Blame Avoidance in Public Reporting

References

• Askim, J., Johnsen, Å., & Christophersen, K.-A. (2008). Factors behind organizational learning from benchmarking: Experiences from Norwegian municipal benchmarking networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 297-320.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586-606.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., & Meier, K. J. (2009). Environmental turbulence, organizational stability, and public service performance. Administration & Society, 40(8), 799-824.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2010). Strategic management and public service performance: The way ahead. Public Administration Review, 70(S1), S185-S192.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., & Petrovsky, N. (2009). Democracy and government performance: Holding incumbents accountable in English local governments. Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1273-1284.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, R. Y., & Kelly, P. K. (1994). Improving through benchmarking: A practical guide to achieving peak process performance. Irvine, CA: Richard Chang Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Charbonneau, E. (2010). Use and sensemaking of performance measurement information by local government managers: The case of Quebec's municipal benchmarking system. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, C. (1999). Local government benchmarking: Lessons from two major multigovernment efforts. Public Administration Review, 59(2), 110-123.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software (2d ed.). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Corporation des officiers municipaux agréés du Québec. (2004). Rapport concernant la catégorisation des organismes municipaux et l'utilisation des facteurs d'influence (Phase III) [Report concerning the categorization of municipal organizations and the use of influential factors (third phase)]. Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2004). Performance measurement in the UK public sector: Understanding performance indicators. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 3(2), 31-47.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, P. (1998). The burgeoning of benchmarking in British local government: The value of "learning by looking" in the public services. Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology, 5(4), 260-270.
   Google Scholar
• de Lancer-Julnes, P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693-708.
   Google Scholar
• DesHarnais, S. I., Forthman, M. T., Homa-Lowry, J. M., & Wooster, L. D. (2000). Risk-adjusted clinical quality indicators: Indices for measuring and monitoring rates of mortality, complications, and readmissions. Quality Management in Health Care, 9(1), 14-22.
   Google Scholar
• Ellig, J. (2009). Federal performance reporting: What a difference ten years makes! Public Manager, 38(2), 5-12.
   Google Scholar
• Foltin, C. (1999). State and local government performance: It's time to measure up! Government Accountants Journal, 48(1), 40-46.
   Google Scholar
• Game, C. (2006). Comprehensive performance assessment in English local government. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(6), 466-479.
   Google Scholar
• Gelders, D., Galetzka, M., Verckens, J. P., & Seydel, E. (2008). Showing results? An analysis of the perceptions of internal and external stakeholders of the public performance communication by the Belgian and Dutch railways. Government Information Quarterly, 25(2), 221-238.
   Google Scholar
• Guven-Uslu, P., & Conrad, L. (2008). Uses of management accounting information for benchmarking in NHS trusts. Public Money & Management, 28(4), 239-246.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L. (2007). Implications of success and persistence for public sector performance. Public Organization Review, 7(3), 281-297.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2002). The risk game and the blame game. Government and Opposition, 37(1), 15-37.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2007a). Public service management by numbers: Why does it vary? Where has it come from? What are the gaps and the puzzles? Public Money & Management, 27(2), 95-102.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2007b). What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance? Public Management Review, 9(2), 191-210.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2011). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, O., & John, P. (2007). Public management at the ballot box: Performance information and electoral support for incumbent English local governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 567-580.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, Å. (2008). Performance information in educational policy making. In W. Van Dooren & S. Van De Walle (Eds.), Performance information in the public sector: How it is used (pp. 157-173). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kloot, L. (2009). Performance measurement and accountability in an Australian fire service. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22(2), 128-145.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. (2006). The history of municipal public reporting. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(4-6), 453-476.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73(1), 13-22.
   Google Scholar
• Martinussen, P. E. (2004). Government performance and political accountability at subnational level: The electoral fate of local incumbents in Norway. Scandinavian Political Studies, 27(3), 227-259.
   Google Scholar
• Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (2005). Models of performance-measurement use in local governments: Understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 180-190.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W. H., Kerr, B., & Ritter, G. (2008). School performance measurement: Politics and equity. American Review of Public Administration, 38(1), 100-117.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère des Affaires Municipales, du Sport et du Loisir (MAMSL). (2004). Les Indicateurs de Gestion Municipaux: Un regard neuf sur notre municipalité [Municipal management indicators: A new look at our municipality]. Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère des Affaires Municipales et Régions (MAMR). (2008). Décret de population [Population decree]. Available at www.mamr.gouv.qc.ca/finances/fina_indi_tran.asp#transmission/
   Google Scholar
• Ministère des Affaires Municipales et Régions (MAMR). (2008). Foire aux questions (FAQ) [Frequently asked questions]. Available at www.mamr.gouv.qc.ca/finances/fina_indi_faqr.asp
   Google Scholar
• Ministère des Affaires Municipales et Régions (MAMR). (2008). Modalités de transmission [Transmission modalities]. Available at www.mamr.gouv.qc.ca/organisation/orga_donn_popu.asp#
   Google Scholar
• Ministère des Affaires Municipales, Régions et Occupation du territoire (MAMROT). (2008). "Guide des indicateurs de gestion 2008" [Municipal management indicators: 2008 guide]. Available at www.mamrot.gouv.qc.ca/publications/finances/indi_guid.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministère des Affaires Municipales, Régions et Occupation du territoire (MAMROT). (2009). "Indicateurs de gestion municipaux—Objectifs et avantages" [Municipal management indicators: Objectives and advantages]. Available at www.mamrot.gouv.qc.ca/finances/fina_indi_obje.asp
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newcomer, K. E. (2007). Measuring government performance. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(3), 307-329.
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Department of Local Government. (2008). Comparative information on NSW local government councils 2005/2006.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, R. (2002). Managing through measurement or meaning? Lessons from experience with New Zealand's public sector performance management systems. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(4), 619-628.
   Google Scholar
• Plant, T., & Douglas, J. (2006). The performance management continuum in municipal government organizations. Performance Improvement, 45(1), 43-48.
   Google Scholar
• Public Administration Select Committee. (2003). On target? Government by measurement. London: House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenström, U., & Kyllönen, S. (2007). Impacts of a participatory approach to developing national-level sustainable development indicators in Finland. Journal of Environmental Management, 84(3), 282-298.
   Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296-320.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, R., Schwartz, A. E., & Stiefel, L. (2003). Better than raw: A guide to measuring organizational performance with adjusted performance measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 607-615.
   Google Scholar
• Savoie, D. J. (1999). Governing from the centre: The concentration of power in Canadian politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatteman, A. M. (2009). Public performance reporting: Determinants of excellence. Ph.D. disssertation, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Schatteman, A. M. (2010). The State of Ontario's municipal performance reports: A critical analysis. Canadian Public Administration, 53(4), 531-550.
   Google Scholar
• Schatteman, A. M., & Charbonneau, E. (2010). A comparative study of municipal performance measurement systems in Ontario and Quebec, Canada. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 1(4), 360-375.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. C. (2005). Performance measurement in health care: History, challenges and prospects. Public Money & Management, 25(4), 213-220.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2011). Consumer price index, by province (Quebec). Available at www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/econ09f-eng.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tooley, S., & Guthrie, J. (2007). Reporting performance by New Zealand secondary schools: An analysis of disclosures. Financial Accountability & Management, 23(4), 351-374.
   Google Scholar
• Try, D., & Radnor, Z. (2007). Developing an understanding of results-based management through public value theory. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(7), 655-673.
   Google Scholar
• Van De Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2007). Perceptions of productivity and performance in Europe and the United States. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(11), 1123-1140.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. A. I., & Gooding, R. Z. (1997). Equivocal information and attribution: An investigation of patterns of managerial sensemaking. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 275-286.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K. (2007). Making performance measurement relevant? Administrators' attitudes and structural orientations. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(3), 342-383.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114-126.
   Google Scholar