Transparency, E-Government, and Accountability

References

• Aguilera, R., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of good governance worldwide: What is the trigger? Organization Studies, 25(3), 417-446. Available at http://business.illinois.edu/aguilera/pdf/Aguilera_Cuervo-Cazurra_OS_2003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aikins, S. K., & Krane, D. (2012) Are public officials obstacles to citizen-centered e-government? An examination of municipal administrators' motivations and actions. State and Local Government Review, 42(2), 87-103.
   Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P., & Heintzman, R. (2000). The dialectics of accountability for performance in public management reform. In B. G. Peters & D. J. Savoie (Eds.), Governance in the twenty-first century: Revitalizing the public service (pp. 244-280). Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. (1938). The function of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, F. S. (2007). Government reform, public service values and the roles of public sector leadership in serving society. Paper presented at workshop 5: Leadership and the New Public Management at the conference Leading the Future of the Public Sector: The Third Transatlantic Dialogue, University of Delaware, May 31-June 2.
   Google Scholar
• Boozman, B. (1993). A theory of government "red tape." J-PART, 3(3), 273-303.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. A.P (2003). De digitale republiek: Democratie en rechtsstaat in de informatiemaatschappij (The digital republic: Democracy and the rule of law in the information society). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2005). Public accountability. In E. Ferlie, L. Lynn, Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 182-208). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brin, G. D. (1998). The transparent society: Will privacy force us to choose between privacy and freedom? Reading, MA: Perseus.
   Google Scholar
• Brüggemeier, M., & Lenk, K. (2011). Bürokratieabbau im Verwaltungsvollzug (Downsizing bureaucracy in administrative processes). Berlin: Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2011, February 11). PM's speech at the Strategic Supplier summit. Transcript, British Prime Minister's Office. Available at www.number10.gov.uk/news/strategic-supplier-summit-speech/
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing e-democracy back in: Why it matters for future research on e-governance. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 443-455. Available at http://newpolcom.rhul.ac.uk/storage/chadwick/Chadwick_Bringing_E-Democracy_Back_In_Social_Science_Computer_Review_2003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A., and May, C. (2003). Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: E-government in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance, 16(2), 271-300.
   Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C. (2009). The transparency president? The Obama administration and open government. Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series Research Paper 09-18. Available at www.law.upenn.edu/institutes/regulation/papers/CoglianeseTransparency-President.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dror, Y. (2000). Transparency and openness of quality democracy. Working paper, Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Available at http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/nispacee/unpan006507.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Information Society, 20(5), 325-344.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (2010). Is transparency the best disinfectant? Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(4), 389-404.
   Google Scholar
• Fayol, H. (1916). Administration industrielle et générale. Prévoyance, organisation, commandement, coordination, contrôle (Industrial and general management: Forecast, organization, directing, coordination, verification). Paris: H. Dunod & E. Pina.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 171-186.
   Google Scholar
• Fenster, M. (2006). The opacity of transparency. University of Florida, Levin College of Law, faculty publication 3-1-2006. Available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1059&context=facultypub/
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M. (1942). The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (C. Metcalf and L. Urwick, Eds.). London: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Gant, J.P, & Gant, D. B. (2002). Web portal functionality and state government e-service. In Proceedings of 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (pp. 1587-1596). Bogna Regis, UK: Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garson, G. D. (2003). Toward an information technology research agenda for public administration. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Public information technology: Policy and management issues (pp. 331-357). Hershey: Idea Group. doi: 10.4018/978-1-59140-060-8.ch014
   Google Scholar
• Garson, G. D. (2004). The promise of digital government. In A. Pavlichev & G. D. Garson (Eds.), Digital government principles and best practices (pp. 2-15). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Greiling, D. (2007). Trust and performance management in non-profit organizations. Innovation Journal: Public Sector Innovation Journal, 12(3). Available at www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/greiling9final1draft.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greiling, D., & Spraul, K. (2010). Accountability and the challenges of information disclosure. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 338-377.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2012). Transparency and trust. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorescu, A. (2002). European institutions and unsuccessful norm transmission: The case of transparency. International Politics, 39(4), 467-489.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorescu, A. (2003). International organizations and government transparency: Linking the international and domestic realms. International Studies Quarterly, 47(4), 643-667.
   Google Scholar
• "Groups Say." (2012, December 6). Groups say transparency program could save state millions. St. Augustine Record. Available at http://staugustine.com/news/local-news/2012-12-06/groups-say-transparency-program-could-save-state-millions#.UQ7R-0C4o7m7/
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, L. (1950). The basis for scalogram analysis. In S. A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E. A. Suchman, P. F. Lazarsfeld, & S. Star (Eds.), Measurement and prediction (pp. 60-90). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hailey, J., & James, R. (2003, November). NGO capacity building: The challenge of impact assessment. Paper presented at the New Directions in Impact Assessment for Developing Methods of Practice conference, University of Manchester. Available at http://portals.wi.wur.nl/files/docs/ppme/Hailey.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (1986). Strategic planning and management? Not necessarily. Public Productivity Review, 10(2), 35-50.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (2002). Performance measurement, accountability, and improved performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(4), 370-374.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (2003). Governance and risk management: The challenge of accountability, transparency and social responsibility. International Review of Public Administration, 8(1), 67-76.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (2004). E-government theory and practice: The evidence from Tennessee (USA). Report of the Ad Hoc Expert Group Meeting on E-governance and Changes in Administrative Structures and Processes, United Nations, New York. Available at http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan019245.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (2011). Accountability and governance. In D. Greiling, A. Halachmi, & R. Schauer (Eds.), Accounting, accountability and governance in the public sector (pp. 226-243).
   Google Scholar
• Linz: Trauner. Halachmi, A., & Holzer, M. (2010). Citizen participation and performance measurement: Operationalizing democracy through better accountability. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 338-376.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. (2007). Accountability in Australia: Control, paradox, and complexity. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 453-479.
   Google Scholar
• Harpe, J. (2009, April 13). The promise that keeps on breaking. TechKnowledge, no. 124. Available at www.cato.org/publications/techknowledge/promise-keeps-breaking/
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (2007). The police and soft technology: How information technology contributes to police decision making. Department of Criminal Justice & Criminology, University of Massachusetts at Lowell. Available at http://faculty.uml.edu/jbyrne/44.203/policing_and_soft_technology.doc
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (1997). eGovernment failure and political timescales. iGovernment Briefing No. 8, University of Manchester. Available at www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/wp/igovernment/short/igov_sp08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2008). What is e-government? eGovernment for Development (eGov4Dev). Available at www.egov4dev.org/success/definitions.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. (2011). E-Kompetenzen (E-Competences). In B. Blanke, S. von Bandemer, F. Nullmeier, & G. Wewer (Eds.), Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform (Handbook of administrative reform, 4th ed., pp. 385-407). Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2006). Transparency in a historical perspective. In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance (pp. 3-23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karger, P.; Rüß, O.; & Scheidt, N. vom (2011). E-Government. In B. Blanke, S. von Bandemer, F. Nullmeier, & G. Wewer (Eds.), Handbuch der Verwaltungsreform (Handbook of administrative reform, 4th ed., pp. 186-195).
   Google Scholar
• Wiesbaden: VS. Kirtley, J. E. (2006). Transparency and accountability in a time of terror: The Bush administration's assault on freedom of information. Communication Law and Policy, 11(4), 479-509.
   Google Scholar
• Kreimer, S. F. (1991, November). Sunlight, secrets, and scarlet letters: The tension between privacy and disclosure in constitutional law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 140(1), 15-28.
   Google Scholar
• La Porte, T. M.; Demchak, C. C.; de Jong, M.; & Friis, C. (2000). Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the Web: Empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Paper presented at the International Political Science Association, Quebec. Available at http://74.125.155.132/scholar?q=cache:CyxWw6lUC6EJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,43/
   Google Scholar
• Lenk, K. (2012). The nuts and bolts of administrative action in the information age. In I. Th.M. Snellen & W. van der Donk (Eds.), Public information in an information age: Revisited (pp. 221-235). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liem, S. I. (2007). Constituents of transparency in public administration with reference to empirical findings from Estonia. Ph.D. dissertation, University of St. Gallen, Graduate School of Business Administration, Economics, Law and Social Sciences. Available at http://verdi.unisg.ch/www/edis.nsf/wwwDisplayIdentifier/3350/$FILE/dis3350.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F. B.; Horsley, S.; & Yang, K. (2012). Overcoming negative media coverage: Does government communication matter? Journal of Public Administration Research, 22(3), 597-621.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2000). Vertrauen (Trust). Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius, UTB.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. (2007). Publishing performance results on the Internet: Do stakeholders use the Internet to hold Dutch public service organizations to account? Government Information Quarterly, 24(1), 165-185.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. (2009). Understanding computer-mediated transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(2), 255-269.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. (2003). Managing the hollow state collaboration and contracting. Public Management Review, 5(1), 1-18.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433.
   Google Scholar
• Morillas, P., & Coupal, J. (2009). Governor Schwarzenegger unveils new state contract transparency Web site. All American Patriots www.allmericanpatriots.com/48753530-california-governor-schwarzenegger-targets-waste/
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. (2008). Public sector reform in New Zealand: Issues of public accountability. Public Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 1-32.
   Google Scholar
• Nadou, V. D. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1-24. Available at http://www.ejisdc.org/ojs2/index.php/ejisdc/article/viewFile/110/110/
   Google Scholar
• Navarra, D. D., & Cornford, T. (2004). ICT, innovation and public management: Governance, models & alternatives for e-government infrastructures. In Proceedings from the 12th European Conference on Information Systems. Turku, Finland. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.144.443&rep=rep1&type=pdf/
   Google Scholar
• Northrup, T. A., & Thorson, S. J. (2003). The web of governance and democratic accountability. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Available at http://origin-www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2003/1874/05/187450143b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D. (2004). Transparency and accountability reconsidered. Journal of Financial Crime, 11(3), 292-300.
   Google Scholar
• Petrie, M. (2002). A framework for public sector performance contracting. Available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/15/43514084.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pina, V.; Torres, L.; & Acerete, B. (2007). Are ICTs promoting government accountability? A comparative analysis of e-governance developments in 19 OECD countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18(5), 583-602.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance information for democracy. Evaluation, 12(1), 38-55.
   Google Scholar
• Rabin, J.; Hildreth, W. B.; & Miller, G. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of public administration. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 653-667.
   Google Scholar
• Rutgers University. (2010). Seoul and Prague achieve top rankings in e-government Web portal excellence: Rutgers Global E-Governance Survey ranks Seoul #1. Available at http://news.rutgers.edu/medrel/news-releases/2010/07/seoul-and-prague-ach-20100713/
   Google Scholar
• Savas, E. S. (1977). An empirical study of competition in municipal service delivery. Public Administration Review, 37(6), 717-724.
   Google Scholar
• Schacter, M. (2002). Not a "tool kit": Practitioner's guide to measuring the performance of public programs. Ottawa: Institute on Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2000). Accountability and the regulatory state. Journal of Law and Society, 27(1), 38-60.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, J. A. (2003). Movie day at the Supreme Court or "I know it when I see it": A history of the definition of obscenity. Coollawyer.com. Available at www.coollawyer.com/webfront/pdf/Obscenity%20Article.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Solow, R. M. (1987, July 12). We'd better watch out. New York Times Book Review, p. 36.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (2011, April 11). The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. Comedy Central. Available at www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-april-4-2011/victory-lapse—obama-transparency-award/
   Google Scholar
• Tatum, B. C. (1996). Using performance indexing to measure organizational gains in white collar environments. Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, San Diego, CA. Available at www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA306915&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tawfik-Shukor, A. R.; Klazinga, N. S.; & Arah, O. A. (2007). Comparing health system performance assessment and management approaches in the Netherlands and Ontario, Canada. BMC Health Services Research, 7(44), 1-12. Available at www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6963-7-25.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, F. W. (1911). Scientific management. Available at http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Principles_of_Scientific_Management.html?id=5ek4cYPdndYC/
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006, May/June). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66, 354-369.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. UNDP policy document. Available at http://mirror.undp.org/magnet/policy/
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S. (2011). New Public Management: Restoring the public trust through creating distrust? In M. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to New Public Management (pp. 309-320). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S., & Leeuw, F. L. (2002, March). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267-281.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S. (2007) Police accountability: Current issues and research needs. National Criminal Justice Reference Series, U. S. Department of Justice. Available at www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/218583.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1915/1947). The theory of social and economic organization (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). London: Collier Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Rho, S. Y. (2007): E-government for better performance: Promises, realities, and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(11), 1197-1217.
   Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar, T. (2003). Bridging the gap between citizens and local authorities via e-government. Paper presented at the symposium on 3-government opportunities and challenges, Muscat, Oman, May 10-12. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.122.1497&rep=rep1&type=pdf/
   Google Scholar