In The Eyes of the Beholders

References

• Allison, G. T., Jr. (1979, November). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? Paper presented at Public Management Research Conference, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Amirkhanyan, A. A., Kim, H. J., & Lambright, K. T. (2008). Does the public sector out-perform the nonprofit and for-profit sectors? Evidence from a national panel study on nursing home quality and access. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 326-353.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., & Ramalho, N. (2006). Communalities and distinctions in the measurement of organizational performance and effectiveness across for-profit and nonprofit sectors. Nonprofit and Volunteer Sector Quarterly, 35, 39-65.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, L. M. (2008). Account space: How accountability requirements shape nonprofit practice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 201-223.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, L. M. (2010a). Funders as principals: Performance measurement in philanthropic relationships. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 20, 383-403.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, L. M. (2010b). Mediating accountability: How nonprofit funding intermediaries use performance measurement and why it matters for governance. Public Performance and Management Review, 33, 594-618.
   Google Scholar
• Bonbright, D., Campbell, D., & Nguyen, L. (2009). The 21st century potential of constituency voice. Report prepared for Alliance for Children & Families, United Neighborhood Centers of America, and Keystone Accountability.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Bretschneider, S. (1994). The "Publicness Puzzle" in organization theory: A test of alternative explanations in differences between public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 197-223.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. A. (2010). Is constituent feedback living up to its promise? Provider perceptions of feedback practices in nonprofit human service organizations. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 91, 313-320.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, J. G. (2007). Evaluation practice among community-based agencies: Research into the reality. American Journal of Evaluation, 28, 60-75.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, J. G. (2011). Understanding evaluation in nonprofit organizations. Public Performance and Management Review, 33, 350-377.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R. A., & Ebrahim, A. (2006). How does accountability affect mission? The case of a nonprofit serving immigrants and refugees. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 17, 195-209.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (2001). A strategic framework for devolving responsibility and functions from government to the private sector. Public Administration Review, 61, 432-440.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J., Schoorman, S., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20-47.
   Google Scholar
• Dicke, L. A. (2002). Ensuring accountability in human services contracting: Can stewardship theory fill the bill? American Review of Public Administration, 32, 455-470.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A. (2003). Making sense of accountability: Conceptual perspectives for northern and southern nonprofits. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14, 191-212.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A. (2010). The many faces of nonprofit accountability. In D. Renz (Ed.), The handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (3rd ed., pp. 110-121). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Eikenberry, A. (2009). Refusing the market: A democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 564-581.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74.
   Google Scholar
• Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 246-265.
   Google Scholar
• Gronbjerg, K. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social services and community development organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1999). Theses on nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 107-126.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2004). Doing things right: Effectiveness in local nonprofits—A panel study. Public Administration Review, 64, 694-704.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2008). Advancing nonprofit organizational effectiveness research and theory: Nine theses. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18, 399-414.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. M., & Romzek, B. S. (1999). Contracting and accountability in state Medicaid reform: Rhetoric, theories and reality. Public Administration Review, 59, 383-399.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, K. P. (1994). The strategic management of accountability in nonprofit organizations: An analytical framework. Public Administration Review, 54, 185-192.
   Google Scholar
• Lambright, K. T. (2009). Agency theory and beyond: Contracted providers' motivations to properly use service monitoring tools. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 207-227.
   Google Scholar
• Moxham, C. (2010). Help or hindrance? Examining the role of performance measurement in UK nonprofit organizations, Public Performance and Management Review, 33, 342-354.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2005). Goal-based learning and the future of performance management. Public Administration Review, 65, 203-216.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Plantz, M. C., Greenway, M. T., & Hendricks, M. (1997). Outcome measurement: Showing results in the nonprofit sector. New Directions for Evaluation, 75, 15-30.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, R., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Toward a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-379.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 447-470.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., Backoff, R. W., & Levine, C. H. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36, 233-246.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. (1999). The nonprofit sector: A primer. New York: Foundation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. (Ed.). (2002). The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawhill, J., & Williamson, D. (2001). Mission impossible? Measuring success in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11, 371-386.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sowa, J. E., Selden, S. C., & Sandfort, J. R. (2004). No longer measurable? A multidi-mensional integrated model of nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 711-723.
   Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, D. M. (2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 157-187.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66, 114-126.
   Google Scholar