Complexities of intercultural writing process of budding multilingual writers

References

• Ahmadian M, Pouromid S, Nickkhah M. 2016. Improving the quality of second language writing by first language use. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 6(4): 767–775. doi: 10.17507/tpls.0604.14
   Google Scholar
• Anokhina O. 2017. Multilingual writers and metalinguistic awareness: Can we use manuscripts as a basis for a typology of creative scriptural practices? In: Plane S, Bazerman C, Rondelli F, Donahue C, Applebee AN, Boré C. . . Russell D (eds), Research on Writing: Multiple Perspectives. Fort Collins: The WAC Clearinghouse and CREM. pp. 549–568.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert J. 2013. Writing as a sociolinguistic object. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(4): 440–459. doi: 10.1111/josl.12042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden D. 1995. The rise of a metaphor: ‘Voice’ in composition pedagogy. Rhetoric Review 14(1): 173–188. doi: 10.1080/07350199509389058
   Google Scholar
• Connor U. 2002. New directions in contrastive rhetoric. Tesol Quarterly 36(4): 493–510. doi: 10.2307/3588238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming A. 1989. Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language learning 39(1): 81–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00592.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins J. 2005. Teaching for cross-language transfer in dual language education: Possibilities and pitfalls. TESOL Symposium on Dual Language Education: Teaching and Learning Two Languages in the EFL Setting. Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Dornyei Z. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Essex C. 1996. Teaching creative writing in the elementary school. http://ericdigests.org/1996-3/writing.htm
   Google Scholar
• Graham S, Harris KR. 2014. Fostering budding witers. Association for Psychological Science. http://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/observer/2014/september-14/fostering-budding-writers.html
   Google Scholar
• Johnny SP. 2017. Stylistics of technical writing and creative writing: A comparative and contrastive study. Research Journal of English and Literature 5(3): 2321–3108.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor KJ. 1975. Creative expression in the English curriculum: An historical perspective. Research in the Teaching of English 9(1): 5–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan RB. 1966. Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language Learning 16(1–2): 1–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubota R, Lehner A. 2004. Toward critical contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing 13(1): 1–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limon D. 2007. Writing across cultures. In: Delanoy W, Helbig J, James A (eds), Towards a Dialogic Anglistics. Berlin: LIT Verlag Münster. pp. 147–160.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Martín P. 2006. Scientific writing: A universal or a culture-specific type of discourse? Revista de Lenguas Para Fines Específicos 11(12): 191–204.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda PK, Canagarajah AS, Harklau L, Hyland K, Warschauer M. 2003. Changing currents in second language writing research: A Colloquium. Journal of Second Language Writing 12(2): 151–179. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00016-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mgijima VD, Makalela L. 2016. The effects of translanguaging on the bi-literate inferencing strategies of fourth grade learners. Perspectives in Education 34(3): 86–93. doi: 10.18820/2519593X/pie.v34i3.7
   Google Scholar
• Monroy-Casas R. 2008. Linearity in language. Rhetorical-discursive preferences in English and Spanish in the light of Kaplan’s model. International Journal of English Studies 8(2): 173–189.
   Google Scholar
• Motlhaka HA, Makalela L. 2016. Translanguaging in an academic writing class: Implications for a dialogic pedagogy. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 34(3): 251–260. doi: 10.2989/16073614.2016.1250356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myles J. 2002. Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 6(2): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Riyanti D. 2015. An exploration of voice in second language writing. The Nebraska Educator 2: 28–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan MC. 1960. Creative language experiences in the high school. The English Journal 49(8): 563–569. doi: 10.2307/810383
   Google Scholar
• Sills SJ, Song C. 2002. Innovations in survey research: An application of web-based surveys. Social Science Computer Review 20(1): 22–30. doi: 10.1177/089443930202000103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temizkan M. 2011. The effect of creative writing activities on the story writing skills. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 11(1): 933–939.
   Google Scholar
• Wright KB. 2005. Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.xl
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiuyan X. 2012. Cultural factors in EAP teaching – Influences of thought pattern on English academic writing. Cross-Cultural Communication 8(4): 53–57.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu P. 2015. Against cultural influence on structuring: a discourse for cross-cultural communication. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science 3(3): 1–10.
   Google Scholar