References
- Arnkil, R., Järvensivu, A., Koski, P., & Tatu, P. (2010). Exploring Quadruple Helix, outlining user-oriented innovation models. University of Tampere: Institute for Social Research Work, Working Paper 85/2010.
- Boshoff, N. (2013). Knowledge utilisation: key authors and models [Powerpoint presentation]. Stellenbosch: Centre for Reach on Evaluation, Science and Technology (CREST), Stellenbosch University.
- Broadbent, E. (2012). Politics of research-based evidence in African policy debates – synthesis of case study findings, Evidence-based Policy in Development Network. London: Overseas Development Institute.
- Caplan, N. (1979). The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. The American Behavioral Scientist, 22(3), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427902200308
- EHPSA. (2017). Truth in a post-truth world. Global Evidence Summit 2017 [blog post]. http://ehpsa.org/blog/item/114-evidence-and-belief EHPSA. (forthcoming). EHPSA’s approach to Evidence into Action: The art of leveraging the research continuum. Pretoria: EHPSA.
- EHPSA & INASP (forthcoming), Factors affecting evidence use in health policymaking institutions in southern and eastern Africa: Knowledge Synthesis report
- Fuzi, A. (2013, July). Quadruple-Helix and its types as user-driven innovation models. Paper presented at the Triple Helix International Conference, London. http://www.triplehelixconference.org/th/11/bic/docs/Papers/Fuzi.pdf
- Kahn, M. (2016). Mitigating South Africa’s HIV epidemic: The interplay of social entrepreneurship and the innovation system. Minerva, 54(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9293-x
- Larkin, S. (2006) Evidence-based policy-making in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health. Australian Aboriginal Studies Journal, 2016(2), p. 17–26.
- Lin, V. (2003). Competing rationalities: evidence-based health policy. In Evidence-Based Health Policy: Problems & Possibilities (pp. 3–17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Morton, S. (2015). Progressing research impact assessment: a “contributions” approach. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv016
- Sumner, A., & Jones, N. (2008). The Politics of Pro-Poor Policy Processes, Policy Influence and the Research-Policy Interface: Are Pro-Poor Policy Processes Expert-Led Or Citizen-Led? London: ODI.
- Waddell, C. (2001). So much research evidence, so little dissemination and uptake: Mixing the useful with the pleasing. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 4(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmh.4.1.3
- Weyrauch, V., Echt, L., & Suliman, S. (2016). Knowledge Into Policy: Going Beyond “Context Matters”. Buenos Aires: Politics & Ideas.