Citizen Participation in the Budget Process and Local Government Accountability

References

• Ahn, S. M., & Choi, Y. J. (2009). The evaluation of participatory budgeting in 5 district governments. Korean Public Administration Quarterly, 21(4), 1369-1397.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). Eight rungs on the ladder of citizen participation. In B. Kahn & E. Passett (Eds.), Citizen participation: Effecting community change (pp. 69-91). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, W. H.; Addams, H. L.; & Davis, B. (2005). Critical factors for enhancing municipal public hearings. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 490-499.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E. (1997). Dealing with cynical citizens. Public Administration Review, 77(2), 105-112.
   Google Scholar
• Berner, M., & Smith, S. (2004). The state of the states: A review of state requirements for citizen participation in the local government budget process. State and Local Government Review, 36(2), 140-150.
   Google Scholar
• Bland, R. L., & Rubin, I. S. (1997). Budgeting: A guide for local governments. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846-860.
   Google Scholar
• Budget Calendar. n.d. Bukgu in Gwangju Metropolitan City government. Available at www.bukgu.gwangju.kr/contents.jsp?S=S31&M=020102000000/
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, K. (2002). The utilization and effectiveness of citizen advisory committees in the budget process of local governments. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 14(2), 295-319.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, H. (2009). Participatory budgeting in Buk-gu, Korea. In Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (Ed.), Focus on citizens: Public engagement for better policy and service. (pp. 135-141). Paris: OECD. Available at http://wiki.civiccommons.org/uploads/8/88/OECDStudy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DeSario, J., & Langton, S. (1987). Citizen participation in public decision-making. Westwood, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & Tucker, A. (2008). Deliberative innovation to different effect: Consensus conferences in Denmark, France and the United States. Public Administration Review, 68(5), 864-876.
   Google Scholar
• Ebdon, C. (2000). The relationship between citizen involvement in the budget process and city structure and culture. Public Productivity and Management Review, 23(3), 383-393.
   Google Scholar
• Ebdon, C. (2002). Beyond the public hearing: Citizen participation in the local government budget. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 14(2), 273-294.
   Google Scholar
• Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A. L. (2004). Searching for a role for citizens in the budget process. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(1), 32-49.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, F. (1993). Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences, 26(3), 165-187.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, A. L.; Ho, A. T.; & Ebdon, C. (2009). Participatory budgeting in midwestern states: Democratic connection or citizen disconnection? Public Budgeting & Finance, 29(3), 52-73.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., & Weiser, P. J. (2006). Jury service as an invitation to citizenship: Assessing the civic value of institutionalized deliberation. Policy Studies Journal, 34(4), 605-627.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A., & Holzer, M. (2010). Citizen participation and performance measurement: Operationalizing democracy through better accountability. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 378-399.
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, K. E. (2003). Assessing the effects of public participation. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 535-543.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Isett, K. R. (2007). Citizen involvement and performance management in special-purpose governments. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 238-248.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55-65.
   Google Scholar
• Ka, S. J. (2010). Examining Korea's good governance in innovation projects, Part I. In United Nations Project Office on Governance (Ed.), An inventory of government innovations and good governance in Asia (pp. 40-55). Seoul: UNPOG. Available at http://ungc.webzero.kr/un/down/An_Inventory_of_Government_Innovations_and_Good_Governance_in_Asia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. (1997). Budgeting democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kairys, D.; Kadane, J. B.; & Lehoczky, J. P. (1977). Jury representativeness: A mandate for multiple source lists. California Law Review, 65(4), 776-827.
   Google Scholar
• Kathi, P., & Cooper, T. (2005). Democratizing the administrative state: Connecting neighborhood councils and city agencies. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 559-567.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B. W. (2006). Local finance management and resident's participatory system—Focusing on the open system of local finance information and resident's participatory budgeting. Korean Comparative Public Law Association, 7(4), 119-152.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, P. S.; Han, S. I.; Jo, Ch.H.; & Kim, Y. J. (2010). A study on the operational substantiality of the citizen's participatory budgeting. Gangwon nonchung, 1(1), 175-196 [in Korean].
   Google Scholar
• Kwack, C. G. (2003). Participatory budgeting system and local NGOs' role. Legal Research Institute of Chonnam National University, 23(2), 123-158 [in Korean].
   Google Scholar
• Kwack, C. G. (2007). Institutionalizing process of citizen participatory budgeting system and its performance: The case of Bukgu of Gwangju metropolitan city. Korean Association for Local Finance, 12(3), 175-211.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organizational Science, 2(1), 71-87.
   Google Scholar
• Middendorf, G., & Busch, L. (1997). Inquiry for the public good: Democratic participation in agricultural research. Agriculture and Human Values, 14(1), 45-57.
   Google Scholar
• Mikesell, J. H. (2007). Fiscal administration: Analysis and applications for the public sector (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G., & Evers, L. (2002). Budgeting structures and citizen participation. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 14(2), 233-272.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 739-777.
   Google Scholar
• Musso, J.; Sithole, M.; Elliot, M.; & Weare, C. (2007). Implementing participatory budgeting: The case of neighborhood councils in Los Angeles. Paper presented at Annual Midwestern Political Science Association Research Conference, Chicago, April. Available at http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/9/8/8/2/pages198824/p198824-1.php
   Google Scholar
• Musso, J.; Weare, C.; Oztas, N.; & Logis, B. (2003). Neighborhood governance reform and networks of community power. Paper presented at Conference on Democratic Network Governance, Centre for Democratic Network Governance, Roskilde University, Copenhagen, May 22-23.
   Google Scholar
• Musso, J. A.; Kitsuse, A.; Okumu, L.; Sithole, M.; & Steinberger, J. (2003). Promises of participation: Building citizenship through involvement in the budget process. Neighborhood Participation Project. Available at www.usc.edu/schools/price/research/npp/pdf/Budget%20Report.Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nah, J. S. (2005). A comparative study for the management model of participatory budgeting: Focus on Brazil, the United States, and South Korea. Korean Association for Local Government Studies, 9(2), 133-158.
   Google Scholar
• Neblo, A.; Estering, K. M.; Kennedy, R. P.; Lazer, D. M. J.; & Sokhey, A. E. (2010). Who wants to deliberate—And why? American Political Science Review, 104(3), 566-583.
   Google Scholar
• Park, M. O. (2006). Operation analysis of participatory budgeting in local governments of South Korea: Focus on the cases of Bukgu of Gwangju metropolitan city and Donggu of Ulsan metropolitan city. Korean Public Personnel Administration Review, 5(2), 131-167.
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T., & Thomas, J. (2007). The wisdom of crowds: Learning from administrator predictions of citizen perceptions. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 279-289.
   Google Scholar
• Rhee, D. Y., & Schachter, H. L. (2010). Agency autonomization in Korea: Some issues in cross-polity transfer of agency autonomization. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 9(1), 58-79.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2002). Keeping public officials accountable through dialogue: Resolving the accountability paradox. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 658-669.
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, H. L., & Liu, R. (2005). Policy development and new immigrant communities: A case study of citizen input in defining transit problems. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 614-623.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2003). Public policy in the community. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. C. (1995). Public participation in public decisions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wampler, B. (2000). A guide to participatory budgeting. Paper presented at the Third Conference of the International Budget Project, Mumbai, November 4-9. Available at www.internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/A-Guide-to-Participatory-Budgeting.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D.; Juster, R.; & Johnson, G. (1991). Institutionalized use of citizen surveys in the budgetary and policy-making processes: A small city case study. Public Administration Review, 51(3), 232-239.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, K., & Hatry, H. P. (1973). Obtaining citizen feedback: The application of citizen surveys to local governments. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar