Evolutionary and ecological influences of plant invader success in the flora of OntarioFootnote

1 Associate Editor: Johan Ehrlén.

Literature cited

• Anderson, U. V., 1995. Comparison of dispersal strategies of alien and native species in the Danish flora. Pages 61–70 in P. Pyšek, K. Prach, M. Rejmánek & M. Wade (eds.). Plant Invasions: General Aspects and Special Problems. Academic Publishing, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, H. G., 1965. Characteristics and mode of origin of weeds. Pages 147–168 in H. G. Baker & G. L. Stebbins (eds.). The Genetics of Colonizing Species. Academic Press, New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, H. G., 1986. Patterns of plant invasion in North America. Pages 44–57 in H. A. Mooney & J. A. Drake (eds.). Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cadotte, M. W. & J. Lovett-Doust, 2001. Ecological and taxonomic differences between native and introduced plants of southwestern Ontario. Écoscience, 8: 230–238.
   Google Scholar
• Cadotte, M. W., B. R. Murray & J. Lovett-Doust, 2006. Ecological underpinnings of biological invasions: Using regional species inventories to analyse patterns of invasions. Biological Invasions, 8: 809–821.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, S. A., J. A. Figueroa, M. Muñoz-Schick & F. M. Laksic, 2005. Minimum residence time, biogeographical origin, and life cycle as determinants of the geographical extent of naturalised plants in continental Chile. Diversity and Distributions, 11: 183–191.
   Google Scholar
• Chazdon, R. L., S. Careaga, C. O. Webb & O. Vargas, 2003. Community and phylogenetic structure of reproductive traits of woody species in wet tropical forests. Ecological Monographs, 73: 331–348.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, M. J., P. H. Harvey & A. Purvis, 1996. Comparative ecology of the native and alien floras of the British Isles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 351: 1251–1259.
   Google Scholar
• Daehler, C. C., 1998. The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: Ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds. Biological Conservation, 84: 167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, J. A., H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmánek & M. Williamson (eds.), 1989. Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. Wiley, Chichester.
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J., 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist, 125: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, H. A., 1952. The New Britton and Brown Illustrated Flora of the Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. Three volumes. Hafner Press, New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, B. J., A. J. McAllister & L. Fahrig, 1999. Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Conservation Biology, 13: 422–426.
   Google Scholar
• Grafen, A., 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 326: 119–157.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. A., B. R. Murray, M. W. Cadotte, G. C. Hose, A. C. Baker, C. J. Harris & D. Licari, 2005. Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at multiple spatial scales. Ecology Letters, 8: 1066-1094.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, P. H. & M. D. Pagel, 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Inderjit, M. W. Cadotte & R. I. Colautti, 2005. The ecology of biological invasions: Past, present and future. Pages 19–43 in Inderjit (ed.). Invasive Plants: Ecological and Agricultural Aspects. Birkhauser-Verlag AG, Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Kolar, C. S. & D. M. Lodge, 2001. Progress in invasion biology: Predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 16: 199–204.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, J. L. & M. L. McKinney, 2001. Biotic Homogenization. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout & F. Bazzaz, 2000. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications, 19: 689–710.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. E. & A. G. Power, 2003. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature, 421: 625–627.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC), 2005. List of Ontario plant species. [Online] URL: http://nhic.mnr.gov.on.ca/MNR/nhic/species/species_list.cfm [April 2005].
   Google Scholar
• Prinzing, A., W. Durka, S. Klotz & R. Brandl, 2002. Which species become aliens? Evolutionary Ecology Research, 4: 385–405.
   Google Scholar
• Pyšek, P., 1997. Clonality and plant invasions: Can a trait make a difference? Pages 405–427 in H. de Kroon & J. van Groenendael (eds.). The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Pyšek, P., 1998. Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos, 82: 282–294.
   Google Scholar
• Pyšek, P., K. Prach & P. Šmilauer, 1995. Relating invasion success to plant traits: An analysis of the Czech alien flora. Pages 39–60 in P. Pyšek, K. Prach, M. Rejmánek & M. Wade (eds.). Plant Invasions: General Aspects and Special Problems. Academic Publishing, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Pyšek, P., J. Sadlo, B. Mandak & V. Jarosil, 2003. Czech alien flora and the historical pattern of its formation: What came first to Central Europe? Oecologia, 135: 122–130.
   Google Scholar
• Reichard, S. H. & C. W. Hamilton, 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conservation Biology, 11: 193–203.
   Google Scholar
• Rejmánek, M., 1996. A theory of seed plant invasiveness: The first sketch. Biological Conservation, 78: 171–181.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, M., 1983. The Explanation of Organic Diversity. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Scoggan, H. J., 1979. The Flora of Canada. National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. K. & F. D. Panetta, 1993. Predicting the Australian weed status of southern African plants. Journal of Biogeography, 20: 87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Thébaud, C. & D. Simberloff, 2001. Are plants really larger in their introduced ranges? American Naturalist, 157: 231–236.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, K., J. G. Hodgson & T. C. G. Rich, 1995. Native and alien invasive plants: More of the same? Ecography, 18: 390–402.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeij, G. J., 1991. When biotas meet: Understanding biotic interchange. Science, 253: 1099–1104.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, C. O., 2000. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: An example from rain forest trees. American Naturalist, 156: 145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, C. O. & M. J. Donoghue, 2002. Phylomatic: A Database for Applied Phylogenetics. [Online] URL: http://www.phylodiversity.net/phylomatic [April 2005].
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. F., 1997. The alien flora of Europe: A taxonomic and biogeographic review. Journal of Vegetation Science, 8: 565–572.
   Google Scholar
• Westoby, M., M. Leishman & J. Lord, 1995. On misinterpreting the ‘phylogenetic correction’. Journal of Ecology, 83: 531–534.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, M., 1999. Invasions. Ecography, 22: 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, M. H. & A. Fitter, 1996. The characters of successful invaders. Biological Conservation, 78: 163–170.
   Google Scholar