Modelling growth behaviour in monoculture in subtropical eastern Australia of two eucalypt species that differ in shade tolerance

References

• Baker TR, Affum-Baffoe K, Burslem DFRP, Swaine MD. 2002. Phenological differences in tree water use and the timing of tropical forest inventories: conclusions from patterns of dry season diameter change. Forest Ecology and Management 171: 261–274. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00787-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley D. 2004. A hypothesis about the interaction of tree dominance and stand production through stand development. Forest Ecology and Management 190: 265–271. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley D, Kashian DM, Boyden S, Kay MW, Bradford JB, Arthur MA, Fornwalt PJ, Ryan MG. 2006. Patterns of growth dominance in forests of the Rocky Mountains, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 236: 193–201. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley D, Stape JL, Bauerle WL, Ryan MG. 2010. Explaining growth of individual trees: Light interception and efficiency of light use by Eucalyptus at four sites in Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 1704–1713. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitra-Tarak R, Ruiz L, Pulla S, Dattaraja HS, Suresh HS, Sukumar R. 2015. And yet it shrinks: a novel method for correcting bias in forest tree growth estimates caused by water-induced fluctuations. Forest Ecology and Management 336: 129–136. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craine JM, Dybzinski R. 2013. Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients water and light. Functional Ecology 27: 833–840. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glencross K, Palmer G, Pelletier M-C, Nichols JD, Smith RGB. 2014. Basal area increment is unaffected by thinning intensity in young Eucalyptus dunnii and Corymbia variegata plantations across different quality sites. Forest Ecology and Management 318: 326–333. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glencross K, West PW, Nichols JD. 2016. Species shade tolerance affects tree basal area growth behaviour in two eucalypt species in thinned and unthinned even-aged monoculture. Australian Forestry 72. DOI: 10.1080/00049158.2016.1160354.
   Google Scholar
• Hara T. 1986a. Growth of individuals in plant populations. Annals of Botany 57: 55–68. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara T. 1986b. Effects of density and extinction coefficient on size variability in plant populations. Annals of Botany 57: 885–892. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan J, Raymond CA, Smith HJ, Thomas DS, Hensom M, Carnegie AJ, Nichols JD. 2011. Variation in growth and Quambalaria tolerance of clones of Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata planted on four contrasting sites in north-eastern NSW. Australian Forestry 74: 205–217. doi: 10.1080/00049158.2011.10676364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SE, Benjamin LR, Watkinson AR. 2003. The theory and application of plant competition models: an agronomic perspective. Annals of Botany 92: 741–748. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcg204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegg GS, Nahrung H, Carnegie AJ, Wingfield MJ, Drenth A. 2011. Spread and development of quambalaria shoot blight in spotted gum plantations. Plant Pathology 60: 1096–1106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02468.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegg GS, O’Dwyer C, Carnegie AJ, Burgess TI, Wingfield MJ, Drenth A. 2008. Quambalaria species associated with plantation and native eucalypts in Australia. Plant Pathology 57: 702–714. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.01840.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegg GS, Webb RI, Carnegie AJ, Wingfield MJ, Drenth A. 2009. Infection and disease development of Quambalaria spp. on Corymbia and Eucalyptus species. Plant Pathology 58: 642–654. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02087.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwinning S, Weiner J. 1998. Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113: 447–455. doi: 10.1007/s004420050397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheil D. 1995. A critique of permanent plot methods and analysis with examples from Budongo Forest, Uganda. Forest Ecology and Management 77: 11–34. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03583-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowdon P. 1991. A ratio estimator for bias correction in logarithmic regressions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21: 720–724. doi: 10.1139/x91-101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valladares F, Niinemets Ü. 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 39: 237–257. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay JK. 1994. Modelling forest growth and yield. Wallingford: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner J. 1986. How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomoea tricolor populations. Ecology 67: 1425–1427. doi: 10.2307/1938699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner J. 1990. Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5: 360–364. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(90)90095-U
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner J, Thomas SC. 1986. Size variability and competition in plant monocultures. Oikos 47: 211–222. doi: 10.2307/3566048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiskittell AR, Hann DW, Kershaw JA, Vanclay JK. 2011. Forest growth and yield modeling. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• West PW. 1981. Simulation of diameter growth and mortality in regrowth eucalypt forest of southern Tasmania. Forest Science 27: 603–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West PW. 1995. Application of regression analysis to inventory data with measurements on successive occasions. Forest Ecology and Management 71: 227–234. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(94)06103-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West PW. 2014a. Calculation of a growth dominance statistic for forest stands. Forest Science 60: 1021–1023. doi: 10.5849/forsci.13-186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West PW. 2014b. Growing plantation forests (2nd edn). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• West PW, Davis AW, Ratkowsky DA. 1986. Approaches to regression analysis with multiple measurements from individual sampling units. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 26: 149–175. doi: 10.1080/00949658608810962
   Google Scholar
• West PW, Jackett DR, Borough CJ. 1989. Competitive processes in a monoculture of Pinus radiata D. Don. Oecologia 81: 57–61. doi: 10.1007/BF00377010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West PW, Ratkowsky DA, Davis AW. 1984. Problems of hypothesis testing of regressions with multiple measurements from individual sampling units. Forest Ecology and Management 7: 207–224. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(84)90068-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao RL, Glencross K, Nichols DJ. 2014. Difference in shade tolerance affects foliage-sapwood response to thinning by two eucalypts. Southern Forests 2014: 93–100. doi: 10.2989/20702620.2014.917354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeide B. 1993. Analysis of growth equations. Forest Science 39: 594–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar