The open court principle in Zimbabwe: A language rights perspective

References

• Bailey J, Burkell J. 2016. Revisiting the open court principle in an era of online publication: Questioning presumptive public access to parties’ and witnesses’ personal information. Ottawa Law Review 48: 143–183.
   Google Scholar
• Bambust I, Kruger A, Kruger T. 2012. Constitutional and judicial language protection in multilingual states. Erasmus Law Review 5(3): 211–232. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR221026712012005003006
   Google Scholar
• Bamgbose A. 2000. Language and exclusion: The consequences of language policies in Africa. London: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bosland J, Gill J. 2014. The principle of open justice and the judicial duty to give public reasons. Melbourne University Law Review 38: 482–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chumbow BS. 2012. Towards a legal framework for language charters in Africa. In: Brohy C, du Plessis T, Turi JG, Woehrling J (eds), Law, language and the multilingual state: Proceedings of the 12^th International Conference of the International Academy of Linguistic Law. Bloemfontein: SUN Media. pp. 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Diamandouros N. 2008. Openness and access to documents. European State Aid Law Quarterly 7(4): 654–658. https://doi.org/10.21552/ESTAL/2008/4/130
   Google Scholar
• France G. 2019. Transparency of court proceedings. Berlin: Transparency International.
   Google Scholar
• Gatsha G. 2009. Introducing minority and marginalised languages in schools through pastoral care. In: Kamwendo G, Jankie D, Chebanne A (eds), Mother tongue education for all: Multilingualism in education and communities in southern Africa. Gaborone: UBTromso Collaborative Programme for San Research and Capacity Building. pp. 64–68.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Zimbabwe. 1981. High Court Act as Amended in 2001. Harare: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Zimbabwe. 1989a. Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act as Amended in 2004. Harare: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Zimbabwe. 1989b. Magistrates Court Act as Amended in 2006. Harare: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Zimbabwe. 1992a. Civil Evidence Act as Amended in 2001. Harare: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Zimbabwe. 1992b. Small Claims Courts Act as Amended in 2002. Harare: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Zimbabwe. 1992c. Supreme Court Act as Amended in 1997. Harare: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Zimbabwe. 2012. Constitution of Zimbabwe (Draft July 2012. Harare: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Zimbabwe. 2013. Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act. Harare: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Zimbabwe. 2020. Freedom of Information Act [Chapter 10:33]. Government Printers: Harare.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Zimbabwe. 2021. National Disability Policy [Zimbabwe].
   Google Scholar
• Harms L. 2012. Opening address. In: Brohy C, du Plessis T, Turi JG, Woehrling J (eds), Law, language and the multilingual state: Proceedings of the 12^th International Conference of the International Academy of Linguistic Law. Bloemfontein: SUN Media. pp. xxiii–xxxi.
   Google Scholar
• Judicial Service Commission. 2021. Judicial Service Commission Strategic Plan 2021 – 2025.
   Google Scholar
• Lubbe HJ. 2004. Linguistic rights litigation. Alternation 11(2): 118–143.
   Google Scholar
• Ndhlovu F. 2008a. The politics of language and nationality in Zimbabwe: Nation building or empire building? South African Journal of African Languages 28(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2008.10587297
   Google Scholar
• Ndhlovu F. 2008b. The conundrums of language policy and politics in South Africa and Zimbabwe. Australian Journal of Linguistics 28(1): 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600701877499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndhlovu F. 2009. The politics of language and nation building in Zimbabwe. Bern: Peter Lang AG.
   Google Scholar
• Ndhlovu F. 2010. Language politics in postcolonial Africa revisited: Minority agency and language imposition. Language Matters 41(2): 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2010.492231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndlovu E. 2013. Mother tongue education in official minority languages of Zimbabwe. PhD thesis, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Ndlovu E. 2015. The language factor in the media and information disseminating organisations as a means of achieving the Millennium Development Goals in Africa. South African Journal of African Languages 35(1): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2015.1056462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndlovu E. 2017. A critical analysis of the provisions of statutory instruments and policy documents relating to court interpreting in Zimbabwe: A case study of selected sections. Zambezia 44(ii): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ndlovu E. 2020a. Interpretation and translation as disciplines and professions in Zimbabwe: A critical appraisal. Language Matters 51(2): 129–147 https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2020.1773518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndlovu E. 2020b. Milestones, challenges and prospects in the implementation of the language provisions of the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No.20) Act. Journal of African Languages and Literary Studies 1(3): 157–178. doi: 10.31920/2633-2116/2020/v1n3a8
   Google Scholar
• Ndlovu E, Mtetwa T, Makina D. 2022. Public access to, involvement in, and the right to petition parliament in Zimbabwe. Language Matters 52(3): 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2021.2012501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nettheim G. 1984. The principle of open justice. University of Tasmania Law Review 8(1): 25–45.
   Google Scholar
• Paciocco DM. 2005. When open courts meet closed government. The Supreme Court Law Review 29: 385–418.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson R. 1992. Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson R. 2009. Linguistic imperialism. In: Mey, JL, Brown K (eds), Concise encyclopaedia of pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd. pp. 780–782.
   Google Scholar
• Puddister K. Small TA. 2019. Navigating the principle of open court in the digital age: The more things change, the more they stay the same. Canadian Public Administration 62(2): 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatino CP. 2019. Adults and access to justice. American Society on Aging 43(4): 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Skutnabb-Kangas T. 2003. Revitalisation of indigenous languages in education: Contextualising the Papua New Guinea experience. Language and Education 17(2): 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666840
   Google Scholar
• Skutnabb-Kangas T. 2006. Language policy and linguistic human rights. In: Ricento T (ed.), Introduction to language policy theory and method. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 273–291.
   Google Scholar
• Skutnabb-Kangas T, Dunbar R. 2010. Indigenous children’s education as linguistic genocide and a crime against humanity? A global view. Gáldu Čála – Journal of Indigenous Peoples Rights No. 1/2010. Gáldu Resource Centre for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278033737_Indigenous_Children’s_Education_as_Linguistic_Genocide_and_a_Crime_Against_Humanity_A_Global_View
   Google Scholar
• Skutnabb-Kangas T, Heugh K. 2010. Introduction – Why this book? In: Heugh K, Skutnabb-Kangas T (eds), Multilingual education works: From the periphery to the centre. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan Pvt. pp. 3–39.
   Google Scholar
• Skutnabb-Kangas T, Phillipson R. 1994. Linguistic human rights: Past and present. In: Skutnabb-Kangas T, Phillipson R. (eds), Linguistic human rights: overcoming linguistic discrimination. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 71–110. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866391.71
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1966. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%20999/volume-999-i-14668-english.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2007. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf
   Google Scholar