The Accountability-Performance Link

References

• Aberbach, J., & Rockman, B. (1988). Mandates or mandarins? Control and discretion in the modern administrative state. Public Administration Review, 48(2), 606-612.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (2d ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandera, K., & Chin, S. (1998). Downsizing in the federal government: Report of an oversight special study. Washington, DC: Office of Personnel Management.
   Google Scholar
• Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game: What happens after a bill becomes a law. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M. (2001). The new public management: Improving research and policy dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., & Peters, B. G. (2002). Performance measurement and management: The Achilles' heel in administrative modernization. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(4), 359-362.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Potoski, M. (2003). Contract management capacity in municipal and county governments. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 153-164.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Potoski, M. (2005). Transaction costs and contracting. The practitioner perspective. Public Performance and Management Review, 28(3), 326-351.
   Google Scholar
• Burnes, B., & Anastasiadis, A. (2003). Outsourcing: A public-private sector comparison. Supply Chain Management, 8(4), 355-366.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state: Power, politics, and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, G. (2005). The politics of competitive sourcing: Cost savings, transactions costs, tradeoffs and traditional public values. Ph.D. dissertation, American University.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. (1996). Public service ethics and the cultures of blame. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference of Ethics in the Public Service, Brisbane, Australia, August 5-9.
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms. Public Performance and Management Review, 28(3), 376-417.
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M., & Fredrickson, H. G. (2010). Accountable agents: Federal performance measurement and third-party government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(supplement 1), 143-159.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, R. (1992). The administrative presidency revisited: Public lands, the BLM, and the Reagan revolution. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, R. (2008). Sharpening a knife cleverly: Organizational change, policy paradox, and the "weaponizing" of administrative reforms. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 282-294.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, R. (2009). Getting dirty-minded: Implementing presidential policy agendas administratively. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 569-585.
   Google Scholar
• Dye, T. (1995). Understanding public policy. 8th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, H. G. (2005). Public administration with an attitude. Washington, DC: American Society for Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Gambetta, D. (1998). Concatenations of mechanisms. In P. Hedström and R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 102-124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gansler, J., & Lucyshyn, W. (2004). Competitive sourcing: What happens to federal employees? Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, B. (1965). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Golden, M. M. (1992). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Bureaucratic responses to presidential control during the Reagan administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(1), 29-62.
   Google Scholar
• Gormley, W. T., & Weimer, D. (1999). Organizational report cards. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grasso, V. B. (2001). Defense outsourcing: The OMB circular A-76 policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, A. (2004, May 26). Forest Service admits flaw in job competition effort. http://govexec.com/dailyfed/0504/052604a1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A., & Bouckaert, G. (1994). Performance measurement, organizational technology and organizational design. Work Study, 43(3), 19-25.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, J., & O'Connor, D. (1984). How winners win: Lessons learned from contract competitions in base operations support. Bethesda, MD: Logistics Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C. V., & Boren, S. (2005). Appropriations for FY 2005: Interior and related agencies. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. & Milkis, S. (1996). The politics of regulatory change: A tale of two agencies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hearing on National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2003: H. R. 4546 and oversight of previously authorized programs (2002, March 13). 107th Cong., 2nd Session (testimony of Angela Styles), pp. 11-13, 36.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, J. P., & Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers. American Sociological Review, 40(1), 1-11.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, M. S. (2003). The file: Agency, authority, and autography in an Islamabad bureaucracy. Language & Communication, 23(3-4), 287-314.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, A. C. (2003, Spring). Getting to green: Management fad of the year. Public Manager, 3-6, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Joaquin, M. E. (2009). Bureaucratic adaptation and the politics of multiple principals in policy implementation. American Review of Public Administration, 39(3), 246-268.
   Google Scholar
• Joaquin, M. E., & Greitens, T. J. (2009). Presidential policy initiatives and agency compliance: Organizational adaptation to A-76. Administration & Society, 41(7), 815-849.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. (2003, July 22). Ask the White House. www.whitehouse.gov/ask/20030722.html
   Google Scholar
• Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2d ed.). New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. (1993). Sharing power: Public governance and private markets. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambright, W. H. (1998). Downsizing big science: Strategic choices. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 259-268.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125 (2), 255-275.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, J. (2007, March 12). Army medical commander retires over Walter Reed fiasco. Government Executive.com www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=36336&sid=6/
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (1987). Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government (2d ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A. (2002, August 1). Opportunity and performance in the president's management agenda. http://reason.org/news/show/opportunity-and-performance-in
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. (2000). Accountability: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555-573.
   Google Scholar
• Navidi, R. (2006, November 13). Navidi to DLL -Deputy Division Commanders. Memorandum on operations and maintenance of navigation locks and dams: Message to employees. Washington, DC: Army Corps of Engineers, Strategic Sourcing Office.
   Google Scholar
• New century, new process: A preview of competitive sourcing for the 21st century: Hearings before the House Committee on Government Reform (2003, June 26). 108th Cong., 1st Sess. (testimony of Angela Styles), pp. 30-41, 71.
   Google Scholar
• Orbuch, T. L. (1997). People's accounts count: The sociology of accounts. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 455-18.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Peckenpaugh, J. (2001, May 19). A-76 process an obstacle to Bush FAIR Act plan. Government Executive.com www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0301/031901p1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Peckenpaugh, J. (2002, November 8). OMB will not cut jobs at agencies that don't meet competition targets. Government Executive.com www.govexec.com/dailyfed/1102/110802p1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Peckenpaugh, J. (2003a, May 29). New rules should make competition routine in government, says OMB. Government Executive.com www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0503/052903p1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Peckenpaugh, J. (2003b, July 18). VA reworks outsourcing report: Says it will show cost savings. Government Executive.com www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0703/071803p1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Peckenpaugh, J. (2003c, March 31). Agencies put thousands of jobs up for competition. Government Executive.com www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0303/033103p2.htm
   Google Scholar
• Perera, D. (2004, July 27). Feds give low grades to OMB scoring system. FCW.com. www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2004/0726/web-scores-07-27-04.asp
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223-243.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., & Savoie, D. (1994). Civil service reform: Misdiagnosing the patient. Public Administration Review, 54(5), 418-425.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. (2006). Challenging the performance movement. Accountability, complexity, and democratic values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the Challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227-238.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. S., & Johnston, J. M. (2002). Effective contract implementation and management: A preliminary model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(3), 423-453.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. H. (1987). Public administrators' liability: Bench v. bureau in the contemporary administrative state. Public Administration Quarterly, 10(4), 373-386.
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, F. (1969). Bureaucracy, politics, and public policy. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, F. (1992). Responsiveness and neutral competence in American bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 52(6), 539-546.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, I. (1985). Shrinking the federal government. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. (2002). Introduction. In L. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 1-47). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayre, W. (1948). The triumph of techniques over purpose. Public Administration Review, 8(2), 134-137.
   Google Scholar
• Schick, A. (1996). Spirit of reform: Managing the New Zealand state sector in a time of change. Wellington, NZ: State Services Commission and the Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Sclar, E. (2002). You don't always get what you pay for: The economics of privatization. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46-62.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (2005, March 25). Bush and the bureaucracy: A crusade for control. Government Executive.com www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0305/032505nj1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Snavely, K., & Desai, U. (2009). Competitive sourcing in the federal civil service. American Review of Public Administration, 40(1), 83-99.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2008). Governance in dark times. Practical philosophy for public service. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, A. L. (2002). Colonial archives and the arts of governance. Archival Science, 2(1-2), 87-109.
   Google Scholar
• Suleiman, E. (2003). Dismantling democratic states. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E. (1991). An alternative metaphor in the study of judgment and choice: People as politicians. Theory & Psychology, 1(4), 451-475.
   Google Scholar
• Then and now: An update on the Bush administration's competitive sourcing initiative: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, of the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (2003, July 24). 108th Cong., 1st Sess. (testimony of Charles Tiefer), pp. 44-45.
   Google Scholar
• To conduct oversight of the competitive sourcing effort within the National Park Service: Hearings before the Subcommittee on National Parks, of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources (2003, July 24). 108th Cong., 1st Sess. (testimony of Fran Mainella), pp. 3-9.
   Google Scholar
• Trondall, J. (1999). Unpacking social mechanisms: Comparing social constructivism and organization theory perspectives. ARENA Working Papers, WP 99/31. www.arena.uio.no/publications/wp99_31.htm
   Google Scholar
• Trondall, J. (2001). Is there any social constructivist-institutional divide? Unpacking social mechanisms affecting representational roles among EU decision makers. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(1), 1-23.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. General Accounting Office. (1991). Government contractors: Are contractors performing inherently governmental functions? GAO/GGD-92-11. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. General Accounting Office. (1998). OMB Circular A-76: Oversight and implementation issues. GAO/T-GGD-98-146. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. House of Representatives. (2004). A report to the Committee on Appropriations, U. S. House of Representatives, on the implementation of the competitive sourcing initiative at the U. S. Forest Service. Surveys and investigation staff, House Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior and Related Agencies. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Office of Management and Budget. (1955). Bulletin No. 55-4: Commercial-industrial activities of the government providing products or services for governmental use. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Office of Management and Budget (2003a). Circular No. A-76: Performance of commercial activities (revised). Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Office of Management and Budget. (2003b). Reasoned and responsible public-private competition. Agency activities. A supplement to the July 2003 report. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Office of Management and Budget. (2004). Competitive sourcing: Report on competitive sourcing results fiscal year 2003. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Office of Management and Budget. (2005). Competitive sourcing: Report on competitive sourcing results fiscal year 2004. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Office of Management and Budget. (2006). Competitive sourcing: Report on competitive sourcing results fiscal year 2005. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Office of Management and Budget. (2007). Competitive sourcing: Report on competitive sourcing results fiscal year 2006. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Office of Management and Budget. (2008). Competitive sourcing: Report on competitive sourcing results fiscal year 2007. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, D. A. (1994). The contributions of total quality management to a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 510-536.
   Google Scholar
• Wholey, J. S. (2001). Managing for results: Roles for evaluators in a new management era. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 343-347.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar