60
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Long term aboveground litterfall production in boreal jack pine (Pinus banksiana) and black spruce (Picea mariana) stands along the Boreal Forest Transect Case Study in western central Canada

&
Pages 301-314 | Received 03 Jun 2014, Accepted 23 Apr 2015, Published online: 03 Dec 2015

Literature cited

  • Adair, E. D., W. J. Parton, S. Del, L. S. Whendee, M. E. Harmon, S. A. Hall, I. C. Burkes & S. C. Hart, 2008. Simple three pool model accurately describes patterns of long-term litter decomposition in diverse climates. Global Change Biology, 14: 2636–2660.
  • Álvarez, J. A., P. E. Villagra, B. E. Rossi & E. M. Cesca, 2009. Spatial and temporal litterfall heterogeneity generated by woody species in the Central Monte desert. Plant Ecology, 205: 295–303. DOI: 10.1007/s11258-009-9618-z
  • Berg, B. A., A. Albrektson, M. P, Berg, J. Cortina, M. B. Johansson, A. Gallardo, M. Madeira, J. Pausas, W. Kratz, R. Vallego & C. McClaugherty, 1999. Amounts of litter fall in some pine forests in a European transect, in particular Scots pine. Annals of Forest Science, 56:625–639.
  • Berg, B. & V. Meentemeyer, 2001. Litterfall in some European coniferous forests as dependent on climate: A synthesis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31: 292–301.
  • Bernier, P., P. J. Hanson & P. S. Curtis, 2008. Measuring litterfall and branchfall in Hoover, C. M. (ed.). Field Measurements for Forest Carbon Monitoring. Springer Science + Business Media B. V, NY, pp. 91–101.
  • Bhatti, J. S., M. J. Apps & H. Jiang, 2002. Influence of nutrients, disturbances and site conditions on carbon stocks along a boreal forest transect in central Canada. Plant and Soil, 242: 1–14.
  • Bray, J. R. & E. Gorham. 1964. Litter production in forests of the world. Advances in Ecological Research, 2: 101–157.
  • Cromer, R. N., D. Tompkins, N. J. Barr, E. R. Williams & H. T. L. Stewart, 1984. Litter-fall in a Pinus radiata forest: The effect of irrigation and fertilizer treatments. Journal of Applied Ecology, 21: 313–326.
  • Dix, R. I. & J. M. A. Swan, 1971. The role of disturbance and succession in the upland forest at Candle Lake, Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Botany, 49: 657–676.
  • Edmonds. R. L. & G. Murray, 2002. Overstory litter inputs and nutrient returns in an oldgrowth temperate forest ecosystem, Olympic National Park, Washington. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32: 742–750.
  • Foster, N. W., 1974. Annual macronutrient transfer from Pinus banksiana Lamb. forest to soil. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 4: 470–476.
  • Foster, N. W. & L. K. Morrison, 1976. Distribution and cycling of nutrients in a natural Pinus banksiana ecosystem. Ecology, 57: 110–120.
  • Fyles, I. W., G. H. La Roi & R. A. Ellis, 1986. Litter production in Pinus banksiana dominated stands in northern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 16: 772–777.
  • Gower, S. T., A. Hunter, J. G. Vogel & J. M. Norman, 2000. Nutrient dynamics of the southern and northern BOREAS boreal forests. Écoscience: 7: 481–490.
  • Halliwell, D. H. & M. J. Apps, 1997. BOReal Ecosystem- Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) biometry and auxiliary sites:overstorey and understorey data. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta.
  • Hansen, K., L. Vesterdal, I. K. Schmidt, P. Gundersen, L. Sevel, A. Basturp-Birk, L. B. Pedersen & J. Bille-Hansen, 2009. Litterfall and nutrient return in five tree species in a common garden experiment. Forest Ecology and Management, 257: 2133–2144.
  • Hennessey, T. C., P. M. Dougherty, B. M. Cregg & R. F. Wittwer, 1992. Annual variation in needle fall of a loblolly pine stand in relation to climate and stand density. Forest Ecology and Management, 51: 329–338.
  • Hogg, E. H., 1994. Climate and the southern limit of the western Canadian boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 24: 1835–1845.
  • Huebschmann, M. M., T. B. Lynch & R. F. Wittwer, 1999. Needle litterfall prediction models for even-aged natural short-leaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 117: 179–186.
  • Killingbeck, K. T., 1996. Nutrients in senesced leaves: Keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology, 77: 1716–1727. DOI: 10.2307/2265777.
  • Kimmins, J. P., 1987. Forest Ecology. Macmillan, New York, New York.
  • Körner, C., 2003. Alpine Plant Life: Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems. 2nd Edition. Springer, Berlin.
  • Kouki, J. & T. Hokkanen, 1992. Long-term needle litterfall of a Scots pine Pinus sylvestris stand: Relation to temperature factors. Oecologia, 89: 176–181.
  • Kurz, C., M. M. Coûteaux & J. M. Thiéry, 2000. Residence time and decomposition rate of Pinus pinaster needles in the forest floor from direct field measurements under a Mediterranean climate. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 32: 1197–1206.
  • Lambert, M. C., C. H. Ung & F. Raulier, 2005. Canadian national tree aboveground biomass equations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35: 1996–2018. DOI:10.1139/X05-112.
  • Lauriault, J., 1989. Identification Guide to the Trees of Canada. Fitzhenry and Whiteside, Markham, Ontario.
  • Lehtonen, A., M. Lindholm, T. Hokkanen, H. Salminen, & R. Jalkanen. 2008. Testing dependence between growth and needle litterfall in Scots pine—a case study in northern Finland. Tree Physiology, 28: 1741–1749.
  • Lehtonen, A., R. Sievänen, A. Mäkelä, R. Mäkipää, K. T. Korhonen & T. Hokkanen, 2004. Potential litterfall of Scots pine branches in southern Finland. Ecological Modelling, 180: 305–315. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.04.024.
  • Li, Z., Kurz, W.A., Apps, M. J., Beukema, S. J., 2003. Belowground biomass dynamics in the carbon budget model of the Canadian forest sector: recent improvements and implications for the estimation of NPP and NEP. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33:126–136.
  • Liu, C., C. J. Westman, B. Berg, W. Kutsch, G. Z. Wang, R. Man & H. Ilvesniemi, 2004. Variation in litterfall—climate relationships between coniferous and broadleaf forests in Eurasia. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 13: 105–114.
  • Martinez-Alonso, C., F. Valladares, J. J. Camarero, M. L. Arias, M. Serrano & J. A. Rodriguez, 2007. The uncoupling of secondary growth, cone and litter production by intradecadal climatic variability in a mediterranean Scots pine forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 253: 19–29.
  • Matthews, E., 1997. Global litter production, pools, and turnover times: Estimates from measurement data and regression models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102: 18771–18800.
  • Malhi, Y., D. D. Baldocchi & P. G. Jarvis, 1999. The carbon balance of tropical, temperate and boreal forests. Plant, Cell and Environment, 22: 715–740.
  • McKenney, D. W., J. H. Pedlara, P. Papadopola & M. F. Hutchinson, 2006. The development of 1901–2000 historical monthly climate models for Canada and the United States. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 138: 69–81.
  • Meentemeyer, V., E. O. Box & R. Thompson, 1982. World patterns and amounts of terrestrial plant litter production. BioScience, 32: 125–128.
  • Moroni, M. T. & X. Zhu, 2012. Litter-fall and decomposition in harvested and un-harvested boreal forests. Forestry Chronicle, 88: 613–62.
  • Nakane, K., T. Kohno, T. Horikoshi & T. Nakatsubo, 1997. Soil carbon cycling at a black spruce (Picea mariana) forest stand in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Geophysical Research, 102: 28785–28793.
  • Pausas, J. G., 1997. Litter fall and litter decomposition in Pinus sylvestris forest of the eastern Pyrenees. Journal of Vegetation Science, 8: 643–650.
  • Pérez-Suárez, M., J. T. Arredondo-Moreno, E. Huber-Sannwald & J. J. Vargas-Hernández, 2009. Production and quality of senesced and green litterfall in a pine—oak forest in central-northwest Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management, 258: 1307–1315. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.031.
  • Peterson, F. S., J. Sexton & K. Lajtha, 2013. Scaling litter fall in complex terrain: A study from the western Cascades Range, Oregon. Forest Ecology and Management, 306: 118–127.
  • Portillo-Estrada, M., J. Korhonen, M. Pihlatie, J. Pumpanen, A. Frumau, L. Morillas, T. Tosens & U. Niinemets, 2013. Inter- and in traannual variations in canopy fine litterfall and carbon and nitrogen inputs to the forest floor in two European coniferous forests. Annals of Forest Science, 70: 369–379. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-013-0273-0
  • Preston, C. M., J. S. Bhatti, L. B. Flanagan & C. Norris, 2006. Stocks, chemistry, and sensitivity to climate change of dead organic matter along the Canadian boreal forest transect case study. Climate Change, 74: 223–251.
  • Price, D. T. & M. J. Apps, 1995. The boreal forest transect case study: global change effects on ecosystem processes and carbon dynamics in boreal Canada. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 82: 203–214.
  • Price, D. T., R. I. Alfaro, K. J. Brown, M. D. Flannigan, R. A. Fleming, E. H. Hogg, M. P. Girardin, T. Lakusta, M. Johnston, J. Pedlar, D. W. McKenney, T. Stratton, R. Sturrock, I. Thompson, J. A. Trofymow & L. A. Venier, 2013. Anticipating the consequences of climate change for Canada's boreal forest ecosystems. Environmental Reviews, 21: 322–365. DOI:10.1139/er-2013-0042.
  • Roig, S., M. del Río, I. Cañellas & G. Montero, 2005. Litter fall in Mediterranean Pinus pinaster Ait. stands under different thinning regimes. Forest Ecology and Management, 206: 179–190.
  • Rowe, J. S., 1972. Forest regions of Canada. Canadian Forest Service, Department of Fisheries and the Environment, Ottawa, Ontario.
  • Singh, T. 1982. Biomass equations for ten major tree species of the prairie provinces. Environment Canada, Canadian Forestry Service, Northern Forest Research Centre, Edmonton, AB. Inf. Rep. NORX- 242.
  • Starr, M, A. Saarsalmi, T. Hokkanen, P. Merila & H. S. Helmisaari, 2005. Models of litterfall production for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Finland using stand, site and climate factors. Forest Ecology and Management, 205: 215–225.
  • Stewart, R. E., D. Bachand, R. R. Dunkley, A. C. Giles, B. Lawson, L. Legal, S. T. Miller, B. P. Murphy, M. N. Parker, B. J. Paruk & M. K. Yau, 1995. Winter storms over Canada. Atmosphere-Ocean, 33: 223–247. DOI: 10.1080/07055900.1995.9649533
  • Sullivan, J. H., B. D. Bovard & E. M. Middleton, 1997. Variability in leaf-level CO2 and water fluxes in Pinus bank-siana and Picea mariana in Saskatchewan. Tree Physiology, 17: 553–561.
  • Tóth, J. A., K. Lajtha, Z. Kotroczó, Z. Krakomperger, B. Caldwell, R. Bowden & M. Papp, 2007. The effect of climate change on soil organic matter decomposition. Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica, 3: 75–85.
  • Trofymow, J. A., H. J. Barclay, & K. M. McCullough, 1991. Annual rates and elemental concentrations of litterfall in thinned and fertilized Douglas-fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21: 1601–1615.
  • Ukonmaanaho, L., P. Merilä, P. Nöjd & T. M. Nieminen, 2008. Litterfall production and nutrient return to the forest floor in Scots pine and Norway spruce stands in Finland. Boreal Environment Research, 13: 67–91.
  • Vogt, K. A., C. C. Grier, & D. J. Vogt, 1986. Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above- and belowground detritus of world forests. Advances in Ecological Research, 15: 303–377.
  • Vose, J. M. & H. L. Allen, 1991. Quantity and timing of needle fall in N and P fertilized loblolly pine stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 41: 205–219.
  • Wirth, C., E. Schulze, V. Kusznetova, I., Milyunoka, G. Hardes, M. Siry, B. Schulze & N. N. Vygodskaya, 2002. Comparing the influence of site quality, stand age, fire and climate on aboveground tree production in Siberian Scots pine forests. Tree Physiology, 22: 537–552.
  • Yang, Y. S., J. F. Guo, G. S. Chen, J. S. Xie, R. Gao, Z. Li & Z. Jin, 2005. Litter production, seasonal pattern and nutrient return in seven natural forests compared with a plantation in southern China. Forestry, 78: 403–415. DOI:10.1093/forestry/
  • Yu, Z., M. J. Apps & J. S. Bhatti, 2002. Implications of floristic and environmental variation for carbon cycle dynamics in boreal forest ecosystems of central Canada. Journal of Vegetation Science, 13: 327–340.
  • Zhang, H., W. Yuan, W. Dong & S. Liu, 2014. Seasonal patterns of litterfall in forest ecosystem worldwide. Ecological Complexity, 20: 240–247. DOI:10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.01.003

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.