Using Enterprise Architecture Standards in Managing Information Technology

References

• Accenture. Architecture frameworks for client/server and netcentric computing. In J.M. Myerson (ed.), Enterprise Systems Integration. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2002, pp. 39-78.
   Google Scholar
• Aerts, A.T.M.; Goossenaerts, J.B.M.; Hammer, D.K.; and Wortmann, J.C. Architectures in context: On the evolution of business, application software, and ICT platform architectures. Information & Management, 41, 6 (Jul 2004), 781-794.
   Google Scholar
• Akkermans, H.A., and van der Horst, H. Managing IT infrastructure standardisation in the networked manufacturing firm. International Journal of Production Economics, 75, 1-2 (January 2002), 213-228.
   Google Scholar
• Aladwani, A.M. An integrated performance model of information systems projects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 1 (Summer 2002), 185-210.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, B.R., and Boynton, A.C. Information architecture: In search of efficient flexibility. MIS Quarterly, 15, 4 (December 1991), 435-445.
   Google Scholar
• Benamati, J., and Lederer, A.L. Rapid information technology change, coping mechanisms, and the emerging technologies group. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 4 (Spring 2001), 183-202.
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A.S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24, 1 (March 2000), 169-196.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, G.B. The business benefit of standards. StandardView, 6, 2 (June 1998), 76-80.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, M.; Weill, P.; and St. Clair, D. The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign. MIS Quarterly, 23, 2 (June 1999), 159-182.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C.V. Horizontal mechanisms under differing IS organization contexts. MIS Quarterly, 23, 3 (September 1999), 421-454.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C.V., and Magill, S.L. Alignment of the IS function with the enterprise: Toward a model of antecedents. MIS Quarterly, 18, 4 (December 1994), 371-403.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C.V., and Magill, S.L. Reconceptualizing the context-design issue for the information systems function. Organization Science, 9, 2 (March-April 1998), 176-194.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, T.A., and Turner, D.E. Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: Exploratory analysis of a construct. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 1 (Summer 2000), 167-208.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, T.A., and Turner, D.E. An exploratory analysis of the value of the skills of IT personnel: Their relationship to IS infrastructure and competitive advantage. Decision Sciences, 32, 1 (Winter 2001), 21-54.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, T.A., and Turner, D.E. An exploratory examination of the relationship between flexible IT infrastructure and competitive advantage. Information & Management, 39, 1 (November 2001), 41-52.
   Google Scholar
• Carley, K. Knowledge acquisition as a social phenomenon. Instructional Science, 14, 3-4 (May 1986), 381-438.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, P.Y.K., and Tam, K.Y. Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: An exploratory study. MIS Quarterly, 21, 1 (March 1997), 1-24.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, P.Y.K., and Tam, K.Y. Organizational adoption of open systems: A "technology-push, need-pull" perspective. Information & Management, 37, 5 (August 2000), 229-239.
   Google Scholar
• Chief Information Officer Council. A Practical guide to federal enterprise architecture. White Paper, Washington DC, 2001 (available at www.gao.gov/bestpractices/bpeaguide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W.; Marcolin, B.; and Newsted, P. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14, 2 (June 2003), 189-217.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R.L. Organization Theory and Design, 3d ed. St. Paul, MN: West, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T.H. Saving IT's soul: Human-centered information management. Harvard Business Review, 72, 2 (March-April 1994), 119-131.
   Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., and Jackson, B.M. Coordination of information technology management: Team-based structures and computer-based communication systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 4 (Spring 1994), 85-110.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, N.B. Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure: A study of resource characteristics and their measure. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 2 (Fall 1995), 37-57.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, R. Build for business innovation. InformationWeek (November 1, 1999), 127-138.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J.R. Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J.R. Competing with Flexible Lateral Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Gefen, D.; Straub, D.W.; and Boudreau, M. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the AIS, 4, article 7 (August 2000), 1-76.
   Google Scholar
• Gelinas, U.J.; Sutton, S.G.; and Hunton, J.E. Accounting Information Systems, 6th ed. New York: South-Western, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D.L.; Quillard, J.A.; and Rockart, J.F. Managing the data resource: A contingency perspective. MIS Quarterly, 12, 3 (September 1988), 373-392.
   Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D.L.; Wybo, M.D.; and Kirsch, L.J. The impact of data integration on the costs and benefits of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 16, 3 (September 1992), 293-311.
   Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D.L.; Kirsch, L.J.; Quillard, J.A.; and Wybo, M.D. Strategic data planning: Lessons from the field. MIS Quarterly, 16, 1 (March 1992), 11-34.
   Google Scholar
• Guynes, C.S., and Vanecek, M.T. Critical success factors in data management. Information & Management, 30, 4 (July 1996), 201-209.
   Google Scholar
• Haenlein, M., and Kaplan, A.M. A beginner's guide to partial least squares analysis. Understanding Statistics, 3, 4 (2004), 283-297.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. Linking strategic information systems concepts to practice: Systems integration at the portfolio level. Journal of Information Technology, 14, 1 (March 1999), 69-82.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, H.H. Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Hasselbring, W. Information system integration. Communications of the ACM, 43, 6 (June 2000), 32-38.
   Google Scholar
• Heo, J., and Han, I. Performance measure of information systems in evolving computing environments: An empirical investigation. Information & Management, 40, 4 (March 2003), 243-256.
   Google Scholar
• Hite, R. Information technology: A framework for assessing and improving enterprise architecture management (version 1.1). White Paper, United States General Accounting Office, Washington, DC, 2003 (available at www.gao.gov/new.items/d03584g.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J. Future space: A new blueprint for business architecture. Harvard Business Review, 79, 4 (April 2001), 149-158.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, H.; Ramamurthy, K.; Ryu, H.S.; and Yasai-Ardekani, M. Success of data resource management in distributed environments: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 22, 1 (March 1998), 1-29.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, J.; Bhattacherjee, B.; Gupta, Y.P.; and Somers, T.M. The effects of MIS steering committees on information technology management sophistication. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 2 (Fall 2000), 207-230.
   Google Scholar
• Kayworth, T., and Sambamurthy, V. Managing the information technology infrastructure. Baylor Business Review, 18, 1 (Spring 2000), 13-14.
   Google Scholar
• Khoumbati, K.; Themistocleous, M.; and Irani, Z. Evaluating the adoption of enterprise application integration in health-care organizations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 4 (Spring 2006), 69-108.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.H., and Lee, J. A contingent analysis of the relationship between IS implementation strategies and IS success. Information Processing & Management, 27, 1 (January 1991), 111-128.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.G., and Everest, G.C. Building an IS architecture: Collective wisdom from the field. Information & Management, 26, 1 (January 1994), 1-11.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R.L. A framework for assessing the business value of information technology infrastructures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 2 (Fall 2004), 11-32.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, W. Investigating success factors in enterprise application integration: A case-driven analysis. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 2 (June 2005), 175-187.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B.R., and Byrd, T.A. Development of a measure for the information technology infrastructure construct. European Journal of Information Systems, 12, 2 (June 2003), 93-109.
   Google Scholar
• Lillrank, P. The quality of standard, routine and nonroutine processes. Organization Studies, 24, 2 (June 2003), 215-233.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R.C.; Browne, M.W.; and Sugawara, H.M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 2 (June 1996), 130-149.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A.; Gosain, S.; and El Sawy, O.A. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quarterly, 29, 1 (March 2005), 145-187.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, N.; Kraemer, K.; and Gurbaxani, V. Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28, 2 (June 2004), 283-322.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D.M. Enterprise client/server planning. Information Systems Management, 14, 2 (Spring 1997), 41-47.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Mische, M.A. Defining systems integration. In J.M. Myerson (ed.), Enterprise Systems Integration. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, S. Information technology as an enabler of growth in firms: An empirical assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 2 (Fall 2005), 279-300.
   Google Scholar
• Myerson, J.M. Enterprise Systems Integration, 2d ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, D.A., and Tushman, M.L. Strategic Organization Design: Concepts, Tools and Processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M.L., and Shaw, M.J. Interorganizational system standards diffusion: The role of industry-based standards development organizations. Working Paper, University of Illinois—Urbana Champaign, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Object Management Group. Introduction to OMG's Unified Modeling Language™ (UML®). Needham, MA, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M.H., and Chervany, N.L. The relationship between organizational characteristics and the structure of the information services function. MIS Quarterly, 4, 2 (June 1980), 57-68.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, R.J. Enterprise architects join the team. IEEE Software, 22, 5 (September-October 2005), 16-17.
   Google Scholar
• Paulk, M.C.; Weber, C.V.; Curtis, B.; and Chrissis, M.B. The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, A. Critical Success Factors for Enterprise Architecture Engineering. Alexandria, VA: Visible Systems Corporation, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. Crafting information technology governance. Information Systems Management, 21, 4 (Fall 2004), 7-22.
   Google Scholar
• Piccinno, D. What chance business analysis success in IT projects? Management Services, 48, 10 (October 2004), 14-17.
   Google Scholar
• Puschmann, T., and Alt, R. Enterprise application integration systems and architecture—The case of the Robert Bosch Group. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17, 2 (April 2004), 105-116.
   Google Scholar
• Raghunathan, T.S. Impact of the CEO's participation on information systems steering committee. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8, 4 (Spring 1992), 83-96.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, G.L.; Jackson, B.M.; and Dickson, G.W. A principles-based enterprise architecture: Lessons from Texaco and Star Enterprise. MIS Quarterly, 14, 4 (December 1990), 385-403.
   Google Scholar
• Romney, M., and Steinbart, P. Accounting Information Systems, 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J.W. Creating a strategic IT architecture competency: Learning in stages. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2, 1 (April 2003), 31-43.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J.W., and Westerman, G. Preparing for utility computing: The role of IT architecture and relationship management. IBM Systems Journal, 43, 1 (October 2004), 5-19.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J.W.; Beath, C.; and Goodhue, D.L. Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Review, 38, 1 (Fall 1996), 31-45.
   Google Scholar
• Rutberg, S. Five-year outlook for the commercial finance industry: The majors speak of growth, change and opportunity. Secured Lender, 56, 3 (May-June 2000), 8-14.
   Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy, V., and Zmud, R.W. Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quarterly, 23, 2 (June 1999), 261-290.
   Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy, V., and Zmud, R.W. The organizing logic for an enterprise's IT activities in the digital era: A prognosis of practice and a call for research. Information Systems Research, 11, 2 (June 2000), 105-114.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoe, K.; Corbitt, G.; and Boykin, R. Enterprise Integration. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Saran, C. Integration of legacy systems is vital to effective customer service. Computer Weekly (May 18, 2004), 20.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, C., and Willcocks, L.P. The evolution of the organizational architect. Sloan Management Review, 43, 3 (Spring 2002), 41-49.
   Google Scholar
• Segars, A.H., and Grover, V. Designing company-wide information systems: Risk factors and coping strategies. Long Range Planning, 29, 3 (June 1996), 381-392.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, G. The challenges of strategic data planning in practice: An interpretive case study. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 6, 1 (March 1997), 69-90.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V. Systems integration: Coping with legacy systems. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 8, 1 (January 1997), 24-28.
   Google Scholar
• Sun Microsystems. Building the smarter enterprise: Architecting IT for economies of scale. White Paper, Santa Clara, CA, 2005 (available at http://uk.builder.com/whitepapers/0,39026692,60154644p-10000341q,00.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi, H. Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 29, 2 (June 2005), 311-334.
   Google Scholar
• The Open Group. TOGAF (The Open Group architecture framework) version 8.1. White Paper, San Francisco, 2003 (available at www.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf8/downloads.htm
   Google Scholar
• Themistocleous, M., and Watson, E. EJIS special issue on making enterprise systems work. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 2 (June 2005), 107-109.
   Google Scholar
• Torkzadeh, G., and Xia, W. Managing telecommunications by steering committee. MIS Quarterly, 16, 2 (June 1992), 187-199.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M., and Katz, R. External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Science, 26, 11 (November 1980), 1071-1085.
   Google Scholar
• Weill, P., and Broadbent, M. Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, R. Behind the numbers legacy—System updates get a second look. InformationWeek (November 3, 2003), 70.
   Google Scholar
• Wybo, M.D., and Goodhue, D.L. Using interdependence as a predictor of data standards: Theoretical and measurement issues. Information & Management, 29, 6 (December 1995), 317-329.
   Google Scholar