Stock separation of the shallow-water hake Merluccius capensis in the Benguela ecosystem using otolith shape analysis

References

• Anderson MJ, Willis TJ. 2003. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84: 511–525. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0511:CAOPCA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg GA, Brown RW. 2000. Stock identification of haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus on Georges Bank based on otolith shape analysis. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129: 935–945. doi: 10.1577/1548-8659(2000)129<0935:SIOHMA>2.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg GA, Waldman JR. 1999. A holistic approach to fish stock identification. Fisheries Research 43: 35–44. doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(99)00065-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg GA, Overholtz WJ, Munroe NJ. 2001. The use of internal otolith morphometrics for identification of haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) stocks on Georges Bank. Fishery Bulletin 99: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolles KL, Begg GA. 2000. Distinction between silver hake (Merluccius bilinearis) stocks in US waters of the northwest Atlantic based on whole otolith morphometrics. Fishery Bulletin 98: 451–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burmeister LM. 2001. Depth-stratified density estimates and distribution of the Cape hake Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus off Namibia deduced from survey data, 1990–1999. South African Journal of Marine Science 23: 347–356. doi: 10.2989/025776101784528863
   Google Scholar
• Campana SE, Casselman JM. 1993. Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50: 1062–1083. doi: 10.1139/f93-123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cañás L, Stransky C, Schlickeisen J, Sampedro MP, Farina AC. 2012. Use of the otolith shape analysis in stock identification of anglerfish (Lophius piscatorius) in the Northeast Atlantic. ICES Journal of Marine Science 69: 250–256. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fss006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardinale M, Doering-Arjes P, Kastowsky M, Mosegaard H. 2004. Effects of sex, stock, and environment on the shape of known-age Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61: 158–167. doi: 10.1139/f03-151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries DA, Grimes CB, Prager MH. 2002. Using otolith shape analysis to distinguish eastern Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean stocks of king mackerel. Fisheries Research 57: 51–62. doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00332-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durholtz MD, Singh L, Fairweather TP, Leslie RW, van der Lingen CD, Bross CAR et al. 2015. Fisheries, ecology and markets of South African hake. In: Arancibia H (ed.), Hakes: biology and exploitation. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. pp 38–69.
   Google Scholar
• Eliceiri KW, Berthold MR, Goldberg IG, Ibáñez L, Manjunath BS, Martone ME et al. 2012. Biological imaging software tools. Nature Methods 9: 697–710. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauldie RW, Crampton JS. 2002. An eco-morphological explanation of individual variability in the shape of the fish otolith: comparison of the otolith of Hoplostethus atlanticus with other species by depth. Journal of Fish Biology 60: 1204–1221. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb01715.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauldie RW, Jones JB. 2000. Stocks, or geographically separated populations of the New Zealand orange roughy, Hoplostethus atlanticus, in relation to parasite infestation, growth rate, and otolith shape. Bulletin of Marine Science 67: 949–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordoa A, Macpherson E, Olivar MP, Scharm W. 1995. Biology and fisheries of Namibian hakes (M. paradoxus and M. capensis). In: Alheit J, Pitcher TJ (eds), Hake fisheries ecology and markets. London: Chapman and Hall. pp 49–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hamer PA, Kemp J, Robertson S, Hindell JS. 2012. Multiple otolith techniques aid stock discrimination of a broadly distributed deepwater fishery species, blue grenadier, Macruronus novaezelandiae. Fisheries Research 113: 21–34. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques R, von der Heyden S, Lipiński MR, du Toit N, Kainge P, Bloomer P, Matthee CA. 2016. Spatio-temporal genetic structure and the effects of long-term fishing in two partially sympatric offshore demersal fishes. Molecular Ecology 25: 5843–5861. doi: 10.1111/mec.13890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings L, van der Lingen CD, Shannon LJ, Crawford RJM, Verheye HMS, Bartholomae CH et al. 2009. The Benguela Current: an ecosystem of four components. Progress in Oceanography 83: 15–32. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen T, Kainge P, Singh L, Wilhelm M, Durholtz D, Strømme T et al. 2015. Spawning patterns of shallow-water hake (Merluccius capensis) and deep-water hake (M. paradoxus) in the Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem inferred from gonadosomatic indices. Fisheries Research 172: 168–180. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen T, Kristensen K, Kainge P, Durholtz DD, Strømme T, Thygesen UH et al. 2016. Migration, distribution and population (stock) structure of shallow-water hake (Merluccius capensis) in the Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem inferred using a geostatistical population model. Fisheries Research 179: 156–167. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.02.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jónsdóttir IG, Campana SE, Marteinsdottir G. 2006. Otolith shape and temporal stability of spawning groups of Icelandic cod (Gadus morhua L.). ICES Journal of Marine Science 63: 1501–1512. doi: 10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapula VKK. 2018. Seasonal transboundary movement of Cape hake (Merluccius capensis) across the western coast of southern Africa. MSc thesis, University of Namibia, Namibia.
   Google Scholar
• Kathena JN, Nielsen A, Høgsbro Thygesen U, Berg CW. 2016. Hake species (Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus) assessment in the Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem. Environmental Development 17: 193–201. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee B, Brewin PE, Brickle P, Randhawa H. 2018. Use of otolith shape to inform stock structure in Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) in the south-western Atlantic. Marine and Freshwater Research 69: 1238–1247. doi: 10.1071/MF17327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Oksanen J, Ter Braak CJ. 2011. Testing the significance of canonical axes in redundancy analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2: 269–277. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00078.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leguá J, Plaza G, Pérez D, Arkhipkin A. 2013. Otolith shape analysis as a tool for stock identification of the southern blue whiting, Micromesistius australis. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 41: 479–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libungan LA, Pálsson S. 2015. ShapeR: an R package to study otolith shape variation among fish populations. PLoS ONE 10: e0121102.
   Google Scholar
• Lombarte A, Torres G, Morales-Nin B. 2003. Specific Merluccius otolith growth patterns related to phylogenetics and environmental factors. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83: 277–281. doi: 10.1017/S0025315403007070h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahé K, Gourtay C, Bled Defruit G, Chantre C, de Pontual H, Amara R et al. 2019. Do environmental conditions (temperature and food composition) affect otolith shape during fish early-juvenile phase? An experimental approach applied to European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 521: article 151239. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2019.151239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mapp J, Hunter E, Van Der Kooij J, Songer S, Fisher M. 2017. Otolith shape and size: the importance of age when determining indices for fish-stock separation. Fisheries Research 190: 43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marengo M, Baudouin M, Viret A, Laporte M, Berrebi P, Vignon M et al. 2017. Combining microsatellite, otolith shape and parasite community analyses as a holistic approach to assess population structure of Dentex dentex. Journal of Sea Research 128: 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2017.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martino J, Doubleday ZA, Woodcock SH, Gillanders BM. 2017. Elevated carbon dioxide and temperature affects otolith development, but not chemistry, in a diadromous fish. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 495: 57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2017.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Nin B. 2000. Review of the growth regulation processes of otolith daily increment formation. Fisheries Research 46: 53–67. doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00133-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musariri C. 2015. Guide to Namibia’s fisheries. Windhoek, Namibia: John Meinert Printing.
   Google Scholar
• Parisi-Baradad V, Lombarte A, García-Ladona E, Cabestany J, Piera J, Chic O. 2005. Otolith shape contour analysis using affine transformation invariant wavelet transforms and curvature scale space representation. Marine and Freshwater Research 56: 795–804. doi: 10.1071/MF04162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne AIL. 1989. Cape hakes. In: Payne AIL, Crawford RJM (eds), Oceans of life off southern Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: Vlaeberg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer LW. 1993. Parasites of Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus from the coast of Namibia. Applied Parasitology 34: 143–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reis-Santos P, Tanner SE, Aboim MA, Vasconcelos RP, Laroche J, Charrier G et al. 2018. Reconciling differences in natural tags to infer demographic and genetic connectivity in marine fish populations. Scientific Reports 8: article 10343. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28701-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. 2018. Integrated development for R. Boston, Massachusetts: RStudio, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Salvanes AGV, Bartholomae C, Yemane D, Gibbons MJ, Kainge P, Krakstad JO et al. 2015. Spatial dynamics of the bearded goby and its key fish predators off Namibia vary with climate and oxygen availability. Fisheries Oceanography 24: 88–101. doi: 10.1111/fog.12068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schade FM, Weist P, Krumme U. 2019. Evaluation of four stock discrimination methods to assign individuals from mixed-stock fisheries using genetically validated baseline samples. Marine Ecology Progress Series 627: 125–139. doi: 10.3354/meps13061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stransky C, Murta AG, Schlickeisen J, Zimmermann C. 2008. Otolith shape analysis as a tool for stock separation of horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean. Fisheries Research 89: 159–166. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2007.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres GJ, Lombarte A, Morales-Nin B. 2000. Sagittal otolith size and shape variability to identify geographical intraspecific differences in three species of the genus Merluccius. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80: 333–342. doi: 10.1017/S0025315499001915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm MR, Roux JP, Moloney CL, Jarre A. 2013. Data from fur seal scats reveal when Namibian Merluccius capensis are hatched and how fast they grow. ICES Journal of Marine Science 70: 1429–1438. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fst101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm MR, Kirchner CH, Roux JP, Jarre A, Iitembu JA, Kathena JN, Kainge P. 2015a. Biology and fisheries of the shallow-water hake (Merluccius capensis) and the deep-water hake (M. paradoxus) in Namibia. In: Arancibia HG (ed.), Hakes: biology and exploitation. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm MR, Jarre A, Moloney CL. 2015b. Spawning and nursery areas, longitudinal and cross-shelf migrations of the Merluccius capensis stock in the northern Benguela. Fisheries Oceanography 24: 31–45. doi: 10.1111/fog.12058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm MR, Moloney CL, Paulus S, Roux JP. 2017. Fast growth inferred for northern Benguela shallow-water hake Merluccius capensis using annual survey- and monthly commercial length- frequency distributions. Fisheries Research 193: 7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm MR, Moloney CL, Paulus SC, Kashava S, Brinkman FR, van der Plas AK, Roux JP. 2018. Biannual otolith zonation of Cape hake (Merluccius capensis) in response to fish physiology and environment in the northern Benguela. Journal of Marine Systems 188: 98–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm MR, Paulus SC, Kashava S. 2019. New age-determination method based on fast growth rate of Cape hake Merluccius capensis. African Journal of Marine Science 41: 119–124. doi: 10.2989/1814232X.2019.1581659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Fan Y, Ye Z, Li Z, Yu H. 2017. Identification of five Pampus species from the coast of China based on sagittal otolith morphology analysis. Acta Oceanologica Sinica 36: 51–56. doi: 10.1007/s13131-017-0982-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar