Grammar rules for the isiZulu complex verb

References

• Beuchat PD. 1966. The verb in Zulu. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press (1966), reprinted from African Studies 22: 137–169, 1963; 23: 35–49, 67–87, 1964; 25: 61–71, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Bird S, Klein E, Loper E. 2009. Natural language processing with Python. O’Reilly Media Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch SE, Eiselen R. 2005. The effectiveness of morphological rules for an isiZulu spelling checker. South African Journal of African Languages 25: 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Buell LC. 2005. Issues in Zulu verbal morphosyntax. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Doke C. 1927. Text book of Zulu grammar. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doke C. 1935. Bantu linguistic terminology. London: Longman, Green and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Durrant P. 2013. Formulaicity in an agglutinating language: the case of Turkish. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9: 1–38. doi: 10.1515/cllt-2013-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwell R. 2005. Finite-state methods for Bantu verb morphology. In: Gaylord N, Hilderbrand S, Lyu H, Palmer A, Ponvert E (eds), Texas Linguistics Society 10: Computational Linguistics for Less-Studied Languages. CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Getao K, Miriti E. 2000. Special Topics in Computing and ICT Research: Computational modelling in Bantu language. Advances in Systems Modelling and ICT Applications. pp. 128–138.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie M. 1971. Comparative Bantu: An Introduction to the Comparative Linguistics and Prehistory of the Bantu Languages. No. v. 1–2, Gregg.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman L. 1991. Conceptual issues in the comparative study of the Bantu verb stem. In: Mufwene SS, Moshi L (eds), Topics in African linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co. pp 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Katushemererwe F, Hanneforth T. 2010. Finite state methods in morphological analysis of Runyakitara verbs. Nordic Journal of African Studies 19: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Keet CM, Khumalo L. 2014. Basics for a grammar engine to verbalize logical theories in isiZulu. In: Bikakis A, et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 8th International Web Rule Symposium (RuleML’14). LNCS, vol. 8620, 18–20 August, Prague, Czech Republic. Springer: Prague. pp 216–225.
   Google Scholar
• Keet CM, Khumalo L. 2014. Toward verbalizing logical theories in isiZulu. In: Davis B, Kuhn T, Kaljurand K (eds), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Controlled Natural Language (CNL’14). LNAI, vol. 8625, 20–22 August, Galway, Ireland. LNAI: Springer. pp 78–89.
   Google Scholar
• Keet CM, Khumalo, L. 2017. Toward a knowledge-to-text controlled natural language of isiZulu. Language Resources and Evaluation 51: 131–157. doi: 10.1007/s10579-016-9340-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khumalo L. 2007. An analysis of the Ndebele passive construction. PhD thesis, University of Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Lindfors AL. 2003. Tense and aspect in Swahili. Technical report, Institutionen for Lingvistik, Uppsalla Universitet (2003), http://www2.lingfil.uu.se/ling/semfiler/Swa_TAM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mabugu P. 2001. Polysemy and the applicative verb construction in Chishona. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Mchombo S. 2004. The syntax of Chichewa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mchombo S. 2007. Argument binding and morphology in Chichewa. In: Hoyt F, Seifert N, Teoderescu A, White J (eds), Texas Linguistics Society 9: Morphosyntax of Underrepresented Languages. Texas Linguistics Society. pp 203–221.
   Google Scholar
• Meeussen AE. 1967. Bantu grammatical reconstructions. Africana Linguistica 3: 79–121. doi: 10.3406/aflin.1967.873
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius R, Berg A, Pretorius L, Viljoen B. 2009. Setswana tokenisation and computational verb morphology: Facing the challenge of a disjunctive orthography. In: Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on Language Technologies for African Languages (AfLaT’09) 31 March, Athens, Greece. Athens: EACL. pp 66–73.
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius L, Bosch ES. 2003. Finite-state computational morphology: An analyzer prototype for Zulu. Machine Translation 18: 195–216. doi: 10.1007/s10590-004-2477-4
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius L, Bosch SE. 2009. Finite state morphology of the Nguni language cluster: modelling and implementation issues. In: Yli-Jyra A, Kornai A, Sakarovitch J, Watson B (eds), Finite-state methods and natural language processing 8th International Workshop (FSMNLP’09). LNCS, vol. 6062. Springer. pp 123–130.
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius L, Bosch S. 2012. Semi-automated extraction of morphological grammars for Nguni with special reference to Southern Ndebele. In: Workshop on Language Technology for Normalisation of Less-Resourced Languages SALTMIL8/AfLaT2012. pp 73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Pullum GK, Gazdar G. 1982. Natural languages and context-free languages. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 471–504. doi: 10.1007/BF00360802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schadeberg TC. 2003. Derivation. In: Nurse D, Philippson G (eds), The Bantu languages. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegler S, van der Spuy A, Flach PA. 2010. Ukwabelana – an open-source morphological Zulu corpus. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’10). Beijing: Association for Computational Linguistics. pp 1020–1028.
   Google Scholar
• Wald B. 1987. Swahili and the Bantu languages. In: Comrie B. (ed.), The world’s major languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp 991–1014.
   Google Scholar
• Zawawi SM. 1979. Loan words and their effect on the classification of Swahili nominals. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
   Google Scholar