Market Segmentation Within Consolidated E-Markets: A Generalized Combinatorial Auction Approach

References

• Axtell, R. Why agents? On the varied motivations for agent computing in the social sciences. Working Paper No. 17, Center on Social and Economic Dynamics, Brookings Institution, November 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bapna, R.; Goes, P.; and Gupta, A. Insights and analyses of online auctions. Communications of the ACM, 44, 11 (2001), 42-50.
   Google Scholar
• Bapna, R.; Goes, P.; and Gupta, A. Analysis and design of business-to-consumer online auctions. Management Science, 49, 1 (2003), 85-101.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., and Smith, M.D. Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Science, 46, 4 (2000), 563-585.
   Google Scholar
• Bykowsky, M.M.; Cull, R.J.; and Ledyard, J.O. Mutually destructive bidding: The FCC auction design problem. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 17, 3 (2000), 205-228.
   Google Scholar
• Clemons, E.K., and Weber, B.W. Segmentation, differentiation, and flexible pricing: Experiences with information technology and segment-tailored strategies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11, 2 (Fall 1994), 9-28.
   Google Scholar
• Clemons, E.K.; Hann, I.-H.; and Hitt, L.M. Price dispersion and differentiation in online travel: An empirical investigation. Management Science, 48, 4 (2002), 534-549.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, P. The FCC spectrum auctions: An early assessment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 6, 3 (1997), 431-495.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J., and Koehler, G.J. Combinatorial auctions using rule-based bids. Decision Support Systems and Electronic Commerce, 34, 1 (2002), 59-74.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J., and Koehler, G.J. A heuristic for winner determination in rule-based combinatorial auctions. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 17, 4 (Fall 2005), 475-489.
   Google Scholar
• Kwasnica, A.M.; Ledyard, J.O.; Porter, D.; and DeMartini, C. A new and improved design for multiobject iterative auctions. Management Science, 51, 3 (2005), 419-435.
   Google Scholar
• Ledyard, J.O.; Porter, D.; and Rangel, A. Experiments testing multiobject allocation mechanisms. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 6, 3 (1997), 639-675.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, R.P., and McMillan, J. Analyzing the airwaves auction. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 1 (1996), 159-175.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. Selling spectrum rights. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 3 (1994), 145-162.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D.T. Generation of random gamma variates from the two-parameter gamma. AIIE Transactions, 3 (September 1971), 191-198.
   Google Scholar
• Rothkopf, M.H.; Harstad, R.M.; and Fu, Y. Is subsidizing inefficient bidders actually costly? Management Science, 49, 1 (2003), 71-84.
   Google Scholar
• Rothkopf, M.H.; Pekec, A.; and Harstad, R.M. Computationally manageable combinational auctions. Management Science, 44, 8 (1998), 1131-1147.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, S. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Varian, H.R. Microeconomic Analysis, 3d ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, M.; Koehler, G.J.; and Whinston, A.B. Pricing combinatorial auctions. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 1 (April 2004), 251-270.
   Google Scholar