The use of Constituent Focus Groups for More Effective Program Planning and Management: A Case Study of the Clean Ohio Revitalization Fund

References

• Ashforth, B. (1992). The perceived inequity of systems. Administration and Society, 24(3), 375-408.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, D. (1981). Citizen participation in American communities: Strategies for success. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Basi, R. (1998). Administrative decision making: A contextual analysis. Management Decision, 36(4), 232-240.
   Google Scholar
• Bellinger, D., Bernhardt, K., & Goldstucker, J. (1976). Qualitative marketing research. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, M. (2003). Public sector performance measurement: Delivering greater accountability. Work Study, 52(1), 20-24.
   Google Scholar
• Comfort, L.K. (1981). Goals and means: The problem of specification in the development of effective public policy. Administration and Society, 13(1), 77-108.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, T., & Margolis, K. (1997). Ohio. In T. Davis & K. Margolis (Eds.), Brownfields: A comprehensive guide to redeveloping contaminated property (pp. 542-556). Chicago: American Bar Association.
   Google Scholar
• Diver, C. (1985). Statutory interpretation in the administrative state. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 133(pt. 1), 549-599.
   Google Scholar
• Desario, J., & Langton, S. (Eds.). (1987). Citizen participation in public decision making. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Dreachslin, J. (1999). Focus groups as a quality improvement technique: A case example from health administration education. Quality Assurance in Education, 7(4), 224-233.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (1993). Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences, 26(3), 165-188.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, J., & Murphy, M. (1996). Public management: Facility accountabilities and failing performance review. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(5/6), 125-137.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., & Van de Graaf, H. (1997). Implementation as communicative action. Policy Sciences, 29(4), 291-319.
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, L. (1992). Matching public relations research to the problem: Conducting a special focus group. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4(1), 21-43.
   Google Scholar
• Harter, P. (1982). Negotiating regulations: A cure for the malaise. Georgetown Law Journal, 71(1), 1-118.
   Google Scholar
• Higgenbotham, J., & Cox, K. (1979). Focus-group interviews: A reader. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Iannone, D. (1997). Creative financing strategies for redeveloping brownfields. In T. Davis & K. Margolis (Eds.), Brownfields: A comprehensive guide to redeveloping contaminated property (pp. 87-99). Chicago: American Bar Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, J. (2001). Focus groups as a tool for policy analysis. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 1(1), 129-146.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, M., & Hoehn, J. (2001). Do focus groups and individual interviews reveal the same information for natural resource valuation? Ecological Economics, 36(2), 237-247.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, K. (1995). Accountability and entrepreneurial public management: The case of the Organ County investment fund. Public Budgeting & Finance, 5(3), 3-21.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, W. (1993). Ecology and community in the Great Lakes Basin: The role of stakeholder and advisory committees in environmental planning processes. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, W. (1998). Adopting an ecosystem approach: Local variability in remedial action plans. Society and Natural Resources, 11(5), 465-483.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, W., Tevesz, M., Robey, C., et al. (2005). Training needs of coastal resources decision makers in Ohio's Lake Erie Basin. Coastal Management Journal, 33(3), 335-351.
   Google Scholar
• Kerwin, C. (2003). Rulemaking: How government agencies write law and make policy. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuger, R. (1994). Focus groups. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kweit, M., & Kweit, R. (1981). Implementing citizen participation in a bureaucratic society: A contingency approach. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Meidinger, E. (1987). Regulatory culture: A theoretical outline. Law and Policy, 9(4), 355-386.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington, DC. American Review of Public Administration, 33(2), 164-188.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. (1997). Brownfields sites: Removing lender concerns as a barrier to redevelopment. In T. Davis & K. Margolis (Eds.), Brownfields: A comprehensive guide to redeveloping contaminated property (pp. 100-120). Chicago: American Bar Association.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, L. (2002). Participatory program planning: Including program participants and evaluators. Evaluation and Program Planning, 25(1), 1-14.
   Google Scholar
• Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. (2005a). Definition of a DERR site. Division of Emergency and Remedial Response. Report no. DERR-00-DI-024. Available at www.epa.state.oh.us/derr/rules/DI-024.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.2005b). Voluntary action program, Rules 1 & 2. Available at www.epa.state.oh.us/derr/vap/rules/vaprules.html
   Google Scholar
• Ohio Revised Code.2001a). Title I, Chapter 122.651, Clean Ohio council created.
   Google Scholar
• Ohio Revised Code.2001b). Title I, Chapter 122.658, Clean Ohio revitalization fund; revolving loan fund.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R. (1988). Policy making in a democracy. In R. Reich (Ed.), The power of public ideas (pp. 123-156). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, H. (1999). One piece of the puzzle: Why state brownfields programs can't lure businesses to the urban cores without finding the missing pieces. Rutgers Law Review, 51(5), 1075-1132.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2000). Accountability in the regulatory state. Journal of Law and Society, 27(1), 38-60.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, M., & Terry, L. (1996). Administrative interpretation of statues: A constitutional view on the "new world order" of public administration. Public Administration Review, 56(1), 38-47.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (1990). The public agency as polis: Active citizenship in the administrative state. Administration and Society, 22(1), 86-105.
   Google Scholar
• Swiss, J. (1983). Holding agencies accountable for efficiency: Learning from past failures. Administration and Society, 15(1), 75-96.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (1993). Public involvement and governmental effectiveness: A decision-making model for public managers. Administration and Society, 24(4), 444-469.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, R. (1985). Ethics in policy analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Vroom, V., & Yetton, P. (1973). Leadership and decision making. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wamsley, G.L., & Wolf, J.F. (1996). Introduction: Can a high modern project find happiness in a postmodern era? In G.L. Wamsley & J.F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding democratic public administration: Modern paradoxes, postmodern challenges (pp. 1-37). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wiig, K. (2002). Knowledge management in public administration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(3), 224-239.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus groups in feminist research: Power, interaction and the construction of meaning. Women's Studies International Forum, 21(1), 111-125.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, W., & Elmore, R. (Eds.). (1976). Social program implementation. New York: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Yamano, N., & Ohkawara, T. (2000). The regional allocation of public investment: Efficiency or equity? Journal of Regional Science, 40(2), 205-229.
   Google Scholar