The classical laws and rules in Bantu languages: How plausible are they?

References

• Bach E. 1968. Two proposals concerning the simplicity metric in phonology. Glossa 2: 128–149.
   Google Scholar
• Bach E, Harms RT. 1972. How do languages get crazy rules? In: Stockwell R, Macanlay R. (eds), Linguistic Change and Generative Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Batibo HM. 1985. Le kesukuma, langue bantu de Tanzanie: Phonologie et morphologie. Paris: Centre de Recherche et Documentation Universitaire.
   Google Scholar
• Batibo HM. 2000. The state of spirantisation in Sukuma-Nyamwezi: A historical account. In: Kahigi KK. Kihore, YM, Mous M. (eds), Lugha za Tanzania. Leiden: Research School for Asian, African and Amerindian Studies. pp. 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Batibo HM. 2001. Change of feature prominence as a motivation to sound change: The case of Setswana consonant system. In: Vossen R, Mietzner A, Meissner A. (eds), Festschrift for Professor Franz Rottland. [Afrikanistiche Beitrage zum 65 Geburtstag von Franz Rotland]. Cologne: Ruediger Koeppe. pp. 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Batibo HM, Moilwa J, Mosaka NM. 1997. The historical implications of the linguistic relationship between Makua and Sotho. In: Darkwah K. (ed.), Festshrift in Honour of Professor Leonard D. Ngcongco. 11(1): 23–29. [Special publication of Pula Journal]. University of Botswana.
   Google Scholar
• Bostoen K. 2008. Bantu spiratization: Morphologization, lexication and historical classification. Diachronica 25(3): 299–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosnaham LF, Malmberg B. 1971. Introduction to Phonetics. Cambridge: W. Hereafter and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Buckeley E. 2000. On the naturalness of unnatural rules. Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Cole DT. 1955. Introduction to Tswana Grammar. Cape Town: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Creissels D. 1999. Remarks on the sound correspondences between Proto-Bantu and Tswana (S.31) with particular attention to problems involving *j (or *y), *j and sequences *NC. In: Hombert J.-M, Hyman LM (eds), Recent Advances in Bantu Historical Linguistics. Stanford: Stanford University Publishers. pp. 297–334.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl E. 1914. Nyamwezi Woerterbuch. Hamburg: University of Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens PR. 1984. The history of the so-called strengthening in Tswana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 6: 97–125.
   Google Scholar
• Doke C. 1935. Bantu Linguistic Terminology. London: Longmans Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doke C. 1967. The Southern Bantu Languages. London: International African Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Evans N, Levinson S. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Science: 57–85.
   Google Scholar
• Fromkin V, Rodman R. 1988. Introduction to Language. (4th edn). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie M. 1948. The Classification of the Bantu Languages. London: International African Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie M. 1967–71. Comparative Bantu. Volumes 1–4. Farnborough: Gregg Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes B. 1995. A phonetically driven optimality-theoretic account of post-nasal voicing. Paper presented at the Tilburg Conference on ‘Derivationality’ Residue.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert RK. 1986. Language Universals, Marked-ness Theory, and Natural Phonetic Process. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Huffman M, Hinnebusch T. 1998. The phonetic nature of ‘voiceless’ nasals in Pokomo: Implications for sound change. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 19: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman LM. 2001. The limits of phonetic determinism in phonology NC revisited. In: Hume E, Johnson K. (eds), The role of speech perception in phonology. New York: Academic Press. pp. 141–185.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman LM. 1975. Phonology: Theory and Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Janson T. 1991/2. Southern Bantu and Makua. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 12/13: 63–106.
   Google Scholar
• Kiparsky P. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In: Bach E, Harms RT. (eds), Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. pp. 170–202.
   Google Scholar
• Kula NC. 2002. The Phonology of verbal derivation in Bemba. PhD Dissertation. University of Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged P, Maddieson I. 1996. The Sounds of the World's Languages. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Maddieson I. 2015. Personal email communication. 15 May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Maganga C, Schadeberg TC. 1999. Kinyamwezi Grammar, Texts and Vocabulary. Koeln: Ruediger Koeppe Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Martinet A. 1965. Economie de changements phonétique (2nd edn). Berne: A. Franche.
   Google Scholar
• Matumo Z. 1993. Setswana-English-Setswana Dictionary. Gaborone: Botswana Book Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Meeussen AE. 1973. Essai de Grammaire Rundi. Tervuren: Musée Royale du Congo Belge.
   Google Scholar
• Meinhof C. 1932 Introduction to the Phonology of the Bantu Languages. (Translation by Van Warmelo). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer
   Google Scholar
• Nurse D. 1988. A lexicostatistical Survey of the East African Bantu Languages. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 9: 15–116.
   Google Scholar
• Pater J. 1996. *NC. Proceedings of the North-East Linguistics Society 26: 227–239.
   Google Scholar
• Polomé E. 1967. A Handbook of Kiswahili Grammar. Washington: Centre for Applied Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal S. 1989. The Phonology of nasalized obstruent sequences. Unpublished MA thesis. McGill University. Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Schadeberg TC. 1995. Spirantization and the 7-to-5 vowel merger in Bantu. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 9: 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Schadeberg TC. 1999. Katupha's Law in Makhuwa. In: Hombert J.-M, Hyman LM. (eds), Recent Advances in Bantu Historical Linguistics. Stanford: Stanford University Publishers. pp 379–411.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias BH. 1962. English-Kwanyama Dictionary. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.
   Google Scholar