Landscape pattern changes over 25 years across a hotspot zone in southern Brazil

References

• Almeida D, Rocha J, Neto C, Arsénio P. 2016. Landscape metrics applied to formerly reclaimed saltmarshes: a tool to evaluate ecosystem services? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 181: 100–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2016.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida-Gomes M, Vieira MV, Rocha CFD, Metzger JP, Coster G. 2016. Patch size matters for amphibians in tropical fragmented landscapes. Biological Conservation 195: 89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks-Leite C, Ewers RM, Metzger JP. 2012. Unraveling the drivers of community dissimilarity and species extinction in fragmented landscapes. Ecology 93: 2560–2569. doi: 10.1890/11-2054.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa KVC, Knogge C, Develey PF, Jenkins CN, Uezu A. 2017. Use of small Atlantic Forest fragments by birds in southeast Brazil. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 15: 42–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pecon.2016.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges LFR, Scolforo JR, Oliveira AD, Mello JM, Acerbi Junior FW, Freitas GD. 2004. Inventário de fragmentos florestais nativos e propostas para seu manejo e o da paisagem. Cerne 10: 22–38 [in Portuguese with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Boscolo D, Candia-Gallardo C, Awade M, Metzger JP. 2008. Importance of interhabitat gaps and stepping-stones for Lesser Woodcreepers (Xiphorhynchus fuscus) in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Biotropica 40: 273–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00409.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boscolo D, Metzger JP. 2011. Isolation determines patterns of species presence in highly fragmented landscapes. Ecography 34: 1018–1029. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06763.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calegari L, Martins SV, Gleriani JM, Silva E, Busato LC. 2010. Análise da dinâmica de fragmentos florestais no município de Carandaí, MG, para fins de restauração florestal. Revista Árvore 34: 871–880 [in Portuguese with English abstract]. doi: 10.1590/S0100-67622010000500012
   Google Scholar
• Collinge SK. 2009. Ecology of fragmented landscapes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collinge SK, Palmer TM. 2002. The influences of patch shape and boundary contrast on insect response to fragmentation in California grasslands. Landscape Ecology 17: 647–656. doi: 10.1023/A:1021536302195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins CD, Banks-Leite C, Brudvig LA, Foster BL, Cook WM, Damschen EI, Andrade A, Austin M, Camargo JL, Driscoll DA, Holt RD, Laurance WF, Nicholls AO, Orrock JL. 2017. Fragmentation affects plant community composition over time. Ecography 40: 119–130. doi: 10.1111/ecog.02607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa RL, Prevedello JA, Souza BG, Cabral DC. 2017. Forest transitions in tropical landscapes: a test in the Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot. Applied Geography 82: 93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csillik O, Belgiu M. 2017. Cropland mapping from Sentinel-2 time series data using object-based image analysis. Paper presented at the 20th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Wageningen, 9–12 May 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Didham RK, Hammond PM, Lawton JH, Eggleton P, Stork N. 1998. Beetle species responses to tropical forest fragmentation. Ecological Monographs 68: 295–323. doi: 10.1890/0012-9615(1998)068[0295:BSRTTF]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didham RK, Lawton JH. 1999. Edge structure determines the magnitude of changes in microclimate and vegetation structure in tropical forest fragments. Biotropica 31: 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewers RM, Didham RK. 2006. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological Reviews 81: 117–142. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrig L. 2002. Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecological Applications 12: 346–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrig L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 487–515. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira IJM, Ferreira JHD, Bueno PAA, Vieira LMV, Bueno RO, Couto EV. 2018. Spatial dimension landscape metrics in remnants of Atlantic Forest in Paraná State, Brazil. Acta Scientiarum. Technology 40: e36503. doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v40i1.36503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher Junior RJ, Ries L, Battin J, Chalfoun AD. 2007. The role of habitat area and edge in fragmented landscapes: definitively distinct or inevitably intertwined? Canadian Journal of Zoology 85: 1017–1030. doi: 10.1139/Z07-100
   Google Scholar
• Glufke C, Finger CAG, Schneider PR. 1997. Crescimento de Pinus elliottii Engelm sob diferentes intensidades de desbaste. Ciência Florestal 7: 11–25 [in Portuguese with English abstract]. doi: 10.5902/19805098335
   Google Scholar
• Gross M. 2017. Brazil’s fragmented forests. Current Biology 27: 681–684. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt E, Pereira-Silva EFL, Santos RF, Tamashiro JY, Ragazzi S, Lins DBS. 2013. The influence of natural and anthropogenic landscapes on edge effects. Landscape And Urban Planning 120: 59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardwick SR, Toum R, Pfeifer M, Turner EC, Nilus R, Ewers RM. 2015. The relationship between leaf area index and microclimate in tropical forest and oil palm plantation: forest disturbance drives changes in microclimate. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 201: 187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper KA, Macdonald SE, Burton P, Chen J, Brosofske KD, Saunders SS, Euskirchen ES, Roberts D, Jaiteh MS, Esseen PA. 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology 19: 768–782. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield JL, Prueger JH. 2015. Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather And Climate Extremes 10: 4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPARDES (Instituto Paranaense de Desenvolvimento Econômico Social. 2017. Perfil da microrregião gográfica de Campo Mourão [in Portuguese]. Available at http://www.ipardes.gov.br/perfil_municipal/MontaPerfil.php?codlocal=605&btOk=ok [accessed 16 November 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Laurance WF. 1991. Edge effects in tropical forest fragments: application of a model for the design of nature-reserves. Biological Conservation 57: 205–219. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(91)90139-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurance WF, Camargo JLC, Farnside PM, Lovejoy TE, Williamson GB, Mesquita RCG, Meyer CFJ, Bobrowiec PED, Laurance SG. 2017. An Amazonian rainforest and its fragments as a laboratory of global change. Biological Reviews 93: 223–247. doi: 10.1111/brv.12343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurance WF, Delamônica P, Laurance SG, Vasconcelos HL, Lovejoy TE. 2000b. Conservation: rainforest fragmentation kills big trees. Nature 404: 836–836. doi: 10.1038/35009032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurance WF, Nascimento HEM, Laurance SG, Andrade A, Ewers RM, Harms KE, Luizão RCC, Ribeiro JE. 2007. Habitat fragmentation, variable edge effects, and the landscape- divergence hypothesis. PLoS ONE 2: e1017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurance WF, Pérez-Salicrup D, Delamônica P, Fearnside PM, D’Angelo S, Jerozolinski A, Pohl L, Lovejoy TE. 2001. Rain forest fragmentation and the structure of Amazonian liana communities. Ecology 82: 105–116. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0105:RFFATS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurance WF, Vasconcelos HL, Lovejoy TE. 2000a. Forest loss and fragmentation in the Amazon. Oryx 34: 39–45. doi: 10.1017/S003060530003088X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima JR, Galatti U, Lima CJ, Fáveri SB, Vasconcelos H, Neckel- Oliveira S. 2015. Amphibians on Amazonian land-bridge islands are affected more by area than isolation. Biotropica 47: 369–376. doi: 10.1111/btp.12205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro W. 2002. Contribuição do ICMS ecológico à conservação da biodiversidade no Estado do Paraná. PhD thesis, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil [in Portuguese with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Lumbierres M, Méndez PF, Bustamante J, Soriguer R, Santamaría L. 2017. Modeling biomass production in seasonal wetlands using MODIS NDVI land surface phenology. Remote Sensing 9: 392. doi: 10.3390/rs9040392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maack R. 1948. Notas preliminares sobre clima, solos e vegetação do Estado do Paraná. Arquivos de Biologia e Tecnologia 2: 102–200 [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Maack R. 1968. Geografia física do estado do Paraná. Curitiba: Livraria José Olympio [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Machado EL, Oliveira-Filho AT, Bergll EVD, Carvalho WAC, Souza JS, Marques J, Calegario N. 2008. Efeitos do substrato, bordas e proximidade espacial na estrutura da comunidade arbórea de um fragmento florestal em Lavras, MG. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 31: 287–302. [[in Portuguese with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Machado RB, Ramos-Neto MB, Pereira PGP, Caldas EF, Gonçalves DA, Santos NS, Steininger M. 2004. Estimativas de perda da área do Cerrado brasileiro. Unpublished report. Brasília: Conservação Internacional [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Magura T. 2017. Ignoring functional and phylogenetic features masks the edge influence on ground beetle diversity across forest-grassland gradient. Forest Ecology and Management 384: 371–377. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarigal K, Marks B. 1995. FRAGSTAT: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. Portland: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger JP. 2009. Conservation issues in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biological Conservation 142: 1138–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munguía-Rosas MA, Montiel S. 2014. Patch size and isolation predict plant species density in a naturally fragmented forest. PLoS ONE 9: e111742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers JC. 1997. Geostatistical error management: quantifying uncertainty for environmental sampling and mapping. New York: Van Nostrand Reinold.
   Google Scholar
• Myers N. 1988. Threatened biotas: “hot spots” in tropical forests. The Environmentalist 8: 187–208. doi: 10.1007/BF02240252
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers N. 1990. The biodiversity challenge: expanded hot-spots analysis. The Environmentalist 10: 243–256. doi: 10.1007/BF02239720
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858. doi: 10.1038/35002501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parolin M, Gurreiro RL C, Kuerten S, Menezes HR. 2010. Bacias hidrográficas Paranaenses. In: Parolin M, Volkmer-Ribeiro C, Leandrini JA (eds), Abordagem ambiental interdisciplinar em bacias hidrográficas no Estado do Paraná. Campo Mourão: Editora da Fecilcam. pp 59–104 [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Pereira JAA, Oliveira-Filho AT, Lemos-Filho JP. 2006. Environ- mental heterogeneity and disturbance by humans control much of the tree species diversity of Atlantic montane forest fragments in SE Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 1761–1784. doi: 10.1007/s10531-006-9063-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezende CL, Uezu A, Scarano FR, Araujo DSD. 2015. Atlantic Forest spontaneous regeneration at landscape scale. Biodiversity and Conservation 24: 2255–2272. doi: 10.1007/s10531-015-0980-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Ponzoni FJ, Hirota MM. 2009. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 142: 1141–1153. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha JG. 2011. Modelagem de conhecimento e métricas de paisagem para identificar e analisar padrões espaciais em ambiente de caatinga. MSc thesis, University of Pernambuco, Brazil [in Portuguese with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Rocha R, López-Baucells A, Farneda FZ, Groenenberg M, Bobrowiec PED, Cabeza M, Palmeirim JM, Meyer CFJ. 2017. Consequences of a large-scale fragmentation experiment for Neotropical bats: disentangling the relative importance of local and landscape-scale effects. Landscape Ecology 32: 31–45. doi: 10.1007/s10980-016-0425-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roderjan CV, Galvão F, Kuniyoshi YS, Hatschbach GG. 2002. As unidades fitogeográficas do Estado do Paraná, Brasil. Revista Ciência e Ambiente 24: 75–92 [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Rossi A. 2010. ICMS ecológico sob o enfoque da tributação verde como meio da sustentabilidade econômica e ecológica: experiência do Paraná. MSc thesis, Fundação Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisas em Contabilidade, Economia e Finanças, Brazil [in Portuguese with English abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Rudel TK, Bates D, Machinguiashi R. 2002. A tropical forest transition? Agricultural change, out-migration, and secondary forests in the ecuadorian amazon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92: 87–102. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider-Maunoury L, Lefebvre V, Ewers RM, Medina-Rangel GF, Peres CA, Somarriba E, Somarribad E, Urbina-Cardonae N, Pfeifer M. 2016. Abundance signals of amphibians and reptiles indicate strong edge effects in Neotropical fragmented forest landscapes. Biological Conservation 200: 207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva RF, Batistella M, Moran EF, Lu D. 2016. Land changes fostering Atlantic Forest transition in Brazil: evidence from the Paraíba Valley. Professional Geographer 69: 80–93. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2016.1178151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira AMG, Soares-Filho BS, Freitas SR, Metzger JP. 2009. Modeling landscape dynamics in an Atlantic Rainforest region: implications for conservation. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 1219–1230. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend CR, Begon M, Harper JL. 2010. Fundamentos em ecologia (3rd edn). Porto Alegre: Artmed [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Uezu A, Beyer DD, Metzger JP. 2008. Can agroforest woodlots work as stepping stones for birds in the Atlantic forest region? Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 1907–1922. doi: 10.1007/s10531-008-9329-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valero S, Morin D, Inglada J, Sepulcre G, Arias M, Hagolle O, Koetz B. 2016. Production of a dynamic cropland mask by processing remote sensing image series at high temporal and spatial resolutions. Remote Sensing 8: 55. doi: 10.3390/rs8010055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira MV, Olifiers N, Delciellos AC, Antunes VZ, Bernardo LR, Grellea CEV, Cerqueira R. 2009. Land use vs fragment size and isolation as determinants of small mammal composition and richness in Atlantic Forest remnants. Biological Conservation 142: 1191–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar