Evaluating vowel normalisation procedures: A case study on Southern Sotho vowels

References

• Adank P. 2003. Vowel normalization: a perceptual-acoustic study of Dutch vowels. PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen, Netherland.
   Google Scholar
• Adank P, Smits R, van Hout R. 2004. A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116: 3099–3107..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard E, Wissing DP. 2008. Vowel variation in Southern Sotho: an acoustic investigation. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 26: 255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma P, Weenink D. 2010. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.3.52. Available at www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat [accessed 20 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland WS. 1993. Visualizing Data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clopper CG. 2009. Computational methods for normalizing acoustic vowel data for talker differences. Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 1430–1442.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Disner SF. 1980. Evaluation of vowel normalisation procedure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67: 253–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doke CM, Mofokeng SM. 1957. Textbook of Southern Sotho grammar. London, Cape Town, New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Essack Z, Quale M. 2007. Students’ perceptions of a university access (bridging) programme for social science, commerce and humanities. Perspectives in Education 25: 71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabricius AH. 2008. Vowel normalisation in sociophonetics: when, why, how? Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Circle, Copenhagen University, Denmark, 6 September 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fabricius AH, Watt DJL, Johnson DE. 2009. A comparison of three speaker-intrinsic vowel formant frequency normalisation algorithms for sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change 21: 413–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn NEJ. 2011. Comparing vowel formant normalisation procedures. York Papers in Linguistics 11: 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn NEJ, Foulkes P. 2011. Comparing vowel formant normalisation procedures. Proceedings of the 17th ICPhS, 7–11 August, Hong Kong. pp 683–686.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe E, Low EL. 2002. Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In: Warner N, Gussenhoven C (eds), Papers in laboratory phonology 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp 515–546.
   Google Scholar
• Guma SM. 1971. An outline structure of Southern Sotho. Pietermaritzburg: Shuter and Shooter.
   Google Scholar
• Hindle D. 1978. Approaches to vowel normalisation in the study of natural speech. In: David Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic variation: models and methods. New York: Academic Press. pp 161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson K. 2008. Quantitative methods in linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Khabanyane KE. 1991. The five phonemic vowel heights of Southern Sotho: an acoustic and phonological analysis. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 5: 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Labov W. 1994. Principles of linguistic change: internal factors. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Labov W, Ash S, Boberg C. 2006. The atlas of North American English: phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged P, Broadbent DE. 1957. Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29: 98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langstrof C. 2006. Vowel change in New Zealand English – patterns and implications. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Le Cordeur M. 2011. Die variëteite van Afrikaans as draers van identiteit: ‘n Sosiokulturele perspektief. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 51: 758–777.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr R, Davies H. 2011. A cross-dialectal acoustic study of the monophthongs and diphthongs of Welsh. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41: 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nearey TM. 1978. Phonetic feature systems for vowels. PhD thesis, Indiana University, Indiana.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson G, Barney H. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24: 175–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner BS, Pickering JB. 1994. Vowel production and perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roux JC. 1983. Vokaalkwaliteit, toon en konsonantale invloede in Sotho. Unpublished research report. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch.
   Google Scholar
• Selebeleng KZ. 1997. Phonetic and phonological aspects of vowel raising in SeSotho. MA thesis, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Syrdal AK, Gopal HS. 1986. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79: 1086–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas ER. 2002. Instrumental phonetics. In: Chambers JK, Trudgill P, Schilling-Estes N (eds), The handbook of language variation and change. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp 168–200.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas ER, Kendall T. 2007. NORM: the vowel normalization and plotting suite. Available at http://ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/tools/norm/ [accessed 11 June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Tucker AN. 1929. The comparative phonetics of the Suto-Chuana group of Bantu languages. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Walt AJ, Wissing DP. 2003. Vowelise. Available at www.puk.ac.za/opencms/export/PUK/html/fakulteite/lettere/HLT_Resources/Tools/vowelise.html [accessed 20 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Watt DJL, Fabricius AH. 2011. A measure of variable planar locations anchored on the centroid of the vowel space: a sociophonetic research tool. Proceedings of the 17th ICPhS, 7–11 August, Hong Kong. pp 2102–2105.
   Google Scholar
• Watt DJL, Fabricius AH. 2002. Evaluation of a technique for improving the mapping of multiple speakers’ vowel spaces in the F1∼F2 plane. In: Nelson, D (ed.), Leeds working papers in linguistics and phonetics9: 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Watt DJL, Fabricius AH, Kendall T. 2011. More on vowels: plotting and normalising. In: di Paolo M, Yaeger-Dror M (eds). Sociophonetics: a student's guide. London: Routledge. pp 107–118.
   Google Scholar