Evaluating the evidence for ecological effectiveness of South Africa’s marine protected areas

References

• Adams RJ, Kowalski P. 2021. State of marine protected area management effectiveness in South Africa. WWF (World Wildlife Fund) South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: WWF.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson RJ, Bolton JJ, Stegenga H. 2009. Using the biogeographic distribution and diversity of seaweed species to test the efficacy of marine protected areas in the warm-temperate Agulhas Marine Province, South Africa. Diversity and Distributions 15: 1017–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANZECC-TFMPA (Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council – Task Force on Marine Protected Areas). 1999. Understanding and applying the principles of comprehensiveness, adequacy and representativeness for the NRSMPA, Version 3.1. Report prepared by the Action Team for the ANZECC Task Force on Marine Protected Areas – Marine Group. Canberra, Australia: Environment Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Arkema KK, Abrahamson SC, Dewsbury BM. 2006. Marine ecosystem-based management: from characterization to implementation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 525–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwood C. 2003. Dynamics of the fishery for galjoen Dichistius capensis, with an assessment of monitoring methods. African Journal of Marine Science 25: 311–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwood CG, Bennett BA. 1994. Variation in dispersal of galjoen (Coracinus capensis) (Teleostei: Coracinidae) from a marine reserve. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 51: 1247–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwood CG, Bennett BA. 1995. Modelling the effect of marine reserves on the recreational shore-fishery of the south-western Cape, South Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 16: 227–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwood CG, Cowley PD. 2005. Alternate explanations of the dispersal pattern of galjoen (Dichistius capensis). African Journal of Marine Science 27: 141–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwood CG, Mann BQ, Beaumont J, Harris JM. 1997. Review of the state of marine protected areas in South Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 18: 341–367.
   Google Scholar
• Attwood CG, Allen J, Claasen PJ. 2002. Nearshore surface current patterns in the Tsitsikamma National Park, South Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 24: 151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwood CG, Cowley PD, Kerwath SE, Næsje TF, Økland F, Thorstad EB. 2008. First tracking of white stumpnose Rhabdosargus globiceps (Sparidae) in a South African marine protected area. African Journal of Marine Science 29: 147–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwood CG, van Zyl CS, Lombard AT, McCagh C. 2016. Seasonally and spatially referenced estimates of recreational shore-angling effort, catch composition, catch rates and total catch in the Goukamma Marine Protected Area, South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 38: 563–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awad AA, Griffiths CL, Turpie JK. 2002. Distribution of South African marine benthic invertebrates applied to the selection of priority conservation areas. Diversity and Distributions 8: 129–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock RC, Shears NT, Alcala AC, Barrett NS, Edgar GJ, Lafferty KD et al. 2010. Decadal trends in marine reserves reveal differential rates of change in direct and indirect effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 18256–18261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon E, Gannona P, Stephen S, Seyoum-Edjigu E, Schmidt M, Lang B et al. 2019. Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 in the like-minded megadiverse countries. Journal for Nature Conservation 51: article 125723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baliwe NG. 2021. The effectiveness of Table Mountain National Park Marine Protected Area in the conservation of intertidal rocky shore biodiversity. MSc thesis, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Ban NC, Gurney GG, Marshall NA, Whitney CK, Mills M, Gelcich S et al. 2019. Wellbeing outcomes of marine protected areas. Nature Sustainability 2: 524–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett NS, Edgar GJ, Buxton CD, Haddon M. 2007. Changes in fish assemblages following 10 years of protection in Tasmanian marine protected areas. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 345: 141–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates AE, Cooke RSC, Duncan MI, Edgar GJ, Bruno JF, Benedetti-Cecchi L et al. 2019. Climate resilience in marine protected areas and the ‘Protection Paradox’. Conservation Biology 236: 305–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batista MI, Baeta F, Costa MJ, Cabral HN. 2011. MPA as management tools for small-scale fisheries: the case study of Arrábida Marine Protected Area (Portugal). Ocean and Coastal Management 54: 137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaugrand G, Edwards M, Raybaud V, Goberville E, Kirby RR. 2015. Future vulnerability of marine biodiversity compared with contemporary and past changes. Nature Climate Change 5: 695–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell JD. 1983. Effects of depth and marine reserve fishing restrictions on the structure of a rocky reef fish assemblage in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Applied Ecology 20: 357–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett BA, Attwood CG. 1991. Evidence for recovery of a surf-zone fish assemblage following the establishment of a marine reserve on the southern coast of South Africa. Marine Ecology Progress Series 75: 173–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett BA, Attwood CG. 1993. Shore-angling catches in the De Hoop Nature Reserve, South Africa, and further evidence for the protective value of marine reserves. South African Journal of Marine Science 13: 213–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett RH, Cowley PD, Childs AR, Attwood CG, Swart L, Næsje TF. 2017. Movement patterns of an endangered fishery species, Lithognathus lithognathus (Sparidae), and the role of no-take marine protected areas as a management tool. African Journal of Marine Science 39: 475–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett NJ, Di Franco A, Calò A, Nethery E, Niccolini F, Milazzo M, Guidetti P. 2019. Local support for conservation is associated with perceptions of good governance, social impacts, and ecological effectiveness. Conservation Letters 12: e12640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton J, Stegenga H. 2002. Seaweed species diversity in South Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 24: 9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton J, Leliaert F, De Clerck O, Anderson R, Stegenga H, Engledow H, Coppejans E. 2004. Where is the western limit of the tropical Indian Ocean seaweed flora? An analysis of intertidal seaweed biogeography on the east coast of South Africa. Marine Biology 144: 51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botsford LW, Micheli F, Hastings A. 2003. Principles for the design of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13(special issue 1): 25–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branch G, Branch M. 2018. Living shores – interacting with southern Africa’s marine ecosystems. Cape Town, South Africa: Struik Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Branch GM, Odendaal FJ. 2003. The effects of marine protected areas on the population dynamics of a South African limpet, Cymbula oculus, relative to the influence of wave action. Biological Conservation 114: 255–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs JC, Bowen BW. 2012. A realignment of marine biogeographic provinces with particular reference to fish distributions. Journal of Biogeography 39: 12–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brill G, Raemaekers S. 2013. A decade of illegal fishing in Table Mountain National Park (2000–2009): trends in the illicit harvest of abalone Haliotis midae and West Coast rock lobster Jasus lalandii. African Journal of Marine Science 35: 491–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer SL. 2002. Movement patterns of red steenbras Petrus rupestris tagged and released in the Tsitsikamma National Park, South Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 24: 375–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer SL, Griffiths MH, Roberts MJ. 2003. Adult movement and larval dispersal of Argyrozona argyrozona (Pisces: Sparidae) from a temperate marine protected area. South African Journal of Marine Science 25: 395–402.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton CD. 1993. Life-history changes in exploited reef fishes on the east coast of South Africa. Environmental Biology of Fishes 36: 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton CD, Allen JE. 1989. Mark and recapture studies of two reef sparids in the Tsitsikamma Coastal National Park. Koedoe 32: 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton CD, Smale MJ. 1989. Abundance and distribution patterns of three temperate marine reef fish (Teleostei: Sparidae) in exploited and unexploited areas off the southern Cape coast. Journal of Applied Ecology 26: 441–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton CD, Hartmann K, Kearney R, Gardner C. 2014. When is spillover from marine reserves likely to benefit fisheries? PLoS ONE 9: e107032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caveen AJ, Gray TS, Stead SM, Polunin NVC. 2013. MPA policy: what lies behind the science? Marine Policy 37: 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caveen AJ, Polunin N, Gray T, Stead SM. 2015. The controversy over marine protected areas: science meets policy. Gland, Switzerland: Springer Briefs.
   Google Scholar
• CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2004. Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its seventh meeting. Marine and coastal biological diversity. Seventh Meeting of the Conference for the Parties, 9–20 and 27 February 2004, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, UNEP/ CBD/COP/DEC/VII/5. Montreal, Canada: CBD.
   Google Scholar
• CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2009a. Annex II: Scientific guidance for selecting areas to establish a representative network of marine protected areas, including in open ocean waters and deep-sea habitats. In: Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its ninth meeting. Marine and coastal biodiversity. Ninth Meeting of the Conference for the Parties, 19–30 May 2008, Bonn, Germany, UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/IX/20. Montreal, Canada: CBD.
   Google Scholar
• CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2009b. Annex I: Scientific criteria for identifying ecologically or biologically significant marine areas in need of protection in open-ocean waters and deep-sea habitats. In: Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its ninth meeting. Marine and coastal biodiversity. Ninth Meeting of the Conference for the Parties, 19–30 May 2008, Bonn, Germany, UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/IX/20. Montreal, Canada: CBD.
   Google Scholar
• CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2010. Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its tenth meeting. X/2. The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Tenth Meeting of the Conference for the Parties, 18–29 October 2010, Nagoya, Japan, UNEP/CBD/COP/10/27. Montreal, Canada: CBD.
   Google Scholar
• CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2014. Marine and coastal biodiversity: ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs). In: Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Twelfth Meeting of the Conference for the Parties, 6–17 October 2014, Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea, UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/XII/22. Montreal, Canada: CBD.
   Google Scholar
• Celliers L, Mann BQ, Macdonald AHH, Schleyer MH. 2007. A benthic survey of the rocky reefs off Pondoland, South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 29: 65–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick P, Duncan J, Tunley K. 2014. State of management of South Africa’s marine protected areas. WWF (World Wildlife Fund) South Africa Report Series – 2014/Marine/001. Cape Town, South Africa: WWF.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers R. 2012. Systematic marine spatial planning and monitoring in a data poor environment: a case study of Algoa Bay, South Africa. PhD thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Clark B, Lombard A. 2007. A marine conservation plan for the Agulhas bioregion: options and opportunities for enhancing the existing MPA network. Cape Town, South Africa: WWF South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Claudet J, Osenberg CW, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Domenici P, García-Charton JA, Pérez-Ruzafa A et al. 2008. Marine reserves: size and age do matter. Ecology Letters 11: 481–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole VJ, McQuaid CD, Nakin MDV. 2011. Marine protected areas export larvae of infauna, but not of bioengineering mussels to adjacent areas. Biological Conservation 144: 2088–2096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conry D. 2017. Population size, movement patterns and habitat use of Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis) along the south coast of South Africa. MSc thesis, Nelson Mandela University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley PD, Brouwer SL, Tilney RL. 2002. The role of Tsitsikamma National Park in the management of four shore-angling fish along the south-eastern Cape coast of South Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 24: 27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowley PD, Kerwath SE, Childs AR, Thorstad EB, Økland F, Næsje TF. 2008. Estuarine habitat use by juvenile dusky kob Argyrosomus japonicus (Sciaenidae), with implications for management. African Journal of Marine Science 30: 247–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford RJM, Shannon LJ, Whittington PA, Murison G. 2000. Factors influencing growth of the African penguin colony at Boulders, South Africa, 1985–1999. South African Journal of Marine Science 22: 111–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creel L. 2003. Ripple effects: population and coastal regions. Washington DC: Population Reference Bureau. Available at https://www.prb.org/rippleeffectspopulationandcoastalregions [accessed 27 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Currie JC, Sink KJ, Le Noury P, Branch GM. 2012. Comparing fish communities in sanctuaries, partly protected areas and open-access reefs in south-east Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 34: 269–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly R, Smale MJ, Singh S, Anders D, Shivji M, Daly CAK et al. 2018. Refuges and risks: evaluating the benefits of an expanded MPA network for mobile apex predators. Diversity and Distributions 24: 1217–1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dames V, Bernard A, Floros C, Mann BQ, Speed C, Maggs JQ et al. 2020. Zonation and reef size significantly influence fish population structure in an established marine protected area, iSimangaliso Wetland Park, South Africa. Ocean and Coastal Management 185: article 105040.
   Google Scholar
• Daru BH, le Roux P. 2015. Marine protected areas are insufficient to conserve global marine plant diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 25: 324–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva C, Kerwath SE, Attwood CG, Thorstad EB, Cowley PD, Økland F et al. 2013. Quantifying the degree of protection afforded by a no-take marine reserve on an exploited shark. African Journal of Marine Science 35: 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day J, Hockings MT, Jones G. 2002. Measuring effectiveness in marine protected areas – principles and practice. Paper presented at the World Congress on Aquatic Protected Areas, Cairns, Queensland, 14–17 August 2002. Brisbane, Queensland: Australian Society for Fish Biology.
   Google Scholar
• De Vos L, Götz A, Winker H, Attwood CG. 2014. Optimal BRUVS (baited remote underwater video system) survey design for reef fish monitoring in the Stilbaai Marine Protected Area. African Journal of Marine Science 36: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos L, Watson RGA, Götz A, Attwood CG. 2015. Baited remote underwater video system (BRUVS) survey of chondrichthyan diversity in False Bay, South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 37: 209–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicken ML, Smale MJ, Booth AJ. 2013. White sharks Carcharodon carcharias at Bird Island, Algoa Bay, South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 35: 175–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DPME (Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation). 2015. Operation Phakisa: Oceans Economy Lab. Available at: https://www.operationphakisa.gov.za/operations/oel/pages/default.aspx [accessed 11 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Duncan MI, Bates AE, James NC, Potts WM. 2019. Exploitation may influence the climate resilience of fish populations through removing high-performance metabolic phenotypes. Scientific Reports 9: article 11437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar GJ, Barrett NS. 1999. Effects of the declaration of marine reserves on Tasmanian reef fishes, invertebrates and plants. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 242: 107–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar GJ, Stuart-Smith RD, Willis TJ, Kininmonth S, Baker SC, Banks S et al. 2014. Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features. Nature 506: 216–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards CTT, Rademeyer RA, Butterworth DS, Plagányi ÉE. 2009. Investigating the consequences of marine protected areas for the South African deepwater hake (Merluccius paradoxus) resources. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66: 72–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwen SH, Best PB. 2004. Female southern right whales Eubalaena australis: are there reproductive benefits associated with their coastal distribution off South Africa? Marine Ecology Progress Series 269: 289–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel B, Bustamante R, Branch GM, Eekhout S, Odendaal F. 1992. A zoogeographic and functional approach to the selection of marine reserves on the west coast of South Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 12: 341–354.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes L, Day J, Lewis A, Slegers S, Kerrigan B, Breen D et al. 2005. Establishing representative no-take areas in the Great Barrier Reef: large-scale implementation of theory on marine protected areas. Conservation Biology 19: 1733–1744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay K. 2020. Challenges facing marine protected areas in southern African countries in the light of expanding ocean economies across the subregion. In: Humphreys J, Clark RWD (eds), Marine protected areas – science, policy and management. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp 37–65.
   Google Scholar
• Floros C, Schleyer MH, Maggs JQ, Celliers L. 2012. Baseline assessment of high-latitude coral reef fish communities in southern Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 34: 55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis J, Nilsson A, Waruinge D. 2002. Marine protected areas in the eastern African region: how successful are they? Ambio 31: 503–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredston-Hermann A, Gaines SD, Halpern BS. 2018. Biogeographic constraints to marine conservation in a changing climate. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1429: 5–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedlander A, Sladek Nowlis J, Sanchez JA, Appeldoorn R, Usseglio P, McCormick C et al. 2003. Designing effective marine protected areas in Seaflower Biosphere Reserve, Colombia, based on biological and sociological information. Conservation Biology 17: 1769–1784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaines SD, Gaylord B, Largier JL. 2003. Avoiding current oversights in marine reserve design. Ecological Applications 13(special issue 1): 32–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Game ET, Grantham HS, Hobday AJ, Pressey RL, Lombard AT, Beckley LE et al. 2009. Pelagic protected areas: the missing dimension in ocean conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 360–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Game ET, Grantham HS, Hobday AJ, Pressey RL, Lombard AT, Beckley LE et al. 2010. Pelagic MPAs: the devil you know. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 63–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Rubies A, Zabala M. 1990. Effects of total fishing prohibition on the rocky fish assemblages of Medes Islands marine reserve (NW Mediterranean). Scientia Marina 54: 317–328.
   Google Scholar
• Garratt P. 1993. Slinger: the final analysis? In: Beckley LE, van der Elst RP (eds), Fish, fishers and fisheries. Proceedings of the Second South African Marine Linefish Symposium, 23–24 October 1992, Durban, South Africa. Special Publication No. 2. Durban, South Africa: Oceanographic Research Institute. pp 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gell FR, Roberts CM. 2003. The fishery effects of marine reserves and fishery closures. Washington DC: World Wildlife Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons MJ, Abiahy BB, Angel M, Assuncao CML, Bartsch I, Best P et al. 1999. The taxonomic richness of South Africa’s marine fauna: crisis at hand. South African Journal of Science 95: 8–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill DA, Mascia MB, Ahmadia GN, Glew L, Lester SE, Barnes M et al. 2017. Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally. Nature 543: 665–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz A. 2005. Assessment of the effect of Goukamma Marine Protected Area on community structure and fishery dynamics. PhD thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Götz A, Kerwath SE, Attwood CG, Sauer WHH. 2008a. Effects of fishing on population structure and life history of roman Chrysoblephus laticeps (Sparidae). Marine Ecology Progress Series 362: 245–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz A, Cowley PD, Winker H. 2008b. Selected fishery and population parameters of eight shore-angling species in the Tsitsikamma National Park no-take marine reserve. African Journal of Marine Science 30: 519–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz A, Kerwath SE, Attwood CG, Sauer WHH. 2009a. Effects of fishing on a temperate reef community in South Africa I: ichthyofauna. African Journal of Marine Science 31: 241–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz A, Kerwath SE, Attwood CG, Sauer WHH. 2009b. Effects of fishing on a temperate reef community in South Africa 2: benthic invertebrates and algae. African Journal of Marine Science 31: 253–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz A, Kerwath SE, Attwood CG. 2013. A step-by-step framework to assess benefits of established temperate marine protected areas. South African Journal of Marine Science 109: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Grantham HS, Game ET, Lombard AT, Hobday AJ, Richardson AJ, Beckley LE et al. 2011. Accommodating dynamic oceanographic processes and pelagic biodiversity in marine conservation planning. PLoS ONE 6: e16552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green AL, Lokani P, Sheppard S, Almany J, Keu S, Aitsi J, et al. 2007. Scientific design of a resilient network of marine protected areas. Pacific Island Countries Report No. 2/07. Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea: The Nature Conservancy.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths CL, Robinson TB. 2016. Use and usefulness of measures of marine endemicity in South Africa. South African Journal of Science 112: article 2015-0249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths MH, Wilke CG. 2002. Long-term movement patterns of five temperate-reef fishes (Pisces: Sparidae): implications for MPAs. Marine and Freshwater Research 53: 233–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidetti P, Sala E. 2007. Community-wide effects of marine reserves in the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 335: 43–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern BS. 2003. The impact of marine reserves: do reserves work and does reserve size matter? Ecological Applications 13(special issue 1): 117–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern BS, Warner RR. 2002. Marine reserves have rapid and lasting effects. Ecology Letters 2002: 361–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern BS, Regan HM, Possingham HP, McCarthy MA. 2006. Accounting for uncertainty in marine reserve design. Ecology Letters 9: 2–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern BS, Lester SE, Kellner JB. 2009. Spillover from marine reserves and the replenishment of fished stocks. Environmental Conservation 36: 268–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanekom N. 2011. Trophic structure and biomass distribution of macrobenthos on sheltered and semi-exposed rocky shores of Tsitsikamma Marine Protected Area. African Zoology 46: 224–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanekom N, Mann-Lang JB, Mann BQ, Carinus TVZ. 1997. Shore-angling catches in the Tsitsikamma National Park, 1989–1995. Koedoe 40: 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Harris JM, Livingstone T, Lombard AT, Lagabrielle E, Haupt P, Sink K et al. 2012. Coastal and Marine Biodiversity Plan for KwaZulu-Natal. Spatial priorities for the conservation of coastal and marine biodiversity in KwaZulu-Natal. Technical report. Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife Scientific Services.
   Google Scholar
• Harris LR, Nel R, Oosthuisen H, Meÿer M, Kotze D, Anders D et al. 2015. Paper-efficient multi-species conservation and management are not always field-effective: the status and future of western Indian Ocean leatherbacks. Biological Conservation 191: 383–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris LR, Holness S, Finke G, Kirkman S, Sink K. 2019. Systematic conservation planning as a tool to advance ecologically or biologically significant area and marine spatial planning processes. In: Zaucha J, Gee K (eds), Maritime spatial panning – past, present, future. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Harris LR, Sink KJ, Holness SD, Kirkman SP, Driver A. 2020. National Coastal and Marine Spatial Biodiversity Plan, version 1. Technical report. Pretoria, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison HB, Williamson DH, Evans RD, Almany GR, Thorrold SR, Russ GR et al. 2012. Larval export from marine reserves and the recruitment benefit for fish and fisheries. Current Biology 22: 1023–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings A, Botsford LW. 2003. Comparing designs of marine reserves for fisheries and for biodiversity. Ecological Applications 13(special issue 1): 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedger RD, Næsje TF, Cowley PD, Thorstad EB, Attwood CG, Økland F et al. 2010. Residency and migratory behaviour by adult Pomatomus saltatrix in a South African coastal embayment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 89: 12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques R, Mann BQ, Nielsen ES, Hui C, von der Heyden S. 2020. Extending biodiversity conservation with functional and evolutionary diversity: a case study of South African sparid fishes. African Journal of Marine Science 42: 215–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyns ER, Bernard ATF, Richoux ND, Götz A. 2016. Depth-related distribution patterns of subtidal macrobenthos in a well-established marine protected area. Marine Biology 163: article 39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyns-Veale ER, Bernard ATF, Götz A, Mann BQ, Maggs JQ, Smith KM. 2019. Community-wide effects of protection reveal insights into marine protected area effectiveness for reef fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 620: 99–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilborn R. 2018. Are MPAs effective? ICES Journal of Marine Science 75: 1160–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinch PR, de Santo EM. 2011. Factors to consider in evaluating the management and conservation effectiveness of a whale sanctuary to protect and conserve the North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis). Marine Policy 35: 163–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindell MA, Reisinger RR, Ropert-Coudert Y, Hückstädt LA, Trathan PN, Bornmann H et al. 2020. Tracking of marine predators to protect Southern Ocean ecosystems. Nature 580: 87–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockey PAR, Bosman AL. 1994. Man as an intertidal predator in Transkei: disturbance, community convergence and management of a natural food resource. Oikos 46: 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockey PAR, Branch GM. 1997. Criteria, objectives and methodology for evaluating marine protected areas in South Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 18: 369–383.
   Google Scholar
• Hockings M, Stolton S, Dudley N. 2000. Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing the management of protected areas. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas, Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines No. 6. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Horigue V, Aliño PM, Pressey RL. 2014. Evaluating management performance of marine protected area networks in the Philippines. Ocean and Coastal Management 95: 11–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes GR. 1973. The sea turtles of South Africa. PhD thesis, University of Natal, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes GR. 1996. Nesting of the leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) in Tongaland, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, 1993–1995. Chelonian Conservation Biology 2: 153–158.
   Google Scholar
• Huisamen J, Kirkman SP, Watson LH, Pistorius PA, Cockcroft VG. 2011. Re-colonisation of the Robberg Peninsula (Plettenberg Bay, South Africa) by Cape fur seals. African Journal of Marine Science 33: 453–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN WCPA (International Union for the Conservation of Nature World Commission on Protected Areas). 2018. Applying IUCN’s global conservation standards to marine protected areas (MPA). Delivering effective conservation action through MPAs, to secure ocean health and sustainable development. Version 1.0. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• James NC, Götz A, Potts WM, Cowley PD. 2012. Temporal variability of a temperate fish assemblage in Africa’s oldest marine protected area. African Journal of Marine Science 34: 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski A, Solmundsson J, Ragnarsson SA. 2010. Fish assemblages inside and outside marine protected areas off northern Iceland: protection effects or environmental confounds? Fisheries Research 102: 50–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins TL, Stevens JR. 2018. Assessing connectivity between MPAs: selecting taxa and translating genetic data to inform policy. Marine Policy 94: 165–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshua TJ, Toefy R, Sparks C, Kirkman SP, Samaai T. 2018. Macro-benthic invertebrate assemblages in the Betty’s Bay Marine Protected Area (Kogelberg region, South Africa). Regional Studies in Marine Science 22: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan D, Chassot E, Gruss A, Fonteneau A. 2010. Pelagic MPAs: the devil is in the details. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 62–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleher G. 1999. Guidelines for marine protected areas. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: International Union for the Conservation of Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Kellner JB, Tetreault I, Gaines SD, Nisbet RM. 2007. Fishing the line near marine reserves in single and multispecies fisheries. Ecological Applications 17: 1039–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerwath SE, Götz A, Attwood CG, Sauer WHH, Wilke CG. 2007a. Area utilisation and activity patterns of roman Chrysoblephus laticeps (Sparidae) in a small marine protected area. African Journal of Marine Science 29: 259–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerwath SE, Götz A, Attwood CG, Cowley PD, Sauer WHH. 2007b. Movement patterns and home range of Roman Chrysoblephus laticeps. African Journal of Marine Science 29: 93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerwath SE, Thorstad EB, Naesje TF, Attwood CG, Cowley PD, Økland F, Wilke C. 2008a. Crossing invisible boundaries: can a marine protected area protect a mobile species? Conservation Biology 23: 653–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerwath SE, Götz A, Attwood CG, Sauer WHH. 2008b. The effects of marine protected areas on an exploited population of a sex-changing temperate reef fish: an individual-based model. African Journal of Marine Science 30: 337–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerwath SE, Winker H, Götz A, Attwood CG. 2013. Marine protected area improves yield without disadvantaging fishers. Nature Communications 4: article 2347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King CM. 2005. Towards a new approach for coastal governance with an assessment of the Plettenberg Bay shore-based linefishery. MSc thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman SP, Holness S, Harris LR, Sink KJ, Lombard AT, Kainge P et al. 2019. Using systematic conservation planning to support marine spatial planning and achieve marine protection targets in the transboundary Benguela Ecosystem. Ocean and Coastal Management 168: 117–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Largier JL. 2003. Considerations in estimating larval dispersal distances from oceanographic data. Ecological Applications 13: 71–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasiak T. 1993. Temporal and spatial variations in exploited and non-exploited populations of the intertidal limpet Cellana capensis. Journal of Molluscan Studies 59: 295–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasiak T. 1998. Multivariate comparisons of rocky infratidal assemblages from replicate exploited and non-exploited localities in Transkei. Marine Ecology Progress Series 167: 15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasiak T. 2006. Spatial variation in density and biomass of patellid limpets inside and outside a marine protected area. Journal of Molluscan Studies 72: 137–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasiak T, Field JG. 1995. Community-level attributes of exploited and unexploited rocky infratidal macrofaunal assemblages in Transkei. Journal of Experimental Biology and Ecology 185: 33–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechanteur YARG. 1999. The ecology and management of reef fishes in False Bay, southwestern Cape, South Africa. PhD thesis, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Lemm S, Attwood CG. 2003. State of marine protected area management in South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: WWF-SA (World Wildlife Fund South Africa).
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone T, Harris JM, Lombard AT, Smit A, Schoeman D. 2018. Classification of marine bioregions on the east coast of South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 40: 51–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard AT, Strauss T, Harris J, Sink K, Attwood C, Hutchings L. 2004. South African National Spatial Biodiversity Assessment 2004: Technical report, vol. 4: marine component. Pretoria, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• López-Sanz À, Stelzenmüller V, Maynou F, Sabatés A. 2011. The influence of environmental characteristics on fish larvae spatial patterns related to a marine protected area: the Medes islands (NW Mediterranean). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 92: 521–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourie SA, Vincent ACJ. 2004. Using biogeography to help set priorities in marine conservation. Conservation Biology 18: 1004–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludford A, Cole VJ, Porri F, McQuaid CD, Nakin MDV, Erlandsson J. 2012. Testing source-sink theory: the spill-over of mussel recruitment beyond marine protected areas Landscape Ecology 27: 859–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggs JQ, Cowley PD. 2016. Nine decades of fish movement research in southern Africa: a synthesis of research and findings from 1928 to 2014. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 26: 287–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggs JQ, Mann BQ, Cowley PD. 2013a. Contribution of a large no-take zone to the management of vulnerable reef fishes in the south-west Indian Ocean. Fisheries Research 144: 38–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggs JQ, Mann BQ, Cowley PD. 2013b. Reef fish display station-keeping and ranging behaviour in the Pondoland Marine Protected Area on the east coast of South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 35: 183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magris RA, Andrello M, Pressey RL, Mouillot D, Daleongeville A, Jacobi MN, Manel S. 2018. Biologically representative and well-connected marine reserves enhance biodiversity persistence in conservation planning. Conservation Letters 11: e12439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majiedt P, Holness S, Sink KJ, Oosthuizen A, Chadwick P. 2013. Systematic Marine Biodiversity Plan for the West Coast of South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mann BQ, Celliers L, Fennessy ST, Bailey S, Wood AD. 2006. Towards the declaration of a large marine protected area: a subtidal ichthyofaunal survey of the Pondoland coast in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 28: 535–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann BQ, Cowley PD, Fennessy ST. 2015. Movement patterns of surf-zone fish species in a subtropical marine protected area on the east coast of South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 37: 99–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann BQ, Cowley PD, Kyle R. 2016a. Estimating the optimum size for inshore no-take areas based on movement patterns of surf-zone fishes and recommendations for rezoning of a World Heritage Site in South Africa. Ocean and Coastal Management 125: 8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann BQ, Winker H, Maggs JQ, Porter S. 2016b. Monitoring the recovery of a previously exploited surf-zone fish community in the St Lucia Marine Reserve using a no-take sanctuary area as a benchmark. African Journal of Marine Science 38: 423–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann-Lang JB, Branch GM, Mann BQ, Sink K, Kirkman SP, Adams R. 2021. A review of the social and economic effects of marine protected areas in South Africa, with recommendations for future assessments. African Journal of Marine Science 43: 367–387 [this issue].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall DJ, Gaines S, Warner R, Barneche DR, Bode M. 2019. Underestimating the benefits of marine protected areas for the replenishment of fished populations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 17: 407–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayfield S, Branch GM, Cockcroft AC. 2005. Role and efficacy of marine protected areas for the South African rock lobster, Jasus lalandii. Marine and Freshwater Research 56: 913–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley DJ, Pinsky ML, Palumbi SR, Estes JA, Joyce FH, Warner RR. 2015. Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean. Science 347: article 1255641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClanahan TR, Graham NAH. 2015. Marine reserve recovery rates towards a baseline are slower for reef fish community life histories than biomass. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282: article 20151938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClanahan TR, Mangi S. 2000. Spillover of exploitable fishes from a marine park and its effect on the adjacent fishery. Ecological Applications 10: 1792–1805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClanahan TR, Muthiga NA. 1988. Changes in Kenyan coral reef community structure and function due to exploitation. Hydrobiologia 166: 269–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClanahan TR, Muthiga NA, Kamukuru AT, Machano H, Kiambo RW. 1999. The effects of marine parks and fishing on coral reefs of northern Tanzania. Biological Conservation 89: 161–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClanahan TR, McField M, Huitric M, Bergman K, Sala E, Nyström M et al. 2001. Responses of algae, corals and fish to the reduction of macroalgae in fished and unfished patch reefs of Glovers Reef Atoll, Belize. Coral Reefs 19: 367–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod E, Salm R, Green A, Almany J. 2009. Designing marine protected area networks to address the impacts of climate change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 362–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill A, Clifton J, Harvey ES. 2018. Attitudes to a marine protected area are associated with perceived social impacts. Marine Policy 94: 106–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens LEA, Tremi EA, von der Heyden S. 2018. Genetic and biophysical models help define marine conservation focus areas. Frontiers in Marine Science 5: article 268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micheli F, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Gambaccini S, Bertocci I, Borsini C, Osio GC, Romano F. 2005. Cascading human impacts, marine protected areas, and the structure of Mediterranean reef assemblages. Ecological Monographs 75: 81–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora C, Andrèfouët S, Costello MJ, Kranenburg C, Rollo R, Veron J et al. 2006. Coral reefs and the global network of marine protected areas. Science 312: 1750–1751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumby PJ, Elliott IA, Eakin CM, Skirving W, Paris CB, Edwards HJ et al. 2011. Reserve design for uncertain responses of coral reefs to climate change. Ecology Letters 14: 132–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murawski SA, Brown R, Lai H-L, Rago PJ, Hendrickson L. 2000. Large scale closed areas as a fishery management tool in temperate marine systems: the Georges Bank experience. Bulletin of Marine Science 66: 775–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthiga NA. 2009. Evaluating the effectiveness of management of the Malindi–Watamu marine protected area complex in Kenya. Ocean and Coastal Management 52: 417–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakin MDV, McQuaid CD. 2014. Marine reserve effects on population density and size structure of commonly and rarely exploited limpets in South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 36: 303–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakin MDV, McQuaid CD. 2016. Effects of marine reserves on the reproductive biology and recruitment rates of commonly and rarely exploited limpets. African Journal of Marine Science 38: 549–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakin MDV, Booth AJ, McQuaid CD. 2012. Species-specific effects of marine reserves: mortality and growth differ within and among heavily exploited and rarely exploited limpets. Marine Ecology Progress Series 445: 53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel P, Branch GM. 2014. The effect of bait collectors on stocks of Callichirus kraussi and Upogebia species in Langebaan Lagoon. African Zoology 49: 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel R, Punt AE, Hughes GR. 2013. Are coastal protected areas always effective in achieving population recovery for nesting sea turtles? PLoS ONE 8: e63525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NPAES 2010. National Protected Area Expansion Strategy for South Africa 2008: priorities for expanding the protected area network for ecological sustainability and climate change adaptation. Document commissioned by the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. Pretoria, South Africa: Government of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara CC, Villaseñor-Derbez JC, Ralph GM, Halpern BS. 2019. Mapping status and conservation of global at-risk marine biodiversity. Conservation Letters 12: e12651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olbers JM, Celliers L, Schleyer MH. 2009. Zonation of benthic communities on the subtropical Aliwal Shoal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. African Zoology 44: 8–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood GJ, McCord ME, Baum JK. 2019. Using baited remote underwater videos (BRUVs) to characterize chondrichthyan communities in a global biodiversity hotspot. PLoS ONE 14: e0225859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbi SR. 2001. The ecology of marine protected areas. In: Bertness MD, Gaines SD, Hay ME (eds), Marine ecology: the new synthesis. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates Inc. pp 509–530.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbi SR. 2003. Population genetics, demographic connectivity, and the design of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13(special issue 1): 146–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattrick P, Strydom NA, Goschen WS. 2013. Shallow-water, nearshore current dynamics in Algoa Bay, South Africa, with notes on the implications for larval fish dispersal. African Journal of Marine Science 35: 269–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelc RA, Baskett ML, Tanci T, Gaines SD, Warner RR. 2009. Quantifying larval export from South African marine reserves. Marine Ecology Progress Series 394: 65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendleton LH, Ahmadia GN, Browman HI, Thurstan R, Kaplan DM, Bartolino V. 2018. Debating the effectiveness of marine protected areas. ICES Journal of Marine Science 75: 1156–1159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phair NL, Nielsen ES, von der Heyden S. 2021. Applying genomic data to seagrass conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 30: 2079–2096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichegru L, Grémillet D, Crawford RJM, Ryan PG. 2010. Marine no-take zone rapidly benefits endangered penguin. Biology Letters 6: 498–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichegru L, Ryan PG, van Eeden R, Reid T, Grémillet D, Wanless R. 2012. Industrial fishing, no-take zones and endangered penguins. Biological Conservation 156: 117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polunin NVC, Roberts CM. 1993. Greater biomass and value of target coral-reef fishes in two small Caribbean marine reserves. Marine Ecology Progress Series 100: 167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeroy RS, Parks JE, Watson LM, Cid GA. 2005. How is your MPA doing? A methodology for evaluating the management effectiveness of marine protected areas. Ocean and Coastal Management 48: 485–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujolar JM, Schiavina M, Di Franco A, Melià P, Guidetti P, Gatto P et al. 2013. Understanding the effectiveness of marine protected areas using genetic connectivity patterns and Lagrangian simulations. Diversity and Distributions 19: 1531–1542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdon N, Shabangu F, Pienaar M, Somers MJ, Findlay KP. 2020. South Africa’s newly approved marine protected areas have increased the protected modelled habitat of nine odontocete species. Marine Ecology Progress Series 633: 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reaugh KE. 2006. Recruitment patterns and processes and the connectivity of rocky shores in southern Africa. PhD thesis, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Reisinger RR, Raymond B, Hindell MA, Bester MN, Crawford RJM, Davies D et al. 2018. Habitat modelling of tracking data from multiple marine predators identifies important areas in the southern Indian Ocean. Diversity and Distributions 24: 535–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson TJ, Potts WM, Santos CV, Sauer HH. 2011. Comparison of population structure and life-history parameters of Diplodus capensis (Sparidae) in exploited and unexploited areas of southern Angola. African Journal of Marine Science 33: 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgway T, Riginos C, Davis J, Hoegh-Guldberg O. 2008. Genetic connectivity patterns of Pocillopora verrucosa in southern African marine protected areas. Marine Ecology Progress Series 354: 161–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CM, Polunin NVC. 1991. Are marine reserves effective in management of reef fisheries? Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 1: 65–91.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts CM, Bohnsack JA, Gell F, Hawkins JP, Goodridge R. 2001. Effects of marine reserves on adjacent fisheries. Science 294: 1920–1923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CM, Andelman S, Branch GM, Bustamante RH, Carlos Castilla J, Dugan J et al. 2003a. Ecological criteria for evaluating candidate sites for marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13(special issue 1): 199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CM, Branch GM, Bustamante G, Castilla JC, Dugan J, Halpern KD et al. 2003b. Application of ecological criteria in selecting marine reserve networks. Ecological Applications 13(special issue 1): 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CM, Hawkins JP, Gell FR. 2005. The role of marine reserves in achieving sustainable fisheries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360: 123–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CM, O’Leary BC, McCauley DJ, Cury FM, Duarte CM, Lubchenco J et al. 2017. Marine reserves can mitigate and promote adaptation to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114: 6167–6175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts MJ, van den Berg M. 2005. Currents along the Tsitsikamma coast, South Africa, and potential transport of squid paralarvae and ichthyoplankton. African Journal of Marine Science 27: 375–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberson L, Winker H, Attwood C, de Vos L, Sanguinetti C, Götz A. 2015. First survey of fishes in the Betty’s Bay Marine Protected Area along South Africa’s temperate south-west coast. African Journal of Marine Science. 37: 543–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson WML, Butterworth DS, Plagányi ÉE. 2015. Quantifying the projected impact of the South African sardine fishery on the Robben Island penguin colony. ICES Journal of Marine Science 72: 1822–1833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RSA (Republic of South Africa). 2004. National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act (Act No. 57 of 2003). Government Gazette, South Africa 464 (26025).
   Google Scholar
• RSA (Republic of South Africa). 2017. Lists of marine species that are threatened or protected, restricted activities that are prohibited, and exemption from restriction in terms of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (Act No. 10 of 2004). Government Gazette, South Africa 623 (40875).
   Google Scholar
• RSA (Republic of South Africa). 2019. Department of Environmental Affairs, Government Notices 757–776 declaring 20 marine protected areas in terms of Section 22A of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act (Act No. 57 of 2003). Government Gazette, South Africa 647 (42478).
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Frau A, Gibbons JM, Hinz H, Edwards-Jones G, Kaiser MJ. 2019. Preference classes in society for coastal marine protected areas. PeerJ 7: e6672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ GR, Alcala AC. 1996. Do marine reserves export adult fish biomass? Evidence from Apo Island, central Philippines. Marine Ecology Progress Series 132: 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ GR, Alcala AC. 2004. Marine reserves: long-term protection is required for full recovery of predatory fish populations. Oecologia 138: 622–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ GR, Alcala AC, Maypa AP, Calumpong HP, White AT. 2004. Marine reserve benefits local fisheries. Ecological Applications 14: 597–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ GR, Cheal AJ, Dolman AM, Emslie MJ, Evans RD, Miller I et al. 2008. Rapid increase in fish numbers follows creation of world’s largest marine reserve network. Current Biology 18: R514–R515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salm RV, Done T, McLeod E. 2006. Marine protected area planning in a changing climate. In: Phinney JT, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Kleypas J, Skirving W, Strong A (eds). Coral reefs and climate change. Science and Management vol. 61. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union. pp 207–221.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer WHH. 1995. South Africa’s Tsitsikamma National Park as a protected breeding area for the commercially exploited chokka squid Loligo vulgaris reynaudii. South African Journal of Marine Science 16: 365–371.
   Google Scholar
• Saura S, Bastin L, Battistella L, Mandrici A, Dubois G. 2017. Protected areas in the world’s ecoregions: how well connected are they? Ecological Indicators 76: 144–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saura S, Bertzky B, Bastin L, Battistella L, Mandrici A, Dubois G. 2018. Protected area connectivity: shortfalls in global targets and country-level priorities. Biological Conservation 219: 53–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks AL. 2009. Pelagic larval duration and dispersal distance revisited. Biological Bulletin 216: 373–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks AL, Grantham BA, Carr MH. 2003. Propagule dispersal distance and the size and spacing of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13(special issue 1): 159–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shears NT, Babcock RC. 2003. Continuing trophic cascade effects after 25 years of no-take marine reserve protection. Marine Ecology Progress Series 246: 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherley RB, Winker H, Altwegg R, van der Lingen CD, Votier SC, Crawford RJM. 2015. Bottom-up effects of a no-take zone on endangered penguin demographics. Biology Letters 11: article 20150237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherley RB, Barham BJ, Barham PJ, Campbell KJ, Crawford RJM, Grigg J et al. 2018. Bayesian inference reveals positive but subtle effects of experimental fishery closures on marine predator demographics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285: 20172443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sink KJ. 2016. The marine protected areas debate: implications for the proposed Phakisa Marine Protected Areas Network. South African Journal of Science 112: 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sink KJ, Branch GM, Harris JM. 2005. Biogeographic patterns in rocky intertidal communities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 27: 81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sink KJ, Attwood CG, Lombard AT, Grantham H, Leslie R, Samaai T et al. 2011. Systematic planning to identify focus areas for offshore biodiversity protection in South Africa. Unpublished final report for the Offshore Marine Protected Area Project. Cape Town, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sink KJ, Holness S, Harris L, Majiedt P, Atkinson L, Robinson T et al. 2012. National Biodiversity Assessment 2011: Technical report, vol. 4: marine and coastal component. Pretoria, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sink KJ, van der Bank MG, Majiedt PA, Harris LR, Atkinson LJ, Kirkman SP, Karenyi N (eds). 2019. South African National Biodiversity Assessment 2018: Technical report, vol. 4: marine realm. Pretoria, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sladek-Nowlis J, Roberts CM. 1990. Fisheries benefits and optimal design of marine reserves. Fisheries Bulletin 97: 604–616.
   Google Scholar
• Solano-Fernandez S, Attwood CG, Chalmers R, Clark BM, Cowley PD. 2012. Assessment of the effectiveness of South Africa’s marine protected areas at representing ichthyofaunal communities. Environmental Conservation 39: 259–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler GA, Edgar GJ, Thomson RJ, Kininmonth S, Campbell SJ, Dawson TP et al. 2015. Reef fishes at all trophic levels respond positively to effective marine protected areas. PLoS ONE 10: e0140270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowman M, Sunde J. 2018. Social impacts of marine protected areas in South Africa on coastal fishing communities. Ocean and Coastal Management 157: 168–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowman M, Hauck M, Van Sittert L, Sunde J. 2011. Marine protected area management in South Africa: new policies, old paradigms. Environmental Management 47: 573–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunde J, Isaacs M. 2008. Marine conservation and coastal communities: who carries the costs? A study of marine protected areas and their impact on traditional small-scale fishing communities in South Africa. Chennai, India: International Collective in Support of Fishworkers.
   Google Scholar
• Teske PR, Forget FRG, Cowley PD, van der Heyden S, Beheregaray LB. 2010. Connectivity between marine reserves and exploited areas in the philopatric reef fish Chrysoblephus laticeps. Marine Biology 157: 2029–2042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teske PR, von der Heyden S, McQuaid CD, Barker NP. 2011. A review of marine phylogeography in southern Africa. South African Journal of Science 107: a514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teske PR, Bader S, Golla TR. 2015. Passive dispersal against an ocean current. Marine Ecology Progress Series 539: 153–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilney RL, Nelson G, Radloff SE, Buxton CD. 1996. Ichthyoplankton distribution and dispersal in the Tsitsikamma National Park marine reserve, South Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 17: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolley KA, da Silva JM, Jansen van Vuuren B. 2019. South African National Biodiversity Assessment 2018: Technical report, vol. 7: genetic diversity. Pretoria, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay PC, Loder JW, Werner FE, Naimie CE, Page FH, Sinclair MM. 1994. Drift of sea scallop larvae, Placopecten magellanicus on Georges Bank: a model study of the roles of mean advection, larval behavior, and larval drift. Deep-Sea Research 41: 7–49.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker L, Griffiths CL, Schroeter F, Vetter HD. 2017. Boulder shores in South Africa – a distinct but poorly documented coastal habitat type. African Journal of Marine Science 39: 193–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunley KL, Attwood CG, Moloney CL, Fairhurst L. 2009. Variation in population structure and life-history parameters of Spondyliosoma emarginatum: effects of exploitation and biogeography. African Journal of Marine Science 31: 133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turpie JK, Beckley LE, Katua SM. 2000. Biogeography and the selection of priority areas for conservation of South African coastal fishes. Biological Conservation 92: 59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Document A/RES/70/1 (21 October 2015). New York: United Nations. Available at https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html.
   Google Scholar
• van Niekerk L, Adams JB, Lamberth SJ, MacKay CF, Taljaard S, Turpie JK, et al. (eds). 2019. South African National Biodiversity Assessment 2018: Technical report, vol. 3: estuarine realm. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Report No. CSIR/SPLA/EM/EXP/2019/0062/A. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) Report No. SANBI/NAT/ NBA2018/2019/Vol3/A. Pretoria, South Africa: SANBI.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas-Fonseca OA, Kirkman SP, Conry D, Rishworth GM, Cockcroft V, Pistorius PA. 2018. Distribution and habitat use of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins Tursiops aduncus along the south coast of South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 40: 439–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venter JA, Mann BQ. 2012. Preliminary assessment of the surf-zone and estuarine linefish species of Dwesa-Cwebe Marine Protected Area, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Koedoe 54: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Heyden S. 2009. Why do we need to integrate population genetics into South African marine protected area planning? African Journal of Marine Science 31: 263–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer M, Gladstone W, Goodall H. 2012. Methods of social assessment in marine protected area planning: is public participation enough? Marine Policy 36: 432–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner RR, Swearer SE, Caselle JE. 2000. Larval accumulation and retention: implications for the design of marine reserves and essential habitat. Bulletin of Marine Science 66: 821–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitfield AK, Attwood CG, Cowley PD, Lamberth SJ, Mann BQ. 2020. No-take estuarine-protected areas: the missing armour for the conservation of fishes. Koedoe 62: a1648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright D, Bishop JM, Matthee CA, von der Heyden S. 2015. Genetic isolation by distance reveals restricted dispersal across a range of life histories: implications for biodiversity conservation planning across highly variable marine environments. Diversity and Distributions 21: 698–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worm B, Barbier EB, Beaumont N, Duffy JE, Folke C, Halpern BJ et al. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314: 787–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeller D, Stoute SL, Russ GR. 2003. Movements of reef fishes across marine reserve boundaries: effects of manipulating a density gradient. Marine Ecology Progress Series 254: 269–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar