Conflict and Performance in Global Virtual Teams

References

• Adler, R.B.; Rosenfield, L.B.; and Towne, N. Interplay: The Process of Interpersonal Communication. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Alagna, S.; Reddy, D.; and Collins, D. Perceptions of functioning in mixed-sex and male medical training groups. Journal of Medical Education, 57, 10 (1982), 801-803.
   Google Scholar
• Barki, H., and Hartwick, J. Interpersonal conflict and its management in information systems development. MIS Quarterly, 25, 2 (2001), 195-228.
   Google Scholar
• Blakar, R. Communication: A Social Perspective on Clinical Issues. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, P.M. Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, S. The grounding problem in conversations with and through computers. In S. Fussell and R. Kreuz (eds.), Social and Cognitive Approaches to Interpersonal Communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998, pp. 210-225.
   Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J.S., and Sutcliffe, K.M. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 5 (2002), 875-893.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13, 1 (1988), 40-52.
   Google Scholar
• Carte, T.A., and Chidambaram, L. A capabilities-based theory of technology deployment in diverse teams: Leapfrogging the pitfalls of diversity and leveraging its potential with collaborative technology. Journal of the AIS, 5, 11-12 (2004), 448-471.
   Google Scholar
• Chatman, J. Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 3 (1991), 459-484.
   Google Scholar
• Chatman, J., and Barsade, S. Personality, culture and cooperation: Evidence from a business simulation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 3 (1995), 423-443.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.C.; Chen, X.P.; and Meindl, J.R. How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism. Academy of Management Review, 23, 2 (1998), 285-304.
   Google Scholar
• Cramton, C.D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 3 (2001), 346-371.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R., and Valacich, J.S. Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. In R.H. Sprague Jr. (ed.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1999 (available at http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/1999/0001/01/00011017.PDF
   Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., and Monge, P. Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10, 6 (1999), 693-703.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, D.L., and Snyder, N.T. Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques that Succeed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Dube, L., and Pare, G. Global virtual teams. Communications of the ACM, 44, 12 (2001), 71-73.
   Google Scholar
• Earley, P.C., and Mosakowski, E. Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1 (2000), 26-49.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.; Kahwajy, J.L.; and Bourgeoise, L.J. Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. California Management Review, 39, 2 (1997), 42-62.
   Google Scholar
• Entrekin, L., and Chung, Y.W. Attitudes towards different sources of executive appraisal: A comparison of Hong Kong Chinese and American managers in Hong Kong. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 6 (2001), 965-987.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand, M.J., and Christakopoulou, S. Culture and negotiator cognition: Judgment accuracy and negotiation processes in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 3 (1999), 248-269.
   Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld, D.H.; Mannix, E.A.; Williams, K.Y.; and Neale, M.A. Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 1 (1996), 1-15.
   Google Scholar
• Hightower, R., and Sayeed, L. The impact of computer-mediated communication systems on biased group discussion. Computers in Organizational Behavior, 11, 1 (1995), 33-44.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, P., and Bailey, D. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14, 6 (2003), 615-632.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G.H. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hultberg, M.; Alve, S.; and Blakar, R. Patterns of attribution of communication difficulties in couples with a "borderline," a "schizophrenic," or a "normal" offspring. In R. Blakar (ed.), Studies of Familial Communication and Psychopathology: A Social Development Approach to Deviant Behavior. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980, pp. 66-104.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S.L.; Knoll, K.; and Leidner, D.E. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 4 (Spring 1998), 29-64.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K.A. A multi-method examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 2 (1995), 256-282.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K.A. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 3 (1997), 530-557.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K.A., and Mannix, E.A. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 2 (2001), 238-251.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K.A.; Northcraft, G.B.; and Neale, M.A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 4 (1999), 741-763.
   Google Scholar
• Kayworth, T., and Leidner, D.E. Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 3 (Winter 2001-2002), 7-40.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchmeyer, C., and Cohen, A. Multicultural groups: Their performance and reactions with constructive conflict. Group and Organization Management, 17, 2 (1992), 153-170.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, D.; Pearce, C.L.; Smith, K.G.; Olian, J.D.; Sims, H.P.; Smith, K.A.; and Flood, P. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 5 (1999), 445-465.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, D.C., and Murnighan, J.K. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 2 (1998), 325-340.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., and Spears, R. Paralanguage and social perception in computer mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 3-4 (1992), 321-341.
   Google Scholar
• Lipnack, J., and Stamps, J. Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology. New York: Wiley, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Mannix, E.A.; Griffith, T.L.; and Neale, M.A. The phenomenology of conflict in virtual work teams. In P.J. Hinds and S. Kiesler (eds.), Distributed Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002, 213-232.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J.E. Time, interaction and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 2 (1991), 147-174.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., and Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda, S.M., and Bostrom, R.P. The impact of group support systems on group conflict and conflict management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 3 (Winter 1993-1994), 63-95.
   Google Scholar
• Montoya-Weiss, M.M.; Massey, A.P.; and Song, M. Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 6 (2001), 1251-1262.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, M., and Hinds, P.J. Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 3 (2001), 212-238.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R.; Caputo, C.; Legant, P.; and Marecek, J. Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 2 (1973), 154-164.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory, 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• O'Hara-Devereaux, M., and Johansen, R. Globalwork: Bridging Distance, Culture, and Time. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Packard, D. The HP Way: How Bill Hewlett and I Built Our Company. New York: Harper Business, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, S.; Samarah, I.M.; Seetharaman, P.; and Mykytyn, P.P. An empirical investigation of collaborative conflict management style in group support system-based global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 3 (Winter 2004-2005), 185-222.
   Google Scholar
• Pelled, L.H. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 6 (1996), 615-631.
   Google Scholar
• Pelled, L.H.; Eisenhardt, K.M.; and Xin, K.R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1 (1999), 1-28.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkley, R.L. Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 2 (1990), 117-126.
   Google Scholar
• Pinsonneault, A., and Kraemer, K.L. The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decision Support Systems, 5 (Special Issue 1989), 197-216.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, R.E., and Balthazard, P.A. Virtual team interaction styles: Assessment and effects. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56, 4 (2002), 423-443.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A.; Piccoli, G.; and Ives, B. Virtual teams: A review of current literature and direction for future research. DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35, 1 (2004), 6-36.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J.B. Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry. New York: Free Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, S., and Zigurs, I. Paradoxes and prerogatives in global virtual collaboration. Communications of the ACM, 44, 12 (2001), 85-88.
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, M.A. Managing Conflict in Organizations. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S.P. Managing Organizational Conflict. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Robey, D.L.; Smith, L.A.; and Vijayasarathy, L.R. Perceptions of conflict and success in information systems development projects. Journal of Management of Information Systems, 10, 1 (Summer 1993), 123-139.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, B., and Shook, R.L. The IBM Way: Insights into the World's Most Successful Marketing Organization. New York: Harper & Row, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy, V., and Poole, M.S. The effects of variations in capabilities of GDSS designs on management of cognitive conflict in groups. Information Systems Research, 3, 3 (1992), 224-251.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, C.S. Virtual teams: Piecing together the puzzle. In R. Zmud (ed.), Framing the Domains of IT Management Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past. Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex, 2000, pp. 29-50.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, S. Effects of intra-group conflict on packaged software development team performance. Information Systems Journal, 11, 2 (2001), 155-178.
   Google Scholar
• Sillars, A.L. Attributions and communication in roommate conflict. Communication Monographs, 47, 3 (1980), 180-200.
   Google Scholar
• Sosik, J.J., and Jung, D.I. Work group characteristics and performance in collectivistic and individualistic cultures. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 1 (2002), 5-24
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, R.J.; Feltovich, P.J.; Jacobson, M.J.; and Coulson, R.L. Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In L.P. Steffe and J. Gale (eds.), Constructivism in Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 85-109.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., and Turner, J.C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W.G. Austin (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, B.C.Y.; Wei, K.K.; Watson, R.T.; Clapper, D.C.; and McLean, E.R. Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. Management Science, 44, 9 (1998), 1263-1278.
   Google Scholar
• Teeni, D. A cognitive affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Quarterly, 25, 2 (2001), 251-312.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H.C. Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A.H., and Ferry, D.L. Measuring and Assessing Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1980 (available at http://webpages.csom.umn.edu/smo/avandeven/Oai%20book/COVER.HTM
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D.R.; Davison, R.M.; and Shroff, R.H. Sociocultural learning: A perspective on GSS-enabled global education. Communications of the AIS, 7, article 9 (2001) (available at http://cais.isworld.org/articles/7-9/default.asp?View=html&x=49&y=11
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D.R.; van Genuchten, M.; Lou, D.; Verveen, S.; van Eekout, M.; and Adams, A. Exploratory research on the role of national and professional cultures in a distributed learning project. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44, 2 (2001), 114-125.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K.Y., and O'Reilly, C.A. Demography and diversity in organizations. In B.M. Staw and R.M. Sutton (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior. Stamford, CT: JAI Press, 1998, pp. 77-140.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Zigurs, I., and Buckland, B.K. A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 22, 3 (1998), 313-334.
   Google Scholar