Fact or Fiction? A Sensemaking Perspective on the Reality Behind Executives' Perceptions of IT Business Value

References

• Alpar, P., and Kim, M. A microeconomic approach to the measurement of information technology value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 2 (Fall 1990), 55-69.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R.P., and Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 1 (1988), 74-94.
   Google Scholar
• Bakos, J.Y. Dependent variables for the study of firm and industry-level impacts of information technology. In J.I. DeGross and C.H. Kriebel (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 1987, pp. 10-23.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R.D.; Kauffman, R.J.; and Morey, R.C. Measuring gains in operational efficiency from information technology: A study of the Positran deployment at Hardee's Inc. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 2 (Fall 1990), 29-54.
   Google Scholar
• Bannister, F., and Remenyi, D. Acts of faith: Instinct, value and IT investment decisions. Journal of Information Technology, 15, 3 (2000), 231-241.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6 (1986), 1173-1182.
   Google Scholar
• Barua, A., and Mukhopadhyay, T. Information technology and business performance: Past, present and future. In R.W. Zmud (ed.), Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past. Cincinnati: Pinnaflex Educational Resources, 2000, pp. 65-84.
   Google Scholar
• Barua, A.; Kriebel, C.H.; and Mukhopadhyay, T. Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 6, 1 (1995), 3-23.
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24, 1 (2000), 169-196.
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A.S., and Konsynski, B.R. Capturing the intangibles. Information Week, 649 (September 22, 1997), 71-74.
   Google Scholar
• Boynton, A.C.; Zmud, R.W.; and Jacobs, G.C. The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations. MIS Quarterly, 18, 3 (1994), 299-318.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, T.; Brynjolfsson, E.; and Hitt, L. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1 (2002), 339-376.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, M., and Weill, P. Improving business and information strategy alignment: Learning from the banking industry. IBM Systems Journal, 32, 1 (1993), 162-179.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 36, 12 (1993), 66-77.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42, 4 (1996), 541-558.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E.; Hitt, L.; and Yang, S. Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1 (2002), 137-171.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E.; Malone, T.W.; Gurbaxani, V.; and Kambil, A. Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Science, 40, 12 (1994), 1628-1644.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, E.A.; Jarvenpaa, S.L.; Tractinsky, N.; and Glick, W.H. External versus internal perspectives in determining a firm's progressive use of information technology. In J.I. DeGross, I. Benbasat, G. DeSanctis, and C.M. Beath (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 1991, pp. 239-250.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N. IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review, 81, 5 (2003), 41-49.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Y.E. IT value: The great divide between qualitative and quantitative and individual and organizational measures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (Spring 2000), 225-261.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W.C., and Newsted, P.R. Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In R.H. Hoyle (ed.), Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999, pp. 307-341.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2d ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Costabile, K.A., and Klein, S.B. Finishing strong: Recency effects in juror judgments. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1 (2005), 47-58.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3 (1989), 319-340.
   Google Scholar
• Dehning, B., and Richardson, V.J. Returns on investments in information technology: A research synthesis. Journal of Information Systems, 16, 1 (2002), 7-30.
   Google Scholar
• Dess, G.G., and Robinson, R.B. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 3 (1984), 265-273.
   Google Scholar
• Devaraj, S., and Kohli, R. Information technology payoff in the health-care industry: A longitudinal study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (Spring 2000), 41-67.
   Google Scholar
• Devaraj, S., and Kohli, R. The IT Payoff. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Devaraj, S., and Kohli, R. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Science, 49, 3 (2003), 273-289.
   Google Scholar
• Dewan, S., and Min, C.K. The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm-level analysis. Management Science, 43, 12 (1997), 1660-1675.
   Google Scholar
• Doll, W.J.; Xia, W.; and Torkzadeh, R. A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction index. MIS Quarterly, 18, 4 (1994), 453-461.
   Google Scholar
• Feeny, D.F., and Willcocks, L.P. Core IS capabilities or exploiting information technology. Sloan Management Review, 39, 2 (1998), 9-21.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1 (1981), 39-50.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, T.L. Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 24, 3 (1999), 472-488.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, V.; Teng, J.; and Fiedler, K. IS investment priorities in contemporary organizations. Communications of the ACM, 41, 2 (1997), 40-48.
   Google Scholar
• Hitt, L., and Brynjolfsson, E. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly, 20, 2 (1996), 121-142.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S.L., and Ives, B. Executive involvement and participation in the management of IT. MIS Quarterly, 15, 2 (1991), 205-227.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, M. IT portfolio management: Challenges and best practices. Diamond Cluster, Chicago, 2003 (available at www.diamondconsultants.com/PublicSite/ideas/perspectives/downloads/ITPM_Study_single.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, J.; Somers, T.M.; and Gupta, Y.P. Impact of environmental uncertainty and task characteristics on user satisfaction with data. Information Systems Research, 15, 2 (2004), 175-193.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, R.J., and Kriebel, C.H. Modeling and measuring the business value of information technologies. In P.A. Strassmann, P. Berger, E.B. Swanson, C.H. Kriebel, and R.J. Kauffman (eds.), Measuring the Business Value of Information Technologies. Washington, DC: ICIT Press, 1988, 97-119.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, R.J., and Weill, P. An evaluative framework for research on the performance effects of information technology investment. In J.I. DeGross and C.H. Kriebel (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 1989, pp. 377-388.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, G.S., and Lederer, A. A resource-based view of strategic IT alignment: How knowledge sharing creates competitive advantage. Decision Sciences, 34, 1 (2003), 1-29.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D.A. Mediation. Tutorial on Structural Equation Modeling. University of Connecticut, 2006 (available at http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ketokivi, M.A., and Schroeder, R.G. Perceptual measures of performance: Fact or fiction? Journal of Operations Management, 22, 3 (2004), 247-264.
   Google Scholar
• Kettinger, W.J., and Lee, C.C. Zones of tolerance: Alternative scales for measuring information systems service quality. MIS Quarterly, 29, 4 (2005), 607-623.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, L.J. Deploying common systems globally: The dynamics of control. Information Systems Research, 15, 4 (2004), 374-395.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, R. In search of the locus of information technology business value: Do measurement levels make a difference? Working Paper, Department of Information Systems, University of Notre Dame, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, R., and Devaraj, S. Measuring information technology payoff: A meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Information Systems Research, 14, 2 (2003), 127-145.
   Google Scholar
• Kudyba, S., and Diwan, R. Increasing returns to information technology. Information Systems Research, 13, 1 (2002), 104-111.
   Google Scholar
• Lehr, B., and Lichtenberg, F.R. Information technology and its impact on productivity: Firm-level evidence from government and private-data sources: 1977-1993. Canadian Journal of Economics, 32, 2 (1999), 335-362.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, M.A., and Soon, S.K. A comprehensive model for measuring the potential impact of information technology on organizational strategic variables. Decision Sciences, 22, 4 (1991), 869-897.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, M.A., and Mann, G.J. Measuring the organizational impact of IT investment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 1 (Summer 1993), 97-122.
   Google Scholar
• Maule, A.J., and Hodgkinson, G.P. Re-appraising managers' perceptual errors: A behavioral decision-making perspective. British Journal of Management, 14, 1 (2003), 33-
   Google Scholar
• McFarlan, F.W. Information technology changes the way you compete. Harvard Business Review, 62, 3 (1984), 98-103.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, E.R. End users as application developers. MIS Quarterly, 3, 1 (1979), 37-46.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, N.; Gurbaxani, V.; and Kraemer, K.L. Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28, 2 (2004), 283-322.
   Google Scholar
• Mezias, J.M., and Starbuck, W.H. Studying the accuracy of managers' perceptions: A research odyssey. British Journal of Management, 14, 1 (2003), 3-17.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C.C.; Cardinal, L.B.; and Glick, W.H. Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1 (1997), 189-204.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, S., and Chaya, A.K. Analyzing cost-effectiveness of organizations: The impact of information technology spending. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 2 (Fall 1996), 29-57.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, J.G.; Gurbaxani, V.; and Kraemer, K.L. A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology. In J.I. DeGross, G. Ariav, G.M. Beath, R. Hoyer, and C. Kemerer (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 1995, pp. 17-27.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, G.L. Information technology: A new competitive weapon. Sloan Management Review, 25, 1 (1983), 3-14.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; and Podsakoff, N.P. Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5 (2003), 879-903.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E. Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E., and Millar, V.E. How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63, 4 (1985), 149-160.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, A.; Patnayakuni, R.; and Patnayakuni, N. Technology investment and business performance. Communications of the ACM, 40, 7 (1997), 89-97.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, B.H., and Benbasat, I. Measuring the linkage between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly, 20, 1 (1996), 55-81.
   Google Scholar
• Rockart, J.F., and Scott-Morton, M.S. Implications of changes in information technology for corporate strategy. Interfaces, 14, 1 (1984), 84-95.
   Google Scholar
• Roese, N.J. Counterfactual thinking and marketing: Introduction to the special issue. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 4 (2000), 227-230.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon, P.B.; Graeser, V.; and Willcocks, L.P. Measuring organizational IS effectiveness: An overview and update of senior management perspectives. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 33, 2 (2002), 11-28.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, L. Adoption as sensemaking: Toward an adopter-centered process model of IT adoption. In W.J. Orlikowski, S. Ang, P. Weill, H.C. Krcmar, and J.I. DeGross (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 2000, 361-370.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi, V., and King, W.R. Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage. Management Science, 40, 12 (1994), 1601-1627.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, N. The impact of information technology on coordination costs: Implications for firm productivity. In J.I. DeGross and K. Kumar (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 1997, pp. 133-146.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout, P.E., and Fleiss, J.L. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 2 (1979), 420-428.
   Google Scholar
• Sircar, S.; Turnbow, J.L.; and Bordoloi, B. A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (Spring 2000), 69-97.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H.J.; Keil, M.; and Depledge, G. Keeping mum as the project goes under: Towards an explanatory model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 2 (Fall 2001), 189-228.
   Google Scholar
• Stapel, D.A., and Koomen, A.W. Interpretation versus reference framing: Assimilation and contrast effects in the organizational domain. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 2 (1998), 132-148.
   Google Scholar
• Starbuck, W.H., and Milliken, F.J. Executives' perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. In D.C. Hambrick and G.L. Brandon (eds.), The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Starbuck, W.H., and Mezias, J.M. Opening Pandora's box: Studying the accuracy of managers' perceptions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 2 (1996), 99-117.
   Google Scholar
• Straub, D.; Limayem, M.; and Karahanna, E. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Science, 41, 8 (1995), 1328-1342.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, K.M., and Weber, K. The high cost of accurate knowledge. Harvard Business Review, 81, 5 (2003), 75-82.
   Google Scholar
• Tallon, P.P., and Kraemer, K.L. The development and application of a process-oriented thermometer of IT business value. Communications of the AIS, 17, 45 (2006), 1-52.
   Google Scholar
• Tallon, P.P.; Kraemer, K.L.; and Gurbaxani, V. Executives' perceptions of the business value of information technology: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (Spring 2000), 145-173.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J.B.; Clark, S.M.; and Gioia, D.A. Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 2 (1993), 239-270.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N. IT-enabled business transformation: From automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review, 35, 2 (1994), 73-87.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N., and Ramanujam, V. Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence. Journal of Management, 13, 1 (1987), 109-122.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, R.T. Influences on the IS manager's perceptions of key issues: Information scanning and the relationship with the CEO. MIS Quarterly, 14, 2 (1990), 217-231.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K.E. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Werts, C.E.; Linn, R.; and Jöreskog, K. A general method of estimating the reliability of a composite. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 2 (1978), 933-938.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S.J., and Taylor, S.L. The role of IT in the transformation of work: A comparison of post-industrial, industrial, and proto-industrial organizations. Information Systems Research, 7, 1 (1996), 5-21.
   Google Scholar