google Scholar
• von Krogh, G.; Ichijo, K.; and Nonaka, I. Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Walls, J.G.; Widmeyer, G.W.; and El Sawy, O.A. Building an information systems design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3, 1 (1992), 36-59.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, J.P., and Ungson, G.R. Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16, 1 (1991), 57-91.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. A. Henderson and T. Parsons (eds.), Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1947 translation [cited in Scott 2003].
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J.B.; Sussman, S.W.; and Henderson, J.C. Understanding "strategic learning": Linking organizational learning, knowledge management, and sensemaking. Organization Science, 12, 3 (2001), 331-345.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J.D. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases in Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomi, I. Data is more than knowledge: Implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational memory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 3 (Winter 1999-2000), 103-117.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Navy, PACOM. Joint Task Force Standing Operating Procedure, Pacific Area of Operations. Honolulu: Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Command, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• van Aken, J.E. Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 2 (2004), 219-246.
   Google Scholar