Control in Internal and Outsourced Software Projects

References

• Anderson, S., and Dekker, H. Management control for market transactions. Management Science, 51, 12 (2005), 1734-1752.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., and Slaughter, S. A. The moderating effects of structure on volatility and complexity in software enhancement. Information Systems Research, 11, 3 (2000), 219-240.
   Google Scholar
• Barki, H., and Hartwick, J. User participation, conflict, and conflict-resolution—The mediating roles of influence. Information Systems Research, 5, 4 (1994), 422-438.
   Google Scholar
• Barki, H.; Rivard, S.; and Talbot, J. An integrative contingency model of software project risk management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 4 (Spring 2001), 37-69.
   Google Scholar
• Benko, C., and McFarlan, W. Connecting the Dots: Aligning Projects with Objectives in Unpredictable Times. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 2 (1959), 81-105.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, S.; Madhok, A.; and Wu, T. Uncertainty, opportunism and governance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 5 (2006), 1058-1077.
   Google Scholar
• Carte, T., and Russell, C. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3 (2003), 479-502.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Y., and Reich, B. IT alignment—What have we learned? Journal of Information Technology, 22, 4 (2007), 297-315.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhury, V., and Sabherwal, R. Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Information Systems Research, 14, 3 (2003), 291-314.
   Google Scholar
• Das, T., and Teng, B. S. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23, 3 (1998), 491-512.
   Google Scholar
• Domberger, S. The Contracting Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J., and Lambert, L. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 1 (2007), 1-22.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31, 2 (1985), 134-149.
   Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., and Sproull, L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46, 12 (2000), 1554-1568.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwick, J., and Barki, H. Explaining the role of user participation in information systems development. Management Science, 40, 4 (1994), 440-465.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., and Lee, S. Managing IS design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Science, 38, 6 (1992), 757-777.
   Google Scholar
• Herbsleb, J., and Mockus, A. An empirical study of speed and communication in globally distributed software development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29, 6 (2003), 481-494.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbs, C.; Jewett, S.; and Sullivan, M. The Art of Lean Software Development. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., and Turrisi, R. Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression, 2d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., and Meckling, W. Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. In L. Werin and H. Wijkander (eds.), Contract Economics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992, pp. 251-274.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, M.; Tiwana, A.; and Bush, A. Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: A Delphi study. Information Systems Journal, 12, 2 (2002), 103-119.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, L. J. Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Information Systems Research, 8, 3 (1997), 215-239.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, L. J. The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organization Science, 7, 1 (1996), 1-21.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, L. J.; Sambamurthy, V.; Ko, D.; and Purvis, R. Controlling information systems development projects: View from the client. Management Science, 48, 4 (2002), 484-498.
   Google Scholar
• Lance, C. Residual centering, exploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 2 (1988), 163-175.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.; Miranda, S.; and Kim, Y. IT outsourcing strategies: Universalistic, contingency, and configurational explanations. Information Systems Research, 15, 2 (2004), 110-131.
   Google Scholar
• McEvily, B.; Perrone, V.; and Zaheer, A. Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14, 1 (2003), 91-103.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw, K., and Wong, S. Forming inferences about some interclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 1 (1996), 30-46.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, J., and Zenger, T. A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15, 6 (2004), 617-632.
   Google Scholar
• Nidumolu, S. The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: Residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Information Systems Research, 6, 3 (1995), 191-219.
   Google Scholar
• Nidumolu, S., and Subramani, M. The matrix of control: Combining process and structure approaches. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 3 (Winter 2003-4), 159-196.
   Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25, 9 (1979), 833-848.
   Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W. Markets bureaucracies and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 1 (1980), 129-141.
   Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W., and Maguire, M. Organizational control: Two functions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20 (1975), 559-569.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, M. G., and Browne, G. J. Stopping behavior of systems analysts during information requirements elicitation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 1 (Summer 2004), 203-226.
   Google Scholar
• Poppo, L., and Zenger, T. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23, 8 (2002), 707-725.
   Google Scholar
• Rowen, R. Software project management under incomplete and ambiguous specifications. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37, 1 (1990), 10-21.
   Google Scholar
• Rustagi, S.; King, W.; and Kirsch, L. Predictors of formal control usage in IT outsourcing partnerships. Information Systems Research, 19, 2 (2008), 126-143.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, K., and Abdel-Hamid, T. The impact of unreliable information on the management of software projects: A dynamic decision perspective. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 26, 2 (1996), 177-189.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. Does technological modularity substitute for control? Strategic Management Journal, 29, 7 (2008), 769-780.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, E. T. G., and Barron, T. Controlling information-system departments in the presence of cost information asymmetry. Information Systems Research, 6, 1 (1995), 24-50.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., and Lui, S. Distinguishing costs of cooperation and control in alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 10 (2005), 913-932.
   Google Scholar