Arthropod community similarity in clonal stands of aspen: A test of the genetic similarity rule

Literature cited

• Bailey, J. K. & T. G. Whitham, 2002. Interactions among fire, aspen, and elk affect insect diversity: Reversal of a community response. Ecology, 83: 1701–1712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. K. & T. G. Whitham, 2003. Interactions among elk, aspen, galling sawflies, and insectivorous birds. Oikos, 101: 127–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. K., J. A. Schweitzer, B. J. Rehill, D. J. Irschick, T. G. Whitham & R. L. Lindroth, 2007. Rapid shifts in the chemical composition of aspen forests: An introduced herbivore as an agent of natural selection. Biological Invasions, 9: 715–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangert, R. K. & T. G. Whitham, 2007. Genetic assembly rules and community phenotypes. Evolutionary Ecology, 21: 549–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangert, R. K., R. J. Turek, B. J. Rehill, G. M. Wimp, J. A. Schweitzer, G. J. Allan, J. K. Bailey, G. D. Martinsen & T. G. Whitham, 2006a. A genetic similarity rule determines arthropod community structure. Molecular Ecology, 15: 1379–1391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangert, R. K., G. J. Allan, R. J. Turek, G. M. Wimp, N. Meneses, G. D. Martinsen, P. Keim & T. G. Whitham, 2006b. From genes to geography: A genetic similarity rule for arthropod community structure at multiple geographic scales. Molecular Ecology, 15: 4215–4228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangert, R. K., E. V. Lonsdorf, G. M. Wimp, S. M. Shuster, D. Fischer, J. A. Schweitzer, G. J. Allan, J. K. Bailey & T. G. Whitham, 2008. Genetic structure of a foundation species: Scaling community phenotypes from the individual to the region. Heredity, 100: 121–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. C., J. M. O'Reilly-Wapstra, D. W. De Little, G. J. Jordan, D. A. Steane, J. R. Humphreys, J. K. Bailey, T. G. Whitham & B. M. Potts, 2009. A geographic mosaic of genetic variation within a foundation tree species and its communitylevel consequences. Ecology, 90: 1762–1772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartos, D. L., 2001. Landscape dynamics of aspen and conifer forests. Pages 5–13 in W. D. Shepperd, D. Binkley, D. L. Bartos, T. J. Stohlgren & L. G. Eskew (eds). Proceedings of the Symposium Sustaining Aspen in Western Landscapes. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station publication RMRS-P-18, Fort Collins, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, J. R. & J. T. Curtis, 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs, 27: 326–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, R. & L. Jin, 1993. Determination of relatedness between individuals using DNA fingerprinting. Human Biology, 65: 875–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, A., R. K. Colwell, C.-W. Lin & N. J. Gotelli, 2009. Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators. Ecology, 90: 1125–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheliak, W. M. & B. P. Dancik, 1982. Genetic diversity of natural populations of a clone-forming tree Populus tremuloides. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology, 24: 611–616.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. Y., P. V Krestov & K. Klinka, 2002. Trembling aspen site index in relation to environmental measures of site quality at two spatial scales. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32: 112–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, C. T., 2003. Genetic variation in rare and common plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34: 213–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, C. T., 2005. Allelic and population variation of microsatellite loci in aspen (Populus tremuloides). New Phytologist, 167: 155–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell, R. K. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7.5. Online [URL] http://purl.oclc.org/estimates (Accessed on 16 October 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Di Orio, A. P., R. Callas & R. J. Schaefer, 2005. Forty-eight year decline and fragmentation of aspen (Populus tremuloides) in the South Warner Mountains of California. Forest Ecology and Management, 206: 307–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, J. R. & R. L. Lindroth, 2008. Effects of variable phytochemistry and budbreak phenology on defoliation of aspen during a forest tent caterpillar outbreak. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 10: 399–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, J. R., M. T. Stevens, H. R. Barnhill & R. L. Lindroth, 2006. Age-related shifts in leaf chemistry of clonal aspen (Populus tremuloides). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 32: 1415–1429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dungey, H. S., B. M. Potts, T. G. Whitham & H. F. Li, 2000. Plant genetics affects arthropod community richness and composition: Evidence from a synthetic eucalypt hybrid population. Evolution, 54: 1938–1946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, C. G., K. E. Samis & S. C. Lougheed, 2008. Genetic variation across species' geographical ranges: The central—marginal hypothesis and beyond. Molecular Ecology, 17: 1170–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, A. M., M. S. Bank, B. D. Clinton, E. A. Colburn, K. Elliott, C. R. Ford, D. R. Foster, B. D. Kloeppel, J. D. Knoepp, G. M. Lovett, J. Mohan, D. A. Orwig, N. L. Rodenhouse, W. V. Sobczak, K. A. Stinson, J. K. Stone, C. M. Swan, J. Thompson, B. V. Holle & J. R. Webster, 2005. Loss of foundation species: Consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9: 479–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Excoffier, L., P. E. Smouse & J. M. Quattro, 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131: 479–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyre, M. D., S. P. Rushton, M. L. Luff & M. G. Telfer, 2005. Investigating the relationships between the distribution of British ground beetle species (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and temperature, precipitation and altitude. Journal of Biogeography, 32: 973–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer, D. S., 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, London.
   Google Scholar
• Floate, K. D. & T. G. Whitham, 1995. Insects as traits in plant systematics: Their use in discriminating between hybrid cotton-woods. Canadian Journal of Botany, 73: 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. & D. A. Rowarth, 1996. Insects and temperature: A general theory. Canadian Entomologist, 128: 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitzendanner, M. A. & P. S. Soltis, 2000. Patterns of genetic variation in rare and widespread plant congeners. American Journal of Botany, 87: 783–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, J. B. & B. H. Pugesek, 1998. On the use of path analysis and related procedures for the investigation of ecological problems. American Naturalist, 152: 151–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman, A. E. & L. G. Butler, 1980. Condensed tannin purification and characterization of tannin-associated protein. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 28: 947–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamrick, J. L. & M. J. W. Godt, 1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species. Pages 43–63 in A. D. H. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler & B. S. Weir (eds). Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Hemming, J. D. C. & R. L. Lindroth, 1995. Intraspecific variation in aspen phytochemistry: Effects on performance of gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia, 103: 79–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemming, J. D. C. & R. L. Lindroth, 1999. Effects of light and nutrient availability on aspen: Growth, phytochemistry, and insect performance. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25: 1687–1714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, S.-Y. & R. L. Lindroth, 1997. Clonal variation in foliar chemistry of aspen: Effects on gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia, 111: 99–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, S.-Y. & R. L. Lindroth, 1998. Consequences of clonal variation in aspen phytochemistry for late season folivores. Écoscience, 5: 508–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarne, P. & P. J. L. Lagoda, 1996. Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11: 424–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelinski, D. E. & W. M. Cheliak, 1992. Genetic diversity and spatial subdivision of Populus tremuloides (Salicaceae) in a heterogeneous landscape. American Journal of Botany, 79: 728–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, L., 2007. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology, 88: 2427–2439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantvilas, G. & P. R. Minchin, 1989. An analysis of epiphytic lichen communities in Tasmanian cool temperate rainforest. Vegetatio, 84: 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Karron, J. D., 1987. A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism and self-compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. Evolutionary Ecology, 1: 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lande, R., 1982. A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. Ecology, 63: 607–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leduc, A., P. Drapeau, Y. Bergeron & P. Legendre, 1992. Study of spatial components of forest cover using partial Mantel tests and path analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science 3: 69–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre, P. & L. Legendre, 1998. Numerical Ecology. 2nd Edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Lindroth, R. L., 2001. Adaptations of quaking aspen for defense against damage by herbivores and related environmental agents. Pages. 273–284 in W. D. Shepperd, D. Binkley, D. L. Bartos, T. J. Stohlgren & L. G. Eskew (eds). Proceedings of the Symposium Sustaining Aspen in Western Landscapes. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station publication RMRS-P-18, Fort Collins, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Lindroth, L. R., M. T. S. Hsia & J. M. Scriber, 1987. Characterization of phenolic glycosides from quaking aspen. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 15: 677–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindroth, R. L. & S. Y. Hwang, 1996a. Diversity, redundancy, and multiplicity in chemical defense systems of aspen. Pages 25–56 in J. T. Romeo, J. A. Saunders & P. Barbosa (eds). Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Phytochemical Society of North America on Phytochemical Diversity and Redundancy in Ecological Interactions (Recent Advances in Phytochemistry). Vol. 30. Plenum Press, New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lindroth, R. L. & S. Y. Hwang, 1996b. Clonal variation in foliar chemistry of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 24: 357–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindroth, R. L., K. K. Kinney & C. L. Platz, 1993. Responses of deciduous trees to elevated atmospheric CO2: Productivity, phytochemistry, and insect performance. Ecology, 74: 763–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madritch, M. D., S. G. Greene & R. L. Lindroth, 2009. Genetic mosaics of ecosystem functioning across aspen-dominated landscapes. Oecologia, 160: 119–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, G. D., K. D. Floate, A. M. Waltz, G. M. Wimp & T. G. Whitham, 2000. Positive interactions between leaf-gallers and other arthropods enhance biodiversity on hybrid cottonwoods. Oecologia, 123: 82–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune, B. & J. B. Grace, 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MJM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Minchin, P. R., 1987a. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio, 69: 89–107.
   Google Scholar
• Minchin, P. R., 1987b. Simulation of multidimensional community patterns: Towards a comprehensive model. Vegetatio, 71: 145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Minchin, P. R., 1999. DECODA: Database for Ecological Community Data. Version 3.00 b06. Australian National University, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Mitton, J. B. & M. C. Grant, 1996. Genetic variation and the natural history of quaking aspen. BioScience, 46: 75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Mock, K. E., C. A. Rowe, M. B. Hooten, J. Dewoody & V. D. Hipkins, 2008. Clonal dynamics in western North American aspen (Populus tremuloides). Molecular Ecology, 17: 4827–4844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, M. D., 2003. Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos, 100: 403–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namroud, M. C., A. Leduc, F. Tremblay & Y. Bergeron, 2006. Simulations of clonal species genotypic diversity: Trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) as a case study. Conservation Genetics, 7: 415–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols-Orians, C. M., R. S. Fritz & T. P. Clausen, 1993. The genetic basis for variation in the concentration of phenolic glycosides in Salix sericea: Clonal variation and sex-based differences. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 21: 535–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osier, L. T., S. Y. Hwang & R. L. Lindroth, 2000. Effects of phytochemical variation in quaking aspen Populus tremuloides clones on gypsy moth Lymantria dispar performance in the field and laboratory. Ecological Entomology, 25: 197–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palo, R. T., 1984. Distribution of birch (Betula spp.), willow (Salix spp.), and poplar (Populus spp.) secondary metabolites and their potential role as chemical defense against herbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 10: 499–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, L. J., L. N. Hrstich & B. G. Chan, 1986. The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry, 25: 223–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, P. W., 1984. Insect Ecology. 2nd Edition. Wiley InterScience, New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Price, P. W., G. W. Fernandes & G. L. Waring, 1987. Adaptive nature of insect galls. Environmental Entomology, 16: 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRISM Group. PRISM Climate Group webpage. Oregon State University. Online [URL] http://prism.oregonstate.edu/ (Accessed on 22 January 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. D. & L. Wu, 2001. Quaking aspen reproduce from seed after wildfire in the mountains of Southeastern Arizona. Pages 369–376 in W. D. Shepperd, D. Binkley, D. L. Bartos, T. J. Stohlgren & L. G. Eskew (eds). Proceedings of the Symposium Sustaining Aspen in Western Landscapes. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station publication RMRS-P-18, Fort Collins, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Online [URL] http://www.R-project.org (Accessed on 18 April 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeldt, G. E., D. E. Ferguson & N. L. Crookston, 2009. Aspen, climate, and sudden decline in western USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 258: 2353–2364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif, J. C., A. E. Melchinger & M. Frisch, 2005. Genetical and mathematical properties of similarity and dissimilarity coefficients applied in plant breeding and seed bank management. Crop Science, 45: 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolf, J. M., 2001. Aspen fencing in Northern Arizona: A 15-year perspective. Pages 273–284 in W. D. Shepperd, D. Binkley, D. L. Bartos, T. J. Stohlgren & L. G. Eskew (eds). Proceedings of the Symposium Sustaining Aspen in Western Landscapes. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station publication RMRS-P-18, Fort Collins, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, S., E. P. McDonald & R. L. Lindroth, 1997. Atmospheric CO2 and soil water availability: Consequences for tree-insect interactions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27: 1281–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, B., 2001. Cause and Correlation in Biology: A Users Guide to Path Analysis, Structural Equations and Causal Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Shuster, S. M., E. V. Lonsdorf, G. M. Wimp, J. K. Bailey & T. G. Whitham, 2006. Community heritability measures the evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects on community structure. Evolution, 60: 991–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smouse, P. E., J. C. Long & R. R. Sokal, 1986. Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Systematic Zoology, 35: 627–632.
   Google Scholar
• Stuever, M. C. & J. S. Hayden, 1996. Plant associations (habitat types) of the forests and woodlands of Arizona and New Mexico. Final report submitted to US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southwestern Region. Contract R3–95–27. Seldom Seen Expeditions, Placitas, New Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. N., 2005. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• USDA NRCS. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Online [URL] http://plants.usda.gov (Accessed on 28 August 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, A. M. & T. G. Whitham, 1997. Plant development affects arthropod community structure: Opposing impacts of species removal. Ecology, 78: 2133–2144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitham, T. G., W. P. Young, G. D. Martinsen, C. A. Gehring, J. A. Schweitzer, S. M. Shuster, G. M. Wimp, D. G. Fischer, J. K. Bailey, R. L. Lindroth, S. Woolbright & C. R. Kuske, 2003. Community and ecosystem genetics: A consequence of the extended phenotype. Ecology, 84: 559–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitham, T. G., J. K. Bailey, J. A. Schweitzer, S. M. Shuster, R. K. Bangert, C. J. LeRoy, E. V. Lonsdorf, G. J. Allan, S. P. DiFazio, B. M. Potts, D. G. Fischer, C. A. Gehring, R. L. Lindroth, J. C. Marks, S. C. Hart, G. M. Wimp & S. C. Wooley, 2006. A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: From genes to ecosystems. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7: 510–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimp, G. M., W. P. Young, S. A. Woolbright, G. D. Martinsen, P. Keim & T. G. Whitham, 2004. Conserving plant genetic diversity for dependent animal communities. Ecology Letters, 7: 776–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimp, G. M., G. D. Martinsen, K. D. Floate, R. K. Bangert & T. G. Whitham, 2005. Plant genetic determinants of arthropod community structure and diversity. Evolution, 59: 61–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimp, G. M., S. Wooley, R. K. Bangert, W. P. Young, G. D. Martinsen, P. Keim, R. L. Lindroth & T. G. Whitham, 2007. Plant genetics predicts intra-annual variation in phytochemistry and arthropod community structure. Molecular Ecology, 16: 5057–5069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S., 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16: 97–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wyman, J., A. Bruneau & M.-F. Tremblay, 2003. Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity in four populations of Populus tremuloides in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Botany, 81: 360–367.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, F. C., D. K. X. Chong & R. C. Yang, 1995. RAPD variation within and among natural populations of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) from Alberta. Journal of Heredity, 86: 454–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, F. C., R-C. Yang, B. J. T. Boyle, Z.-H. Ye, & J. X. Mao, 1997. POPGENE, the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Yukawa, J., 2000. Synchronization of gallers with host plant phenology. Population Ecology, 45: 105–113.
   Google Scholar