Nest-site characteristics of Levaillant’s Woodpecker Picus vaillantii endemic to North Africa

References

• Bendjoudi D, Chenchouni H, Doumandji S, Voisin JF. 2013. Bird species diversity of the Mitidja Plain (Northern Algeria) with emphasis on the dynamics of invasive and expanding species. Acrocephalus 34: 13–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/acro-2013-0002.
   Google Scholar
• Bent AC. 1939. Life histories of North American woodpeckers. Bulletin 174. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution, United States National Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Blondel J. 1999. Peuplement d’oiseaux des cédraies méditerranéennes. Forêt méditerranéenne 20: 191–197.
   Google Scholar
• BNEDER (Bureau National d’Etudes pour le Développement Rural). 2010. Étude et expertise sur le dépérissement de la cédraie d’Ouled Yagoub et Chelia – Wilaya de Khenchela, Algérie. Algiers: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bougaham AF. 2016. Données numériques sur la reproduction du pic de Levaillant Picus vaillantii en Algérie. Alauda 84: 231–235.
   Google Scholar
• Boukerker H. 2016. Autoécologie et évaluation de la biodiversité dans les Cédraies de Cedrus atlantica Manetti dans le parc national de Belezma (Batna, Algérie). PhD thesis, Université Mohamed Khider, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Brunetti M, De Capua EL, Macchioni N, Monachello S. 2001. Natural durability, physical and mechanical properties of Atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica Manetti) wood from Southern Italy. Annals of Forest Science 58: 607–613. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2001148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caccamise DE. 1977. Breeding success and nest-site characteristics of the Red-winged Blackbird. The Wilson Bulletin 89: 396–403.
   Google Scholar
• Chappuis C. 2000. African Bird Sounds, Vol 1: North Africa, Canary and Cape-Verde Islands. Paris: Société d’Etudes Ornithologiques de France.
   Google Scholar
• Cikovic D, Barišic S, Tutiš V, Kralj J. 2014. Nest site and nest-hole characteristics used by Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major L. in Croatia. Polish Journal of Ecology 62: 349–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3161/104.062.0213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cody ML. 1985. Habitat selection in birds. Orlando: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson EC. 2003. The Howard and Moore complete checklist of the birds of the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dvorak M, Ranner A, Berg H-M. 1993. Atlas der Brutvögel Österreichs. Hrsg. Umweltbundesamt & Österreichische Gesellschaft für Vogelkunde. Vienna: Federal Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Epron D. 1997. Effects of drought on photosynthesis and on the thermotolerance of photosystem II in seedlings of cedar (Cedrus atlantica and C. libani). Journal of Experimental Botany 48: 1835–1841. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/48.10.1835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etchecopar R, Hûe F. 1964. Les oiseaux de l’Afrique du Nord. Paris: Boubée.
   Google Scholar
• Glutz von Blozheim UN, Bauer KM. 1980. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Wiesbaden: Aula-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gould W. 2000. Remote sensing of vegetation, plant species richness, and regional biodiversity hotspots. Ecological Applications 10: 1861–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1861:RSOVPS]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard M, Gaines WL. 2001. Effects of stand replacement fire and salvage logging on a cavity-nesting bird community in eastern Cascades, Washington. Northwest Science 75: 387–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagvar S, Hagvar G, Mønnes E. 1990. Nest site selection in Norwegian woodpeckers. Holarctic Ecology 13: 156–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris R. 1983. Arboriculture: Care of Trees, Shrubs, and Vines in the Landscape. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Henine-Maouche A, Bougaham AF, Moulaï R, Nicolau-Guillaumet P. 2017. Premières données sur le régime alimentaire des jeunes Pics de Levaillant Picus vaillantii. Alauda 85: 152–154.
   Google Scholar
• Hilden O. 1965. Habitat selection in birds: a review. Annales Zoologici Fennici 2: 53–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hines JE. 2006. PRESENCE2: software to estimate patch occupancy and related parameters. US Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland, USA. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/software/presence.html.
   Google Scholar
• del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J. 2002. Handbook of the birds of the world. Volume 7. Jacamars to woodpeckers. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyt SF. 1957. The ecology of the Pileated Woodpecker. Ecology 38: 246–556. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1931683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold DJ. 1990. Simultaneous use of nest trees by breeding Red-headed and Red-bellied Woodpeckers and European Starlings. Condor 92: 252–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1368412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold D J. 1998. The influence of starlings on flicker reproduction when both naturally excavated cavities and artificial nest boxes are available. The Wilson Bulletin 110: 218–225.
   Google Scholar
• Isenmann P, Moali A. 2000. Oiseaux d’Algérie: Birds of Algeria. Paris: Société d’Études Ornithologiques de France.
   Google Scholar
• Isenmann P, Gaultier T, El Hili A, Azafzaf H, Dlensi H, Smart M. 2005. Birds of Tunisia. Paris: Société d’Etudes Ornithologiques de France.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson JA, Jackson BJS. 2004. Ecological relationships between fungi and woodpecker cavity sites. Condor 106: 37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kear J. 2003. Cavity-nesting ducks: why woodpeckers matter, British Birds 96: 217–233.
   Google Scholar
• Kerpez TA, Smith NS. 1990. Nest-site selection and nest-cavity characteristics of Gila Woodpeckers and Northern Flicker. Condor 92: 193–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/106.1.37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler J. 2016. Picidae in the European fossil, subfossil, and recent bird faunas and their osteological characteristics. Ornis Hungarica 24: 96–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/orhu-2016-0006.
   Google Scholar
• Kilham L. 1977. Nest-site differences between Red-headed and Red-bellied Woodpeckers in South Carolina. The Wilson Bulletin 89: 164–165.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig WD, Hallock EM, Weber DJ, Walters EL. 2021. Nest cavity reuse by the cooperatively breeding Acorn Woodpecker. Ornithology 138: 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithology/ukaa088.
   Google Scholar
• Kopij G. 2017: Breeding densities of woodpeckers (Picinae) in the inner and outer zones of a Central European city. Sylvia (Praha) 53: 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kosiński Z, Winiecki A. 2004. Nest-site selection and niche partitioning among the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos medius in a riverine forest of Central Europe. Ornis Fennica 81: 145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosiński Z, Kempa M. 2007. Density, distribution, and nest-sites of woodpeckers (Picidae), in a managed forest of Western Poland. Polish Journal of Ecology 55: 519–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosiński Z, Walczak Ł. 2019. Does cavity reuse affect timing of reproduction and fledging success in the Black Woodpecker? Journal of Ornithology 160: 79–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-018-1585-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotaka N, Matsuoka S. 2002. Secondary users of Great Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopos major) nest cavities in urban and suburban forests in Sapporo City, northern Japan. Ornithological Science 1: 117–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.1.117.
   Google Scholar
• Ladjal M, Epron D, Ducrey M. 2000. Effects of drought preconditioning on thermo tolerance of photosystem II and susceptibility of photosynthesis to heat stress in cedar seedlings. Tree Physiology 20: 1235–1241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/20.18.1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammertink M. 2004a. Grouping and cooperative breeding in the Great Slaty Woodpecker. Condor 106: 309–319. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/106.2.309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammertink M, Fernández JM. Cockle KL. 2020. Comparison of nesting ecology of three co-existing Atlantic Forest woodpeckers reveals narrow specialization in the Helmeted Woodpecker Celeus galeatus. Acta Ornithologica 55: 101–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3161/00016454AO2020.55.1.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence LDK. 1967. A comparative life-history study of four species of woodpeckers. Ornithological Monographs 5: 1–156.
   Google Scholar
• Ligon JD. 1968. Sexual differences in foraging behavior in two species of Dendrocopos woodpeckers. Auk 85: 203–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4083581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin K, Eadie JM. 1999. Nest webs: a community-wide approach to the management and conservation of cavity-nesting forest birds. Forest Ecology and Management 115: 243–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00403-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin K, Aitken KEH, Wiebe KL. 2004. Nest sites and nest webs for cavity-nesting communities in interior British Columbia, Canada: nest characteristics and niche partitioning. Condor 106: 5–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/106.1.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka S. 2008. Wood hardness in nest trees of the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major. Ornithological Science 7: 59–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2326/1347-0558(2008)7[59:WHINTO]2.0.CO;2.
   Google Scholar
• Mazgajski TD. 1998. Nest-site characteristics of Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major in Central Poland. Polish Journal of Ecology 46: 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Mazgajski TD. 2002. Nesting phenology and breeding success in Great Spotted Woodpecker Picoides major near Warsaw (Central Poland). Acta Ornithologica 37: 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3161/068.037.0101.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland R, Frissell S. 1975. Identifying forest snags useful for hole-nesting birds. Journal of Forestry 73: 414–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melletti M, Penteriani V. 2003. Nesting and feeding tree selection in the endangered White-backed Woodpecker, Dendrocopos leucotos lilfordi. The Wilson Bulletin 115: 299–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1676/03-022.
   Google Scholar
• Mikusiński G, Gromadzki M, Chylarecki P. 2001. Woodpeckers as indicators of forest bird diversity. Conservation Biology 15: 208–217. . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.99236.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussouni A, Boubaker Z. 2015. Diversité des oiseaux de la cédraie de Djurdjura (Est de l’Algérie). Revue Forestière Française 58: 421–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/59956.
   Google Scholar
• Newton I. 1994. The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review. Biological Conservation 70: 265–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)90172-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickley B, Bulluck LP. 2019. Spanning the habitat gradient: Red-headed Woodpecker nest-site selection in three distinct cover types. Forest Ecology and Management 444: 115–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.04.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakkala T, Tiainen H, Pakkala H. 2019. Nest tree characteristics of the Lesser Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopos minor) in boreal forest landscapes. Ornis Fennica 96: 169–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perktas U, Barrowclough GF, Groth JG. 2011. Phylogeography and species limits in the Green Woodpecker complex (Aves: Picidae): Multiple Pleistocene refugia and range expansion across Europe and the Near East. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 104: 710–723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01750.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons JM, Olioso G, Cruaud C, Fuchs J. 2011. Phylogeography of the Eurasian Green Woodpecker (Picus viridis). Journal of Biogeography 38: 311–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02401.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reller RAW. 1972. Aspects of behavioral ecology of Red-headed and Red-bellied Woodpeckers. American Midland Naturalist 88: 270–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2424354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer S, Schulze CH, Frank G. 2010. Siedlungsdichte und Habitatwahl des Grünspechts Picus viridis im Nationalpark Donau-Auen (Niederösterreich). Die Vogelwarte 48: 275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Saporetti F, Colaone S, Guenzani W, Zarbo T. 2016. Nest-site characteristics and breeding biology of the Black Woodpecker in north-western Lombardy, Italy. Rivista Italiana di Ornitologia – Research in Ornithology 86: 39–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4081/rio.2016.304.
   Google Scholar
• Schepps J, Lohr S, Martin TE. 1999. Does tree hardness influence nest-tree selection by primary cavity nesters? Auk 116: 658–665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4089327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short LL. 1979. Burdens of the picid hole-nesting habit. The Wilson Bulletin 91: 16–28.
   Google Scholar
• Short LL. 1982. Woodpeckers of the world. Greenville: Delaware Museum of Natural History. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.132270.
   Google Scholar
• Snow DW, Perrins CM. 1998. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sonerud GA. 1985. Nest hole shift in Tengmalm’s Owl Aegolius funereus as defence against nest predation involving long-term memory in the predator. Journal of Animal Ecology 54: 179–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamungang SA, Kougoum PGN, Teguia A. 2016. Nest Characteristics for the Conservation of the Grey Parrot in Cameroon. Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment 8: 142–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5897/JENE2016.0601.
   Google Scholar
• Touihri M, Villard MA, Charfi-Cheikhrouha F. 2015. Nesting habitat requirements of two species of North African woodpeckers in native oak forest. Bird Study 62: 386–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2015.1049511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valette JC. 1990. Inflammabilité des espèces forestières méditerranéennes: Conséquences sur la combustibilité des formations forestières. Revue Forestière Française 42: 76–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/26171.
   Google Scholar
• Virkkala R. 2006. Why study woodpeckers? The significance of woodpeckers in forest ecosystems. Annales Zoologici Fennici 43: 82−85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson JEM, Whittaker RI, Dawson TP. 2004. Habitat structure and proximity to forest edge affect the abundance and distribution of forest dependent birds in tropical coastal forests of southeastern Madagascar, Biological Conservation 120: 311–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe KL. 2003. Delayed timing as a strategy to avoid nest-site competition: testing a model using data from starlings and flickers. Oikos 100: 291–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12046.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar