The everyday life of sexual politics: A feminist critical discourse analysis of herbalist pamphlets in Johannesburg

References

• Atanga LL, Ellece SE, Sunderland J, Litosseliti L. (eds). 2012. Gender and language in Sub-Saharan Africa: Tradition, struggle and change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Adegoju A. 2008. A rhetorical analysis of the discourse of advertising herbal medicine in south-western Nigeria. Linguistik Online 33: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Artz L. 2009. The weather watchers: Gender, violence, and social control.’ In: Steyn M, van Zyl M (eds), The prize and the price: Shaping sexualities in South Africa. Pretoria: HSRC Press. pp 169–191.
   Google Scholar
• Atanga LL. 2013. African feminism? In: Atanga LL, Ellece SE, Sunderland J, Litosseliti L (eds), Gender and language in Sub-Saharan Africa: Tradition, struggle and change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp 301–314.
   Google Scholar
• Baker P. 2006. Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Baker P. 2008a. ‘Eligible’ bachelors and ‘frustrated’ spinsters: Corpus linguistics, gender and language. In: Harrington K, Litosseliti L, Sauntson H, Sunderland J (eds), Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Baker P. 2008b. Sexed texts: Language, gender and sexuality. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Baker P. 2010. Will Ms ever be as frequent as Mr? A corpus-based comparison of gendered terms across four diachronic corpora of British English. Gender & Language 4: 125–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, P, Gabrielatos C, KhosraviNik M, Krzyżanowski M, McEnery T, Wodak, R. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK. Discourse & Society 19: 273–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker P, McEnery T. 2005. A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts.’ Journal of Language and Politics 4: 197–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha H. 1991. The location of culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Billig M. 1995. Banal nationalism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bordo S. 1993. Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron D. 2006. On language and sexual politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron D, Kulick D. 2003. Language and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell R. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Kadt E. (ed). 2002. Focus issue: Gender and language. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 20: iii–iii.
   Google Scholar
• Du Plessis R. 2010. The sites/citing of female sexuality: An Irigarayan reading of sex positive.’ Communication 36: 309–326.
   Google Scholar
• Epprecht M. 2004. Hungochani: The history of a dissident sexuality in Southern Africa. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon F. 1952. Black skin white masks. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. 1980. Power/knowledge. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Freake R, Gentil G, Sheyholislami J. 2011. A Bilingual corpus-assisted discourse study of the construction of nationhood and belonging in Quebec. Discourse & Society 22: 21–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frosh S, Phoenix A, Pattman R. 2002. Young masculinities. Understanding boys in contemporary society. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielatos C, Baker P. 2008. Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK Press 1996-2005. Journal of English Linguistics 36: 5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington K, Litosseliti L, Sauntson, H, Sunderland J (eds). 2008. Gender and language research methodologies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. 2000. Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollway W. 1984. Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In: Henriques J, Holloway W, Urwin C, Venn C, Walkerdine V (eds), Changing the Subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London:Routledge. pp 223–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard B, Hunt S. 2013. The representation of sex work in South African media: Deviants, victims and invisible clients. Paper presented at the conference: Discourse, Gender and Sexuality: South-South Dialogues, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 15-16 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworska S, Krishnamurthy R. 2012. On the F word: A corpus-based analysis of the media representation of feminism in the British and German press discourse 1990-2009. Discourse & Society 23: 401–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski A, Thurlow C. (eds). 2012. Semiotic landscapes. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson S. 1997. Theorising language and masculinity: A Feminist perspective. In: Johnson S, Meinhoft UH (eds), Language and Masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell. pp 8–26.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson S. 2007. The iconography of orthography: Representing German spelling reform in the news magazine ‘Der Spiegel’ In: Johnson S, Ensslin A (eds), Language in the media: Representations, identities, ideologies. London: Continuum. pp 91–110.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson S, Milani TM (eds). 2010. Language ideologies and media discourse: Texts, practices, politics. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Kadenge M, Ndlovu T. 2012. ’Encounters with panaceas’: Reading flyers and posters on ‘traditional’ healing in and around Johannesburg's central business district. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 30: 461–482.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesling SF. 2011. The interactional construction of desire as gender. Gender & Language 5: 241–269.
   Google Scholar
• King B. 2009. Building and analysing corpora of computer-mediated communication. In: Baker P (ed.), Contemporary Corpus Linguistics. London: Continuum. pp 301–320.
   Google Scholar
• Koedt A. 1973. The myth of the vaginal orgasm. In: Koedt A, Levine E, Rapone A (eds), Radical Feminism. New York: Quadrangle Books. pp 198–207.
   Google Scholar
• Koller V, Mautner G. 2004. Computer applications in critical discourse analysis. In: Coffin C, Hewings A, O'Halloran K (eds), Applying English grammar: Functional and corpus approaches. London: Hodder and Stoughton. pp 216–228.
   Google Scholar
• Kress G, van Leeuwen T. 1996. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress G, van Leeuwen T. 1998. Front pages: (The critical) Analysis of newspaper layout. In: Bell A, Garrett P (eds), Approaches to media discourse. Oxford: Blackwell. pp 186–219.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar MM. 2005. Politicising gender in discourse: Feminist critical discourse analysis as political perspective and praxis. In: Lazar MM (ed.), Feminist critical discourse analysis: Studies in gender, power and ideology. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. pp 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar MM. 2007. Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies 4: 141–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar MM. 2013. Representing post-equal gender relations: ‘New’ femininities and masculinities in discourse. Keynote address delivered at the conference Discourse, Gender and Sexuality: South-South Dialogues, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 15-16 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis D. 2001. African feminisms. Agenda 16: 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Louw B. 1993. Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? – The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In: Baker M, Francis G, Tognini-Bonelli E (eds), Text and Technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp 157–176.
   Google Scholar
• Machin D. 2007. Introduction to multimodal analysis. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Machin D. 2013. What is multimodal critical discourse studies? Critical discourse studies 10: 347–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElhinny B. 2003. Theorising gender in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology. In: Holmes, J, Meyerhoff M (eds), The Language and Gender Handbook. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden P. 2003. Sexual pleasure as feminist choice. Feminist Africa 2: 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mikell G. 1997. African feminism: The politics of survival in Sub-Saharan Africa. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milani TM. 2013. ’Are “queers” really “queer”?’ Language, identity and same-sex desire in a South African online community. Discourse & Society 24: 615–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani TM. 2014. Sexed signs – queering the scenery. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 228: 201–225.
   Google Scholar
• Milani TM, Shaikjee M. 2013. A New South African man: Beer, masculinity and social change. In: Atanga LL, Ellece SE, Sunderland J, Litosseliti L (eds), Gender and language in Sub-Saharan Africa: Tradition, struggle and change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Mills S, Mullany L. 2012. Language, gender and feminism: Theory, methodology and practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Msibi T. 2011. The lies we have been told: On (homo) sexuality in Africa. Africa Today 58: 55–77.
   Google Scholar
• Partington, A. 2008. The armchair and the machine: Corpus-assisted discourse research. In: Torsello CT, Ackerley K, Castello E (eds), Corpora for university language teachers. Switzerland: Peter Lang AG, International Academic Publishers. pp 95–118.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy V, De Kadt E. 2006. Focus issue: Language and gender in South Africa. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 24: iii–iii.
   Google Scholar
• Scott M. 2012. WordSmith Tools version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
   Google Scholar
• Sideris T. 2004. ’You have to change and you don't know how!’: Contesting what it means to be a man in a rural area of South Africa. African Studies 63: 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan N. 2003. A Critical Introduction to Queer Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland J. 2004. Gendered discourses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland J. 2012. ’Brown sugar’: The textual construction of femininity in two ‘tiny texts’. Gender and Language 6: 105–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann J. 2002. Yes, but is it gender? In: Litosseliti L, Sunderland J (eds), Gender identity and discourse analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. pp 43–68.
   Google Scholar
• Tamale S. (ed). 2013. African sexualities: A reader. Cape Town: Pambazuka Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vigouroux C. 2011. Magic marketing: Performing grassroots literacy. Diversities 13: 53–69.
   Google Scholar
• Walker L. 2005. Men behaving differently: South African men since 1994. Culture, Health & Sexuality 7: 225–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh F. 2010. Male Trouble: Masculinity and the Performance of Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak R. 2011. The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar