Administrative Performance and Legitimacy

References

• Aghion, P., Alesina, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Endogenous political institutions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 565-611.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J. S., & Weingast, B. R. (1992). The political control of bureaucracies under asymmetric information. American Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 509-524.
   Google Scholar
• Besanko, D., & Spulber, D. F. (1989). Antitrust enforcement under asymmetric information. Economic Journal, 99, 408-425.
   Google Scholar
• Bjornstrom, E. E. (2007). The political economy of antitrust enforcement: Toward a longitudinal explanation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 11, 2009. Available at www.allacademic.com/meta/p177425_index.html
   Google Scholar
• Cyrenne, P. (1999). On antitrust enforcement and the deterrence of collusive behaviour. Review of Industrial Organization, 14(3), 257-272.
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 376-417.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, M. A., & Meier, K. J. (1990). Presidential control versus bureaucratic power: Explaining the Reagan revolution in antitrust. American Journal of Political Science, 34(1), 269-287.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, D., & O'Halloran, S. (1994). Administrative procedures, information, and agency discretion. American Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 697-722.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, S. (1982). Economic self-interest and political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 26(3), 446-466.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosal, V., & Gallo, J. (2001). The cyclical behavior of the Department of Justice's antitrust enforcement activity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(1-2), 27-54.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, M., & Mannion, R. (2004). The role of horizontal and vertical approaches to performance measurement and improvement in the UK public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(1), 75-95.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R., Kornberger, M., & Clegg, S. R. (2009). Power, rationality and legitimacy in public organizations. Public Administration, 87(1), 15-34.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, J. E., Jr. (2005). Optimal cartel pricing in the presence of an antitrust authority. International Economic Review, 46(1), 145-169.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Inokuchi, T. (2000). Dictionary of politics. Tokyo: Kobundo (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Japan Fair Trade Commission. (1997). The history of 50 years of policies of the Antimonopoly Act. Tokyo: Kosei-Torihiki Kyokai (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Krause, G. A. (1996). The institutional dynamics of policy administration: Bureaucratic influence over securities regulation. American Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 1083-1121.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, G. A. (2008). A positive theory of bureaucratic discretion as agency choice. Available at http://localgov.fsu.edu/papers/archive/krause_001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Maskin, E., & Tirole, J. (2004). The politician and the judge: Accountability in government. American Economic Review, 94(4), 1034-1054.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. (1987). An assessment of the positive theory of "congressional dominance." Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 475-520.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M. J., and Weingast, B. R. (1982). Congress as the source of regulatory decisions: The case of the Federal Trade Commission. American Economic Review, 72(2), 109-113.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M. J., & Weingast, B. R. (1983). Bureaucratic discretion or congressional control? Regulatory policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. Journal of Political Economy, 91(5), 765-800.
   Google Scholar
• Muris, T. (1986). Regulatory policymaking at the Federal Trade Commission: The extent of congressional control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 884-889.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 327-331). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, R. (1970). A statistical study of antitrust enforcement. Journal of Law and Economics, 13, 365-419.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, P. (2003). Toward a theory of competition policy. In M. Dewatripoint, L. P. Hansen, & S. J. Burnovsky (Ed.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics (vol. 2, pp. 82-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ringquist, E. J. (1995). Political control and policy impact in EPA's office of water quality. American Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 336-363.
   Google Scholar
• Ringquist, E. J., Worsham, J., & Eisner, M. A. (2003). Salience, complexity, and the legislative direction of regulatory bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 141-164.
   Google Scholar
• Sasaki, T. (1999). Lecture on politics. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Souam, S. (2001). Optimal antitrust policy under different regimes of fines. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(1-2), 1-26.
   Google Scholar
• Takase, K., Kuroda, T., & Suzuki, M. (2001). Dokusenkinshiseisaku kunan no jidai no kaikoroku (Memoir during the difficult time of the Antimonopoly Law in Japan). Tokyo: Kosei-torihiki kyokai.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, K., & Okada, A. (2000). Reform of central ministries and agencies. Tokyo: Nihon Hyoronsha (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Economy and society). Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, B. D., & Anderson, J. E. (1993). The politics of U. S. antitrust regulation. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 1-39.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. W. (1993). The dynamics of political-bureaucratic adaptation. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 497-528.
   Google Scholar