Accountability and Organizational Learning in the Public Sector

References

• Abelson, J., & Gauvin, F. P. (2004). Engaging citizens: One route to health care accountability. Canadian Policy Research Network, Health Care Accountability Paper, no. 2. Available at http://cprn.org/documents/28104_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Knowledge management systems: Issues, challenges, and benefits. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 1(2), 1-36.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, G. T. (1969). Conceptual models and the Cuban missile crisis. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 689-718.
   Google Scholar
• Argote, L. (2005). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1999). Organizational learning (2nd ed.). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schoen, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Askim, J.; Johnsen, A.; & Christopherson, K. A. (2008). Factors behind organizational learning from benchmarking: Experiences from Norwegian municipal benchmarking networks. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 18(2), 297-320.
   Google Scholar
• Barrados, M., & Mayne, J. (2003). Can public sector organizations learn? OECD Journal of Budgeting, 3(3), 87-103.
   Google Scholar
• Berends, H.; Boersma, K.; & Weggeman, K. (2003). The structuration of organizational learning. Human Relations, 56(9), 1035-1056.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2007). New forms of accountability and EU-governance. Comparative European Politics, 5, 104-120.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M.; Schillemans, T.; & 't Hart, P. (2008). Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86(1), 225-242.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, A. (1998). Knowledge management and innovation at 3M. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(1), 17-22.
   Google Scholar
• Broader Public Sector Accountability Act 2010. (2010). Legislative Assembly of Ontario. Available at www.ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&%20/
   Google Scholar
• Brodtrick, O. (1998). Organizational learning and innovation: Tools for revitalizing public services. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 64(1), 83-96.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organizational Science, 2(1), 40-57.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Ittner, C. D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 29(3/4), 243-267.
   Google Scholar
• Charlish, D.; David, R.; Foresti, M.; Knight, L. A.; & Newens, M. (2003). Towards organizational performance assessment: Experiences of strengthening learning, accountability and understanding social change. Paper presented at Development Assistance Committee Conference, OECD, Paris. Available at www.pnud.ne/rense/Biblioth%E8que/Charlish01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Child, J. (2003). Learning through strategic alliances. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning & knowledge (pp. 657-680). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conceição, P.; Hamill, D.; & Pinheiro, P. (2002). Innovative science and technology commercialization strategies at 3M: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19(1), 25-38.
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, S., & Hansén, D. (2004). Learning under pressure: The effects of politicization on organizational learning in public bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 211-230.
   Google Scholar
• Dierkes, M.; Antal, A. B.; Child, J.; & Nonaka, I. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of organizational learning & knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4), 514-539.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (2008). Concept of the corporation (7th ed.). Newark, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. J., & Justice, J. B. (2006). Accountability and the evil of administrative ethics. Administration & Society, 38(2), 236-267.
   Google Scholar
• Dull, M. (2009). Results-model reform leadership: Questions of credible commitment. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 19(2), 255-284.
   Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M., & Crossan, M. (2000). Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 783-796.
   Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M., & Lyles, M. A. (Eds.). (2005). The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A. (2005). Accountability myopia: Losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(1), 56-87.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, T. M.; Yang, B.; & Bartlett, K. R. (2004). The effects of organizational learning culture and job satisfaction on motivation to transfer learning and turnover intention. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(3), 279-301.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2008). Understanding relations of individual-collective learning in work: A review of research. Management Learning, 39(4), 227-243.
   Google Scholar
• Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, J., Jr. (1991). Service efforts and accomplishments reporting. Public Productivity & Management Review, 15(2), 191-198.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, V. J.; Lipshitz, R.; & Overmeer, W. (2003). Creating conditions for organizational learning. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning & knowledge (pp. 757-774). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, D. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78-91.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, C.; Dunleavy, P.; & Tinkler, J. (2009). Organizational learning in government sector organizations: Literature review. Report to the National Audit Office from the London School of Economics Public Policy Group. Available at www2.lse.ac.uk/government/research/resgroups/LSEPublicPolicy/pdf/PPG_OrgLearninginGovLit_review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Government Performance Results Act (GPRA). (1993). The White House, Office of Management and Budget. Available at www.whitehouse.gov/omb/mgmt-gpra/gplaw2m#h2/
   Google Scholar
• Greiling, D., & Halachmi, A. (Eds.) (2010a). Accountability and governance, Part I. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 130-262.
   Google Scholar
• Greiling, D., & Halachmi, A. (Eds.). (2010b). Accountability and governance, Part II. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 272-335.
   Google Scholar
• Greiling, D.; Halachmi, A.; & Schauer, R. (Eds.). (2011). Accounting, accountability and governance in the public sector. Linz: Trauner.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, V.; Teng, J. T. C.; & Fiedler, K. D. (1998). Technological and organizational enablers of business process reengineering. In V. Grover & W. J. Kettinger (Eds.), Business process change: Reengineering concepts, methods, and technologies (pp. 16-33). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (1979). On the job training of social workers: The case for the continuing seminars. International Social Work, 22, 33-44.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (1993). From performance appraisal to performance targeting. Public Personnel Management, 22(2), 323-344.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (1996). Promises and possible pitfalls on the way to SEA reporting. In A. Halachmi & G. Bouckaert (Eds.), Organizational performance and measurement in the public sector: Toward service effort and accomplishment reporting (pp. 77-100). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (2002). Performance measurement and government productivity. Work Study, 51(2), 63-73.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (2005). Performance measurement: Test the water before you dive in. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 255-266.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (2011). Accountability and governance. In D. Greiling, A. Halachmi, & R. Schauer (Eds.), Accounting, accountability and governance in the public sector (pp. 226-244). Linz: Trauner.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A., & Greiling, D. (Eds.). (2011). Accountability and organizational performance in the public sector: A symposium. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(1).
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A., & Holzer, M. (2010). Citizen participation and performance measurement: Operationalizing democracy through better accountability. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 338-376.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. (2007). Accountability in Australia: Control, paradox, and complexity. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 453-479.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Herzberg, F.; Mausner, B.; & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T. (2006). Accounting for the value of performance measurement from the perspective of Midwestern mayors. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 16(2), 217-237.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1971). Groupthink. Psychology Today (November), 84-90. Available at http://agcommtheory.pbworks.com/f/GroupThink.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jang, H.; Berry, F. S.; & de Lancer Julnes, P. (n.d.). Assessing the antecedents of organizational learning in American state, county and city governments. Available at http://yupa.yonsei.ac.kr/pds/org_learning_PAR%20submission%20060210.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, T., & Siverbo, S. (2009). Explaining the utilization of relative performance evaluations in local government: A multi-theoretical case study using data from Sweden. Financial Accountability & Management, 25(2), 197-224.
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P.; Roness, P. G.; & Rubecksen, K. (2006). Performance management in practice: The Norwegian way. Financial Accountability & Management, 22(3), 251-270.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. (1971). The continuing decision seminar as a technique of instruction. Policy Sciences, 2(1), 43-57.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2008). Preparing performance information in the public sector: An Australian perspective. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(2), 117-149.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
   Google Scholar
• Linstone, H. A. (1981). The multiple perspective concept. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 20(4), 275-325.
   Google Scholar
• Lipshitz, R., & Popper, M. (2000). Organizational learning in a hospital. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(3), 345-361.
   Google Scholar
• Lipshitz, R.; Popper, M.; & Friedman, V. J. (2002). A multi-facet model of organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38(1), 78-98.
   Google Scholar
• Lunney, K. (2011). Council moves forward on performance management plan. Government Executive (November 16). Available at www.govexec.com/oversight/2011/11/council-moves-forward-on-performance-management-plan/35434/
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organization learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J.; Smith, S.; & Buxton, S. (2009a). Learning organization and organizational learning: What have we learned? Management Services, 53(2), 36-44.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J.; Smith, S.; & Buxton, S. (2009b). Learning organization and organizational learning: What have we learned? Management Services, 53(3), 14-19.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. M. (2005). Avoiding epistemological myopia. In J. Courtney, J. D. Haynes, & D. Paradice (Eds.), Inquiring organizations: Moving from knowledge management to wisdom (pp. 173-194). Washington, DC: Idea Group. Available at http://faculty.washington.edu/rmmason/Publications/Proof_Epistemological_Myopia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M. (2009). The limits of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 918-938.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, N., & Boud, D. (1996). Animating learning from experience. In D. Boud & N. Miller (Eds.), Working with experience: Animating learning (pp. 3-13). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S.; Jacobs, K.; & Wiesel, F. (2007). A process (re)turn? Path dependencies, institutions and performance management in Swedish central government. Management Accounting Research, 18(4), 453-475.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 20(4), 849-866.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D.; Powell, J.; Convile, R.; & Martinez-Solano, L. (2008). Managing knowledge in the health care sector. A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(3), 245-263.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, S. L., & Scarbrough, H. (1999). Knowledge management in practice: An exploratory case study. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11(3), 359-374.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlowsky, P. (2003). The treatment of organizational learning in management science. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning & knowledge (pp. 61-88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2009). Bureaucracies remember, post-bureaucratic organizations forget? Public Administration, 87(2), 198-218.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R. (1998). Organizational learning mechanisms: A structural and cultural approach to organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(2), 161-179.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R. (2000). Organizational learning: Mechanisms, culture and feasibility. Management Learning, 31(2), 181-196.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2003). Evaluating the audit explosion. Law and Policy, 25(2), 185-202.
   Google Scholar
• Rashman, L.; Withers, E.; & Hartley, J. (2009). Organizational learning and knowledge in public service organizations: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 463-494.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. S.; Leroux, K.; & Blackmar, J. M. (2012). A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 442-453.
   Google Scholar
• Rondeau, K. V., & Wagar, T. H. (2002). Organizational learning and continuous quality improvement: Examining the impact on nursing home performance. Healthcare Management Forum, 15(2), 17-23.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (1996). Organizational learning: What is new? Working paper no. 3912. Cambridge: MIT Sloan School of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, J., & Kluge, A. (2009). Barriers to organizational learning: An integration of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(3), 337-360.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Bantam Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Skerlavaj, M.; Stemberger, M. I.; & Skrinjar, R. (2007). Organizational learning culture—The missing link between business process change and organizational performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(2), 346-367.
   Google Scholar
• ter Bogt, H. (2004). Politicians in search of performance information? Survey research on Dutch aldermen's use of performance information. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(3), 221-252.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wijk, R.; Jansen, J. J. P.; & Lyles, M. A. (2008). Inter- and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 830-853.
   Google Scholar
• Vince, R., & Broussine, M. (2000). Rethinking organizational learning in local government. Local Government Studies, 26(1), 15-30.
   Google Scholar
• Vince, R., & Saleem, T. (2004). The impact of caution and blame on organizational learning. Management Learning, 35(2), 133-154.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K. (2009). Examining perceived honest performance reporting by public organizations: Bureaucratic politics and organizational practice. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 19(1), 81-105.
   Google Scholar