Efficacy and deficiencies of rapid biomonitoring in biodiversity conservation: a case study in South Africa

References

• Allen RK. 1973. New Ephemerellidae from Madagascar and Afghanistan (Ephemeroptera). The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 49: 160–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber-James HM. 2015. Chapter 8. Ephemeroptera. In: Griffiths C, Picker M, Day JA (eds), Freshwater life: a field guide to the plants and animals of southern Africa. Cape Town: Struik. pp 140–151.
   Google Scholar
• Barber-James, HM Gattolliat J-L. 2012. How well are Afrotropical mayflies known? Status of current knowledge, practical applications and future directions. Inland Waters 2: 1–9. doi: 10.5268/IW-2.1.447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard KH. 1932. South African may-flies (Ephemeroptera). Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 20: 201–259. doi: 10.1080/00359193209518858
   Google Scholar
• Bonada N, Prat N, Resh VH, Statzner B. 2006. Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: a comparative analysis of recent approaches. Annual Review of Entomology 51: 495–523. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffagni A, Kemp JL, Erba S, Belfiore C, Hering D, Moog O. 2001. A Europe-wide system for assessing the quality of rivers using macroinvertebrates: the AQEM Project and its importance for southern Europe (with special emphasis on Italy). Journal of Limnology 60: 39–48. doi: 10.4081/jlimnol.2001.s1.39
   Google Scholar
• Chakona A, Swartz ER, Gouws G, Bloomer P. 2013. A freshwater fish defies ancient mountain ranges and drainage divides: extrinsic and intrinsic influences on the evolutionary history of a recently identified galaxiid. Journal of Biogeography 40: 1399–1412. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler JR. 1970. A biological approach to water quality management. Water Pollution Control 69: 415–422.
   Google Scholar
• Chessman BC. 1995. Rapid assessment of rivers using macroin-vertebrates: a procedure based on habitat-specific sampling, family level identification and a biotic index. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 122–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1995.tb00526.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chessman BC. 2003. SIGNAL 2.iv – A scoring system for macro-invertebrates (‘water bugs’) in Australian rivers. Monitoring River Heath Initiative Technical Report No. 31. Canberra: Department of the Environment and Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• Chesters RK. 1980. Biological monitoring working party: the 1978 national testing exercise. Technical Memorandum 19. Department of the Environment, London.
   Google Scholar
• Chutter FM. 1972. An empirical biotic index of the quality of water in South African streams and rivers. Water Research 6: 9–30. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(72)90170-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chutter FM. 1994. The rapid biological assessment of streams and river water quality by means of macroinvertebrate communities in South Africa. In: Uys MC (ed.), Classification of rivers and environmental health indicators. WRC Report No. TT 63/94. Pretoria: Water Research Commission. pp 217–234.
   Google Scholar
• Chutter FM. 1998. Research on the rapid biological assessment of water quality impacts in streams and rivers. WRC Report No. 422/1/98. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Dallas HF. 1997. A preliminary evaluation of aspects of SASS (South African Scoring System) for the rapid bioassessment of water quality in rivers, with particular reference to the incorporation of SASS in a national biomonitoring programme. African Journal of Aquatic Science 23: 79–94. doi: 10.1080/10183469.1997.9631389
   Google Scholar
• de Moor FC. 2002. Shortcomings and advantages of using rapid biological assessment techniques for determining the health of rivers in South Africa. Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie 28: 651–662.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens CWS, Graham PM. 2002. The South African Scoring System (SASS) Version 5 rapid bioassessment method for rivers. African Journal of Aquatic Science 27: 1–10. doi: 10.2989/16085914.2002.9626569
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds GF, Polhemus DA. 1990. Zoogeographical patterns among mayflies (Ephemeroptera) in the Malay Archipelago, with special reference to Celebes. In: Knight WJ, Holloway JD (eds), Insects and the rainforests of South-East Asia (Wallacea). London: The Royal Entomological Society of London. pp 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira WR, Paiva LT, Callisto M. 2011. Development of a benthic multimetric index for biomonitoring of a neotropical watershed. Brazilian Journal of Biology 71: 15–25. doi: 10.1590/S1519-69842011000100005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficetola, GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. 2008. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biology Letters 4: 423–425. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg CS, Pilliod DS, Arkle RS, Waits LP. 2011. Molecular detection of vertebrates in stream water: a demonstration using Rocky Mountain tailed frogs and Idaho giant salamanders. PLoS ONE 6: e22746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison AD, Agnew JD. 1962. The distribution of invertebrates endemic to acid streams in the western and southern Cape Province. Annals of the Cape Provincial Museums 2: 273–291.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison AD, Elsworth JF. 1958. Hydrobiological studies on the Great Berg River, Western Cape Province. Part 1. General description, chemical studies and main features of the flora and fauna. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 35: 125–226. doi: 10.1080/00359195809520025
   Google Scholar
• Hilsenhoff WL. 1977. Use of arthropods to evaluate water quality of streams. Technical Bulletin No. 100. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Hilsenhoff WL. 1987. An improved biotic index of organic stream pollution. Great Lakes Entomologist 20: 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilsenhoff WL. 1988. Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family-level biotic index. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7: 65–68. doi: 10.2307/1467832
   Google Scholar
• Jerde CL, Mahon AR, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM. 2011. ‘Sightunseen’ detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Conservation Letters 4: 150–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00158.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaaya LT, Day JD, Dallas HF. 2015. Tanzania River Scoring System (TARISS): a macroinvertebrate-based biotic index for rapid bioassessment of rivers. African Journal of Aquatic Science 40: 109–117. doi: 10.2989/16085914.2015.1051941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King JM, Schael DM. 2001. Assessing the ecological relevance of spatially-nested geomorphological hierarchy for river management. WRC Report No. 754/1/01. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Kolkwitz R, Marsson M. 1902. Grundsätze für die biologische beürteilung des wassers nach seiner flora und fauna. Mitteilingen Prüfungsanst Wasserversorg Abwasserreinig 1: 33–72.
   Google Scholar
• Li L, Zheng B, Liu L. 2010. Biomonitoring and bioindicators used for river ecosystems: Definitions, approaches and trends. Procedia Environmental Sciences 2: 1510–1524. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.164
   Google Scholar
• Martynov AV, Palatov DM, Boonsoong B. 2016. A new species of Dudgeodes Sartori, 2008 (Ephemeroptera: Teloganodidae) from Thailand. Zootaxa 412: 545–554. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4121.5.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews RA, Buikema AL, Cairns J, Rodgers JH, 1982. Biological monitoring. Part IIA. Receiving system functional methods, relationships and indices. Water Research 16: 129–39. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(82)90102-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty WP, Benstead JP. 2002. Cladistic resolution and ecology of the Madagascar genus Manohyphella Allen (Ephemeroptera: Teloganodidae). Annales de Limnologie 38: 41–52. doi: 10.1051/limn/2002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty WP, Wang T-Q. 1997. Phylogenetic systematics of the family Teloganodidae (Ephemeroptera: Pannota). Annals of the Cape Provincial Museums (Natural History) 19: 387–437.
   Google Scholar
• McCafferty WP, Wang T-Q. 2000. Phylogenetic systematics of the major lineages of pannote mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Pannota). Transactions of the American Entomological Society 126: 9–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss D, Furse MT, Wright JF, Armitage PD. 1987. The prediction of the macro-invertebrate fauna of unpolluted running-water sites in Great Britain using environmental data. Freshwater Biology 17: 41–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1987.tb01027.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odume ON, Muller WJ, Arimoro FO, Palmer CG. 2012. The impact of water quality deterioration on macroinvertebrate communities in Swartkops River, South Africa: a multimetric approach. African Journal of Aquatic Science 37: 191–200. doi: 10.2989/16085914.2012.670613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odume ON, Palmer CG, Arimoro FO, Mensah PK. 2015. Influence of selected biotopes on chironomid-based bioassessment of the Swartkops River, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Water SA 41: 343–358. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v41i3.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paisley MF, Trigg DJ, Walley WJ. 2014. Revision of the Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP) score system: derivation of present-only and abundance-related scores from field data. River Research and Applications 30: 887–904. doi: 10.1002/rra.2686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer RW, Taylor ED. 2004. The Namibian Scoring System (NASS) Version 2 rapid bio-assessment method for rivers. African Journal of Aquatic Science 29: 229–234. doi: 10.2989/16085910409503814
   Google Scholar
• Pereira-da-Conceicoa LL. 2016. Phylogenetics and historical biogeography of the Teloganodidae (Ephemeroptera). PhD thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Ractliffe G, Cullis J, Rooseboom G. 2008. Flood disturbance responses of invertebrate assemblages in two cobble and boulder bed rivers of the Western Cape. WRC Report No. 1411/2/08. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg DM, Resh VH. 1993. Introduction to freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg DM, Resh VH (eds), Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic invertebrates. New York: Chapman and Hall. pp 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori M, Peters JG, Hubbard MD. 2008. A revision of Oriental Teloganodidae (Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Ephemerelloidea). Zootaxa 1957: 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Schael DM, King JM. 2005. Western Cape river and catchment signatures. WRC Report No. 1303/1/05. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Uys MC, Goetsch P-A, O’Keeffe JH. 1996. National Biomonitoring Programme for riverine ecosystems: ecological indicators, a review and recommendations. NPB Report Series No. 4. Pretoria: Institute for Water Quality Studies, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Woodiwiss FS. 1964. The biological system of stream classification used by the Trent River Board. Chemistry & Industry 11: 443–447.
   Google Scholar
• Wright JF, Moss D, Armitage PD, Furse MT. 1984. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great Britain based on macroinvertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwater Biology 14: 221–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1984.tb00039.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon IB, Bae YJ. 1993. Indicator organisms and biological indices in freshwater ecosystems. Korean Journal of Nature Conservation 82: 23–27.
   Google Scholar