Anchoring to determine negotiated catch limits: a case study of an industrial fishery in Oman

References

• Al-Masroori HS. 2008. An assessment of the commercial trawl fishery of the Sultanate of Oman using the ecologically sustainable development framework. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania, Australian Maritime College, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Masroori HS, Bose S. 2014. Towards developing index for the assessment of sustainable development: a case study of the Sultanate of Oman. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET), 7–11 July 2014, Brisbane, Australia. IIFET, Corvallis. Available at http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/54719/Al-Masroori267.pdf?sequence=1 [accessed 27 July 2015] (8 pp).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Subhi KKN, Bose S, Al-Masroori HS. 2013. Fishers’ compliance motivations: a case study of the Sultanate of Oman. Marine Policy 37: 141–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann M, Hinz H, Blyth RE, Kaiser M, Rogers SI, Armstrong M. 2004. Using knowledge from fishers and fisheries scientists to identify possible groundfish ‘essential fish habitats’. Fisheries Research 66: 373–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S, Crees-Morris A. 2009. Stakeholder's views on fisheries compliance: an Australian case study. Marine Policy 33: 248–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles A. 1998. Living with uncertainty in fisheries: analytical methods, management priorities and the Canadian groundfishery experience. Fisheries Research 37: 37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Rocha JM, Cervino S, Villasante S. 2012. The common fisheries policy: an enforcement problem. Marine Policy 36: 1309–1314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Valle I, Astorkiza K. 2007. Institutional designs to face the dark side of total allowable catches. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64: 851–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation). 1996. Precautionary approach to capture fisheries and species introductions. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries No. 2. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Francis RIC, Shotton R. 1997. “Risk” in fisheries management: a review. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 1699–1715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Smith D, van Putten IE. 2011. Human behavior: the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management. Fish and Fisheries 12: 2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham A, Boo CH. 2011. A literature review of the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics 40: 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia SM. 1994. The Precautionary Principle: its implications in capture fisheries management. Ocean & Coastal Management 22: 99–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay J. 1998. Truth or consequences. National Fisherman March: 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Getz WM, Bergh MO. 1992. Quota setting in stochastic fisheries. In: Wooster WS (ed.), Fishery science and management objectives and limitations. Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies 28. Berlin: Springer. pp 259–274.
   Google Scholar
• Grafton RQ, Kompas T, McLoughlin R, Rayns N. 2007. Bench-marking for fisheries governance. Marine Policy 31: 470–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger RJR, Garcia SM. 1996. Chronicles of marine fishery landings (1950–1994): trend analysis and fisheries potential. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 359. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Gujarati DN. 2003. Basic economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond JS, Keeney RL, Raiffa H. 1998. The hidden traps in decision making. In: Harvard business review on decision making. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. pp 143–167.
   Google Scholar
• Hare SR. 1990. Demersal finfish final report. Sultanate of Omani-American Joint Commission and Marine Science and Fisheries Centre, Muscat.
   Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J. 2008. Contracts as reference points. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123: 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley TW, Robertson RA. 2006. Stakeholder engagement, cooperative fisheries research and democratic science: the case of the Northeast Consortium. Human Ecology Review 13: 161–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley TW, Robertson RA. 2008. Stakeholder collaboration in fisheries research: integrating knowledge among fishing leaders and science partners in Northern New England. Society and Natural Resources 22: 42–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilborn R. 2002. The dark side of reference points. Bulletin of Marine Science 70: 403–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoggarth DD, Abeyasekera S, Arthur RI, Beddington JR, Burn RW, Halls AS et al. 2006. Stock assessment for fishery management: a framework guide to the stock assessment tools of the Fisheries Management Science Programme. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 487. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Jentoft S. 2000. Legitimacy and disappointment in fisheries management. Marine Policy 24: 141–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentoft S, McCay BJ, Wilson DC. 1998. Social theory and fisheries co-management. Marine Policy 22: 423–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauck T, Clark CW, Mangel M, Munro GR. 1998. Implementing the precautionary principle in fisheries management through marine reserves. Ecological Applications 8: S72–S78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig D, Hilborn R, Walters C. 1993. Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. Science 260: 17, 36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackinson S. 2001. Integrating local and scientific knowledge: an example of fisheries science. Environmental Management 27: 533–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddala GS. 1992. Introduction to econometrics (2nd edn). New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Editions.
   Google Scholar
• MAF (Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries). 2007. Annual Statistics Report for 2006. Muscat, Sultanate of Oman: MAF.
   Google Scholar
• MAF (Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries). 2009a. Fish resources assessment survey of the Arabian Sea coast of Oman. Technical Report 1: Fish resources of the Arabian Sea coast of Oman. MAF, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
   Google Scholar
• MAF (Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries). 2009b. Fish resources assessment survey of the Arabian Sea coast of Oman. Technical Report 2: Demersal fish resources of the Arabian Sea coast of Oman. MAF, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon R, Oxenford HA. 1999. Precautionary assessment and management of dolphinfish in the Caribbean. Scientia Marina 63: 429–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangel M, Clark CW. 1983. Uncertainty, search, and information in fisheries. Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 41: 93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews CP, Al-Mamry J, Al-Habsi S. 2001. Precautionary management of Oman's demersal fishery. In: Goddard S, Al-Oufi H, McIlwain J, Claereboudt M (eds), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Fisheries, Aquaculture and Environment in the Northwest Indian Ocean, 8–10 January 2001, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. Muscat: Sultan Qaboos University Press. pp 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mkenda AF, Folmer H. 2001. The maximum sustainable yield of artisanal fishery in Zanzibar: a cointegration approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 19: 311–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T, Strack F. 2001. The semantics of anchoring. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 86: 234–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakken O, Sandberg P, Steinshamn SI. 1996. Reference points for optimal fish stock management: a lesson to be learned from the Northeast Arctic cod stock. Marine Policy 20: 447–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeroy RS, Berkes F. 1997. Two to tango: the role of government in fisheries co-management. Marine Policy 21: 465–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja Abdullah NM, Kuperan K, Pomeroy RS. 1998. Transaction costs and fisheries co-management. Marine Resource Economics 13: 103–114.
   Google Scholar
• Sen S, Raakjær Nielsen J. 1996. Fisheries co-management: a comparative analysis. Marine Policy 20: 405–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinath M, Kuriakose S, Jayasankar J, Mini KG. 2006. Generalised fishery development model (GFDM) approach for analysis of marine fish landings in India. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 48: 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson RL, Lane DE. 1995. Fisheries management science: a plea for conceptual change. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 2051–2056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocker M, Butler TH. 1990. Surplus production model analysis of crab (Cancer magister Dana) fisheries of British Columbia, Canada. Fisheries Research 9: 231–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright G, Metzner R, Chevis H. 2000. Using mediation to solve fisheries issues in the Guidelines for Voluntary Resource Sharing process. Fisheries Western Australia, Perth.
   Google Scholar