Antecedents to Municipal Performance Measurement Implementation

References

• Ammons, D. N. (1995). Overcoming the inadequacies of performance measurement in local government: The case of libraries and leisure services. Public Administration Review, 55(1), 37-47.
   Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N. (1996). Municipal benchmarks: Assessing local performance and establishing community standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586-606.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E., & Wang, X-H. (2000). Performance measurement in U. S. counties: Capacity for reform. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 409-420.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, F. S. (1994). Innovation in public management: The adoption of strategic planning. Public Administration Review, 54(4), 322-330.
   Google Scholar
• de Lancer Julnes, P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693-708.
   Google Scholar
• Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (2002). Performance measurement survey: Performance measurement at the state and local levels: A summary of survey results. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, H. P. (1972). Issues in productivity measurement for local government. Public Administration Review, 32(6), 776-785.
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, H. P. (2002). Performance measurement fashions and fallacies. Public Management, 25(4), 352-358.
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, H. P., Fountain, J. R., Jr., Sullivan, J. M., & Kremer, L. (1990). Service efforts and accomplishments reporting: Its time has come (pp. 1-50). Norwalk, CT: Governmental Accounting and Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A.T-K., & Coates, P. (2004). Citizen-initiated performance assessment—The initial Iowa experience. Public Performance & Management Review, 27(3), 29-50.
   Google Scholar
• Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (2005). Models of performance measurement use in local governments: Understanding budgeting, communications, and lasting effects. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 180-190.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, B. (1998). Effective use and misuse of performance measurement. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(3), 367-379.
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (1999). Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice. Public Administration Review, 59(4), 325-335.
   Google Scholar
• Sanger, M. B. (2008). From measurement to management: Breaking through the barriers to state and local performance. Public Administration Review, 68, S70-S85.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Institute & International City/County Management Association. (1997). Comparative performance measurement: FY 1995 data report. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wholey, J. S., & Newcomer, K. E. (1997). Clarifying goals, reporting results. In K. E. Newcomer (Ed.), Using performance measurement to improve public and nonprofit programs (pp. 91-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2004). Performance measurement and improvement: An assessment of the state of the art. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(1), 15-31.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114-126.
   Google Scholar