Perspectives on Protecting African freshwater Ecosystems in the Anthropocene

References

• Birkhead AL, Brown CA, Bukhari H, Reinecke MK, Mgoola WO, Nyirenda JK. 2022a. The Elephant Marsh, Malawi – Part 1: reconstruction of the historic hydromorphology. African Journal of Aquatic Science 47: 369–385. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2022.2093828.
   Google Scholar
• Birkhead AL, Reinecke MK, Brown CA, Mgoola WO, Nyirenda JK. 2022b. The Elephant Marsh, Malawi – Part 2: two-dimensional hydrodynamic modelling in support of an eco-social assessment. African Journal of Aquatic Science 47: 386–404. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2022.2124228.
   Google Scholar
• Brown C, Campher D, King J. 2020. Status and Trends in EFlows in Southern Africa. Natural Resources Forum 44: 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown C, Joubert A, Turpie J, Reinecke K, Birkhead A, Forsythe K, Davies T, Mgoola W, Nyirenda J, Arthur R. 2022. The Elephant Marsh, Malawi – Part 3: the application of an eco-social model to assess options for managing ecological status. African Journal of Aquatic Science 47: 405–420. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2022.2044750.
   Google Scholar
• Bukhari H, Brown CA. 2022. A comparative review of decision support tools routinely used by selected transboundary River Basin Organisations. African Journal of Aquatic Science 47: 318–337. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2021.1976610.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn J. 2021. Knowledge integration in transdisciplinary sustainability science: Tools from applied critical realism. Sustainable Development 30: 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallas H, Rivers-Moore N. 2022a. A protocol and tools for setting environmental water temperature guidelines for perennial rivers in South Africa. African Journal of Aquatic Science 47: 275–290. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2021.1982673.
   Google Scholar
• Dallas H, Shelton J, Sutton T, Cuptura DT, Kajee M, Job N. 2022b. The Freshwater Biodiversity Information System (FBIS) – mobilising data for evaluating long-term change in South African rivers. African Journal of Aquatic Science 47: 291–306. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2021.1982672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewart-Smith JL. 2022. Drivers of periphyton biomass in south-western Cape rivers, South Africa, and the implications for management. African Journal of Aquatic Science 47: 259–274. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2022.2047589.
   Google Scholar
• Joubert AR, Brown CA, King JM, Beuster H, Greyling A. 2022. DRIFT: incorporating an eco-social system network and time series approach into environmental flow assessments. African Journal of Aquatic Science 47: 338–352. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2022.2107477.
   Google Scholar
• King J, Brown C. 2021. Africa’s Living Rivers: Managing for Sustainability. Dædalus 150: 240–259. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King J, Pienaar H (eds). 2011. Sustainable use of South Africa’s inland waters: A situation assessment of Resource Directed Measures 12 years after the 1998 National Water Act. Water Research Commission Report No. TT 491/11. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa. 259 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Libala N, Griffin N, Nyingwa A, Dini J. 2022. Freshwater ecosystems and interactions with the SDG 2030 Agenda: implications for SDG implementation in South Africa. African Journal of Aquatic Science 47: 353–368. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2022.2109574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nature Geoscience. 2021. Valuing Wetlands (Editorial). 14: 111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00713-4.
   Google Scholar
• Nature Sustainability. 2021. Too Much and Not Enough (editorial) 4: 659. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00766-8.
   Google Scholar
• Odume ON. 2022. The contribution and value of the trait-based approach to water resource protection. African Journal of Aquatic Science 47: 307–317. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2022.2047590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe JH. 2018. A perspective on training methods aimed at building local capacity for the assessment and implementation of environmental flows in rivers. Frontiers in Environmental Science 6: article 125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00125.
   Google Scholar
• Reinecke MK, Brown CA, Esler KJ, King JM. 2022. Using riparian plant species to locate the 1:2-year floodline on single channel rivers. African Journal of Aquatic Science 47: 245–258. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2021.2007044.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter AR, Hughes DA, Retief DCH, Mantel SK. 2017. A management-oriented water quality model for data scarce catchments. Environmental Modelling and Software 97: 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tickner D, Opperman JJ, Abell R, Acreman M, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Cooke SJ, Dalton J, Darwall W, Edwards G, et al. 2020. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: an emergency recovery plan. Bioscience 70: 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venot J-P, Vos J, Molle F, Zwarteveen M, Veldwisch GJ, Kuper M, Mdee A, Ertsen M, Boelens R, Cleaver F, et al. 2022. A Bridge over Troubled Waters. Nature Sustainability 5: 92. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00835-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wepener V, O’Brien G. The application of Bayesian networks to evaluate risks from multiple stressors to water quality of freshwater ecosystems. African Journal of Aquatic Science 47: 231–244. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2022.2130866.
   Google Scholar