Public Good as Public Interest?

References

• Benson, Bruce. L. 2008. "The Evolution of Eminent Domain: A Remedy for Market Failure or an Effort to Limit Government Power and Governmental Failure?" Independent Review 12: 423-432.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, Dana. 2002. Government Theft: The Top 10 Abuses of Eminent Domain: 1998-2002. Available at http://www.castlecoalition.org/publications/top_10_abuses/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, Dana. 2003. Public Power, Private Gain: A Five-Year, State-by-State Report Examining the Abuse of Eminent Domain. Arlington, Va.: Institute for Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, Dana. 2006. Opening the Floodgates: Eminent Domain Abuse in a Post-Kelo World. Arlington, Va.: Institute for Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Bixby, Michael B. 1987. "The ‘Public Use’ Requirement After Midkiff." American Business Law Journal 24: 621-641.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreaux, Paul. 2005. "Eminent Domain, Property Rights, and the Solution of Representative Reinforcement." Denver University Law Review 83: 1-55.
   Google Scholar
• Box, Richard C. 1992. "The Administrator as Trustee of the Public Interest: Normative Ideals and Daily Practice." Administration & Society 24: 323-345.
   Google Scholar
• Calfee, Corinne. 2006. "Kelo v. City of New London: The More Things Stay the Same, the More They Change." Ecology Law Quarterly 33: 545-581.
   Google Scholar
• Castle Coalition. 2009. "Enacted Legislation Since Kelo." Arlington, Va.: Castle Coalition. Available at http://www.castlecoalition.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=510&Itemid=107
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Charles E. 2006. "Eminent Domain After Kelo v. City of New London: An Argument for Banning Economic Development Takings." Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 29: 491-568.
   Google Scholar
• Coyne, Thomas J. 1985. "Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff: A Final Requiem for the Public Use Limitation on Eminent Domain?" Notre Dame Law Review 60: 388-404.
   Google Scholar
• Cypher, Matthew L., and Fred A. Forgey. 2003. "Eminent Domain: An Evaluation Based on Criteria Relating to Equity, Effectiveness, and Efficiency." Urban Affairs Review 39: 254-268.
   Google Scholar
• Dorf, Michael C. 2005. "Justice Stevens Adds Fuel to the Fire Over the New London Eminent Domain Case." Available at http://writ.lp.findlaw.com/dorf/20050829.html
   Google Scholar
• Douglass, Bruce. 1980. "The Common Good and the Public Interest." Political Theory 8: 103-117.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Richard A. 1982. "Not Deference but Doctrine: The Eminent Domain Clause." Supreme Court Review, 351-380.
   Google Scholar
• Erler, Edward J. 1981. "The Problem of the Public Good in The Federalist." Polity 4, 649-667.
   Google Scholar
• Farjad, Nasim. 2007. "Condemnation Friendly or Land Use Wise? A Broad Interpretation of the Public Use Requirement Works Well for New York City." Fordham Law Review 76: 1121-1191.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, David B., III. 1986. "Eminent Domain, the Police Power, and the Fifth Amendment: Defining the Domain of the Takings Analysis." University of Pittsburgh Law Review 47: 491-515.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, Amanda. W. 2007. "Rejecting the Return to Blight in Post-Kelo State Legislation." New York University Law Review 82: 178-208.
   Google Scholar
• Goodsell, Charles T. 1990. "Public Administration and the Public Interest." In Refounding Public Administration, edited by Gary L. Wamsley, Robert N. Bacher, Charles T. Goodsell, Philip S. Kronenberg, John A. Rohr, Camilla M. Stivers, Orion F. White, and James F. Wolf, pp. 96-113. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Richard T. 1992. "Constitutional Jurisprudence: Reviving Praxis in Public Administration." Administration & Society 24: 3-21.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Andrew S. 2008. "From New London to Norwood: A Year in the Life of Eminent Domain." Duke Law Journal 57: 1449-1483.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, E. Pendleton. 1997. "Public Administration and the Public Interest." In Classics of Public Administration, 4th ed., edited by Jay M. Shafritz and Albert C. Hyde, pp. 76-80. Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Donald L. 1977. "The Courts as Guardians of the Public Interest." Public Administration Review 37: 148-154.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, Gregory S. 2008. "Maintaining Government Accountability: Calls for a ‘Public Use’ Beyond Eminent Domain." Indiana Law Journal 83: 1097-1119.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Carol W. 2006. "In Pursuit of the Public Interest." Public Administration Review 66: 694-701.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Norton E. 1988. "Public Administration, Cognitive Competence, and the Public Interest." Administration & Society 20: 334-343.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Norton E. 1991. "Politics, Political Science and the Public Interest." PS: Political Science & Politics 24: 670-675.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, Edward J., and Sasha M. Totah. 2007. "Kelo and Its Discontents: The Worst (or Best?) Thing to Happen to Property Rights." Independent Review 11: 397-416.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, Julia D. 2005. "Kelo's Legacy: Eminent Domain and the Future of Property Rights." Supreme Court Review, 103-133.
   Google Scholar
• Main, Carla T. 2005. "How Eminent Domain Ran Amok." Policy Review 133: 3-24.
   Google Scholar
• Melton, Buckner F., Jr. 1996. "Eminent Domain, ‘Public Use,’ and the Conundrum of Original Intent." Natural Resources Journal 36: 59-85.
   Google Scholar
• Mitnick, Barry M. 1976. "A Typology of Conceptions of the Public Interest." Administration & Society 8: 5-28.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Douglas F. 2001. "The Public Interest." In Handbook of Administrative Ethics, 2d ed., edited by Terry L. Cooper, pp. 151-178. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Mushkatel, Alvin, and Khalil Nakhleh. 1978. "Eminent Domain: Land-Use Planning and the Powerless in the United States and Israel." Social Problems 26: 147-159.
   Google Scholar
• Olejarski, Amanda M. 2008. "E[I]m[M]inent Domain: An Assumption of Academic Duty." Paper presented at the meeting of the Public Administration Theory Network, Richmond, Va.
   Google Scholar
• Olejarski, Amanda M. 2010/11. "The Kelo Opportunity: A Loss for the Court but a Gain for Public Administrators." Public Integrity 13: 41-58.
   Google Scholar
• Publius. 1961. The Federalist, edited by Jacob E. Cooke. Cleveland: Meridian Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rohr, John A. 1989. Ethics for Bureaucrats: An Essay on Law and Values, 2d ed. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Salkin, Patricia E., and Lora A. Lucero. 2005. "Community Redevelopment, Public Use, and Eminent Domain." Urban Lawyer 37: 201-242.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, Glendon A., Jr. 1957. "‘The Public Interest’ in Administrative Decision-Making: Theorem, Theosophy, or Theory?" American Political Science Review 51: 346-368.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, Michael W., and Larry D. Terry. 1993. "Legitimacy, History, and Logic: Public Administration and the Constitution." Public Administration Review 53: 239-246.
   Google Scholar
• Staley, Samuel R., and John P. Blair. 2005. "Eminent Domain, Private Property, and Redevelopment: An Economic Development Analysis." Available at http://www.reason.org/ps331.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stoebuck, William B. 1972. "A General Theory of Eminent Domain." Washington Law Review 47: 553-608.
   Google Scholar
• Wamsley, Gary L., Charles T. Goodsell, John A. Rohr, Camilla M. Stivers, Orion F. White, and James F. Wolf. 1990. "Public Administration and the Governance Process: Shifting the Political Dialogue." In Refounding Public Administration, edited by Gary L. Wamsley, Robert N. Bacher, Charles T. Goodsell, Philip S. Kronenberg, John A. Rohr, Camilla M. Stivers, Orion F. White, and James F. Wolf, pp. 31-51. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, Margaret G., and Joyce E. Stigter. 1989. "Rethinking the Role of Judicial Scrutiny in Eminent Domain." Journal of the American Planning Association 55: 57-65.
   Google Scholar
• Berman et al., Executors v. Parker et al., 348 U.S. 26 (1954).
   Google Scholar
• Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U.S. 112 (1896).
   Google Scholar
• Hawaii Housing Authority et al. v. Midkiff et al., 467 U.S. 229 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Kelo et al. v. City of New London et al., 545 U.S. 469 (2005).
   Google Scholar