Abundance and degree of residency of humpback dolphins Sousa plumbea in Mossel Bay, South Africa

References

• Anchor Environmental. 2012. Great Brak estuary situation assessment. Unpublished report. Prepared for Cape Action for People and the Environment (C.A.P.E.) Regional Estuarine Management Programme and the Mossel Bay Municipality. Anchor Environmental, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins S, Atkins BL. 2002. Abundance and site fidelity of Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis) at Richards Bay, South Africa. Report No. SC/54/SM presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the International Whaling Commission, Shimonoseki, Japan, May 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins S, Cliff G, Pillay N. 2013. Humpback dolphin bycatch in the shark nets in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Biological Conservation 159: 442–449. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins SA, Plön S, Conry D, Pistorius P, Cockcroft V, Elwen S. In press. A conservation assessment of Sousa plumbea. In: Child MF, Do Linh San E, Raimondo D, Davies-Mostert H (eds), The national Red List of mammals of South Africa, Swaziland and Lesotho. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Baird RW, Gorgone AM, McSweeney DJ, Ligon AD, Deakos MH, Webster DL et al. 2009. Population structure of island-associated dolphins: evidence from photo-identification of common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the main Hawaiian Islands. Marine Mammal Science 25: 251–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00257.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barendse J, Best PB, Thornton M, Pomilla C, Carvalho I, Rosenbaum HC. 2010. Migration redefined? Seasonality, movements and group composition of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae off the west coast of South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 32: 1–22. doi: 10.2989/18142321003714203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best PB. 2007. Whales and dolphins of the southern African subregion. Cape Town: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach (2nd edn). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham KP, Anderson DR, White GC, Brownie C, Pollack KH. 1987. Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release-recapture. American Fisheries Society Monograph 5, part 9: 387–410.
   Google Scholar
• Calambokidis J, Barlow J. 2004. Abundance of blue and humpback whales in the eastern North Pacific estimated by capture-recapture and line-transect methods. Marine Mammal Science 20: 63–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2004.tb01141.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao A. 2001. An overview of closed capture-recapture models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 6: 158–175. doi: 10.1198/108571101750524670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao A, Huggins RM. 2005. Classical closed-population capture-recapture models. In: Amstrup SC, McDonald TL, Manly BFJ (eds), Handbook of capture-recapture analysis. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. pp 22–35.
   Google Scholar
• Conn PB, Gorgone AM, Jugovich AR, Byrd BL, Hansen LJ. 2011. Accounting for transients when estimating abundance of bottlenose dolphins in Choctawhatchee Bay, Florida. The Journal of Wildlife Management 75: 569–579. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooch E, White G. 2012. Program Mark – a gentle introduction (11th edn). Available from http://www.phidot.org.
   Google Scholar
• Cormack RM. 1964. Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals. Biometrika 51: 429–438. doi: 10.1093/biomet/51.3-4.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currey RJC, Dawson SM, Slooten E. 2009. An approach for regional threat assessment under IUCN Red List criteria that is robust to uncertainty: the Fiordland bottlenose dolphins are critically endangered. Biological Conservation 142: 1570–1579. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham B. 1994. The distribution and abundance of the humpback dolphin (Sousa chinensis) along the Natal coast, South Africa. MSc thesis, University of Natal, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Elwen SH, Findlay KP, Kiszka J, Weir CR. 2011. Cetacean research in the southern African subregion: a review of previous studies and current knowledge. African Journal of Marine Science 33: 469–493. doi: 10.2989/1814232X.2011.637614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwen SH, Reeb D, Thornton M, Best PB. 2009. A population estimate of Heaviside's dolphins Cephalorhynchus heavisidii in the southern end of their range. Marine Mammal Science 25: 107–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00246.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay KP, Best PB, Ross GJB, Cockcroft VG. 1992. The distribution of small odontocete cetaceans off the coasts of South Africa and Namibia. In: Payne AIL, Brink KH, Mann KH, Hilborn R (eds), Benguela trophic functioning. South African Journal of Marine Science 12: 237–270.
   Google Scholar
• Guissamulo A, Cockcroft VG. 2004. Ecology and population estimates of Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis) in Maputo Bay, Mozambique. Aquatic Mammals 30: 94–102.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond PS, Mizroch SA, Donovan GP (eds). 1990. Individual recognition of cetaceans: use of photo-identification and other techniques to estimate population parameters. Reports of the International Whaling Commission Special Issue 12: 57–61.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins RM. 1989. On statistical analysis of capture-recapture experiments. Biometrika 76: 133–140. doi: 10.1093/biomet/76.1.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins RM. 1991. Some practical aspects of a conditional likelihood approach to capture experiments. Biometrics 47: 725–732. doi: 10.2307/2532158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson LF, Lipschitz S. 1984. Coastal sensitivity atlas of southern Africa 1984. Pretoria: Department of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson TA, Karczmarski L. 2001. Sousa chinensis. Mammalian Species 655: 1–9. doi: 10.1644/1545-1410(2001)655<0001:SC>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson TA, Rosenbaum HC. 2014. Taxonomic revision of the humpback dolphins (Sousa spp.), and description of a new species from Australia. Marine Mammal Science 30: 1494–1541. doi: 10.1111/mms.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobson AJ. 2006. Insights into population size, group dynamics and site fidelity of humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis) in Plettenberg Bay, South Africa. MSc thesis, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson RL, Bester MN, Dudley SFJ, Oosthuizen WH, Meyer M, Hancke L, Gennari E. 2009. Coastal swimming patterns of white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) at Mossel Bay, South Africa. Environmental Biology of Fishes 85: 189–200. doi: 10.1007/s10641-009-9477-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly GM. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika 52: 225–247. doi: 10.1093/biomet/52.1-2.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karczmarski L. 1996. Ecological studies of humpback dolphins Sousa chinensis in the Algoa Bay region, Eastern Cape, South Africa. PhD thesis, University of Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Karczmarski L. 1999. Group dynamics of humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis) in the Algoa Bay region, South Africa. Journal of Zoology, London 249: 283–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb00765.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karczmarski L, Cockcroft VG. 1998. Matrix photo-identification technique applied in studies of free-ranging bottlenose and humpback dolphins. Aquatic Mammals 24: 143–147.
   Google Scholar
• Karczmarski L, Winter PED, Cockcroft VG, McLachlan A. 1999. Population analyses of Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins Sousa chinensis in Algoa Bay, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Marine Mammal Science 15: 1115–1123. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.1999.tb00880.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith M, Peddemors VM, Bester MN, Ferguson JWH. 2002. Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins at Richard's Bay, South Africa: implications for incidental capture in shark nets. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 32: 153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laake JL. 2013. RMark: an R interface for analysis of capture-recapture data with MARK. AFSC Processed Report No. 2013-01. Alaska Fisheries Science Centre, NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Seattle, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Mansur RM, Strindberg S, Smith BD. 2011. Mark-resight abundance and survival estimation of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops aduncus, in the Swatch-of-No-Ground, Bangladesh. Marine Mammal Science 28: 561–578.
   Google Scholar
• Mendez M, Jefferson TA, Kolokotronis SO, Krützen M, Parra GJ, Collins T et al. 2013. Integrating multiple lines of evidence to better understand the evolutionary divergence of humpback dolphins along their entire distribution range: a new dolphin species in Australian waters? Molecular Ecology 22: 5936–5948. doi: 10.1111/mec.12535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otis DL, Burnham KP, White GC, Anderson DR. 1978. Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs 62: 1–135.
   Google Scholar
• Pledger S. 2000. Unified maximum likelihood estimates for closed capture-recapture models using mixtures. Biometrics 56: 434–442. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00434.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read AJ, Urian KW, Wilson B, Waples DM. 2003. Abundance of bottlenose dolphins in the bays, sounds, and estuaries of North Carolina. Marine Mammal Science 19: 59–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2003.tb01092.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves RR, Dalebout ML, Jefferson TA, Karczmarski L, Laidre K, O'Corry-Crowe G et al. 2008. Sousa chinensis. The IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2010.4. Available at www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 14 May 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Reisinger RR, Karczmarski L. 2010. Population size estimate of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins in the Algoa Bay region, South Africa. Marine Mammal Science 26: 86–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2009.00324.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross GJB, Cockcroft VG, Melton DA, Butterworth DS. 1989. Population estimates for bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus in Natal and Transkei waters. South African Journal of Marine Science 8: 119–129. doi: 10.2989/02577618909504555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saayman GS, Tayler CK. 1973. Social organisation of inshore dolphins (Tursiops aduncus and Sousa) in the Indian Ocean. Journal of Mammalogy 54: 993–996. doi: 10.2307/1379100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz CJ, Arnason AN. 1996. A general methodology for the analysis of capture-recapture experiments in open populations. Biometrics 52: 860–873. doi: 10.2307/2533048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seber GAF. 1965. A note on the multiple-recapture census. Biometrika 52: 249–259. doi: 10.1093/biomet/52.1-2.249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Goodwin JA. 1997. A molecular genetic assessment of the population structure and variation in two inshore dolphin genera on the east coast of South Africa. PhD thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Swartz CD, Knott M, Malan WM, van Eeden JD. 2000. Biological phosphate removal to meet strict quality requirements for discharge into ecosensitive Hartenbos estuary. Presented at the WISA (Water Institute of South Africa) Biennial Conference, Sun City, South Africa, 28 May–1 June 2000. Available at http://www.ewisa.co.za/literature/files/37swartz.pdf [accessed October 2015].
   Google Scholar
• White GC, Burnham KP. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46 (Supplement): 120–138. doi: 10.1080/00063659909477239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams BK, Nichols JD, Conroy MJ. 2002. Analysis and management of animal populations. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Hammond PS, Thompson PM. 1999. Estimating size and assessing trends in a coastal bottlenose dolphin population. Ecological Applications 9: 288–300. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0288:ESAATI]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar