Technology Usage and Sales Teams: A Multilevel Analysis of the Antecedents of Usage

References

• Ahearne, Michael, Ronald Jelinek, and Adam Rapp (2005), “Moving Beyond the Direct Effect of SFA Adoption on Salesperson Performance: Training and Support as Key Moderating Factors,” Industrial Marketing Management, 34 (4), 379–388.
   Google Scholar
• Ahearne, Scott B. MacKenzie, Phillip M. Podsakoff, John E. Mathieu, and Son K. Lam (2010), “The Role of Consensus in Team Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (3), 458–469.
   Google Scholar
• Amyx, Douglas, and Bruce L. Alford (2005), “The Effects of Salesperson Need for Achievement and Sales Manager Leader Reward Behavior,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 25, 4 (Fall), 345–359.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Erin, and Thomas S. Robertson (1995), “Inducing Multiline Salespeople to Adopt House Brands,” Journal of Marketing, 59 (2), 16–31.
   Google Scholar
• Band, William, Sharyn Leaver, and Mary Ann Rogan (2007), “Trends 2007: Customer Relationship Management,” Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, Albert (1977), “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191–215.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, Kevin, Steven Brown, Shankar Ganesan, Gary Hunter, Vincent Onyemah, Robert Palmatier, Dominque Rouzies, Rosann Spiro, Harish Sujan, and Barton Weitz (2010), “The Embedded Sales Force: Connecting Buying and Selling Organizations,” Marketing Letters, 21 (3), 239–253.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Stephen P., William L. Cron, and John W. Slocum, Jr. (1998), “Effects of Trait Competitiveness and Perceived Intraorganizational Competition on Salesperson Goal Setting and Performance,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (4), 88–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, Anthony S., and Steve W. Raudenbush (1992), Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Tricia (1998), “Beating the Sales Force Technophobia,” Sales and Marketing Management, 150, 68–72.
   Google Scholar
• Cheema, Amar, and Rajesh Bagchi (2011), “The Effect of Goal Visualization on Goal Pursuit: Implications for Consumers and Managers,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (2), 109–123.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Gilad, and Paul D. Bliese (2002), “The Role of Different Levels of Leadership in Predicting Self- and Collective Efficacy: Evidence for Discontinuity,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (3), 549–556.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, John E. Mathieu, and Paul D. Bliese (2004), “A Framework for Conducting Multilevel Construct Validation,” in Research in Multilevel Issues: Multilevel Issues in Organizational Behavior and Processes, vol. 3, Francis J. Yammarino and Fred Dansereau, eds., Oxford: Elsevier, 273–303.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Bradley L. Kirkman, Ruth Kanfer, Don Allen, and Benson Rosen (2007), “A Multilevel Study of Leadership, Empowerment, and Performance in Teams,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (2), 331–346.
   Google Scholar
• Cichelli, David (2005), “What’s the Buzz All About?” Sales and Marketing Management, 157 (80), 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Susan G., Lei Chang, and Gerald E. Ledford, Jr. (1997), “A Hierarchical Construct of Self-Management Leadership and Its Relationship to Quality of Work Life and Perceived Work Group Effectiveness,” Personnel Psychology, 50 (2), 275–308.
   Google Scholar
• Conger, Jay A., and Rabindra N. Kanungo (1988), “The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice,” Academy of Management Review, 13 (3), 471–82.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Fred D. (1986), “A Technology Acceptance Model for Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results,” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis (1989), “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science, 35 (8), 982–1003.
   Google Scholar
• Deeter-Schmelz, Dawn R., and Rosemary P. Ramsey (2003), “An Investigation of Team Information Processing in Service Teams: Exploring the Link Between Teams and Customers,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (4), 409–424.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, Ad, Ko de Ruyter, and Jos Lemmink (2004), “Antecedents and Consequences of the Service Climate in Boundary-Spanning Self-Managing Service Teams,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (2), 18–35.
   Google Scholar
• Druskat, Vanessa Urch, and Jane V. Wheeler (2003), “Managing from the Boundary: The Effective Leadership of Self-Managing Work Teams,” Academy of Management Journal, 46 (4), 435–457.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, Martin, and Icek Ajzen (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Gatignon, Hubert, and Thomas S. Robertson (1989), “Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects,” Journal of Marketing, 53 (1), 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Gully, Stanley M., Dennis J. Devine, and David J. Whitney (1995), “A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance: Effects of Level of Analysis and Task Interdependence,” Small Group Research, 26 (4), 497–520.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzo, Richard A., Paul R. Yost, Richard J. Campbell, and Gregory P. Shea (1993), “Potency in Groups: Articulating a Construct,” British Journal of Social Psychology, 32 (1), 87–106.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, Sandra, William C. Moncrief, and A. Parasuraman (1989), “An Empirical Investigation of Salespeople’s Performance, Effort and Selling Method During a Sales Contest,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17 (1), 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, Candice R., George M. Zinkhan, Warren French, and Ji Hee Song (2009), “E-Collaborative Networks: A Case Study on the New Role of the Sales Force,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 29, 2 (Spring), 125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Homburg, Christian, Jan Wieseke, and Christina Kuehnl (2010), “Social Influence on Salespeople’s Adoption of Sales Technology: A Multilevel Analysis,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38 (2), 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, Earl D., Jr., Tanya Thelen, Shawn T. Thelen, and Sharon K. Hodge (2005), “Impediments to Sales Force Automation,” Industrial Marketing Management, 34 (4), 313–322.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, Gary K., and William D. Perrault (2007), “Making Sales Technology Effective,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (1), 16–34.
   Google Scholar
• Igbaria, Magid, Saroj Parasuraman, and Jack J. Baroudi (1996), “A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 13 (1), 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, Bernard J., and Ajay K. Kohli (1991), “Supervisory Feedback: Alternative Types and Their Impact on Salespeople’s Performance and Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (2), 190–201.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Eli, James A. Roberts, and Lawrence B. Chonko (2000), “Motivating Sales Entrepreneurs to Change: A Conceptual Framework of Factors Leading to Successful Change Management Initiatives in Sales Organizations,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 8 (2), 37–49.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Steven P. Brown, Andris A. Zoltners, and Barton A. Weitz (2005a), “The Changing Environment of Selling and Sales Management,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 25, 2 (Spring), 105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Andrea L. Dixon, Lawrence B. Chonko, and Joseph P. Cannon (2005b), “Key Accounts and Team Selling: A Review, Framework, and Research Agenda,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 25, 2 (Spring), 181–198.
   Google Scholar
• Khandpur, Navtej, and Jasmine Wevers (1998), Sales Force Automation Using Web Technologies, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, Bradley L., and John E. Mathieu (2005), “The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality,” Journal of Management, 31 (5), 700–718.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, and Benson Rosen (1999), “Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment,” Academy of Management Journal, 42 (1), 58–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, and Benson Rosen, Paul E. Tesluk, and Cristina B. Gibson (2004), “The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction,” Academy of Management Journal, 47 (2), 175–192.
   Google Scholar
• Kouzes, James M., and Barry Z. Posner (1995), The Leadership Challenge: How to Keep Getting Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kraut, Robert E., Ronald E. Rice, Colleen Cool, and Robert S. Fish (1998), “Varieties of Social Influence: The Role of Utility and Norms in the Success of a New Communication Medium,” Organization Science, 9 (4), 437–453.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, Gary P., and Timothy E. Steele (1983), “The Motivational Effects of Participation Versus Goal Setting on Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 26 (3), 406–417.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, Edward E., Susan A. Mohrman, and Gerald E. Ledford (1995), Creating High Performance Organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bon, Joel, and Dwight Merunka (2006), “The Impact of Individual and Managerial Factors on Salespeople’s Contribution to Marketing Intelligence Activities,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23 (4), 395–408.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsley, Dana H., Daniel J. Brass, and James B. Thomas (1995), “Efficacy-Performance Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 645–678.
   Google Scholar
• Lipnack, Jessica, and Jeffrey Stamps (2000), Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, Edwin A., Karyll N. Shaw, Lise M. Saari, and Gary P. Latham (1981), “Goal Setting and Task Performance,” Psychological Bulletin, 90 (1), 125–152.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, John M., Michael Ahearne, and Scott R. Taylor (2007), “A Longitudinal Cross-Level Model of Leader and Salesperson Influences on Sales Force Technology Use and Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (2), 528–537.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, Lucy L. Gilson, and Thomas M. Ruddy (2006), “Empowerment and Team Effectiveness: An Empirical Test of an Integrated Model,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (1), 97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, M. Travis Maynard, Tammy Rapp, and Lucy Gilson (2008), “Team Effectiveness 1997–2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse into the Future,” Journal of Management, 34 (3), 410–476.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Mark, and Gary Armstrong (1994), “Selling Teams: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 14, 1 (Winter), 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Michael G., and Viswanath Venkatesh (2000), “Age Differences in Technology Adoption Decisions: Implications for a Changing Work Force,” Personnel Psychology, 53 (2), 375–403.
   Google Scholar
• Moutot, Jean-Michael, and Ganael Bascoul (2008), “Effects of Sales Force Automation Use on Sales Force Activities and Customer Relationship Management Processes,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 28 (2), 167–184.
   Google Scholar
• Musalem, Andres, and Yogesh V. Joshi (2009), “How Much Should You Invest in Each Customer Relationship? A Competitive Strategic Approach,” Marketing Science, 28 (3), 555–565.
   Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan, Ramon, Patrick J. Kaufmann, and Benn R. Konsynski (1992), “Adoption Correlates and Share Effects of Electronic Data Interchange Systems in Marketing Channels,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (2), 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Palmatier, Robert W., Cheryl Burke Jarvis, Jennifer R. Bechkoff, and Frank R. Kardes (2009), “The Role of Customer Gratitude in Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (5), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, A., and Dhruv Grewal (2000), “Serving Customers and Consumers Effectively in the Twenty-First Century: A Conceptual Framework and Overview,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (1), 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy, M., and R.S. Sohli (1997), “Salesforce Automation and the Adoption of Technological Innovations by Salespeople: Theory and Implications,” Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 12 (3–4), 196–208.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, Philip M., Scott B. MacKenzie, and Michael Ahearne (1997), “Moderating Effects of Goal Acceptance on the Relationship Between Group Cohesiveness and Productivity,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (6), 974–983.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, Philip M., Jeong-Yeon Lee, and Nathan P. Podsakoff (2003), “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, Adam, Michael Ahearne, John Mathieu, and Tammy Rapp (2010), “Managing Sales Teams in a Virtual Environment,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27 (3), 213–224.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, Adam, Michael Ahearne, John Mathieu, and Niels Schillewaert (2006), “The Impact of Knowledge and Empowerment on Working Smart and Working Hard: The Moderating Role of Experience,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23 (3), 279–293.
   Google Scholar
• Sarin, Shikhar, and Vijay Mahajan (2001), “The Effect of Reward Structures on the Performance of Cross-Functional Product Development Teams,” Journal of Marketing, 65 (2), 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Schillewaert, Niels, Michael J. Ahearne, Ruud T. Frambach, and Rudy K. Moenaert (2005), “The Adoption of Information Technology in the Sales Force,” Industrial Marketing Management, 34 (4), 323–336.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, Gregory P., and Richard A. Guzzo (1987), “Group Effectiveness: What Really Matters?” Sloan Management Review, 28 (3), 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Jagdip, and Gary K. Rhoads (1991), “Boundary Role Ambiguity in Marketing-Oriented Positions: A Multidimensional, Multifaceted Operationalization,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (3), 328–338.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, Tom A.B., and Roel J. Bosker (1996), Introduction to Multilevel Analysis, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, Raji, Gary L. Lilien, and Arvind Rangaswami (2002), “The Role of Technological Opportunism in the Adoption of Radical Technologies by Firms: An Application to E-Business,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (3), 47–60.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Kenneth W., and Walter G. Tymon (1994), “Does Empowerment Always Work? Understanding the Role of Intrinsic Motivation and Personal Interpretation,” Journal of Management Systems, 6 (2), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Ronald L., Christopher A. Higgins, and Jane M. Howell (1991), “Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization,” MIS Quarterly, 15 (1), 125–143.
   Google Scholar
• van Ittersum, Koert, and Fred M. Feinberg (2010), “Cumulative Timed Intent: A New Predictive Tool for Technology Adoption,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (5), 808–822.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath, and Fred D. Davis (2000), “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science, 46 (2), 186–204.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis (2003), “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425–478.
   Google Scholar
• Weitz, Barton A., and Kevin D. Bradford (1999), “Personal Selling and Sales Management: A Relationship Marketing Perspective,” Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 27 (2), 241–254.
   Google Scholar
• Westland, J. Christopher, and Theordore H.K. Clark (2000), Global Electronic Commerce: Theory and Case Studies, Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar