Spatial considerations when monitoring reef fishes

References

• Beale CM, Lennon JJ, Yearsley JM, Brewer MJ, Elston DA. 2010. Regression analysis of spatial data. Ecology Letters 13: 246–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett RH. 2008. Optimisation of a sampling protocol for long-term monitoring of temperate reef fishes. MSc thesis. Rhodes University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett RH, Götz A, Sauer WHH, Cowx IG, Palmer RM. 2009. Optimisation of underwater visual census and controlled angling methods for monitoring subtidal temperate reef fish communities. African Journal of Marine Science 31: 277–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard ATF. 2012. Towards a cost-efficient and standardised monitoring protocol for subtidal reef fish in the Agulhas Ecoregion of South Africa. PhD thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Bivand RS, Pebesma E, Gómez-Rubio V. 2013. Applied spatial data analysis with R. New York: Springer New York.
   Google Scholar
• Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P. 2011. Numerical ecology with R. New York: Springer New York.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45: 5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton CD, Mann BQ, Pollard D, Carpenter KE, Winker H. 2014. Chrysoblephus cristiceps. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T170183A1288745.
   Google Scholar
• Cheal A, Delean S, Sweatman H, Thompson AA. 2007. Spatial synchrony in coral reef fish populations and the influence of climate. Ecology 88: 158–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliff A, Ord J. 1981. Spatial processes: models and applications. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler D, Edwards T, Beard K, Cutler A, Hess K, Gibson J, Lawler JJ. 2007. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88: 2783–2792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araújo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G et al. 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30: 609–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dray S, Pélissier R, Couteron P, Fortin M, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR et al. 2012. Community ecology in the age of multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. Ecological Monographs 82: 257–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin M, Dale MRT. 2005. Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamylton S. 2013. Five practical uses of spatial autocorrelation for studies of coral reef ecology. Marine Ecology Progress Series 478: 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris DJ. 2015. Generating realistic assemblages with a joint species distribution model. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6: 465–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heemstra P, Heemstra E. 2004. Coastal fishes of southern Africa. Grahamstown, South Africa: National Inquiry Services Centre (NISC) and South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB).
   Google Scholar
• Heyns-Veale E, Bernard AT, Parker D, Richoux NB, Langlois T, Harvey ES, Gotz A. 2016. Depth and habitat determine community structure of South Africa’s warm-temperate reef fish. Marine Biology 163: 158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyns E, Bernard A, Richoux N, Götz A. 2016. Depth-related distribution patterns of subtidal macrobenthos in a well-established marine protected area. Marine Biology 163: 39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilborn R, Walters C. 1992. Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: choice, dynamics and uncertainty. New York: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn I. 2006. Incorporating spatial autocorrelation may invert observed patterns. Diversity and Distributions 13: 66–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler JJ, White D, Neilson RP, Blaustein AR. 2006. Predicting climate-induced range shifts: model differences and model reliability. Global Change Biology 12: 1568–1584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74: 1659–1673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennert-Cody CE, Roberts JJ, Stephenson RJ. 2008. Effects of gear characteristics on the presence of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the catches of the purse-seine fishery of the eastern Pacific Ocean. ICES Journal of Marine Science 65: 970–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebhold AM, Gurevitch J. 2002. Integrating the statistical analysis of spatial data in ecology. Ecography 25: 553–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunder MN, Punt AE. 2004. Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches. Fisheries Research 70: 141–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntire E, Fajardo A. 2009. Beyond description: the active and effective way to infer processes from spatial patterns. Ecology 90: 46–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy P, Anticamara J, Rist J, Vincent A. 2010. Frugal conservation: what does it take to detect changes in fish populations? Biological Conservation 143: 2532–2542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran P. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37: 17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne PE, Foody GM, Suárez-Seoane S. 2007. Non-stationarity and local approaches to modelling the distributions of wildlife. Diversity and Distributions 13: 313–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovaskainen O, Abrego N, Halme P, Dunson D. 2016. Using latent variable models to identify large networks of species-to-species associations at different spatial scales. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7: 549–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovaskainen O, Soininen J. 2011. Making more out of sparse data: hierarchical modeling of species communities. Ecological Society of America 92: 289–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker D. 2015. An evaluation of sampling and statistical methods for long-term monitoring of subtidal reef fishes: a case study of Tsitsikamma National Park marine protected area. PhD thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa
   Google Scholar
• Parker D, Winker H, Attwood CG, Kerwath SE. 2016a. Dark times for dageraad Chrysoblephus cristiceps: evidence for stock collapse. African Journal of Marine Science 38: 341–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker D, Winker H, Bernard ATF, Heyns-Veale E, Langlois TJ, Harvey ES, Gotz A. 2016b. Insights from baited video sampling of temperate reef fishes: how biased are angling surveys? Fisheries Research 179: 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planque B, Loots C, Petitgas P, Lindstrøm U, Vaz S. 2011. Understanding what controls the spatial distribution of fish populations using a multi-model approach. Fisheries Oceanography 20: 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant RE. 2012. Spatial data analysis in ecology and agriculture using R. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sink K, Holness S, Harris L, Majiedt P, Atkinson L, Robinson T et al. 2012. National Biodiversity Assessment 2011: technical report, volume 4: marine and coastal component. Pretoria, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Thorson JT, Minto C. 2014. Mixed effects: a unifying framework for statistical modelling in fisheries biology. ICES Journal of Marine Science 72: 1245–1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson JT, Scheuerell MD, Shelton AO, See KE, Skaug HJ, Kristensen K. 2015. Spatial factor analysis: a new tool for estimating joint species distributions and correlations in species range. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6: 627–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler WR. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46: 234–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos P, Meelis E, ter Keurs WJ. 2000. A framework for the design of ecological monitoring programs as a tool for environmental and nature management. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 61: 317–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood SN. 2006. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. New York: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. 2009. Mixed-effects models and extensions in ecology with R. London: Springer Science and Business Media.
   Google Scholar