Team Knowledge and Coordination in Geographically Distributed Software Development

References

• Adams, M.; Tenney, Y.; and Pew, R. Situation awareness and the cognitive management of complex systems. Human Factors, 37, 1 (1995), 85-104.
   Google Scholar
• Alavi, M., and Leidner, D.E. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25, 1 (2001), 107-136.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T. Managing the Flow of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Andres, H.P., and Zmud, R.W. A contingency approach to software project coordination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 3 (Winter 2001-2), 41-70.
   Google Scholar
• Anthes, G.H. Software development goes global. Computerworld Online (June 26, 2000) (available at http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/software/story/0,10801,46187,00.html.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, B.R. Software Engineering Economics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, D.G.; Handel, M.J.; and Herbsleb, J.D. Virtual community presence awareness. ACM SIGGROUIP Bulletin, 19, 3 (1998), 11-14.
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, D.P., and Hollingshead, A. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15, 6 (2004), 633-644.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, F. The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, anniversary ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A. Re-grounding grounded theory. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4, 1 (2002), 25-42.
   Google Scholar
• Bullen, C., and Bennett, J. Groupware in practice: An interpretation of work experiences. In R. Baecker (ed.), Groupware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: Assisting Human-Human Collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman, 1993, pp. 69-84.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers, J.A.; Salas, E.; and Converse, S. Shared mental models in expert team decision-making. In J. Castellan (ed.), Individual and Group Decision-Making: Current Issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993, pp. 221-246.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers, J.A., and Salas, E. Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 2 (2001), 195-202.
   Google Scholar
• Carmel, E. Global Software Teams. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., and Gaines, B. A cyber-organism model for awareness in collaborative communities on the Internet. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 12, 1 (1997), 31-56.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 1 (1960), 37-46.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, N.J.; Salas, E.; Cannon-Bowers, J.A.; and Stout, R.J. Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors, 42, 1 (2000), 151-173.
   Google Scholar
• Cramton, C.D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 3 (2001), 346-371.
   Google Scholar
• Crowston, K., and Kammerer, E.E. Coordination and collective mind in software requirements development. IBM Systems Journal, 37, 2 (1998), 227-245.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50, 3 (2004), 352-364.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, B.; Krasner, H.; and Iscoe, N., A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31, 11 (1988), 1268-1286.
   Google Scholar
• Deephouse, C.; Mukhopadhyay, T.; Goldenson, D.R.; and Keller, M.I. Software processes and project performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 3 (Winter 1996-97), 187-205.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P., and Bellotti, V. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In M. Mantel and R. Baecker (eds.), ACM Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work. New York: ACM Press, 1992, pp. 107-114.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 1 (1995), 32-64.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa, J.A.; Cadiz, J.; Rico-Gutierrez, L.; Kraut, R.E.; Scherlis, W.; and Lautenbacher, G. Coming to the wrong decision quickly: Why awareness tools must be matched with appropriate tasks. In T. Turner, G. Szwillus, M. Czerwinski, F. Peterno, and S. Pemberton (eds.), SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2000, pp. 392-399.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa, J.A.; Cummings, J.N.; Wilson, J.M.; and Pearce, B.M. Team boundary issues across multiple global firms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (Spring 2003), 157-190.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa, J.A.; Slaughter, S.A.; Herbsleb, J.D.; and Kraut, R.E. Coordination mechanisms in globally distributed software development. In D. Moitra (ed.), First International Conference on Management of Globally Distributed Work. Bangalore, India: GDW Consortium, 2005, pp. 9-20.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa, J.A.; Lee, G.; and DeLone, W. Global boundaries, task processes and IS project success: A field study. Information, Technology and People, 19, 4 (2006), 345-370.
   Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., and Sproull, L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46, 12 (2000), 1554-1568.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, R.S.; Kraut, R.E.; Root, R.W.; and Rice, R.E. Video as a technology for informal communication. Communications of the ACM, 36, 1 (1993), 48-61.
   Google Scholar
• Fussell, S., and Krauss, R. Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 3 (1992), 378-391.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Godefroid, P.; Herbsleb, J.D.; Jagadeesan, L.J.; and Li, D. Ensuring privacy in presence awareness systems: An automated verification approach. In W. Kellog and S. Whittaker (eds.), 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work. New York: ACM Press, 2000, pp. 59-68.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S.; Gutwin, C.; and Cockburn, A. Using distortion-oriented displays to support workspace awareness. Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Canada, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Grinter, R.E. Workflow systems: Occasions for success and failure. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 9, 2 (2000), 189-214.
   Google Scholar
• Gutwin, C., and Greenberg, S. The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration. In E. Salas and S.M. Fiore (eds.), Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors that Drive Process and Performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2004, pp. 177-201.
   Google Scholar
• Handel, M., and Herbsleb, J.D. What is chat doing in the workplace? In E. Churchill, J. McCarthy, C. Neuwirth, and T. Rodden (eds.), 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press, 2002, pp. 1-10.
   Google Scholar
• Herbsleb, J.D., and Grinter, R.E. Architectures, coordination, and distance: Conway's law and beyond. IEEE Software, 16, 5 (1999), 63-70.
   Google Scholar
• Herbsleb, J.D.; Mockus, A.; Finholt, T.; and Grinter, R.E. Distance, dependencies and delay in a global collaboration. In W. Kellog and S. Whittaker (eds.), 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work. New York: ACM Press, 2000, pp. 319-328.
   Google Scholar
• Herbsleb, J.D., and Mockus, A. An empirical study of speed and communication in globally distributed software development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29, 6 (2003), 481-494.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S.; Wholey, D.; and Carley, K. Coordination as linkage: The case of software development teams. In D.H. Harris (ed.), Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994, pp. 214-239.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., and Cummings, J.N. What do we know about proximity in work groups? A legacy of research on physical distance. In P. Hinds and S. Kiesler (eds.), Distributed Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002, pp. 57-80.
   Google Scholar
• King, N. Template analysis. In G. Symon and C. Cassell (eds.), Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998, pp. 118-134.
   Google Scholar
• Klimoski, R.J., and Mohammed, S. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor. Journal of Management, 20, 2 (1994), 403-437.
   Google Scholar
• Kraiger, K., and Wenzel, L. Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared mental models as indicators of team effectiveness. In M. Brannick, E. Salas, and C. Prince (eds.), Team Performance Assessment and Measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997, pp. 63-84.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, R., and Fussell, S. Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness. In J. Galegher, R.E. Kraut, and C. Egido (eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1990, pp. 111-146.
   Google Scholar
• Kraut, R.E., and Streeter, L.A. Coordination in software development. Communications of the ACM, 38, 3 (1995), 69-81.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, R.J., and Koch, G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 1 (1977), 159-174.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 4 (2003), 587-604.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, D.; Moreland, R.; and Argote, L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 4 (1995), 384-393.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, T. Modeling coordination in organizations and markets. Management Science, 33, 10 (1987), 1317-1332.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, T., and Crowston, K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26, 1 (1994), 87-119.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, C.C. Why software is so bad. Technology Review, 105, 5 (2002), 33-38.
   Google Scholar
• March, J., and Simon, H.A. Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, A.P.; Montoya-Weiss, M.M.; and Hung, Y.-T. Because time matters: Temporal coordination in global virtual project teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (Spring 2003), 129-156.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J.; Goodwin, G.F.; Heffner, T.S.; Salas, E.; and Cannon-Bowers, J.A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 2 (2000), 273-283.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., and Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, C. IM tools expand presence. InfoWorld (September 27, 2002) (available at www.infoworld.com/articles/pl/xml/02/09/30/020930plentim.html.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, G.M., and Olson, J.S. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 1 (2000), 139-179.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. Case tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 19, 3 (1993), 309-340.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13, 3 (2002), 249-273.
   Google Scholar
• Pauleen, D.J. An inductively derived model of leader-initiated relationship building with virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 3 (Winter 2004-5), 227-256.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, D.E.; Staudenmayer, N.A.; and Votta, L.G. People, organizations, and process improvement. IEEE Software, 11, 4 (1994), 36-45.
   Google Scholar
• Rentsch, J.R., and Hall, R.J. Members of great teams think alike: A model of the effectiveness and schema similarity among team members. In M.M. Beyerlein and D.A. Johnson (eds.), Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Theories of Self-Managing Work Teams, vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1994, pp. 223-261.
   Google Scholar
• Rentsch, J.R., and Klimoski, R.J. Why do great minds think alike? Antecedents of team member schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 2 (2001), 107-120.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, W.B., and Morris, N.M. On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3 (1986), 349-363.
   Google Scholar
• Schultze, U., and Leidner, D.E. Studying knowledge management in information systems research: Discourses and theoretical assumptions. MIS Quarterly, 26, 3 (2002), 213-242.
   Google Scholar
• Silvester, J. Attributional coding. In G. Symon and C. Cassell (eds.), Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998, pp. 73-93.
   Google Scholar
• Steinfield, C.; Jang, C.-Y.; and Pfaff, B. Supporting virtual team collaboration: The teamscope system. In S.C. Hayne (ed.), Group '99: International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. New York: ACM Press, 1999, pp. 81-90.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and Teddlie, C. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Teasley, S.D.; Covi, L.A.; Krishnan, M.S.; and Olson, J.S. Rapid software development through team collocation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28, 7 (2002), 671-683.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., and McLean, E.R. Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 1 (Summer 2005), 13-44.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A.H.; Delbecq, L.A.; and Koenig, R.J. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41, 2 (April 1976), 322-338.
   Google Scholar
• Vreede, G.-J. de; Jones, N.; and Mgaya, R.J. Exploring the application and acceptance of group support systems in Africa. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 3 (Winter 1998-99), 197-234.
   Google Scholar
• Walz, D.B.; Elam, J.J.; and Curtis, B. Inside a software design team: Knowledge acquisition, sharing, and integration. Communications of the ACM, 36, 10 (1993), 63-77.
   Google Scholar
• Watson-Manheim, M.B.; Chudoba, K.; and Crowston, K. Discontinuities and continuities: A new way to understand virtual work. Information, Technology and People, 15, 3 (2002), 191-209.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R.P. Basic Content Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen and G. Goethals (eds.), Theories of Group Behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986, pp. 185-205.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 3 (1995), 319-339.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K., and Roberts, K. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 3 (1993), 357-381.
   Google Scholar
• Wellens, R. Group situation awareness and distributed decision-making: From military to civilian applications. In J. Castellan (ed.), Individual and Group Decision-Making: Current Issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993, pp. 267-291.
   Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum, G.M., and Stasser, G. Management of information in small groups. In J. L. Nye and A.M. Brower (eds.), What's Social About Social Cognition? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, pp. 3-27.
   Google Scholar