Searching for a Strategic Fit

References

• Allison, G. T. (1983). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In J. L. Perry & K. L. Kraemer (Eds.), Public management (pp. 72-91). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2002). The psychological barriers to performance management: Or why isn't everyone jumping on the performance-management bandwagon? Public Performance & Management Review, 26(1), 5-25.
   Google Scholar
• Boston, J., & Pallot, J. (1997). Linking strategy and performance: Developments in the New Zealand public sector. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(3), 382-404.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, A. O. M., & Kearney, R. C. (1988). Dimensions of state government capacity. Western Political Quarterly, 41(2), 341-362.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, B. K., Dess, G. G., & Rasheed, A. M. A. (1993). Divergence between archival and perceptual measures of the environment: Causes and consequences. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 204-226.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., Gould-Williams, J. S., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2004). Problems of rational planning in public organizations: An empirical assessment of the conventional wisdoms. Administration & Society, 36(3), 328-50.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (1993). Public management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A. (2006). All measures of performance are subjective: More evidence on U. S. federal agencies. In G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O'Toole, Jr., & R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public service performance (pp. 35-54). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M. (2004). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., & Lindblom, C. E. (1953). Politics, economics, and welfare. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• de Lancer Julnes, P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693-708.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. E., & Pollitt, C. (2007). Oxford handbook of public management. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 168-176.
   Google Scholar
• Furlong, S. R. (1998). Political influence on the bureaucracy: The bureaucracy speaks.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(1), 39-65.
   Google Scholar
• Gargan, J. J. (1981). A capacity-building framework: A search for concept and purpose. Public Administration Review, 41(5), 649-658.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accounting Office (GAO). (1997). The Government Performance and Results Act: 1997 Governmentwide implementation will be uneven. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accounting Office (GAO). (1999). Managing for results: Opportunities for continued improvements in agencies' performance plans. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• General Accountability Office (GAO). (2005). Managing for results: Enhancing agency use of performance information for management decision making. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (2008). Contemporary strategy analysis (6th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Grizzle, G. A., & Pettijohn, C. D. (2002). Implementing performance-based program budgeting: A system-dynamics perspective. Public Administration Review, 62(1), 51-62.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L. (2008a). The forgotten regional organizations: Creating capacity for economic development. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 110-125.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L. (2008b). Assessing local capacity for federal grant-getting. American Review of Public Administration, 38(4), 463-479.
   Google Scholar
• Heclo, H. (1977). A government of strangers. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2002). Reinventing government in the information age: International practice in IT-enabled public sector reform. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Honadle, B. W., & Howitt, A. M. (Eds.). (1986). Perspectives on management capacity building. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing process and the literature. Organizational Science, 2(1), 88-115.
   Google Scholar
• Ingraham, P. W., Joyce, P. G., & Donahue, A. K. (2003). Government performance: Why management matters. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamensky, J. M. (1995). Program performance measures: Designing a system to manage for results. In A. Halachmi & M. Holzer (Eds.), Competent government: Theory and practice. The best of Public Productivity and Management Review, 1985-1993 (pp. 239-246). Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamensky, J. M. (2008). Building Obama's performance management approach. PA Times, 31(12), 9-9.
   Google Scholar
• Kamensky, J. M. (2011). The Obama performance approach: A midterm snapshot. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(1), 133-148.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katsikeas, C., Samiee, S., & Theodosiou, M. (2006). Strategy fit and performance consequences of international marketing standardization. Strategic Management Journal, 27(9), 867-890.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F., & Fesler, J. W. (2009). The politics of administrative process (4th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. E., & Lee, J. W. (2009). The impact of management capacity on government innovation in Korea: An empirical study. International Public Management Journal, 12(3), 345-369.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. W., & Cho, Y. J. (2011). In search of a right fit: Exploring conditions for successful performance-based human resources management in U. S. federal agencies. International Review of Public Administration, 16(3), 1-24.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. W., Rainey, H. G., & Chun, Y. H. (2009). Of politics and purpose: Political salience and goal ambiguity of U. S. federal agencies. Public Administration, 87(3), 457-484.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. E. (2003). Presidents and the politics of agency design: Political insulation in the United States Government bureaucracy, 1947-1997. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, P. C. (1995). Thickening government: Federal hierarchy and the diffusion of accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, P. C. (1997). The tides of reform: Making government work, 1945-1995. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. J. (1979). The end of liberalism: The second republic of the United States. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. E. (1981). Managing the public's business. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. E., Heinrich, C., & Hill, C. (2001). Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malysa, L. L. (1996). A comparative assessment of state planning and management capacity: Tidal wetlands protection in Virginia and Maryland. State and Local Government Review, 28(3), 205-218.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (2000). Politics and the bureaucracy (4th ed.). New York: Harcourt College.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., Brudney, J. L., & Bohte, J. (2009). Applied statistics for public and nonprofit administration (7th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). (2007). Accomplishing our mission: Results of the Merit Principles Survey 2005. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Metzenbaum, S. H. (2009). Performance management recommendations for the new administration. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, R. (2001). Introduction. In D. W. Forsythe (Ed.), Quicker, better, and cheaper: Managing performance in American government (pp. 1-16). Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H. (2003). Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. D. (1999). Strategic management in the public sector: Concepts, models, and processes. Public Productivity & Management Review, 22(3), 308-325.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2001). Integrating financial management and performance management. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 1(2), 7-37.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance management in practice: A comparative study of executive agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 25-44.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, P. L., & Fantone, D. M. (2007). Assessing federal program performance: Observations on the U. S. Office of Management and Budget's Program Assessment and Rating Tool and its use in the budget process. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(3), 351-368.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A. (2000). The Government Performance and Results Act and the tradition offederal management reform: Square pegs in round holes? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 111-135.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A. (2006). Challenging the performance movement. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G. (2003). Understanding and managing public organizations (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., & Lee, J. W. (2006). Of politics and purpose: Political context and goal ambiguity in U. S. federal agencies. Paper presented at Conference on the Determinants of Performance in Public Organizations II, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., & Thompson, J. (2006). Leadership and transformation of a major institution: Charles Rossotti and the Internal Revenue Service. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 596-604.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2000). The synoptic model of strategic planning and the GPRA: Lacking a good fit with the political context. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(3), 297-311.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. C. (1993). Limitations of strategic action in bureaus. In B. Bozeman (Ed.), Public management: State of the art (pp. 153-172). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rossotti, C. (2005). Many unhappy returns: One man's quest to turn around the most unpopular organization in America. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2001). Performance management, evaluation and learning in "modern" local government. Public Administration, 79(2), 297-313.
   Google Scholar
• Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, G. H., & Osborn, R. N. (2005). Organizational Behavior (9th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stillman, R. J. (2004). The American bureaucracy: The core of modern government (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423-444.
   Google Scholar
• Vinzant, D. H., & Vinzant, J. C. (1996). Strategy and organizational capacity: Finding a fit. Public Productivity & Management, 20(2), 139-157.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, D. P. (1975). A theory of public bureaucracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waterman, R. W., Rouse, A., & Wright, R. (1998). The venue of influence: A new theory of political control of the bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(1), 13-39.
   Google Scholar
• West, W. F. (1995). Controlling the bureaucracy: Institutional constraints in theory and practice. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. B. (1979). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, B. D., & Bohte, J. (2004). Political transaction costs and the politics of administrative design. Journal of Politics, 66(2), 176-202.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2009). How do perceived political environment and administrative reform affect employee commitment? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 335-360.
   Google Scholar
• Zajack, E. J., Kraatz, M. S., & Bresser, R. K. (2000). Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 429-453.
   Google Scholar