Longitudinal species turnover rates are predictable and should guide location of sampling sites for South African river surveys to assess aquatic biodiversity

References

• Abell R. 2002. Conservation biology for the biodiversity crisis: A freshwater follow-up. Conservation Biology 16: 1435–1437. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01532.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibald CGM, Coetzee OJ, Kemp PH, Pretorius SJ, Sibbald RR. 1969. Water quality and abatement of pollution in Natal rivers. Part IV. The rivers of Northern Natal and Zululand. National Institute for Water Research, CSIR and the Town and Regional Planning Commission Report.
   Google Scholar
• Baselga A. 2010. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19: 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand PAJ, Kemp PH, Pretorius SJ, Schoonbee HJ. 1967. Water quality and abatement of pollution in Natal rivers. Part II. Survey of the Three Rivers Region. National Institute for Water Research, CSIR and the Town and Regional Planning Commission Report.
   Google Scholar
• Bush A, Nipperess D, Turak E, Hughes L. 2012. Determining vulnerability of stream communities to climate change at the landscape scale. Freshwater Biology 57: 1689–1701. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02835.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho JC, Cardoso P, Borges PAV, Schmera D, Podani J. 2013. Measuring fractions of beta diversity and their relationships to nestedness: a theoretical and empirical comparison of novel approaches. Oikos 122: 825–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20980.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chutter FM. 1970. Hydrobiological studies in the catchment of Vaal Dam, South Africa. Part 1. River zonation and the benthic fauna. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie 55: 445–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.19700550315.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke A, MacNally R, Bond NR, Lake PS. 2008. Macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: a review. Freshwater Biology 53: 1707–1721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02041.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke A, MacNally R, Bond NR, Lake PS. 2010. Conserving macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: the importance of knowing the relative contributions of  and diversity. Diversity & Distributions: 16: 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00692.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucherousset J, Santoul F, Figuerola J, Céréghino R. 2008. How do biodiversity patterns of river animals emerge from the distributions of common and rare species? Biological Conservation 141: 2984–2992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallas HF. 2004. Spatial variability in macroinvertebrate assemblages: comparing regional and multivariate approaches for classifying reference sites in South Africa. African Journal of Aquatic Science 29: 161–171. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085910409503807.
   Google Scholar
• Dallas HF, Janssens MP, Day JA. 1999. An aquatic macroinvertebrate and chemical database for riverine ecosystems. Water SA 25: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daufresne M, Bady P, Fruget J-F. 2007. Impacts of global changes and extreme hydroclimatic events on macroinvertebrate community structures in the French Rhône. Oecologia 151: 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0655-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day JH, de Moor IJ. 2002. Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of southern Africa. Volume 6: Araneae, Water Mites, Mollusca. x + 141 p. Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission. ISBN 1-86845-875-X.
   Google Scholar
• Day JH, Stewart BA, de Moor IJ, Louw AE. 2001. Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of southern Africa. Volume 4: Crustacea III: Bathynellacea, Amphipoda, Isopoda, Spelaeogriphacea, Tanaidacea and Decapoda. x + 141 p. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Day JH, Harrison AD, de Moor IJ. (Eds). 2003. Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of southern Africa. Volume 9: Diptera. X + 200 p. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• de Moor FC. 2002. Shortcomings and advantages of using rapid biological assessment techniques for the purpose of characterizing river in South Africa. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für Theoretische-und Angewante Limnologie 28: 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/03680770.2001.11901795.
   Google Scholar
• de Moor FC. 2007. Regional biogeographical differences in Trichoptera diversity in South Africa: Observed patterns and processes. (pp 211–218). In: Bueno-Soria J, Barba-Alvares R, Armitage B (Eds). Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Trichoptera. (2006 Mexico City). The Caddis Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Moor IJ, Day JH, de Moor FC. (Eds). 2003a. Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of southern Africa. Volume 7: Insecta 1: Ephemeroptera, Odonata & Plecoptera. x + 288 p. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• de Moor IJ, Day JH, de Moor FC. (Eds). 2003b. Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of southern Africa. Volume 8: Insecta II: Hemiptera, Megaloptera, Neuroptera, Trichoptera & Lepidoptera. x + 209 p. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Dollar LH, Dollar ESJ, Moolman J. 2006. Development of an automated desktop procedure for defining macro-reaches for river longitudinal profiles. Water SA 32: 395–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domisch S, Jahnig SC, Haase P. 2011. Climate-change winners and losers: stream macroinvertebrates of a submontane region in Central Europe. Freshwater Biology 56: 2009–2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02631.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eady BR, Rivers-Moore NA, Hill TR. (2013) Relationship between water temperature predictability and aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblages in two South African streams. African Journal of Aquatic Science 38: 163–174. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2012.763110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin M-J, Dale M. 2006. Spatial Analysis: A guide for Ecologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frissell CA, Liss WJ, Warren CE, Hurley MD. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10: 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4: 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves C. 2003. Drafting a conservation blueprint: A practitioner’s guide to planning for biodiversity. Washington, DC: The Nature Conservancy, Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison AD. 1958. Hydrobiological studies on the Great Berg River. Part II: Quantitative studies on sandy bottoms, notes on tributaries and further information on the fauna, arranged systematically. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 35: 227–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00359195809520026.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison AD, Agnew JD. 1962. The distribution of invertebrates endemic to acid streams in the western and southern Cape province. Annals of the Cape Provincial Museum 2: 273–291.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison AD, Elsworth JF. 1958. Hydrobiological studies of the Great Berg River, Western Cape Province. Part I: General description, chemical studies and main features of the flora and fauna. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 35: 125–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00359195809520025.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins M. 2003. Prospects for biodiversity. Science 302: 1175–1177. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1088666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp PH, Chutter FM, Coetzee DJ. 1976. Water quality and abatement of pollution in Natal rivers. Part V. The rivers of Southern Natal. National Institute for Water Research, CSIR and the Town and Regional Planning Commission Report.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF. 1988. Statistical Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Minshall GW, Petersen RC Jr, Curtis FN. 1985. Species richness in streams of different size from the same drainage basin. American Naturalist 125: 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/284326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliff WD. 1960. Hydrobiological studies on the Tugela River system, Part I. The main Tugela River. Hydrobiologia 14: 281–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162106.
   Google Scholar
• Oliff WD, King JL. 1964. Hydrobiological studies on the Tugela River system, Part IV The Mooi River. Hydrobiologia 24: 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142003.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer RW, O’Keeffe JH. 1989. Temperature characteristics of an impounded river. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 116: 471–485.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer RW, O’Keeffe JH. 1990. Downstream effects of a small impoundment on a turbid river. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 119: 457–473.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge TC, Maud RR. 2000. Macro-scale geomorphic evolution of southern Africa. (pp 3–18). In: Partridge TC, Maud RR (Eds). The Cenozoic of Southern Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rivers-Moore NA. 2012. Turnover patterns in fish versus macroinvertebrates - implications for conservation planning. African Journal of Aquatic Science 37: 301–309. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2012.708857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers-Moore NA, de Moor FC, Morris C, O’Keeffe J. 2007. Effect of flow variability modification and hydraulics on invertebrate communities in the Great Fish River (Eastern Cape province, South Africa), with particular reference to critical hydraulic thresholds limiting larval densities of Simulium chutteri Lewis (Diptera, Simuliidae). River Research and Applications 23: 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon AL. 2012. Possible climate-induced shift of stoneflies in a southern Appalachian catchment. Freshwater Science 31: 765–774. https://doi.org/10.1899/11-135.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stals R, de Moor IJ. (Eds). 2007. Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of southern Africa. Volume 10: Coleoptera. xii + 263 p. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Statzner B, Higler B. 1986. Stream hydraulics as a major determinant of benthic invertebrate zonation patterns. Freshwater Biology 16: 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1986.tb00954.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE. 1980. The River Continuum Concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward JV, Stanford JA. 1983. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: an explanation for biotic diversity patterns in lotic ecosystems. (pp 347–356). In: Fontain TD, Bartell SM (Eds). Dynamics of Lotic Ecosystems. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Ann Arbor Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker RH. 1952. A study of summer foliage insect communities in the Great Smokey mountains. Ecological Monographs 22: 1–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/1948527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker RH. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21: 213–251. doi: 10.2307/1218190
   Google Scholar
• World Conservation Union 2000. The 2000 IUCN red list of threatened species. Gland: IUCN. http://www.redlist.org/.
   Google Scholar